
By Gus Saltonstall
The most common word used to describe the candidate field in the race to succeed longtime Democratic Rep. Jerrold Nadler in New York’s 12th Congressional District is “crowded.”
For good reason, too.
There are currently 12 Democratic candidates in the running to represent the district that includes the Upper West Side and Upper East Side. There are also six Republican candidates and three Independents. In the lead-up to the primary for the race on June 23, West Side Rag will profile as many of these candidates as we can.
Our first interview is with Nina Schwalbe, who is a first-time candidate for political office, a public health expert, and an Upper West Sider.
Schwalbe is the president and founder of the global think tank Spark Street Advisors and a senior scholar at Georgetown University’s Center for Global Health Policy & Politics. In recent years, she led a $7 billion program under the Biden Administration that distributed 500 million COVID-19 vaccines around the world.
The Rag interviewed Schwalbe this week about the race, her background, and her positions on housing, immigration, safety, and other issues.
The interview has been edited lightly for clarity.
WSR: Hi Nina, let’s start here. This is your first time running for political office, why was this the right moment and right race to do so?
Schwalbe: There’s no time to waste in changing what’s happening in Washington D.C. I’m a public health expert and advocate, and on Day 1, this current administration destroyed public health, both at home and abroad. Nobody in Congress was standing up for it. We don’t have any congressional expertise in public health, so, I thought I could sit around and complain, or I could run.
I’ve run a large federal program. The COVID-19 Biden Administration program, which was a $7 billion program that distributed 500 million vaccines around the world. It was a program where we worked closely with Congress, the White House, and the National Security Council. My whole life I’ve worked with the government, so I’ve got a good sense on how it works.
Along with the public health expertise, I’ve spent a lot of my career working in foreign policy and overseas, so those are two fields that I thought we were failing at, and I thought I could lend some elbow grease.
WSR: Could you speak a little more about how your background in public health sets you up to succeed in Congress?
Schwalbe: Public health is a basic function of government. Keeping us safe. Keeping us healthy. It’s a major driver of our economy. The fact that we have no Democrats in Congress with that expertise is shocking because they’re the ones who review and approve budgets for the public health system. We can’t be healthy as a democracy unless we’re healthy as a people. When public health is working, nobody notices, but when it’s not working, everybody notices. It’s one of the backbone functions that government provides.
WSR: And then, what would you say to a voter who might be wary of your lack of experience in political office?
Schwalbe: I don’t know when in this country we got to the place where career politics was a career. The fact that we have people running who have been in Albany, or who have been in city government is great, but I don’t know if that prepares you to discuss Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Somalia, pandemic treaties, or all the other things that Congress decides on.
The other thing I would say to that is that I think that’s a question women get and that men don’t. I mean look at our current president. Men don’t seem to be asked that question in the same way that women do.
WSR: How would you look to balance the work that you have in Washington D.C. with making sure that you still show up in the NY-12 District to help residents with more local issues?
Schwalbe: One of the things I’m obsessed with is transparency and accountability. On the local level, I’m surprised that our current representative has a constituent office that is not actually in the current district. [Rep. Jerrold Nadler’s office is at 201 Varick Street, which was within his former district before the congressional district maps were redrawn in 2022]. We should have at least three offices in the district and we should have mobile offices, so we can reach people where they are.
The other thing we need is accountability. When you write a complaint or go into your local congressmember’s office, that should be logged in a public place and I should have accountability, and will have accountability, on whether or not your issue is resolved, how it is resolved, and the time it took to resolve it. That log will also serve as a public resource for other people that have questions. I want to move resources from Washington D.C. to the district for better and more accessible constituency services, and a stronger recording system.
Schwalbe cross-country skied to West Side Rag’s offices on Monday for the candidate interview.

WSR: If elected, you would be put side to side with the Trump Administration. What would your mindset be in terms of interacting with the current president’s team and office?
Schwalbe: He’s a bad man. He’s destroyed our public health policy. We have to impeach RFK [Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.]. And we have to hold Trump accountable. On Day 1, I’m not going to wear a tie and jacket to get sworn in, instead my T-shirt will say, “Impeach RFK.”
We have to hold Trump accountable for his illegal activities. First and foremost, his administration not spending the funding that’s been allocated to him by Congress. He plays an amazingly clever whac-a-mole strategy where you chase after this, you chase after that, and it makes it so there’s so much that he’s done that’s goes unnoticed. One of those things is withdrawing from parts of the United Nations, but he’s not allowed to do that, and someone in Congress has to sue him for it. So many of the organizations that I work with have money allocated and appropriated by Congress but they’re not getting the check.
WSR: Do you have a first bill you would look to sponsor?
Schwalbe: What I would start by doing is not introduce my own bill, but to dig down and look at all of the bills that are already put forward. There already is an impeach RFK bill, for example. There are good bills on the table, and I would start by supporting them and looking to build coalitions. One of them is related to primary healthcare. One of the ways we keep people out of the hospital and drive up affordability is by lowering the cost of healthcare. There are two great bills in Congress already looking to do that.
One is to expand pricing negotiation with pharmaceutical companies. To expand the Inflation Reduction Act. To expand the number of drugs covered by insurance. Also, to put conditionalities. The American people pay about $50 billion a year to invest in drug development, yet we pay the highest rates in the world for those drugs when they come out. There is legislation proposed already to put conditionalities on that. So, if the drugs are developed, made and paid for by the American people, we shouldn’t then pay the top prices. All to say, there is a lot of good pending legislation in there already, and we’ve got to pump it up.
WSR: Immigration continues to be a major talking point politically throughout the country. What would you do on the immigration front if elected to Congress?
Schwalbe: First and foremost: Abolish ICE. I’ve worked in government, at nonprofits, and the United Nations, and in all those places, when you have a division that’s not working, you have to close it. That’s normal practice. Dysfunctional divisions get closed. The Department of Homeland Security has way too much money, and that’s being directly taken away from programs that affect us here. Everything from transit projects, to SNAP, to Medicaid and Medicare.
On immigration we need better pathways to immigration. We need enough judges, social services, and we need to speed up the pathway, so people are not lost in a bureaucratic morass. There’s a lot we can do to make it a more humane process, more transparent, and more fair.
WSR: At the city level, housing and the price of housing continues to be a central topic. How would you look to improve the housing situation in the district?
Schwalbe: Housing is a public good. It’s not a market commodity, and we have to treat it in that mindset. We have NYCHA funding, we have Section 8 and Section 9 funding that we are not accessing because the federal government is not releasing it. We need these programs, which Congress appropriated, to be fully funded. And then we need that citizen accountability and scorecard system that the residents of that housing are getting value for that money and those services. The other part in need of urgent action is the health concerns within public housing. There’s no reason that people who live in public housing should have higher rates of asthma than the rest of the city. These are documented complaints that need to be addressed.
WSR: “Safety” is also listed on your website as a central tenet of your campaign. What does safety mean to you as someone running for Congress?
Schwalbe: Well first, I’m going to talk about E-bikes, which is my latest obsession. On my way to a Democratic West Side forum the other night, I got hit by one. I got clocked. We need to regulate those things as Class 2 or Class 3 motor vehicles. They’re currently classified under consumer protections and that’s not where they should be.
What I mean by safety more broadly is that safety is part of health. It means knowing you’ve not going to be picked up by ICE. It means mental health. It means knowing that you’re going to get to work on time and you’re not going to lose your job, and that means faster subways. It means that if you’re without a home, you’ve got a place to go. It means that if you’re using drugs, you can get clean needles. That’s what I mean by safety.
WSR: You currently live on the Upper West Side. How long have you lived in the neighborhood over the course of your life?
Schwalbe: Around 20 years.
WSR: And any favorite local spots?
Schwalbe: I’m still mourning H&H. I have a deep, deep mourning for the loss of H&H. My favorite thing to do in New York is just walk up and down Broadway. I love it all. I love the park. I love Sheep’s Meadow. I’ve always loved running around the Central Park Reservoir. So much of the neighborhood has changed since I grew up. The magic of walking down any side street with trees and brownstones. I love the Upper West Side. The people on the Upper West Side are different. They’ll tell you your business. And I like that.
WSR: To end with. It’s almost a running joke in terms of the number of Democratic candidates in the NY-12 race. How would you say you stand out from the large field?
Schwalbe: I’m not a politician. But neither are some of the other candidates. I’ve lived my life delivering services funded by the government for people. That’s been my lifework. Time is now to get those people who know how to get stuff done into Congress. To make sure our dollars get stuff done. It’s about making sure the government delivers the services that we need. I’ve run billion dollar programs. I’ve delivered millions of vaccines around the world.
This district doesn’t need to do the whole, “We just need to beat MAGA.” We are one of the most educated and one of the wealthiest districts in the United States of America and I don’t think we need to feel shame about that. We don’t need to put forward another candidate who is middle of the road. We can put forward a candidate who is a progressive Democrat that can change the way Washington works.
And let me add, the crowded race is a good thing. Your candidate is not being chosen for you. You can learn about more than 10 different candidates who are very different, share some similarities, and choose the person who you think will be your best representative in Congress. This is about having someone who represents us in Congress. Let’s take that liberty and vote for that person who we think will best do this job.
WSR: And if someone asked why that candidate is you?
Schwalbe: I am a public health expert who has delivered programs around the world to make it more affordable and more equitable. I get stuff done. I have no political ties. I’m not beholden to anyone. And I’m going to get stuff done for the Upper West Side and District 12.
You can learn more about Schwalbe’s campaign — HERE.
Subscribe to West Side Rag’s FREE email newsletter here. And you can Support the Rag here.






May I suggest asking each candidate if they agree with Trump on any issue? I get the appeal of being anti-Trump, but can these candidates find any common ground anywhere? Can they work across the aisle? Can they think independently?
I trust you also “get” the “appeal” of being, say, anti-cancer.
I love Nina who’s deeply thoughtful and strategic and would urge my neighbors to really get to know her platform. And GiveMeCake, this is precisely why Im running for NY-12 as an Independent. So, if youre looking for an Independent candidate, no corporate PAC or Super PAC money, and who has a record of working across divisions on critical issues like tech and public safety, consider checking out my platform: https://www.wilneidany12.com/
It’s hard to find common ground with someone who constantly violates the Constitution and the law, lies with every breath, switches his positions on the drop of a dime and then switches back again, alienates our allies, sucks up to dictators, green lights war crimes (and outright murders), is instituting huge concentration camps here as well as sending people who’ve committed no crimes to foreign torture gulags, has raped women and underage girls, and whose policies are incalculably cruel to the most vulnerable among among us.
Any candidate I vote for will be looking to oppose Trump right down the line and will vow to impeach him.
Yes, he’s a revolting person. But does he ever take a position with which you agree?
Yes: back in 2011 he said, “Our president will start a war with Iran because he has absolutely no ability to negotiate. He’s weak, and he’s ineffective.”
I agree!
Dear GiveMeCake: what if I agree with Trump on some of his positions and goals, but completely disagree with the way he’s implementing them? Execution is everything. Getting things done the right way is part of the goal setting process.
Thank you – this is exactly how I feel. I don’t like Trump as a person, but I agree with some things he is trying to accomplish such as closing the borders until we can take care of our own people. I need to hear more from Dems as far as what their plan is rather than “TRUMP bad!” all the time. The fact that not one Dem stood up when Trump asked people to stand if they agreed that US citizens should come before illegals is outrageous…..
Stopping minting new pennies is a great call and long overdue, I will give him credit for that.
Antinumismatist!
Pennies had to go. But the one reason that might have motivated Trump was Elon Musk, someone on Twitter suggested that the San Francisco Mint be closed and be redeveloped because it makes coins for collectors and Musk liked the idea and had DOGE visit the facility. They want to end pennies for circulation so that they can close the San Francisco Mint, a mint that coin collectors will pay a premium to buy coins from, for redevelopment. Has more to do with YIMBY than common sense.
Ummm, this is the “other side”. The DSA, a group to which Mamdani proudly belongs. Are you sure you want these people as your “allies”?
https://www.city-journal.org/article/democratic-socialists-of-america-national-political-committee-maoist?utm_source=virtuous&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=cjdaily&vcrmeid=HNxsD54qukepMNNWMCSASA&vcrmiid=vggP4PrVeU2LpeB35rM6kw
Agreed, the “I will wear a shirt saying ‘impeach RFK’ is a posture, not a policy”
What about Mark Gorton’s relationship with RFK Jr.? No one has anything to say about that!
These people are so tiresome
“Indifference to Injustice is the Gate to Hell.”
Bon voyage!
Who? The Self-righteous politicians? The condescending academics? The whiny Never-Trumpers? The delusional “community leaders?” All of the above?
Hopefully she’s not as clownish as Trump made her fellow Dems look last night: https://nypost.com/2026/02/25/opinion/trump-rightly-pushes-democrats-to-show-voters-their-weird-extremism/
Though I have my doubts…..
This interview left me really frustrated.
That’s exactly the mentality that sparked the backlash that gave us Trump.
“We just need to beat MAGA. We are one of the most educated and wealthiest districts in the United States of America, and I don’t think we need to feel shame about that.”
What is that supposed to be? Another “basket of deplorables” moment, just aimed at anyone outside the UWS?
She claims to care about justice and safety, but seems to look down on the very people she says she’s fighting for.
Her RFK T‑shirt comment almost made me choke with laughter. A T‑shirt? That’s the big brave stand? I agree RFK is a joke and should be impeached, but the way she talks about it is just juvenile.
And “no middle‑of‑the‑road” position – really? A lot of us moderate Democrats have distanced ourselves from the party for exactly that reason. Her “abolish ICE” line is pure populism. It’s the same energy as “defund the police” after George Floyd; instead of fixing what’s broken, making sure ICE follows the law and doesn’t target or harm innocent people, the answer is just to get rid of it entirely?
Meanwhile, how does she like the “better quality of life” now that criminal and freeloading migrants aren’t tearing around on scooters, riding on sidewalks, and snatching phones and necklaces?
It isn’t serious policymaking. It’s performance politics.
Totally agree with you!
Agree. We have enough activists and fundraisers in Washington. We need electeds who know how to write good legislation and get laws passed. Not wear tshirts (or buttons) to call attention for Instagram reels. Hard pass for me but I do applaud her desire to enter the race.
Dress-code issues aside, I doubt wearing a t-shirt and serving in Congress are mutually exclusive. After all, they let certain representatives carry guns in there.
Either you clearly state your argument or don’t say anything. Your deflection and snickering is unnecessary.
She sounds great. Smart, knowledgeable, progressive, energetic. Compare to Jack Schlossberg, who has no relevant qualifications (“I’m a Kennedy” doesn’t count) but who got Nancy Pelosi’s endorsement.
Do most voters care about experience any longer? Doesn’t seem like it.
Oh please. The TDS is absurd. Being obsessed with hating Trump isnt a policy. We dont all hate him. I voted for him and I’m glad I did! Border is secure. English is our official language. My niece doesn’t have to worry about boys on her sports teams. The Israeli hostages are home. Venture out of this deep blue bubble and you’ll find lots of folks who agree with me
So true and none of this would have happened if Harris got in.
Please slowly step away from the Fox Propaganda Network. You have been brainwashed. You will be OK. Trump has told you to worry about non-issues that have no impact on your daily life. He has created drama where barely none existed. Please use critical thinking skills. You succeeded in dropping more Trump talking points in one paragraph than I thought were possible.
Agree, hating Trump is not a policy position.
His policies are bad enough on the merits (e.g. the ridiculous and arbitrary tariffs, the massively corrupt pardons, gutting of the EPA and consumer financial protection bureau and putting partisan hacks running the DoD, DoJ and FBI to name just a few) & candidates should make that case instead of these empty gestures
Liberals and progressives have to do more than resist Trump. Seems like that is all they want to do. Then they come to more competitive districts asking people for their vote as if they really care about their vote.
Maybe those cited bad policies explain the animosity, eh? I rather doubt such candidates will fail to make their case detailed and explicit during their campaigns.
Dudei s happy he voted for a convicted felon, insurrectionist, adjudicated sexual assaulter, adjudicated fraudster, credibly accused pedophile.
But since you love his policy’s lets discuss policy, His policies led to the cold blooded murder of two American citizens with zero accountability, Illegal tariffs which you are paying for to line his pockets, “detention centers” that illegally bar our elected representatives from inspecting and no one knows what’s happening inside. Federal agents in masks forcing people to produce papers in the street and illegally entering homes and businesses without warrants.
Starting a war with Iran when they are no threat to us,
Ukraine still fighting for its life day 400 after saying he’ll end on day one
Threatening to invade Greenland
Destroying our relationship with Canada
Destroying our relationships with Europe
Taking a plane as a bribe from Qatar and then allowing them to build an airbase on American soil
Im just getting started but I actually have a life .
You could have just saved time by saying I love fascism and pedophiles
Oh and btw English is not the official language and we always allowed to say Merry Christmas
Oh and your niece hates you.
This is my issue with the left. Talk about tolerance and inclusion and diversity but spew hate at those who disagree with you. You sound pretty mean. My niece adores me. And actually not all who voted for Trump are “dudes,” I’m a woman
There are a lot of people on the left who are only as inclusive as long as they can made to believe that others who are different than them are beneath them. They are tolerant of people as long as they know their place on the totem pole.
Agree.
Awaiting the onslaught 3,2,1.
Sounds like Nina would do a great job representing the UWS and would be highly effective in Congress. It’s tough to run against people with name recognition and political relationships. I hope that as the field narrows, she emerges as one of the top few – if she gets serious consideration, she’ll come out on top.
Will the Republican Party have a viable candidate?
If by viable you mean capable of surviving outside the uterus, probably; if instead you mean credible, almost certainly not.
For each candidate The Rag interviews, I’d like to hear about foreign policy. In particular, their position on Israel. Unfortunately, this has become the most important issue for me. If you’re against the Jews having our own nation-state, or if you endorse someone with that ideology, you are not getting my vote. I’m sure many of my fellow Democrats (and even some fellow Jews, much to my chagrin) will disagree with this litmus test. But, I am certain, based on numerous, recent, high quality polls that this is also a salient issue for a substantial number of the voters in this district, on both sides. Don’t skirt this issue, WSR! 🙂
I was the candidate who supported Israel as a Jewish state. I was the candidate who plainly stated I could not vote for Mamdani for mayor because he does not. (Check the record of the other candidates on both.) I was aggressively heckled at the candidate debate at Bank Street earlier this month when I stated my heartfelt views on Israel. But because of party machinery, and political dynasty and celebrity, I was outspent before the March filing deadline. The fact that each of these 12 candidates is expected to raise between 1-2 million dollars is, frankly, disgusting. It was also why I was running. To call out the money that is killing our politics. But. now I’m not. I dropped out this week.
I’m sorry to hear that. Based on my limited research you seemed like a great candidate who would speak for the many moderate Democrats on the UWS who believe in core Democrat values and despise Trump but also have some level of pragmatism. Which remaining candidate do you prefer?
While you have other candidates like Laura Dunn who raised $55,000 and have much less than that on hand as of the end of December who are still in the race! She is not dropping out either!
“Abolish ICE” a slogan this woman promotes is just as deadly for the dems as “Defund the Police” was. Will dems ever learn to present their plans in a non-threatening way?
As long as what’s being threatened is fascism, I sincerely hope not!
Yes. It’s not as catchy but something like “Make ICE accountable” or “Make them follow the same rules that our beloved police officers must follow” (showing respect for police) or “Don’t let them violate your civil rights.” Don’t throw out the baby with the bath water. ICE has been awful. But no ICE at all is a bad idea. Our immigration situation is problematic. We can’t just ignore it. That has been the Democrats problem for years. Trump’s solutions have been horrible and extremist. But you can’t just say the status quo is OK. That is why Trump won.
What an extraordinary woman.!
I agree with Nina that pharmaceutical companies are spending way too much money on drug development – over $50 billion annually as she accurately notes. As a result, they need to charge huge costs to patients to offset these research costs. This is why I support the plan to outlaw private drug development and make ownership of drug-related IP a collective asset that is administered by experts such as Nina Schwalbe. This will lower healthcare costs and avoid wasteful spending by profiteering drug companies looking for the next “blockbuster drug” to line their pockets with. We can do better and Nina knows how to do it.. STOP BIG PHARMA NOW!!!.
My love! You had me at “clean needles”!
The article quotes Schwalbe saying”this district ***doesn’t*** need to do the whole, “We just need to beat MAGA.”
And ICE has lost all credibility: build a legal responsible entity to take its place.
When asked about public safety, she starts ranting about ICE and waxing about making sure we get addicts clean needles. These people have made it impossible to parody them, I’ll give them that.