West Side Rag
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART & CULTURE
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • ABOUT US
    • OUR STORY
    • CONTRIBUTORS
    • CONTACT
    • ADVERTISE
    • GET WSR FREE IN YOUR INBOX
    • SEND US TIPS AND IDEAS
West Side Rag
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result

Favorite WSR Stories

    SUPPORT THE RAG
    Get the neighborhood news that matters.
    Sign up for our free newsletter

    Driver Who Struck Columbia Dean Arrested and Charged

    March 26, 2019 | 8:25 PM
    in NEWS
    22

    By Alex Israel

    A Queens man has been charged with a moving violation and traffic infraction in relation to a crash that led to the death of Columbia Dean Peter Awn, according to a spokesperson from NYPD’s Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Public Information (DCPI).

    Shiv Kumar, 24, was arrested last week and charged with failure to yield to a pedestrian and failure to use due care after striking Awn with his vehicle at the intersection of Claremont Avenue and 116th Street, the spokesperson said.

    If found guilty of both charges, Kumar could owe up to $900 and serve up to fifteen days in jail, according to New York Vehicle Traffic Law. (Failure to yield to a pedestrian, a moving violation, carries a possible sentence of up to $150 in fines; failure to use due care, a traffic infraction, carries a possible sentence of up to $750 in fines, up to fifteen days in jail, or a mandatory motor vehicle accident prevention course.)

    The arrest came nearly two months after the crash, which occurred on January 25 and left Awn (pictured at left) in critical condition. He died on February 17. When asked about the delay preceding the charges, the spokesperson attributed it to the “ongoing investigation.”

    Since the crash, nothing has changed on the block—despite requests from local residents and institutions.

    Last month, a Department of Transportation representative said the agency was in the midst of developing a plan for safety measures on Claremont Avenue. They have not responded to a request for an update on timing or details.

    Share this article:
    SUPPORT THE RAG
    Leave a comment

    Please limit comments to 150 words and keep them civil and relevant to the article at hand. Comments are closed after six days. Our primary goal is to create a safe and respectful space where a broad spectrum of voices can be heard. We welcome diverse viewpoints and encourage readers to engage critically with one another’s ideas, but never at the expense of civility. Disagreement is expected—even encouraged—but it must be expressed with care and consideration. Comments that take cheap shots, escalate conflict, or veer into ideological warfare detract from the constructive spirit we aim to cultivate. A detailed statement on comments and WSR policy can be read here.

    guest

    guest

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    22 Comments
    Countey
    Countey
    7 years ago

    “$900 and serve up to fifteen days in jail” for hitting and killing a pedestrian??!! Is this an effing joke??!!

    0
    Reply
    Marci
    Marci
    7 years ago
    Reply to  Countey

    I’m with everyone else on this. $900 and up to 15 days in jail – for taking a person’s LIFE?? What is wrong with this picture????

    0
    Reply
    Uwsider
    Uwsider
    7 years ago

    If found guilty of both charges, Kumar could owe up to $900 and serve up to fifteen days in jail — that’s just pathetic.

    0
    Reply
    Ken
    Ken
    7 years ago
    Reply to  Uwsider

    And the laws he’s being charged under were only recently enacted. Previously, he would have gotten off scot free because a police officer didn’t actually witness it. You’re right, it’s pathetic, and until there are real consequences for killing or seriously injuring another human being with a motor vehicle, drivers will continue to behave as if they are above the law — because they essentially are.

    0
    Reply
    EricaC
    EricaC
    7 years ago
    Reply to  Ken

    I agree this is pathetic, and the law should be changed. But I don’t think the issue is that people don’t care about hitting other people – I think the issue is that they simply don’t make the connection between speeding and hurting people. It is the same mechanism that lets people believe that not exercising won’t hurt their health, not flossing will not result in gum problems, buying plastic junk won’t hurt the environment, etc. People don’t connect things that are distant or rare with their own actions. Having greater penalties for speeding makes the consequences more real and immediate. Greater punishment makes many people pause and think more about the risk (though obviously even the death penalty didn’t stop murder, so it won’t be universally effective).

    I suspect that the driver here is horrified by what he did. The problem we face is how to get people to think before they act.

    0
    Reply
    Vince
    Vince
    7 years ago

    We need to change these traffic law penalties. It’s outrageous.

    0
    Reply
    Kathleen
    Kathleen
    7 years ago

    What?! No manslaughter charge?! You have to be kidding!

    0
    Reply
    Jane
    Jane
    7 years ago

    That’s the maximum punishment for someone who takes a LIFE???

    0
    Reply
    Larry K
    Larry K
    7 years ago

    I’m not a lawyer but what happened to vehicular homicide? What the F???

    0
    Reply
    Robin
    Robin
    7 years ago

    I don’t understand the paltry sentence in this case for causing someone’s death????
    Below is an online explanation of vehicular manslaughter.
    “A conviction for second-degree vehicular manslaughter carries a penalty of up to 7 years in prison and a maximum fine of $5,000. If you are convicted of first-degree vehicular manslaughter, however, although the fine may remain the same, you can be sentenced to up to 15 years of incarceration.“

    0
    Reply
    lcnyc
    lcnyc
    7 years ago
    Reply to  Robin

    Read the requirements for a vehicular manslaughter charge. It only applies if the driver is impaired (i.e. drunk or on drugs).

    0
    Reply
    Dale
    Dale
    7 years ago

    This has to be incorrect. Didn’t he also leave the scene of the accident? WTF?

    0
    Reply
    Susan Purdy
    Susan Purdy
    7 years ago

    As a graduate student in the Dept. of Religion at CU in the late 70’s, early 80’s, I took courses from Peter Awn. He was a gentle soul and a fierce academic. It is a great loss.

    0
    Reply
    Sid
    Sid
    7 years ago

    I can’t recall in recent memory a driver who killed a pedestrian who was charged with leaving the scene of a crash involving serious injury or death, which is a felony. Atrocious.

    0
    Reply
    SD
    SD
    7 years ago

    Mr. Awn’s family might very well go after this killer driver with their own lawsuit and have him lockec up for taking a life.

    0
    Reply
    Woody
    Woody
    7 years ago
    Reply to  SD

    Your understanding of the legal system needs to be rewired.

    0
    Reply
    Upperwestsidewally
    Upperwestsidewally
    7 years ago
    Reply to  Woody

    Hear, hear.

    0
    Reply
    Scott
    Scott
    7 years ago

    I wish people would stop focusing on street redesign when these tragedies occur. This is a case of a bad driver who committed a crime. Not every street has to be redesigned to slow traffic to a crawl, unless you work for an urban planning firm, in which case every street is a nail waiting to be hammered.

    0
    Reply
    Sid
    Sid
    7 years ago
    Reply to  Scott

    Bad drivers and reckless drivers and drunk drivers will always exist. The point of street safety measures it to prevent it entirely. And it has been proven to work, and make it safer for all users (Drivers, peds, cyclists).

    0
    Reply
    CosiCeleste
    CosiCeleste
    7 years ago

    @WSR: would it be too much to ask for the WSR staff to investigate with Police and DA what has happened here in the process of applying justice?

    Thank you!

    0
    Reply
    David S
    David S
    7 years ago

    The article doesn’t say whether or not there were any witnesses to the accident, so we can’t say who’s truly at fault. As both a motorist and a pedestrian in Manhattan, I’ve seen clueless and negligent behavior on both sides. As a motorist, I’ve lost count of the times a pedestrian stepped in front of my moving car while jaywalking or ignoring a “don’t walk” signal. And as a pedestrian, I’ve lost count of the number of times motorists and bicyclists have violated my right of way.

    Perhaps the lenient-seeming penalty and the delay before charges were made have to do with the police being unsure about what really happened but being pressured to “do something”?

    0
    Reply
    DL
    DL
    7 years ago

    How do we get this law changed? How do we start? We have power if we band together. Someone point me in the right direction.

    Sick of this. I see it all too often. There are so many little kids in this neighborhood and impatient drivers. These drivers need a law to be afraid of. Let’s get it passed.

    Anyone?

    0
    Reply

    YOU MIGHT LIKE...

    A Rainy Day on the Upper West Side Outside of Fairway: Photographs by Stephen Harmon
    ART

    A Rainy Day on the Upper West Side Outside of Fairway: Photographs by Stephen Harmon

    September 14, 2026 | 5:08 PM
    Turtles Are Getting Snared by Illegal Barbed Fishing Hooks in Central Park
    NEWS

    Turtles Are Getting Snared by Illegal Barbed Fishing Hooks in Central Park

    September 14, 2026 | 10:56 AM
    Previous Post

    Restaurant Updates: Cipriani Food Market, City Slickers Diner, Boucherie

    Next Post

    Coyote Spotted in Central Park; What to Do if You See One

    this week's events image
    Next Post
    CENTRAL PARK ROBBERY SUSPECT ARRESTED, AS ANOTHER MUGGING IS REPORTED

    Coyote Spotted in Central Park; What to Do if You See One

    Unauthorized Toe Sculpture Remains, And Has Now Received a Pedicure

    Unauthorized Toe Sculpture Remains, And Has Now Received a Pedicure

    The Answer Column: It’s Been Closed for Two Years, So Why Is Artie’s Still Clogging Our Arteries?

    The Answer Column: It’s Been Closed for Two Years, So Why Is Artie’s Still Clogging Our Arteries?

    • ABOUT US
    • CONTACT US
    • NEWSLETTER
    • WSR MERCH!
    • ADVERTISE
    • EVENTS
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS OF USE
    • SITE MAP
    Site design by RLDGROUP

    © 2026 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • TOP NEWS
    • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
    • OPEN/CLOSED
    • FOOD
    • SCHOOLS
    • OUTDOORS
    • REAL ESTATE
    • ART & CULTURE
    • POLITICS
    • COLUMNS
    • CRIME
    • HISTORY
    • ABSURDITY
    • ABOUT
      • OUR STORY
      • CONTRIBUTORS
      • CONTACT US
      • GET WSR FREE IN YOUR INBOX
      • SEND US TIPS AND IDEAS
    • WSR SHOP

    © 2026 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.