West Side Rag
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART & CULTURE
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • ABOUT US
    • OUR STORY
    • CONTRIBUTORS
    • CONTACT
West Side Rag
No Result
View All Result
SUPPORT THE RAG

Search the site

No Result
View All Result
Get WSR FREE in your inbox
SUPPORT THE RAG

Renderings Show Condos That Are Replacing Century-Old Synagogue

October 29, 2020 | 11:23 PM - Updated on October 31, 2020 | 12:24 PM
in NEWS, REAL ESTATE
57


Artist’s rendering. Architecture by ODA New York.

Architectural renderings show what a 14-story condo building will look like when it’s completed at 212 West 93rd Street, the former home of Shaare Zedek Synagogue.

The development includes 20 condos, with 1-4 bedrooms starting at $1.875 million.

Shaare Zedek is expected to get a three-story synagogue at the bottom of the building. Some neighbors had opposed the demolition of the former synagogue, which was built in the early 1920s and dedicated in 1923, and had hoped it could be landmarked.


Before demolition.

Seventy percent of the new residences will have private outdoor space, according to 6sqft.

“Residents can enjoy shared amenities like a lovely rooftop terrace, 24-hour attended lobby, fitness studio, children’s playroom, a pet spa, bike storage, and additional storage for purchase,” according to 6sqft.

The marketing site is here.

Share this article:
SUPPORT THE RAG
guest

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

57 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Marti Cassidy
Marti Cassidy
4 years ago

Horrid

0
Reply
Quan Lee
Quan Lee
4 years ago
Reply to  Marti Cassidy

Horrid beyond belief. Ugly. Ugly, ugly.
The synagogue should not be demolished. A grand piece of West 93rd.

0
Reply
Paul
Paul
4 years ago
Reply to  Quan Lee

That happened a couple of years ago.

More than one person said this, perhaps the article should have been more clearly written?

0
Reply
Darwin
Darwin
4 years ago

Wow – that’s a whole lot of ugly. And a whole lot of money for outdoor space overlooking a NYCHA building in grave disrepair.

0
Reply
Paul
Paul
4 years ago
Reply to  Darwin

It’s a sad reminder of how well we were doing pre-Covid.

That a developer would pay millions to build 20 luxury condos and a new synagogue across the street from a housing project, and that banks would finance that, shows how strong we actually were.

0
Reply
wombatNYC
wombatNYC
4 years ago

Nice renderings but that’s what you call some bad timing. $1.875 for a 1 bedroom on West 93rd street with a shul on the ground floor. Pass!

0
Reply
Bob
Bob
4 years ago

“Progress.”

0
Reply
lizzie
lizzie
4 years ago

The upper part is okay, but at street level it looks really uninspired and dreary. Overall, it looks like the second coming of the worst of brutalist architecture. This is the best New York can do?

0
Reply
PM
PM
4 years ago
Reply to  lizzie

Yeap, all of New York gathered at the site, discussed, assessed, surveyed, planned, prototyped, designed – and this is the best we could do.

0
Reply
Joan
Joan
4 years ago

And another lovely old building hits the dust.

0
Reply
Otis
Otis
4 years ago
Reply to  Joan

It was a lovely old building that was literally falling apart and was unsafe and the congregation did not have the money to properly maintain it.

0
Reply
Henny Youngman Fan
Henny Youngman Fan
4 years ago

Some thoughts:
1. the lower floors sort-of suggest a Rubik’s Cube…gone bonkers!;
2. this is NOT what was meant by “Cubism”; and
3. with a one-bedroom starting at $1.8M, it’s doubtful that they’ll market the apartments as “cubicles”
Bah-da-Bing, Bah-da-Boom !!!

0
Reply
James Brummel
James Brummel
4 years ago

JENGA!!!!

0
Reply
Carlos
Carlos
4 years ago
Reply to  James Brummel

LOL. Or a poorly played game of tetris. Regardless, not somewhere I would want to live or live near. Some of the other new buildings in the neighborhood have made an effort to fit in architecturally. This seems to fail miserably.

There seems to be an emphasis on outdoor space, but it all faces NYCHA housing. The web site shows a picture of Central Park. Not exactly…

0
Reply
Jean Luke
Jean Luke
4 years ago

Shame to lose the synagogue but I like the design of the building a lot. Definitely some interesting design elements and something different and innovative looking than a flat curtain wall on the street. This building is a huge improvement over almost anything built in the 1960’s and 1970’s.

0
Reply
Chuck
Chuck
4 years ago

How will this impact the rehab of Bayside Cemetary in Queens? I had read where some of the money from the deal was supposed to support the restoration of Bayside which had been linked to the Shaare Zedek.

0
Reply
Jane Sokol
Jane Sokol
4 years ago

Really, who needs a deco old building where people come to pray and reflect when you can have a pet spa. “Progress” indeed.

0
Reply
Pedestrian
Pedestrian
4 years ago

In Europe they know how to preserve their built heritage and provide new housing. Unfortunately our developers and building just aren’t smart enough to do that or is it greed.

This thing is awful, just awful.

0
Reply
Alan Flacks
Alan Flacks
4 years ago
Reply to  Pedestrian

D’accord!

0
Reply
robert
robert
4 years ago

I’m not sure why you are running this
The building is 99% done and selling very well.

Go take a look at it, it looks a lot better in person rather than in computer generated sketch’s

The congregation worked out a deal to survive, the building they have was in bad shape and just could not be supported anymore.

0
Reply
David Kleinberg-Levin
David Kleinberg-Levin
4 years ago

What a shame!
New building: Aesthetically ugly facade!

0
Reply
Besuretovote
Besuretovote
4 years ago

“Residents can enjoy shared amenities like a lovely rooftop terrace, 24-hour attended lobby, fitness studio, children’s playroom, a pet spa, bike storage, and additional storage for purchase,” with breathtaking views of Central Park because it appears there is no east-facing wall

0
Reply
James Brummel
James Brummel
4 years ago

“Shaare Zedek is expected to get a three-story synagogue at the bottom of the building”

What does this mean? Did the temple sell air rights but still owns the 1st 3 floors? Or is the temple owner/sponsor of the entire structure?

0
Reply
Local minds want to know
Local minds want to know
4 years ago
Reply to  James Brummel

They sold the land. In return, along with money, substantial amount earmarked for Bayside Cemetery,they got 3 floors worth of space. They still have to pay to build out the interior.
Before the deal there was little money left to maintain the building and care for the cemetery. The alternative was to disband and just sell the building. This way,there’s a chance to grow the congregation.Sometimes a building is not the most important thing

0
Reply
Paul
Paul
4 years ago
Reply to  James Brummel

It means that the deal between the congregation and the developer requires the developer to build with a synagogue occupying the first three floors of the new building.

0
Reply
Yimby
Yimby
4 years ago

I guess houses of worship are now just “place holders” for new development, like parking garages and abandoned buildings. Rapidly dwindling congregations can no longer sustain the cost of necessary repairs and maintenance. But at least new developments serve a real purpose and pay taxes.

0
Reply
Rob G.
Rob G.
4 years ago

I mourn the loss of the beautiful synagogue, but applaud the new condos. Although the ground floor is “meh” at best.

0
Reply
Kathleen
Kathleen
4 years ago

That new building is awful! What a shame that such a beautiful old building is being replaced with ugliness.

0
Reply
watto
watto
4 years ago

Just disgusting!!!

0
Reply
Jean Siegel
Jean Siegel
4 years ago

FEH!

0
Reply
Midwesterner
Midwesterner
4 years ago
Reply to  Jean Siegel

I was going to say “Eww” but “FEH!” is better.

0
Reply
Ikemp
Ikemp
4 years ago
Reply to  Jean Siegel

Oy!

0
Reply
MARCI
MARCI
4 years ago

it is becoming more and more important for new construction to be made to have garages a rule that went by the wayside and had been in effect. we need to reduce the congestion on the UWS

0
Reply
Grossed Out
Grossed Out
4 years ago

Woof. New York has no penchant for preservation like many other great historic cities do. Sterilized condos in place of a religious and cultural place of worship? I’ll pass. There needs to be some community opposition against this. I’m sure there’s a dilapidated eyesore of a building somewhere they could have bulldozed in place of the synagogue.

0
Reply
Josh P.
Josh P.
4 years ago
Reply to  Grossed Out

“In Manhattan, 27 percent of lots were either include in a historic district or designated as an individual or interior landmark. Those lots comprise 19.9 percent of lot area in Manhattan.”
https://furmancenter.org/files/NYUFurmanCenter_50YearsHistoricPresNYC_7MAR2016.pdf

New York grants historic preservation to a huge number of sites, many with questionable historic value. Real estate interests lobby for preservation because it prevents people from building new homes with modern conveniences that would make their old investments look unattractive by comparison. They don’t want to compete so they make it illegal to build anything new.

0
Reply
Uws knows
Uws knows
4 years ago
Reply to  Grossed Out

The synagogue will be returning with more space than it had before and in better financial shape. I don’t love the building but it can be a gain for the area not a loss.

0
Reply
filatura
filatura
4 years ago

If the top six stories and the tower-like enclosure on top are actually a giant two-dimensional billboard, as they appear in the rendering, the buyers of those apartments are in deep (or shall I say shallow) trouble. This adds new meaning to that suspect architectural gimcrack, the “void.”

0
Reply
Susan Green
Susan Green
4 years ago

We have enough condos in New York, and with the virus still with us, people are moving out of the city – not in. And the old building is beautiful and should not be destroyed.

0
Reply
judy
judy
4 years ago

what about some affordable housing !!

0
Reply
Boris
Boris
4 years ago
Reply to  judy

Buy some of your own land and build affordable housing. What’s stopping you?

0
Reply
Upperwest
Upperwest
4 years ago

The leadership had a solid offer from Romemu to buy the building but they hid that from their congregation. Now they get a very ugly building and a congregation that will probably not survive anyway because of they insist on being stuck in the past. I hope they survive but given all of the things they have tried, I doubt it will happen.

0
Reply
Colleen Meehan
Colleen Meehan
4 years ago

Are you kidding me? It’s one thing to tear down confederate monuments. But tear down houses of worship??

0
Reply
MelissaD
MelissaD
4 years ago
Reply to  Colleen Meehan

Tearing down is when something is done without permission. The synagogue made a decision. Who are we to decide? Churches, synagogues mosques and temple buildings are replaced all the time.

0
Reply
David S
David S
4 years ago

I’m glad they worked so hard to ensure that the new building harmonizes with the existing architecture of the block.

0
Reply
Carnival Canticle
Carnival Canticle
4 years ago
Reply to  David S

You have a wicked way with sarcasm, David. Applause.

0
Reply
rj
rj
4 years ago

The is a shame . The begining of the end of NYC . Hey millionaires of the UWS pony up and buy the temple and don’t let this happen. First the homeless invade the UWS and now a Yuppie Condominium not a hiistoric site Where is Helen Rosenthal now? Useless political figure . Save this historic site . O Mr Mayor where are you now another useless politician. Justvtrying to stop the sale of the Mets. Hey Bill do us all a favor and move far away . maybe Cuba , Russia or Venezuela.

0
Reply
Reality check
Reality check
4 years ago
Reply to  rj

The building was sold and demolished a year ago. Done deal. Nothing to “save”
I hate the design and won’t be spending that kind of money, but it will probably sell quickly. You may be in denial, but those prices are not really high (for other people) compared with other new buildings in the area.

0
Reply
Nj
Nj
4 years ago

Ridiculous that more buildings going up when the new ones can’t be filled! A shame and ugly too.

0
Reply
ST
ST
4 years ago

Rich folks don’t want to live here anymore. There’s tons of crime at 94th and Amsterdam. Good luck selling those condos.

0
Reply
Barbara Litt
Barbara Litt
4 years ago

UGLY building! Lots of ugly Westside building going on! i don’t know if people have or want to pay that much for apartments now. Time will tell…
It should, however, be noted that without selling the air rights, the synagogue would have financially gone under; that’s why the congregation entered the deal.

0
Reply
charles hoffman
charles hoffman
4 years ago

a welcome addition to the neighborhood

it’s replacing an under-utilized crumbling structure with no hope for revival

0
Reply
Josh P.
Josh P.
4 years ago

“New buildings are ugly. Also, music today isn’t as good as it was when I was younger!” People complain that everything new is bad, but everything we love now was new once. No piece of architecture has ever been immediately beloved. People hated, hated the Eiffel Tower when it was built.
New buildings are objectively greener and more accessible though, so for that alone I find them more beautiful than any of the 100 year old Brownstones that pollute our neighborhood.

0
Reply
Maxine DeSeta
Maxine DeSeta
4 years ago

More luxury housing that we do not need! This is my first time commenting, please do not autoatically delete.

0
Reply
Sam Katz
Sam Katz
4 years ago

I find it hard to believe that competent architects could not figure out how to build atop that beautiful centuries old structure and incorporate it into any new design. What a disgrace how quick we are to abandon our history.

0
Reply
Igg Hch
Igg Hch
4 years ago
Reply to  Sam Katz

The building that was demolished was from the 1920s not “centuries old” and falling apart.

0
Reply
Barbara B
Barbara B
4 years ago

We of the building behind this monstrosity tried to stop the demolition of the beautiful synagogue 2 years ago.
Not only is it ugly it has disturbed the peace and light of many buildings around it.
And there were in the plans presented only supposed to be 3 terraces.
Now they say 70 % of residents will have private outdoor space. What mendacity! I am sickened by this horrible building.

0
Reply
RL
RL
4 years ago
Reply to  Barbara B

can’t speak for the inside but it was never a “beautiful” building on the outside.

0
Reply

YOU MIGHT LIKE...

UWS Train Station Reopens With Improvements: New Benches and Paint Job
NEWS

UWS Train Has By Far the Most Broken Air Conditioning Complaints of Any in NYC: Data

July 9, 2025 | 11:28 AM
COLUMNS

Openings & Closings: Goldfish Swim School, TP TEA; Rocket Club; Sushi Tokyo; 2nd Street; West Side Kids; Strand Bookstore

July 9, 2025 | 8:48 AM
Previous Post

Man Struck by Train at 103rd Street

Next Post

Local Parents Organize to Oppose Limits on Opt-In Rules at Public Schools

this week's events image
Next Post
Local Parents Organize to Oppose Limits on Opt-In Rules at Public Schools

Local Parents Organize to Oppose Limits on Opt-In Rules at Public Schools

Tenant Leaders and Cryptocurrency Millionaire Rally to Restore Gas at NYCHA After Outage

Tenant Leaders and Cryptocurrency Millionaire Rally to Restore Gas at NYCHA After Outage

Working Families Party is In Danger of Losing Ballot Access if People Don’t Vote on Their Line

Working Families Party is In Danger of Losing Ballot Access if People Don't Vote on Their Line

  • ABOUT US
  • CONTACT US
  • NEWSLETTER
  • WSR MERCH!
  • ADVERTISE
  • EVENTS
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • SITE MAP
Site design by RLDGROUP

© 2025 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • TOP NEWS
  • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART & CULTURE
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • ABOUT
    • OUR STORY
    • CONTRIBUTORS
    • CONTACT US
  • WSR SHOP

© 2025 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.