West Side Rag
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART & CULTURE
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT
West Side Rag
No Result
View All Result

Get WSR FREE in your inbox

Search the site

No Result
View All Result

Get WSR FREE in your inbox

AVAILABLE NOW!


HERE

LINCOLN SQUARE REDESIGN AND EXTENDED COLUMBUS AVENUE BIKE LANE TO BE INSTALLED STARTING THIS WEEK

July 27, 2015 | 6:00 AM
in NEWS
53

Screen Shot 2015-02-12 at 9.38.35 PM

A project to redesign Lincoln Square between 66th and 63rd street and extend the Columbus Avenue bike lane from 69th to 59th street will begin this week, according to the Lincoln Square Business Improvement District. The area is one of the top 5% most dangerous intersections in the city.

The Department of Transportation plans to make several changes to the area:

  • Install more direct, safer pedestrian crossings and create new sidewalk space at congested pedestrian corners
  • Install green painted, protected bicycle lanes on Columbus Ave. from W.69th to W.59th Streets
  • Retime signals to remove pedestrian-vehicle conflicts on the east crosswalks at Columbus Avenue and W. 65th St.
  • Install audible pedestrian signals
  • Widen pedestrian cut-throughs at Broadway malls and address ponding concerns
  • Relocate M7 bus stop to west side of Columbus Ave., between W. 66th St. and W.67th St.
  • Relocate M20 bus stop to north side of W. 66th St., east of Columbus Ave.
  • Ban left turn from Columbus Ave. to Broadway
  • Ban right turn from northbound Broadway to 65th St., and ban left turn from southbound Broadway onto 64th St.

We covered this project in more detail here.

Share this article:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

53 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
denton
denton
7 years ago

Should be interesting and I am looking forward to the improvements. So if you are heading south on Columbus, you will be forced to drive down 9th Avenue? People are not going to like that.

0
Reply
TG
TG
7 years ago
Reply to  denton

Whoa, that is a seriously annoying change.

0
Reply
caitlin
caitlin
7 years ago

I am a pedestrian – don’t know how to drive.
But bad (and dangerous) behavior by pedestrians has worsened in the past few years and needs to be addressed as well.

Things seem to have worsened since Century 21 opened, replacing Barnes & Noble. People walk into Broadway disregarding red lights. People stand in the street blocking the buses trying to get to the bus stop on 66th & Broadway.

More tourists/visitors as well as newbie New Yorkers who purposefully ignore red lights and purposefully walk into moving traffic…

Pedestrians, along with drivers and cyclists, need to be part of the civic framework. Entitling pedestrians to further disregard laws is not the solution.

0
Reply
Jeff Berger
Jeff Berger
7 years ago
Reply to  caitlin

I think you are missing the point. We need to make Cars secondary to Bikes and Pedestrians. Bikes are the future of an island like Manhattan. There really is no need to use a car and we should begin to discourage their use.

0
Reply
Ira
Ira
7 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Berger

Congestion pricing! Now!

0
Reply
caitlin
caitlin
7 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Berger

Jeff – Regarding your comment on my comment…I’d respectfully disagree that bicycles should be the future.
As a non-driver, I walk and use the subway and bus. IMO subway and bus transportation are critical, not bicycles.
Buses, an important segment of NYC’s mass transportation are, sadly, severely impacted by traffic congestion.
Much traffic results from commercial traffic – construction, service, package delivery (especially “instant gratification” delivery), Uber, etc.
As for bicycles, unfortunately too many NYC cyclists completely disregard red lights and endanger pedestrians. I am not referring to exploited delivery people – IMO it is the “civilian cyclists who seem to be the most egregious.

0
Reply
ira
ira
7 years ago
Reply to  caitlin

Cars should not own streets. Streets should be for pedestrians and bicyclists. It would be easier to design a system where pedestrians and bicyclists and buses would coexist if there were no cars.

0
Reply
TG
TG
7 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Berger

I wonder how many bikes it will take for all the grocery stores, bodegas, restaurants, and bars to stock up for the week?

Bikes actually are most likely to replace subway travel and walking, not cars.

0
Reply
Jeremy
Jeremy
7 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Berger

Jeff – you are correct because it never rains.

0
Reply
lmr
lmr
7 years ago
Reply to  Jeremy

It is simple to ride a bike in the rain. Wear a raincoat and rain pants. It is done all the time by more than a million people throughout Scandinavia.

0
Reply
Christina
Christina
7 years ago
Reply to  lmr

@ Elizabeth… if you can afford a car, you can afford a bike and rain gear. So, in my opinion your statement doesn’t make much sense.

0
Reply
Elizabeth
Elizabeth
7 years ago
Reply to  lmr

Not everyone has money for gear, let alone the bike. And what about people commuting to work from far out in one borough to far away in another. Should they travel three hours instead of one?

0
Reply
Mike
Mike
7 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Berger

“There really is no need to use a car…”

I can only imagine your New York. Let’s have the old, young, handicapped and infirmed sign up for Citibike and all will be good in the city. You should probably let the big-box stores know you’re on the pedal patrol, too. How many packs of Costco toilet paper can you fit in your bike basket?

0
Reply
Christina
Christina
7 years ago
Reply to  Mike

Who has the room for multiple bulks of toilet paper in their apt. anyway?! Or most things Costco sells. Don’t get me wrong, I love Costco but a lot of items are in bulk and I really don’t know who has the room to store so much.

0
Reply
dannyboy
dannyboy
7 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Berger

There is a need to use a car. My wife is disabled.

Actually…the result of a bicycling crash.

0
Reply
UWS Dad
UWS Dad
7 years ago

Traffic on 9th Ave is already horrendous. Why filter even more cars down it when that section of Broadway is relatively quiet?

0
Reply
uwsdad
uwsdad
7 years ago

I live on West 65th between Lincoln Square and CPW ~ now if I’m coming uptown on Broadway I will not be able to turn right on my street. I will have to go up CPW and either walk to my building on west 65th or go to 66th street and take 3 left turns to actually be dropped off at my door.

0
Reply
Lita
Lita
7 years ago

More walkng, more walking, good for the body, good for the soul…..no need for cars in Manhattan…YEA!!!

0
Reply
Lita
Lita
7 years ago

More walking, more walking, good for the body, good for the soul…..no need for cars in Manhattan…YEA!!!

0
Reply
Mike
Mike
7 years ago

So if you’re heading North on Broadway intending to go to 65th Street, you need to go to 67th, then East to CPW, South to 66th, then West to Columbus, and finally left onto 65th. Considering considerable pedestrian traffic, bus stops, transverse backlogs, and light timing, that’s probably a 20-minute detour.

What really also needs to be addressed throughout the entire Upper West are the cars/cabs/trucks that believe that when they are making a left off Broadway to any of the streets, the red light at the center aisle doesn’t pertain to them. I don’t exaggerate in the least when I say that EVERY day I see vehicles run through the intersections against the light, threatening pedestrians and Broadway traffic in the process. Taxis appear to be the worst offenders. Signs need to be posted in the intersections and on the lights themselves telling these obviously poorly-informed drivers that they have to wait for the light.

0
Reply
Woody
Woody
7 years ago
Reply to  Mike

You’re incorrect. Cars do not need to stop at the median unless it is posted like at many intersections on Park Avenue. Lights at medians are redundant just like at mostly every intersection in Manhattan.

Their is no effect of a car completing its turn through a median on pedestrians who should not be crossing there anyway. There are no crosswalks between the medians.

0
Reply
Zulu
Zulu
7 years ago
Reply to  Woody

I just looked it up and unfortunately you are correct. If the median is less than 30 feet wide you can continue through the left turn. I say unfortunately because drivers tend to not yield to either oncoming traffic or pedestrians who at that point have the right of way.

0
Reply
Woody
Woody
7 years ago
Reply to  Zulu

Pedestrians have the right of way when the Walk signal is illuminated. Once it starts flashing Don’t Walk, pedestrians are not even supposed to step off the curb let alone start their crossing. That’s when the problem arises because cars miss the opportunity to turn if pedestrians don’t respect the laws that apply to them.

As to cars being allowed to cross the median, I wouldn’t have posted what I did had I not known for sure. I was told that by an officer from the 20th precinct. The median is irrelevant to cars turning. Cars turn all the time on 2-way streets without medians and the same issue of pedestrians having to cross on the other side exist. How else would you expect cars to ever turn?

0
Reply
Christina
Christina
7 years ago
Reply to  Woody

Most of the light signals have countdown signals now. So the flashing lights are becoming the thing of the past.

0
Reply
Cato
Cato
7 years ago
Reply to  Woody

“Lights at medians are redundant”.

Really?? The entire system of lights at every intersection along divided Broadway — how many miles is that? — is nothing but “redundant”.

You should bring a fraud action against the City for wasting taxpayer funds installing, maintaining and operating a miles-long system of “redundant” traffic controls. This isn’t a one-time spending waste; you’re talking about keeping up an entire system, always. Constantly. For years and years.

Or maybe stop a second and think: Maybe, just maybe, the City wouldn’t waste time, money and personnel long-term on a “redundant” system. So maybe, just maybe, the system *isn’t* redundant.

So maybe, just maybe, what everyone else is saying is right: Traffic is expected to stop at the red light when turning through a divided highway (street).

0
Reply
Woody
Woody
7 years ago
Reply to  Cato

By redundant, I mean that intersections have multiple sets of traffic lights. The position of each has no bearing on where vehicles stop. Just because it’s located on the median means nothing unless it’s posted that vehicles must stop there if the light is red. Otherwise it’s just like any left turn across traffic.

0
Reply
Mike
Mike
7 years ago
Reply to  Woody

I’m sorry, but you’re grossly mistaken. I’m not referring to pedestrians crossing between the medians, which is improper, but crossing WITH the light north or southbound at the appropriate N/S crosswalks of Broadway. The cars turning east or west are indeed required to enter the path of traffic in those directions and proceed ONLY with the light, as they otherwise directly endanger any pedestrians who have the light and right of way at the proper crosswalks along Broadway. This is one of the primary reasons a number of pedestrians have been struck and killed or injured in just the last year.

0
Reply
Zulu
Zulu
7 years ago
Reply to  Mike

Not just on Broadway, I believe that if the median is over 6′ wide all turning vehicles must stop and wait for the light to turn green.

0
Reply
D.R.
D.R.
7 years ago

The traffic lights at 65th Street and Columbus are too low.
When a large truck or a bus breaches the stop line ever so slightly, it is totally impossible to see the “walk/don’t walk” sign.
Dangerous

0
Reply
Elizabeth
Elizabeth
7 years ago

I don’t drive or bike in the city. If the city has bike lanes, they need to make them safe for pedestrians, old and young, in strollers, walking dogs, etc. Construction detours and street conditions are bad enough to make the bike lanes (that become also pedestrian paths) dangerous. But the bikers need to respect the law. No sidewalks, no riding uptown in the downtown lane, no speeding and no running lights and stop signs. And to be clear, these are not all food delivery people; by far the violators are not those guys. I think NYC should ticket bikers liberally for breaking those rules, just as they should drivers, and maybe even enforce jaywalking. No one class of New Yorker is above another. Riding a bike doesn’t automatically make you better than the rest of us. We are walking, running, driving, and using our crutches here too.

0
Reply
Richard
Richard
7 years ago
Reply to  Elizabeth

As one who regularly bikes all over the UWS – stopping for lights, signaling turns and NOT riding in the wrong direction – I couldn’t agree more.

Instead of ticketing cyclists running red lights in Central Park at 6am when no pedestrians are crossing (and no, I’m not one of those cyclists, either), how hard could it be to station a cop on ANY bike lane and simply arrest all the cyclists riding the wrong way (both delivery and non-delivery cyclists)? I mean, they’d be riding right towards you; no chasing necessary. Honestly, what could be easier?

0
Reply
elizabeth
elizabeth
7 years ago
Reply to  Richard

That would be what? A cop on every corner, on every avenue with a bike lane. I’d say that’s a pretty big deal.

0
Reply
Richard
Richard
7 years ago
Reply to  elizabeth

No. Instead of having a cop (or more usually cops) chasing down/ticketing cyclists who roll through a red light WHEN NO ONE IS COMING (the way pedestrians do when they cross against the light – I believe it’s called jaywalking), have just a single cop stand on the corner of, say, Columbus and 85th holding his ticket book. Every time a cyclist approaches heading north (the wrong way), simply stand in that cyclist’s path and issue a ticket. ONE COP to cover the entire Columbus Ave bike path from, say, 95th to 65th could ticket dozens of wrong-way cyclists every hour. One cop. Without having to take even a single step, let alone give chase, one cop could easily ticket dozens of wrong way cyclists every hour.

0
Reply
Woody
Woody
7 years ago
Reply to  Elizabeth

Among the three groups, pedestrians interfere with the other two groups (cyclists and vehicles) far more than the others with either each other or pedestrians.

All the focus on cyclists and vehicles as being the disruptive factors is ridiculous. Pedestrians have no regard for anyone else and will do whatever they want to get somewhere. Is it any wonder that drivers and cyclists get frustrated when they can’t make a turn when it’s their right-of-way?

It’s ironic that one of the poles in Lincoln Square at Broadway and 65th St (on the triangle) has a small sign that instructs pedestrians that they should not step off the crosswalk when the Don’t Walk signal is flashing.

0
Reply
D.R.
D.R.
7 years ago
Reply to  Elizabeth

As you probably read in “Morning Bulletin”, Councilwoman Helen Rosenthal filed a bill to require that delivery bicyclists be identifiable with the business that employs them. (Possibly, via a luminescent vest?)
But it seems to me that the businesses would ignore such a requirement rather than risk fines for employees’ violations.

0
Reply
Aunt Renie
Aunt Renie
7 years ago
Reply to  D.R.

Great idea…its only a start though.

ALSO, bikes should require a license at a nominal fee. A plate can be put on the bike so it can be identified in an accident by those probing street cameras that catch everything you do these days.

0
Reply
Zulu
Zulu
7 years ago
Reply to  Aunt Renie

The plate on the bikes have been tried before and has failed in every single city that has attempted it. The amount of work and money required for this to take place eclipses any of the perceived benefits. BTW bicyclist do get ticketed by NYPD as it is.

0
Reply
Elizabeth
Elizabeth
7 years ago
Reply to  D.R.

They are not the whole problem. They should be identifiable, but so should the other cyclists that disobey the law and endanger people in the street. I know you are probably just on this information, but it’s important not to put the whole burden on one class of rider. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve almost been hit by a non-delivery person riding in the wrong direction on the corner of 75th Street, sometimes making a turn east from the bike lane, which is also against the traffic on 75th Street. post a license on all of them, I say.

0
Reply
Christina
Christina
7 years ago
Reply to  Elizabeth

I know! Now the old adage “Look both ways before crossing the street” pertains to one way streets as well.

0
Reply
Zulu
Zulu
7 years ago
Reply to  Elizabeth

I can definitely get behind this sentiment.

0
Reply
Bibi
Bibi
7 years ago

I frankly hate the bike lanes. They made the street look more crowded and congested the traffic even more. I remember looking up Columbus Avenue and it was so beautiful and so wide – now with the bike lanes and the “floating parking” it looks horrible and the double parking and trucks unloading, you are lucky if you get ONE working lane!!! Not to mention, the bikers ARE STILL USING THE CAR LANES AND NOT THE BIKE LANE. I have sat there and just watched them. And when they do, they speed – I have more of a chance of getting run over by a biker than I do by a car!

0
Reply
lynn
lynn
7 years ago
Reply to  Bibi

I’m with you on this one. I’ve been hit by cyclists twice and both times they were adult males in racing gear (not delivery people) and they were NOT using the bike lane and were obviously too entitled to obey traffic lights. Both times the police told me there was nothing they could do unless I went to the hospital. The first time I was just knocked over, and the second time I was walking two dogs and sustained a permanent injury when I pulled them to safety. I’m confused by the poster who said that pedestrians “have no regard for anyone else and will do whatever they want to get somewhere.” What does that even mean? Are pedestrians aimlessly dashing through the intersections at 20 mph? If I’m standing on a corner and a cyclist runs into me I would say the cyclists are the problem. I would definitely like them to be licensed and identifiable.

0
Reply
lmr
lmr
7 years ago
Reply to  Bibi

Oh, I forgot that the road is there to look pretty as opposed to being used for transportation.

0
Reply
Woody
Woody
7 years ago
Reply to  Bibi

I’m a frequent cyclist and find the city’s approach to bike lanes deplorable. It’s very good at installing them but terrible at enforcing them so cyclists can use them safely. I, too, avoid the protected bike lanes many times since it’s impossible to navigate them with all the pedestrians, vehicles, and other objects blocking them.

0
Reply
Mike
Mike
7 years ago
Reply to  Bibi

You took the words out of my mouth. The bicyclists are not just a hazard for pedestrians, but for cars, too. I try to be mindful of bicyclists when driving, but they seem intent on zipping from lane to lane as if they are playing a video game. The bike lanes are useless if the people who they’re intended for ignore them. All they do is make the avenues narrower, create a hazard when cars are trying to park in the spots that have now impinged on a lane, and make it harder for pedestrians to see oncoming traffic from the corner.

0
Reply
D.R.
D.R.
7 years ago
Reply to  Bibi

Although sometimes the bicyclists are not to blame for avoiding the bike lane.
I noticed, last week, on 8th Avenue in the 50s, that the bike lane was replete with slippery road apples from NYPD horses.
Hazardous.

0
Reply
UWS neighbor
UWS neighbor
7 years ago

The UWS Community really needs to address the local BID who does nothing to assist long time business owners and make the area bicycle friendly. It’s time the President of the BID retired since she seems to not be engaged to what her neighbors like and just listens to her REBNY/real estate/chain store owners. Thus the area is simple very boring to shop now.

0
Reply
D.R.
D.R.
7 years ago

Two questions:
#1) I think that I skimmed a comment here about a month or so ago, stating that licensing bikers is not practicable. If not practicable, does anyone know why?

#2) When the bike lanes were planned, was it contemplated that they would serve as NYPD horse trails as well? (I’ve seen evidence of this both on Columbus and on 8th Avenue.)

0
Reply
Zulu
Zulu
7 years ago
Reply to  D.R.

A licensing plan would not have a positive cost/benefit analysis.
Here are my $.02:
-It would require new plate sizes since current vehicular plates would be too large an potentially hazardous in the event of crash (sharp edges).
-Smaller plates would not be as visible as current vehicular ones.
-DMV would have to hire additional people to handle the work load. Perhaps new computer system?
-The fees for registering a bicycle would have to substantially lower than a motorized vehicle given the weight and road usage, perhaps not offsetting the cost of issuing such licenses.
-It would discourage people from bicycling given the additional layer of bureaucracy (have you been to a DMV office lately?)
-Would not necessarily keep bad behavior from occurring.
-Difficult to match a license plate to a bicycle make or brand since there are lots of ratty bikes out there with no paint or discernible features.

As far as bike lanes being used for official use like mounted police, emergency vehicles (ambulances or fire trucks) during a call or so, I’m all for it. I will gladly step on a sidewalk and let an ambulance go by. In fact I would feel happy to know that the ambulance has a means to get around a traffic jam by means of a bike lane.

0
Reply
D.R.
D.R.
7 years ago
Reply to  Zulu

Thank you so much for your time in replying so comprehensively, Zulu.

Perhaps you can copy and save your comments about the licensing, and paste them *each time* that the licensing suggestion comes up — including, right now, into the current “Citibike” story.

I am totally, totally respectful of any emergency operations.

0
Reply
DMH
DMH
7 years ago

So happy for these long-awaited changes. Thanks, DOT!

I wonder if serious consideration is given to opening Central Park West southbound to Columbus Circle. At least a southbound bike lane? It seems like a shame the street is closed, but I don’t know the whole backstory.

0
Reply
nycissues.org
nycissues.org
7 years ago
Reply to  DMH

CPW needs to have a protected north bound lane to compliment the south bounds in Central Park and Columbus Avenue. It could then continue up Frederick Douglass Boulevard passing near all of the parks uptown.

0
Reply
Steve
Steve
7 years ago
Reply to  DMH

Most European cities have SAFE and SEPARATED Bicycle Lanes.

Many with sophistated well-designed barrier posts lining the bike routes or other sensible architecturally applied methods.

With clear communication displayed on smart, uncluttered and easy-to-understand attractive graphic signage.

The surface of a BIKE route is generally green – which clearly indicates a recognizable designated bike lane usage to any crossing pedestrians.

I suggest bike lanes along our major north-south arteries like Broadway and east-west routes like 81 Street by REMOVING ONE PARKED CAR LANE from our congested and noisy thoroughfares! This will allow the proper space for a sensible bike lane. With a green surface and smart graphic signage: Less parked cars = less congestion and less street noise!

Our political leaders must consider smarter urban infrastructure bicycle lane planning – resulting in an environmentally friendly, healthier and safer quality of life.

0
Reply

YOU MIGHT LIKE...

Reports, Resources, and a Photographic Record of NYC’s Record Pollution: Send Your Photos!
NEWS

Reports, Resources, and a Photographic Record of NYC’s Record Pollution: Send Your Photos!

June 7, 2023 | 9:06 PM
Openings and Closings: Broadway Restaurant; Sherry Herring; Spark; PingPod; Sales & Design Gallery
COLUMNS

Openings and Closings: Broadway Restaurant; Sherry Herring; Spark; PingPod; Sales & Design Gallery

June 7, 2023 | 9:43 AM
Previous Post

POLICE SAY THEY KNOW IDENTITY OF CITY DINER SHOOTER, BUT HE’S ‘ON THE LAM’

Next Post

MORNING BULLETIN: A NOTORIOUS TOWNHOUSE AND A TREMENDOUS WATERFIGHT

this week's events image

Explore Your Favorite Subject

20th precinct 24th precinct american museum of natural history animals art bicycling bulletin central park closings columns community board 7 coronavirus crash crime dogs events fdny fire food gale brewer helen rosenthal history homelessness jcc lincoln center monday bulletin morning bulletin nypd openings openings and closings pedestrian safety photography photos politics public schools pupper west side real estate restaurants riverside park silver stars fitness snow sponsored subway upper west side uws

CITY NEWS

The City
Brick Underground
City Limits
Eater
Gothamist
NY Daily News
NY Post
NY Times

LOCAL RESOURCES

Bloomingdale Neighborhood History Group
Central Park Conservancy
CB7
Community Education Council 3
Assembly District 67
The New York Historical Society
Riverside Park
West End Preservation

UWS Blogs

Bloomingdale History Central Park Blogger
North River Notes

Next Post
MORNING BULLETIN: A NOTORIOUS TOWNHOUSE AND A TREMENDOUS WATERFIGHT

MORNING BULLETIN: A NOTORIOUS TOWNHOUSE AND A TREMENDOUS WATERFIGHT

THIEVES SAW CATALYTIC CONVERTER OFF OF CAR ON RIVERSIDE DRIVE

THIEVES SAW CATALYTIC CONVERTER OFF OF CAR ON RIVERSIDE DRIVE

FINALLY, UPPER WEST SIDERS CAN KNOW THE TIME AND TEMPERATURE

FINALLY, UPPER WEST SIDERS CAN KNOW THE TIME AND TEMPERATURE

  • ABOUT US
  • CONTACT US
  • NEWSLETTER
  • WSR MERCH!
  • ADVERTISE
  • EVENTS
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • SITE MAP
Site design by RLDGROUP

© 2023 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • TOP NEWS
  • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART & CULTURE
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT US
  • WSR SHOP

© 2023 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.