West Side Rag
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT
West Side Rag
No Result
View All Result

Get WSR FREE in your inbox

Search the site

No Result
View All Result

Get WSR FREE in your inbox

AVAILABLE NOW!


HERE

Updated: Nadler Retires Maloney – Hoylman Defeats Danzilo

August 23, 2022 | 9:59 PM - Updated on August 24, 2022 | 11:06 PM
in NEWS, POLITICS
64

By Bob Tannenhauser

The polls closed at 9:00 pm and by 9:30, CNN projected that Jerry Nadler had defeated his colleague of thirty years, Carolyn Maloney, in the hotly contested Democratic primary for the newly drawn 12th District Congressional seat. Suraj Patel came in a distant third. Nadler will face Mike Zumbluskas, the Republican candidate, in the November general election.

In the Democratic primary for the new 47th NY State Senate district, incumbent State Senator Brad Hoylman triumphed over challenger Maria Danzilo by a substantial margin. Hoylman will also be on the ballot in November as the Working Families Party candidate.

Update:

In his acceptance speech, Jerry Nadler said some people asked why he wanted to run for this particular redrawn district seat. “This place is my home,” he said. “Why would I want to be anyplace else?”

Nadler said he had spoken with Patel and Maloney, “both of whom have graciously conceded.” He called Patel “exceptionally bright” and said of Maloney, “I thank her for her decades of service to this city.”

Nadler read his remarks, sometimes a bit haltingly, and, except for his wife, was surrounded, perhaps deliberately, by markedly young supporters. He ticked off issues he prioritizes, including: “a stacked Supreme Court [that] has bulldozed our rights” and “the scourge of gun violence in America.”

NY1 showed a bit of Patel’s speech to his supporters, though they cut away mid-sentence. He called New York “the most inspiring city in the world, except for its politics,” and said his “call for generational change isn’t about age. It isn’t just a slogan. It’s a fact of life.” He added that new leaders are needed for today’s new challenges.

At around 11 pm, Carolyn Maloney spoke. She called Nadler “a distinguished member of Congress” whose “progressive values” she shares. “I wish him every success.” Of Patel, she said she hopes his campaign “will inspire other young people” to get involved.

Then, as she did repeatedly during her campaign, she ticked off some of her accomplishments: a credit card bill of rights, funding for the Second Avenue subway, getting the ERA on the agenda.

Maloney quoted former U.S. Reps Shirley Chisholm (“We must continue to be unbought and unbossed”) and Bella Abzug (“A woman’s place is in the House, the House of Representatives”).

“I’m really sad that we no longer have a woman representing Manhattan in the Congress,” she said, but women must continue to fight, and must “work for a big Democratic win in November,” or else we will be “watching [the country] be set on a forced march back to a darker time.”

“It has been the joy of my life, the privilege of my life, to work for you,” she concluded.

Underscoring how extraordinary this race was, Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi released a statement praising both Maloney and Nadler.

“During her three decades in the House, Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney has been a deeply respected leader in our Caucus and a champion for integrity,” Pelosi wrote. “House Democrats are grateful for Chairwoman Maloney’s tenacious leadership. Her longtime public service will be profoundly missed in the Congress and by her constituents and the country.”

Pelosi called Maloney “a prolific and effective legislator. Americans will continue to benefit from laws she authored to protect credit card users. New York families salute her fight to secure full health benefits for the heroic first responders on September 11th.”

The Speaker closed by offering “Congratulations to Chairman Jerry Nadler on prevailing in the election. For three decades in the House, Chairman Nadler has been a commanding force for freedom and justice: whether protecting our children from gun violence, fighting for civil rights for all or defending our Democracy.”

Share this article:
guest

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

64 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
72RSD
72RSD
7 months ago

Danzilo seems to be at around 30%. With more time and attention to the race she could have done better. I hope she keeps trying, her voice and views are needed.

39
Reply
DML
DML
7 months ago
Reply to  72RSD

Very happy that the scaremongering Danzilo went down. I’m sure she’d be much happier running as a Republican next time. Or, you know, getting a job from our mayor..

15
Reply
Charles David
Charles David
7 months ago
Reply to  DML

Good call. Voters saw through her demonIzing of homeless, which all began at the Lucerne. She’s done.

3
Reply
Robert Spire
Robert Spire
7 months ago
Reply to  Charles David

We shouldn’t have demonized the homeless during the time they were housed at the Lucerne, after all they have to go somewhere and we are in Manhattan. This isn’t Nassau County where there’s limited transportation and limited opportunities. But that is no excuse for the bike lobby and progressives to run roughshod and unilaterally dictate people’s commuting, living choices either and put pressure on unwanted people to leave NYC. While pro-shelter folks are good at calling shelter opponents NIMBY’s, the pro-shelter folks have their own NIMBYism too, but it’s much more subtle.

1
Reply
Neighbor785
Neighbor785
7 months ago
Reply to  72RSD

Yes, disappointing. No one I talked to who doesn’t follow WSR knew who she was.

18
Reply
Lisa
Lisa
7 months ago
Reply to  Neighbor785

She ran a bad campaign. Hopefully another Democrat will champion her positions and unseat head-in-the-clouds Hoylman.

5
Reply
Rez
Rez
7 months ago
Reply to  72RSD

Agreed. We’ll continue seeing high levels of crime thanks to the policies Holyman supports.

And it will be the poor, minority class paying the price as the frequent victims of the high crime.

36
Reply
Norm Zinker
Norm Zinker
7 months ago
Reply to  Rez

Vehemently disagree. Brad Hoylman continues to do an outstanding job.

10
Reply
Robert Spire
Robert Spire
7 months ago
Reply to  Norm Zinker

It will take NYC becoming San Francisco for Manhattanites to tire of progressive policies. Our politicians may bring us close to that to get rid of unwanted constituents, but they’ll never let it actually get there and screw themselves.

13
Reply
Jen
Jen
7 months ago

I can’t even imagine why would anyone vote for Hoylman and then complain about crime. You get what you voted for.

40
Reply
Leon
Leon
7 months ago

Several of us were calling on WSR to preview the Danzilo-Hoylman race weeks ago so that those voting early would be better informed. The preview WSR did was excellent and made clear the differences between the two candidates. She lost by enough that I don’t think an earlier preview would have gotten her the victory, but it might have helped to bridge the gap.

Unfortunately, I don’t think she got her name and platform out there enough so many people voted for the more familiar name. This was also partly caused by that race being drowned out by the Nadler-Maloney race. It is a shame as she had good, common sense solutions to a major issue in our neighborhood while also sticking to core Democrat values.

Rather than trying to find a compromise solution that would appease his many constituents who seem to agree with Danzilo that something needs to be done about crime and quality of life, it seems like Hoylman is digging in his heals and going further in the woke direction, which is truly frightening.

30
Reply
Sally
Sally
7 months ago

Hoylman got 75% You people supporting Danzilo have to accept she is a right wing fringe candidate who doesn’t share the values of west siders. The numbers tell the story.

33
Reply
Robert Spire
Robert Spire
7 months ago
Reply to  Sally

The numbers do tell the story insofar that we are not at San Francisco level of decay.

1
Reply
Enough is enough
Enough is enough
7 months ago
Reply to  Sally

10,000 = fringe… all right then. so many other candidates got their nominations with far fewer votes… Maria showed amazing growth between last year’s primary for city council and this round. Please keep running Maria, we need common sense back in politics!

11
Reply
Neighbor785
Neighbor785
7 months ago
Reply to  Sally

I don’t think many people knew about her. I wouldn’t have known except from WSR. As a candidate, she got limited exposure.

12
Reply
Madd Donna
Madd Donna
7 months ago
Reply to  Sally

How dare you accuse Danzilo of being “right wing fringe”. You have no idea what you are talking about. She’s a moderate and SANE Democrat who is watching our neighborhood and city crumble into pieces. What good has Hoylman done for us?? NADA!!

36
Reply
Charles David
Charles David
7 months ago
Reply to  Madd Donna

She’s a fringe on her desire to lower taxes for the wealthy, supporting charter schools, opposing tenant rights and allowing Republicans to vote in primaries. That’s whacko Lee Zeldin stuff.

2
Reply
Matt
Matt
7 months ago
Reply to  Charles David

Wouldn’t be shocked to find out she’s voted for republicans in state/local level elections. Right Wing Dems

0
Reply
Lisa
Lisa
7 months ago
Reply to  Charles David

Supporting charter schools where kids can actually get a good education, especially after the last two years, is whacko? Sign me up for the whacko train then!

2
Reply
Old West Sider
Old West Sider
7 months ago
Reply to  Sally

@Sally
I think you have to accept the fact Hoylman’s election, and his views on what has become a very serious problem, increased crime, will, unfortunately, continue to make the West Side more unlivable. Don’t complain when crime, of all types, continues to affect all of us.

23
Reply
Robert Spire
Robert Spire
7 months ago
Reply to  Old West Sider

Hoylman knows what he’s doing. He helped push through Madeline Singas’ nomination to the court of appeals. Madeline Singas was the former Nassau County DA and their plea bargaining policies are something pro-cop people can only dream of. Trust me, if you are poor or a minority, you don’t want to be arrested in Nassau County.

1
Reply
TW Baskins
TW Baskins
7 months ago
Reply to  Sally

75% of voters who voted! It would appear that the overwhelming number of registered voters on the UWS have become numb and totally disenfranchised. Business as usual.

15
Reply
Christine E
Christine E
7 months ago
Reply to  TW Baskins

The state senate district is much larger than the UWS.

The outcome of total district votes do not necessarily represent that of UWS voters.

5
Reply
UWS Dad
UWS Dad
7 months ago
Reply to  Sally

Agreed – the landslide Hoylman victory makes that obvious, all these commenters on WSR blaming him for the nationwide increases in crime look foolish

7
Reply
Charles David
Charles David
7 months ago
Reply to  UWS Dad

Landslide. Thank goodness.

1
Reply
TW Baskins
TW Baskins
7 months ago
Reply to  UWS Dad

Sally, you are correct. “The nationwide increases in crime,” takes a village to occur and more often than not, progressive villages that turn a blind eye to lawlessness through loose bail reforms, decriminalizing minor crime, and demonizing law enforcement under the guise of constitutionally protected freedoms. While the UWS deserves far better, they also apparently know what works, what doesn’t work, and what they really don’t give a damn about either way. Given the burgeoning crime stats on the UWS, looking “foolish,” is in the eyes of the beholder!

4
Reply
Paul
Paul
7 months ago
Reply to  UWS Dad

It’s not a matter of smart, or foolish, or right, or wrong.

It’s more that the people who comment, and who 👍 comments, are not a representative sample of the neighborhood.

0
Reply
UWS Dad
UWS Dad
7 months ago
Reply to  Paul

Well yes certainly the WSR commenters are not representative, no disagreement there

0
Reply
Concernedsmallbusinessowner
Concernedsmallbusinessowner
7 months ago

Won’t bother to spend time posting any longer. When you see your local small businesses and stores leave, know it is because the crime, safety and quality of life took your businesses away. It is not the rent and we survived the pandemic but can’t survive the demise of this city and especially this UWS neighborhood.

Maria Danzillo would have improved this neighborhood but people here stay in their fantasy world and their tunnel vision and never acknowledge the true challenges we face on a daily basis. Goodbye.

32
Reply
Lisa
Lisa
7 months ago
Reply to  Concernedsmallbusinessowner

I completely agree and the people who actually use logic and reason, as well as their eyes, agree as well. I’m so sorry. I hope you relocate your business to a sane, safe place. The politicians here won’t really pay attention until the tax base is so eroded by residents and businesses leaving that the city is nearly bankrupt. Best of luck.

1
Reply
Jay
Jay
7 months ago
Reply to  Concernedsmallbusinessowner

It’s Amazon killing small business, well and congestion pricing.

You act like there weren’t small business at street level in the actual bad days of the 1980s.

Thank your lucking stars for the vast improvement in inexpensive security cameras and data recorders over the last 5 years.

MD is a rightist, who would not have improved the UWS had she won election to the State Senate.

5
Reply
Bill Pearlman
Bill Pearlman
7 months ago
Reply to  Jay

we didn’t have industrial level shoplifting back then. We do now. And that’s because of the progressives. Progress I suppose

1
Reply
Concernedsmallbusinessowner
Concernedsmallbusinessowner
7 months ago
Reply to  Jay

People are using Amazon now more than ever in our neighborhood because they don’t even want to walk the sidewalks. You are not a small business owner so don’t tell me what affects us. There was no Amazon in the 1980’s so people HAD to walk the sidewalks no matter how bad. And it doesn’t matter if a security camera records a robbery when the crime is lessened to a misdemeanor because this Manhattan DA’s office can’t handle the volume or wants to lessen the crime for his own philosophies. Clean safe sidewalks people want to walk and safe subways people want to ride bring us walk-by traffic which is what we need. So save your comments as you do NOT know what affects your Mom and Pop stores in this neighborhood, I do.

Last edited 7 months ago by Concernedsmallbusinessowner
21
Reply
Che_junglecat
Che_junglecat
7 months ago

I voted Nadler and Danzilo, later realizing both are from my neighborhood.

Danzilo seems ready to take charge, may run again for office. Nadler’s passionate concern surpasses politicking.

The rest of the country is under ideological seige. It’s painful. We need strong minds and hearts here.

5
Reply
John E.
John E.
7 months ago

Thought the race for the 12th Congressional district would be closer. Did Maloney’s use of the gender card and attacking Nadler turn off voters or did Nadler’s westside base simply carried him to victory?

2
Reply
Carmella Ombrella
Carmella Ombrella
7 months ago
Reply to  John E.

Maloney, who has undoubtedly done some good work in Congress and for the East Side, lost my respect and my vote when she came out with that heavy-handed “Don’t send a man to do a woman’s job” campaign line. I have been an active feminist at least as long as Maloney has; I’ve marched and protested and supported feminist causes for decades. But sexism works both ways and I could not support a candidate who used her X chromosomes as a cudgel. (Besides, I think Jerry’s suspenders are sort of cute.)

6
Reply
Phoebe
Phoebe
7 months ago
Reply to  John E.

Hmm. Don’t know about that. I think the gender card is a good card to use when you’re holding it. But I guess ya gotta know when to hold ‘em… And she does. It drew me in, along with a few other factors, but Nadler is good.

1
Reply
John E.
John E.
7 months ago
Reply to  Phoebe

But read the post by Carmella before you. If an active feminist was turned off by the gender card, maybe she should have folded and played another hand. I’m sure she lost many a male vote. That ad by Maloney really turned me off, not to mention her insinuating that Nadler was not for fit the job. Those tactics were signs of desperation and panic.

3
Reply
Robert Spire
Robert Spire
7 months ago
Reply to  John E.

I think people follow the NY Times religiously in Manhattan even though they don’t do any local coverage anymore and the NY Times endorsement helped Nadler win. It certainly helped Goldman win and caused Garcia to almost be mayor (if Wiley told her supporters to rank Garcia #2, Adams would’ve lost).

1
Reply
Christine E
Christine E
7 months ago

I would be curious about the voting by each neighborhood within the districts (and other categories like age, gender, etc if available) . For example did the west side carry Nadler, while the east side favored Maolney but there simply were more west siders voting? Did Danzilio win the north (UWS, where she is better known) while Hoylman carried the south district (down to Village/Chelsea). How much did identity politics (geography, age religion, sexual orientation, etc) play a role? Clearly gender did not, and mysogyny remains a systemic barrier. Both contests had an equal number of men and women running. Yet men continued to be elected, overwhelmingly so.

On the one hand we can be proud that Manhattan politicians will represent important perspectives in legislative bodies, such as Jewish or LBGTQ. On the other hand, NY (and the world) is also 50% women, and none of the victors can truly represent these perspectives, no matter their intent.

3
Reply
Christine E
Christine E
7 months ago

Now that Hoylman is more or less assured of re election in November, UWSers need to stop complaining in WSR and redirect that energy to Albany. Inform Hoylman what his constituents want and need to make the UWS safe and livable and what are the intended or unintended results of his policy. Based on WSR comments, Hoylman is quite disconnected from this information.

21
Reply
Carmella Ombrella
Carmella Ombrella
7 months ago
Reply to  Christine E

Thank you; it’s good to hear a constructive suggestion instead of the usual complaints.

6
Reply
Christine E
Christine E
7 months ago
Reply to  Christine E

P.S. Looking at the old vs new state senate maps, Hoylman, although an “incumbent,” did not previously represent UWS. And he still does not, until Jan 2023, assuming he wins in November. In the meantime, due to restricting, we have lame ducks.

7
Reply
Charles David
Charles David
7 months ago
Reply to  Christine E

He represented up to UWS. Quite a bit of the UWS including Lincoln Towers and Amsterdam Houses.

1
Reply
Bambi
Bambi
7 months ago

I am so sad as to how few people vote – people take this right for granted and the rest of us who care about issues like how bad bail reform laws suffer…let’s not also forget how few people voted in the elections that got DeBlasio elected

12
Reply
Kathi
Kathi
7 months ago
Reply to  Bambi

I am now a registered Independent (formerly an actively voting Democrat, who got disgusted after the DNC manipulations with Clinton over Sanders) who would have happily voted if the primary was open, as some states have done. I was not motivated to change my registration to D to vote, and subsequently change back to I. I am curious as to whether the primary turnout , besides being UNREALISTICALLY scheduled for late AUGUST, would have been more representative if Independents were permitted to participate.

8
Reply
Leon
Leon
7 months ago
Reply to  Kathi

Being a registered Independent accomplishes nothing. Most elections are largely decided in the primary. Perhaps it makes you feel good about yourself but if you want to be part of the system, you should just pick a party. You can go back and forth between parties if that makes you feel good.

I agree that the two party system with primaries is awful and often results in candidates who are at the two extremes and freezes out the middle (I’m a moderate Democrat). But these are the rules and they are unlikely to change so you have to play by them.

9
Reply
UpperWest Side Dad
UpperWest Side Dad
7 months ago
Reply to  Leon

Agree with Leon. In NYC in particular (since Democrats almost always are victorious), most elections are actually decided at the primary stage.

2
Reply
JustSayNoToFUD
JustSayNoToFUD
7 months ago

I won’t vote for any candidate whose primary sales pitch caters to fear of crime. Not Adams, not Danzillo, and certainly not the populist Republicans. It’s an immediate NFW from me. And I’m old enough to remember when Nadler was our State Assemblyman and crime was a much bigger issue on the UWS than it is now.

The results validate that this minority opinion amongst the WSR commentariat is closer to the way voters in our district vote. Maybe the moaners here would be happier in Florida.

Last edited 7 months ago by JustSayNoToFUD
7
Reply
Matt
Matt
7 months ago
Reply to  JustSayNoToFUD

100% correct! Nadler and Brad were clearly the progressive choices in these races. Danzilo is a joke and clearly just a regressive agent of capital. Our cushy, affluent neighbors clearly don’t remember the 80’s and 90’s levels of crime. To blame a rep for a national rise in crime as a result of the poverty caused by the pandemic is asinine and clearly fear mongering. I feel plenty safe here.
The concern about crime is largely media driven and is a front for a Pro-incarceration, Anti homeless, anti affordable housing agenda. If these right wing democrats actually cared about homelessness and those in need, they’d vocally support safe injection sights, legalizing drugs, ending food deserts, and turning as many buildings into affordable housing as possible. All they actually care about is getting these “ugly”, “dirty” (largely POC) homeless individuals, many who are experiencing addiction and mental health issues, out of their neighborhood and out of sight.

5
Reply
Katherine
Katherine
7 months ago
Reply to  Matt

So glad you, a man, feel safe here. Personally I do not want any drug injection sites on the Upper West Side, thanks. But you are right, I do want these individuals out of the neighborhood.

3
Reply
Lisa
Lisa
7 months ago
Reply to  Matt

Mentally ill drug addicts benefit no one by living on the street. I am astounded that you would criticize those of us who want to stop this devastating phenomenon. Let’s bring back mandated treatment for those who cannot take care of themselves.

8
Reply
Bill Pearlman
Bill Pearlman
7 months ago
Reply to  Matt

how many are in front of your building?

5
Reply
GoRangers
GoRangers
7 months ago
Reply to  Matt

“Regressive agent of capital”! Aha-ha-ha-ha! You are few decades past the Marxism prime, comrade. I’ve got to get stuff this guy’s smoking!

7
Reply
MR68
MR68
7 months ago

Hopefully, Nadler will start grooming a successor.

4
Reply
Carlos
Carlos
7 months ago
Reply to  MR68

I think unfortunately that might be Hoylman, though he turns 57 shortly so is no spring chicken (or perhaps on the UWS we call them spring goats?)

1
Reply
Robert Spire
Robert Spire
7 months ago
Reply to  Carlos

That will likely be Scott Stringer.

0
Reply
John E.
John E.
7 months ago
Reply to  Robert Spire

Most probably will be Stringer. He won Nadler’s state assembly seat in 1992 when Nadler went to Congress. Stringer was Nadler’s legislative assistant to Nadler for the 9 previous years. Nadler fought strongly for Stringer when he ran against Spitzer in the Democratic primary for city comptroller in 2013 and endorsed him for his unsuccessful run for mayor. I always thought Nadler was Stringer’s mentor and “rabbi”.

1
Reply
good humor
good humor
7 months ago

“…and expecting a different result.”

6
Reply
Frustrated UWS
Frustrated UWS
7 months ago

Just want to point out that as a resident I am sick and tired of hearing how “the 70’s and 80’s were much worse…” blah blah blah.

You have held onto that for too long. This city was amazing from the late 90’s until 2015 and then the progressives got elected and here we are. It was going bad before the pandemic

I am not conservative at all but to live like we are now with people comparing the city to the worst time ever with crime and drug use is ASININE.

For God’s sake, it should be a livable safe city for EVERYONE – especially those of us barely able to pay full rent, working hard, with no tax breaks, and paying for all your progressive programs.

Enough with the old timers claiming “you’ve seen nothing” – I’m sick of it. We shouldn’t have to see it back like that – that’s the damn point.

6
Reply
JustSayNoToFUD
JustSayNoToFUD
7 months ago
Reply to  Frustrated UWS

For info: https://www.wsj.com/articles/violent-crime-rural-america-homicides-pandemic-increase-11654864251

“Violent crime isn’t just rising in the nation’s cities. Murder rates across the rural U.S. have soared during the pandemic, data show, bringing the kind of extreme violence long associated with major metropolises to America’s smallest communities.

Homicide rates in rural America rose 25% in 2020, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It was the largest rural increase since the agency began tracking such data in 1999. The CDC considers counties rural if they are located outside metropolitan areas defined by the federal government.

The rise came close to the 30% spike in homicide rates in metropolitan areas in 2020.”

0
Reply
UpperWest Side Dad
UpperWest Side Dad
7 months ago
Reply to  Frustrated UWS

A couple of thoughts in response. I agree with you that the comparisons to the 80’s are getting played out. Was violent crime and crime in general worse in the 80’s and early 90’s than it is now.? Yes, and I don’t think most rationale people would disagree. However, that does not mean that crime and the general condition of the city haven’t gotten worse over the last number of years. It doesn’t mean that people shouldn’t be concerned or their feelings of being unsafe are misplaced simply because conditions were worse 30-40 years ago.

Part of the problem with politics today is that everybody wants it their way. I want this program, I want that program, I am right and you are wrong, etc.. Politics has become winner take all. There is no civility and there is certainly no compromise. You only need to look at how people speak to each other in the comments to realize this is the case……

2
Reply
UWSPoliticalComms
UWSPoliticalComms
7 months ago

interesting factoid that shows how poorly Carolyn Maloney did. Brad Hoylman won more votes than Maloney, even though she was running in a much larger district: 27,814 to 20,038.

2
Reply
Bill Pearlman
Bill Pearlman
7 months ago

If you voted for Hoylman. You have no right to complain about crime, taxes, garbage in the streets..Anything quality of life . You have forfeited it

2
Reply

YOU MIGHT LIKE...

SRO ‘Reclaimed’ as Permanent Supportive Housing on West 107th Street
NEWS

SRO ‘Reclaimed’ as Permanent Supportive Housing on West 107th Street

March 29, 2023 | 10:05 AM
Updated: Police Activity at Jack’s Convenience on Broadway and 109th
CRIME

Updated: Police Activity at Jack’s Convenience on Broadway and 109th

March 28, 2023 | 11:14 AM
Previous Post

All Goat Things Must Come to an End, But First—a Talent Competition!

Next Post

Free Backpack and School Supply Giveaway Wednesday From 3PM to 6PM — Go Early!

this week's events image

Explore Your Favorite Subject

20th precinct 24th precinct american museum of natural history animals art bicycling bulletin central park closings columns community board 7 coronavirus crash crime development dogs events fdny fire food gale brewer helen rosenthal history jcc lincoln center monday bulletin morning bulletin nypd openings pedestrian safety photography photos politics public schools pupper west side real estate restaurants retail riverside park silver stars fitness snow sponsored subway upper west side uws

CITY NEWS

Brick Underground
City Limits
Eater
Gothamist
NY Daily News
NY Post
NY Times

LOCAL RESOURCES

Bloomingdale Neighborhood History Group
Central Park Conservancy
CB7
Community Education Council 3
Assembly District 67
The New York Historical Society
Riverside Park
West End Preservation

UWS Blogs

Bloomingdale History Central Park Blogger
North River Notes

Next Post
Free Backpack and School Supply Giveaway Wednesday From 3PM to 6PM — Go Early!

Free Backpack and School Supply Giveaway Wednesday From 3PM to 6PM -- Go Early!

Openings and Closings: Restaurant in David Geffen Hall; Pico de Gallo; Lululemon; Crumbl Cookies; Team 7; Mega Building Supply; Exotic Smoke Shop

Openings and Closings: Restaurant in David Geffen Hall; Pico de Gallo; Lululemon; Crumbl Cookies; Team 7; Mega Building Supply; Exotic Smoke Shop

This Chicken is a Dog with a Mission

This Chicken is a Dog with a Mission

  • ABOUT US
  • CONTACT US
  • NEWSLETTER
  • WSR MERCH!
  • ADVERTISE
  • EVENTS
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • SITE MAP
Site design by RLDGROUP

© 2023 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • TOP NEWS
  • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT US
  • WSR SHOP

© 2023 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.