West Side Rag
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART & CULTURE
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT
West Side Rag
No Result
View All Result
Get WSR FREE in your inbox

Search the site

No Result
View All Result

Get WSR FREE in your inbox

AVAILABLE NOW!


HERE

Museum of Natural History Closes Part of Surrounding Park for New Building as Opposition Heads to Court

September 20, 2018 | 3:09 PM - Updated on September 21, 2018 | 7:41 AM
in NEWS
34

By Carol Tannenhauser

Don’t try to enter Theodore Roosevelt Park from Columbus Avenue and 79th Street; that entrance was blockaded Thursday morning. And if you enter the park at 81st and Central Park West, you’ll make it to the dog run, but not much further; green fences will stop you at the Nobel Monument.

Preparations for the construction of the Richard Gilder Center for Science, Education, and Innovation, at the American Museum of Natural History, have begun. The section of the park involved has been completely closed off, except to construction workers, who are erecting the barriers and digging a path around the periphery of the park with heavy machinery.

According to a message from the Museum sent to community members at the end of August, here’s what’s going on:

“In the first two weeks of September, we expect to begin work on the temporary park access path near 80th Street. Tree protection will also be installed over the next several weeks, based on consultation with the New York City Parks Department. Once the path is installed and the tree protection is installed, we will begin to install the site fence. Materials for this work, and for the site fence, will be delivered and staged in the park. With installation of the site fence, the pedestrian islands at 79th Street will be removed to allow for temporary protected pedestrian and bicycle paths around the site fence. We expect that this work will take approximately 4-6 weeks following the installation of the temporary park path.”

Work is proceeding despite the fact that a lawsuit was filed on March 15th in New York State Supreme Court by Community United to Save Theodore Roosevelt Park, a nonprofit group fighting to stop the construction of the Gilder Center, on the grounds that it was incorrectly approved by the city and, “if completed, would cause catastrophic environmental damage to the area, posing a series of life-threatening health hazards to residents of, and visitors to, the Upper West Side of Manhattan,” the suit says. Oral argument has been scheduled for Tuesday, October 2nd, at 9:30 AM, at 80 Centre Street, Courtroom 278.

Community United declined to comment, referring us to their lawyer, who was not immediately available. The Museum released the following statement:

“As described in the August 30 Gilder Center update email and on the website, the work underway in the Park relates to the installation of the construction site fence for the Gilder Center project. It includes work on a temporary park access path near 80th street as well as the installation of tree protection. Once the path is completed and the tree protection is installed, we will begin to install the site fence.

Regarding the court date, the Museum doesn’t comment on pending litigation.”

Share this article:
Get WSR FREE in your inbox
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

34 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ScooterStan
ScooterStan
5 years ago

So CUSTRP claims that the proposed Gilder Center would, “…cause catastrophic environmental damage … posing a series of life-threatening health hazards to … the Upper West Side of Manhattan….”

Hey,CUSTRP, don’t we get enough FAKE NEWS from our “elected leaders”? Why pile it higher?

0
Reply
Dr. Cary Goodman
Dr. Cary Goodman
5 years ago

Starting the annexation of the park just before the court hears the case is the height of arrogance. The museum doesn’t want to be a good neighbor or listen to the community. It is only focused on the selfish interests of super donors and climate change deniers like Rebeka Mercer and Richard Gilder. Shame on them!

0
Reply
Zulu
Zulu
5 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Cary Goodman

And please, stop polluting the streets with those little signs on popsicle sticks. They just end up on the ground and add to the street garbage.

0
Reply
Pedestrian
Pedestrian
5 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Cary Goodman

Arrogance and overreach have been hallmarks of the Museum’s behavior since the beginning of this project,

0
Reply
Confused
Confused
5 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Cary Goodman

Actually, they have been listening for a LONG time, hearing the fearmongering by NIMBYs like yourself. The park isn’t being destroyed to make way for a sewage pit – they’re adding to the community by expanding the museum. Are you saying museums have a negative effect on our community?

0
Reply
Pete on 80th
Pete on 80th
5 years ago

What Community United is fighting for is the fact that the AMNH has claimed the ENTIRE park is theirs to do with as they please.

What they are trying to do in this 1st phase of expanding their university presence (Gilder Graduate School) is to move a large portion of the crowds to the other side of the park to 79th and Columbus to create what Museum President Futter called a “Major Entrance” on Columbus Avenue which would be a second main entrance on Central Park West.

Despite assertions to the contrary, the AMNH does not, in fact, own the entire park, nor was it “set aside for them in its entirety” as they claim.

Asking the AMNH to go through the proper land use processes as Community United is doing here, is simply an act of trying to get a fair shake against a very powerful Cultural institution with political connections the likes of Rebekah Mercer and Bill de Blasio.

I applaud the leadership of Laura, William, and Claudia as they have shepherded the legal fight to the where it is now. Keep it up guys….time for me to go make another donation.

0
Reply
Jay
Jay
5 years ago

Give it up folks. The gilder center is being built. Stop wasting the museum’s money.

0
Reply
Diane
Diane
5 years ago
Reply to  Jay

Totally agree. Enough. We have much bigger battles to fight.

0
Reply
Married with children
Married with children
5 years ago
Reply to  Jay

Kudos !

0
Reply
Yimby
Yimby
5 years ago
Reply to  Jay

Totally, and most people in the neighborhood actually want this to happen. The NIMBY-sauruses might recall that there’s this park right across the street with 850+ acres of parkland. The Gilder Center will take up less than 1/4 acre of the 28 acres surrounding the AMNH — the size of a small residential lot in the suburbs. So this will cause pollution Armageddon? Really? What about all the high-rises going up on the UWS? Hope they’re building a bunker.

0
Reply
Pedestrian
Pedestrian
5 years ago
Reply to  Jay

In 2010 the NYT reported: In addition to her $877,000 compensation package, Ellen V. Futter, president of the American Museum of Natural History, lives rent free in a $5 million East Side apartment that the museum bought when she came aboard.

Ummmmm. I find this very interesting and yet the City will be giving the millions for this expansion including but limited to the $16 million that was given to the Museum long before any public hears were held or any approvals given!

0
Reply
Genius boy UWS
Genius boy UWS
5 years ago
Reply to  Pedestrian

What’s wrong with you people you are so jealous, that’s the perks of the job…
In my professional business on what I do, I have a very similar career or I should say something much better than what she was offered. 😉

0
Reply
Robert Goodman
Robert Goodman
5 years ago

For the sake of the author of the remarks quoted below and of the community in which we live I hope two competent psychiatrists read them and do the right thing: “if completed, would cause catastrophic environmental damage to the area, posing a series of life-threatening health hazards to residents of, and visitors to, the Upper West Side of Manhattan,”

0
Reply
Dr. Cary Goodman
Dr. Cary Goodman
5 years ago

Why couldn’t the museum wait a few days until the judge had a chance to hear the community’s case?

Their bullying of the park is arrogant and belies their claim of being a good neighbor and park steward.

After all, it is not their park, it is ours.

0
Reply
Rob G.
Rob G.
5 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Cary Goodman

Cary, your ramblings and reasons for opposing the Gilder Center are as hilarious now as they were months ago. My family and I will thank you for the laughs when we walk through the improved park and visit the museum for years to come!

0
Reply
Josh
Josh
5 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Cary Goodman

Cary, the park is ours, but it is not the personal property of your small group of friends. Our elected leaders, chosen by the community as a whole, have supported this project from the beginning. You ran for office and lost. Whether you choose to accept it or not, you don’t represent us. You and your friends are a self appointed group who speak only for yourselves. You are a special interest fighting against the public as a whole. Please do not pretend that you are the voice of the community. You are not.

0
Reply
UWS_lifer
UWS_lifer
5 years ago
Reply to  Josh

Bravo, Sir!!!! I couldn’t have articulated it better myself.

Thanks. Maybe you should run for office around here.:) You really do speak for the community.

0
Reply
stakan
stakan
5 years ago
Reply to  Josh

+1000
Self-appointed arbiters on common good have go sit down. Enough of harassing the progress.

0
Reply
Maria Fernandez R.N.
Maria Fernandez R.N.
5 years ago

This is a travesty. Annexation of public park land by a private institution demonstrates greed and deranged judgement. Replacing open space with a fossil fuel burning building will make our air dirtier and our community sick. Stop the Museum!

0
Reply
Zulu
Zulu
5 years ago
Reply to  Maria Fernandez R.N.

Maria Fernandez,

With all due respect you may have been misinformed on this matter. Most buildings if not all in NYC use fossil fuels for heating and hot water. Your stove unless electric, uses a fossil fuel too for cooking your food. Nobody is getting sick from using these fuels, they are clean burning and represent an infinitesimally small percentage of the pollutants in our atmosphere. In fact, if we still used wood for cooking and heating it would be more of a pollutant than our modern fuels.

Don’t listen to the fear mongers in this thread. At this point they’re grasping at straws to keep their misguided “battle” alive.

0
Reply
Cato
Cato
5 years ago
Reply to  Maria Fernandez R.N.

— “Replacing open space with a fossil fuel burning building…”

Really, what else would you expect the Museum of Natural History to use but fossil fuel??

0
Reply
Ananda
Ananda
5 years ago
Reply to  Maria Fernandez R.N.

This is heartbreaking news. It’s totally wrong what the Museum is doing. They should have waited til the court case was decided. It’s not their land. It’s land that benefits so many of us as a park. We need to preserve whatever green land we have in Manhattan rather than snatching it up and doing construction. Shame on the Museum.

0
Reply
Rob G.
Rob G.
5 years ago

The Gilden Center will be one of the great bright spots of the Upper West Side, and I am thrilled that the small gang of opposers didn’t screw this up. Hooray science! Hooray education! Hooray AMNH! A win for the neighborhood!

0
Reply
Patricia
Patricia
5 years ago

Anything with Rebekah Mercer attached to it is doomed to bring about pain and misery. She has no heart or soul, just deep pockets and a derp thirst for power and control of any kind. Take she and her money out of the equation and all will go well.

0
Reply
Zulu
Zulu
5 years ago
Reply to  Patricia

I rather take her money and build the center to promote the advancement of science than the alternative.

0
Reply
Ye Olde Englishe Teachere
Ye Olde Englishe Teachere
5 years ago
Reply to  Patricia

Re: “…a derp thirst for power….”

Wow, that’s even DERPER than a DEEP thirst!

Re: “Take she and her money….”

Grammar-tyme:
“SHE” is a subjective pronoun, used at the start of a phrase;
“HER” is an objective pronoun, following a verb (like “take”)

0
Reply
BillyNYC
BillyNYC
5 years ago

What a joke “Community United” get over it…we won !!!!
But we would’ve Won any how $$$$
What a waste of time you people have on your hands… …go out and do something constructive… like a job !

0
Reply
Genius boy UWS
Genius boy UWS
5 years ago

Community United is a total laughingstock of the upper West side and a joke !!!!

0
Reply
BillyNYC
BillyNYC
5 years ago
Reply to  Genius boy UWS

Awesome I totally agree

0
Reply
StevenCinNYC
StevenCinNYC
5 years ago

The histrionics over a tiny patch of green next to the huge Central Park are just absurd. Environmental damage? Seriously? The museum serves the whole City and a few vocal locals are tying them up in legal challenges, wasting everyone’s time and the museum’s money.

0
Reply
Zulu
Zulu
5 years ago

I live very close to AMNH and I support this expansion.

0
Reply
michael
michael
5 years ago

I just walk by the site (Friday, 12:05pm) and saw two things.
1) A new pathway from the park to Columbus Ave being formed.
2) The Princess of Sweden walking into the AMNH from Columbus Avenue.

I think we need to take an honest perspective. The AMNH is world stage and we should be grateful for those that have steered it. Second (and consequently) the continued growth and expansion is important to the museum and New York City.

Given that Central Park is less than 500 steps from this site, there are far more meaningful causes to protest and far more meaningful reasons to protest them (read, human liberties)

0
Reply
Bob Lamm
Bob Lamm
5 years ago

Since Cary Goodman is back again on this issue, I believe it’s a useful time to recall the results of the relevant 2017 Democratic primary for City Council:

Helen Rosenthal 13,060 votes (64.8%)
(Rosenthal supported the Museum’s plan)

Mel Wymore 6,280 votes (31.2%)

Cary Goodman 805 votes (4.0%)

Goodman can claim to speak for the FOUR percent of district residents who voted for him. That’s it.

0
Reply
BillyNYC
BillyNYC
5 years ago
Reply to  Bob Lamm

I’m not a supporter of Helen Rosenthal… BUT! I’m impressed with her support for the museum of natural history, thank you Ms Rosenthal!
Thank you.
BillyNYC

0
Reply

YOU MIGHT LIKE...

90 Years Apart on the UWS: Christopher Rothko Looks After His Father’s Legacy
ART

90 Years Apart on the UWS: Christopher Rothko Looks After His Father’s Legacy

November 28, 2023 | 1:48 PM - Updated on November 29, 2023 | 12:05 AM
El Doradohenge! ‘I’ve Been Waiting for This Day for Months’
NEWS

El Doradohenge! ‘I’ve Been Waiting for This Day for Months’

November 28, 2023 | 11:05 AM
Previous Post

Police Looking for Man After Woman’s Wallet Swiped at the Great Lawn

Next Post

Stories Projected in Light on the Old Transfer Bridge, and Two Other Local Art Installations

this week's events image

Explore Your Favorite Subject

20th precinct 24th precinct american museum of natural history animals art bicycling bulletin central park closings columns community board 7 coronavirus crash crime dogs events fdny fire food gale brewer helen rosenthal history homelessness jcc lincoln center monday bulletin morning bulletin nypd openings openings and closings pedestrian safety photography photos politics public schools pupper west side real estate restaurants riverside park silver stars fitness snow sponsored subway upper west side uws

CITY NEWS

The City
Brick Underground
City Limits
Eater
Gothamist
NY Daily News
NY Post
NY Times

LOCAL RESOURCES

Bloomingdale Neighborhood History Group
Central Park Conservancy
CB7
Community Education Council 3
Assembly District 67
The New York Historical Society
Riverside Park
West End Preservation

UWS Blogs

Bloomingdale History Central Park Blogger
North River Notes
Next Post
Stories Projected in Light on the Old Transfer Bridge, and Two Other Local Art Installations

Stories Projected in Light on the Old Transfer Bridge, and Two Other Local Art Installations

Schools Chancellor Carranza Hosting Upper West Side Town Hall

Schools Chancellor Carranza Hosting Upper West Side Town Hall

Raccoon Accused of ‘Attacking Passersby’ on Columbus Avenue; But Was It Framed?

Raccoon Accused of 'Attacking Passersby' on Columbus Avenue; But Was It Framed?

  • ABOUT US
  • CONTACT US
  • NEWSLETTER
  • WSR MERCH!
  • ADVERTISE
  • EVENTS
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • SITE MAP
Site design by RLDGROUP

© 2023 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • TOP NEWS
  • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART & CULTURE
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT US
  • WSR SHOP

© 2023 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.