
By Daniel Katzive
The trial of Lashawn Mackey, accused of murdering 74-year-old Upper Westsider Maria Hernandez in January 2023, ended in a mistrial on Friday. The defendant will remain on Rikers Island while he awaits a new trial now scheduled for April.
New York State Supreme Criminal Court Judge Felicia Mennin accepted arguments made by Mackey’s attorney, Jessica Horani, that Mackey’s right to a fair trial was impaired by a series of failures by the prosecution to disclose evidence which the defense was entitled to receive in a timely manner. The jury, which had been sitting for almost two weeks and heard about half of the planned prosecution witnesses, was brought into the courtroom, thanked by the judge, and discharged.
A new jury will be selected beginning April 13.
Judge Mennin cited a number of discovery failures which had been uncovered during the trial, including the prosecution providing incomplete banking and phone records to the defense and witnesses revealing new information in testimony – or just before testimony – which had not been included in interviews conducted at the time of the initial investigation.
Additionally, one prosecution witness, a now-retired detective who was involved in gathering video evidence following the crime but had been left off a witness list provided to the defense, broke down while testifying, asked to leave the stand, and could be heard loudly wailing outside the courtroom. Once the jury had been ushered out and the retired detective was brought back in, he explained that he had been overcome by emotion on seeing the victim’s family members sitting in the audience.
Mackey’s attorney had called for a mistrial repeatedly, but the final straw – what the judge called the “coup de grace” – came Friday, when it emerged that notes taken by a paralegal in the district attorney’s office had not been previously disclosed to the defense. The notes, discovered this week, described a “proffer” meeting with Mackey’s now-deceased co-defendant, Terrence Moore.
Assistant District Attorney Maxine Rosenthal argued strenuously that the notes contained no information that had not previously been revealed in Moore’s initial arrest interview with detectives, the video of which had been provided to the defense. But the judge said that it was the defense’s right to make that evaluation. In issuing her ruling, Judge Mennin said the pattern of late disclosure by prosecutors pointed to “sloppiness at best and [was] at worst unprofessional.”
A spokesperson for the district attorney’s office told West Side Rag via an emailed statement: “We are committed to pursuing justice in this case and plan to retry it on April 13th.”
Hernandez was found by her sister unconscious and bound in her ransacked West 83rd Street apartment on January 18, 2023. EMTs and paramedics made extensive efforts to revive her, but were unsuccessful. Investigators determined she had been sexually abused and strangled.
Mackey, who had worked as a temporary superintendent in the building about six months before, was identified by witnesses as having been in the building that day. A search of his residence found rope, similar to the kind that had been found binding Hernandez, and a key, which detectives said opened the door to her apartment. Mackey conceded that he was in the building on the day of the murder but has denied he was in Hernandez’s apartment or that he committed the crimes.
The trial had included emotional testimony from the victim’s family members and the building’s super, which they will now have to deliver at the new trial. Other family members and friends have also been regularly sitting in the courtroom audience, including during sessions with graphic crime scene photos, and were visibly frustrated by Friday’s turn of events.
Subscribe to West Side Rag’s FREE email newsletter here. And you can Support the Rag here.






At 74-year-old woman was sexually assaulted and murdered, and the New York justice system is fumbling what to do in a case where there is zero ambiguity or doubt. Something is deeply rotten in the system.
Were you one of the jurors who were involved in the mistrial? If not, you can’t possibly say that there is “zero ambiguity or doubt”.
Bragg. Voted against him the first time, voted against him the second time. But of the few who vote at all, a majority. Sigh. We are stuck with incompetence like this on his watch.
You are 100% correct about incompetence. In addition the ny court sysyem is rife with corruption.
Good God, what an embarrassment for the DA’s office, prolonging the suffering of Hernandez’s loved ones. Judges hate tossing cases for lack of disclosure halfway through, so this must have been truly egregious.
The new discovery rules created by the criminal loving Democrats have helped to release thousands of criminals.
Ah, yes, I’m sure that if you or a loved one were on trial for murder, you’d be quite content to let the DA hold onto evidence that could possibly clear you. Get James Monroe’s name out of your mouth.
This is so lazy. Also, incorrect. Also, ignore how many people were wrongfully convicted by Dems and republicans in the 90s, only to result in multi-million dollar payouts after decades in prison
Who in particular are these “criminal[-]loving Democrats” you mention?
The new discovery rules have nothing to do with this mistrial.
I’m a lawyer and I’m genuinely asking which of the discovery rules changed recently, I wasn’t aware of any recent changes to the criminal procedure code in the state?
In 2020, the state legislature repealed CPL 240.20 and replaced it with 245.20. The new section and judges interpretations of the legislative intent on the law added significantly to the list of what is required to be disclosed. It grew to include documents never previously conceived of as being relevant.
For example, if the defense didn’t receive the Department of Corrections log showing which jail cells the defendant was held in, the case would be dismissed. That is not an exaggeration. That prompted some recent changes in the discovery law to restore *some * sanity to the process.
A larger problem was that the law also drastically sped up the deadline for compliance. The defense used to get all the discover shortly before trial, now it is required in just 15 days after the arrest. This doesn’t apply in murder cases, so it’s not an issue for this case, but the 15 day deadline is practically impossible to comply with in anything but the simplest of misdemeanors.
This was a seismic shift in NY practice, so I’m surprised that you, as a lawyer, weren’t aware of this.
It is the Republicans who love criminals, as evidenced by their approval of President Trump’s pardons of those who were convicted of crimes in connection with the attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021, as well as his many other pardons.
Democrats have embraced criminals, fraud, illegal aliens, Islamic terrorists, South American narco traffickers and now even the ayatollahs of Iran. If it weakens the USA, human freedom or the West they are all in!
This situation has nothing to do with the President. You should look up how many people get pardoned by Democrat Presidents and what their crimes were.
Less than the current President. That is fact. But you’ll find out when the cult fever wears off.
That’s a soulless decision. There’s no saving the city if this is the judiciary. Said another way, this judiciary is not worth saving.
You…um…you do understand that he will be retried, right? You know, like it says right in the first paragraph of the article?
Yes but my heart goes out to this poor woman and I can’t believe that her grieving traumatized family has to go through it all once more, Horrible.
Echoing others frustrations. Given how selective the office is about what they will or won’t try,, we can’t argue that the office just can’t keep up with the volume and pace. Given how Bragg loves to brag, one would think he would ensure more professionalism and rigor so that accused receive a speedy trial and taxpayer money is not wasted. The poor family of the victim.
NOT GUILTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It’s easy to bemoan the effect of sloppy administrative errors when the guilt of the defendant appears to be without question. But those who challenge the procedural safeguards that the judge was upholding should wonder about what happens when an innocent defendant who everyone assumes is guilty is denied those safeguards. I have no problem criticizing prosecutors who make mistakes (intentional or otherwise, and how many turn out to be the former?), but not all defendants are guilty because we think so. Ask the “Central Park Five.”
This prosecutor is known for her egregious behavior when it comes to concealing evidence, even before the discovery laws were changed. She needs to be disbarred so victims’ families aren’t further hurt by her antics. It’s disgusting.