West Side Rag
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART & CULTURE
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • ABOUT US
    • OUR STORY
    • CONTRIBUTORS
    • CONTACT
West Side Rag
No Result
View All Result
SUPPORT THE RAG

Search the site

No Result
View All Result
Get WSR FREE in your inbox
SUPPORT THE RAG

Multiple People Hospitalized After NYPD Car Swerves Into UWS Outdoor Dining Setup: Police

May 27, 2025 | 11:00 AM
in NEWS
107
The scene after a police car swerved into outdoor dining Monday on the UWS. Photo Credit: Erika Heise.

By Gus Saltonstall

Multiple people were hospitalized, including two restaurant patrons, after a police car swerved into an Upper West Side outdoor dining setup on Monday, in an attempt to avoid colliding with another car, a police spokesperson told West Side Rag on Tuesday morning.

An NYPD patrol car was driving northbound around 4:10 p.m. on Broadway near 112th Street with its lights and sirens on, when it swerved to avoid a yellow taxi that was traveling south on Broadway and had attempted to make a left turn to go east on 112th Street, according to police.

The patrol car swerved to avoid the taxi and struck a 70-year-old woman and 63-year-old man seated within an outdoor dining area on the block, according to police. While NYPD did not confirm which restaurant the outdoor seating was connected to, the photo sent to the Rag by an eyewitness shows that it appears to have been Tom’s Restaurant.

The two patrons, along with three NYPD officers and a civilian in the patrol car, were all taken to Mount Sinai Morningside in stable condition with minor injuries, police said.

The 37-year-old taxi driver was given a summons for failure to yield to oncoming traffic, police said.

The investigation remains ongoing.

Subscribe to West Side Rag’s FREE email newsletter here. And you can Support the Rag here.

Share this article:
SUPPORT THE RAG
guest

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

107 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
uwser
uwser
16 days ago

Honestly surprised this doesn’t happen more often

33
Reply
UWS Resident
UWS Resident
15 days ago
Reply to  uwser

Exactly! Our roads were not built for tables and chairs! The pandemic is over! Hospitality taking advantage of what was a 4 year free gift. The novelty has worn off. Safety comes first!

14
Reply
A. L. Z.
A. L. Z.
15 days ago
Reply to  UWS Resident

The tables and chairs at Tom’s are on the sidewalk next to the building, not in the street or even on the street side of the sidewalk.

0
Reply
UWS Dad
UWS Dad
15 days ago
Reply to  UWS Resident

Our roads were built for pedestrians prior to the invention of cars and they’ve been taken over by drivers. If safety came first we’d have much narrower lanes and give more space back to pedestrians.

23
Reply
Jerome
Jerome
15 days ago
Reply to  UWS Dad

Do you still go places with a horse and buggy?

0
Reply
Ira
Ira
10 days ago
Reply to  Jerome

There’s transportation devices run by the MTA and Amtrak and for short distances there’s something called legs. There even happens to be a subway under Broadway.

2
Reply
Jerome
Jerome
15 days ago
Reply to  UWS Dad

yawn… you guys already have what we call a sidewalk. and guess what, even on both sides of the streets! Lucky you!

0
Reply
Alvaro Mendez-Stagnaro
Alvaro Mendez-Stagnaro
15 days ago
Reply to  UWS Resident

Outdoor dining has been here way before the pandemic. What the hell are you talking about?

27
Reply
Ronnie
Ronnie
15 days ago
Reply to  Alvaro Mendez-Stagnaro

Not on the streets. Outdoor dining was confined to the sidewalks before the pandemic, which is where it should return.

0
Reply
Peter
Peter
16 days ago

A “pedestrian” is in the patrol car? In the capacity of a … pedestrian?

1
Reply
Ian Alterman
Ian Alterman
15 days ago
Reply to  Peter

ANY civilian can do an NYPD “ride-along.” You need to contact the Community Affairs office of your local precinct and apply for it. I have done them twice. They are quite informative and interesting. If the car is called to an actual crime scene, they leave you at a safe corner and move on. If they can get you back to the precinct first, they try to do so.

0
Reply
caly
caly
16 days ago
Reply to  Peter

Unless I missed the edit, but it shows ‘civilian.’

2
Reply
Peter
Peter
16 days ago
Reply to  caly

You didn’t miss it – it was corrected.

2
Reply
dannyb
dannyb
16 days ago

Sorry, but the operator of the police car should have been able to, and chosen to, stop rather then divert into pedestrians.

35
Reply
ILikeYou
ILikeYou
16 days ago
Reply to  dannyb

dannyb, it’s fortuitous that you were there and can give us first-hand information on what the police officer did wrong.
Thank you for reporting this back to us.

24
Reply
OPOE
OPOE
16 days ago
Reply to  dannyb

Cue the defund Police Car movement.

Maybe they were on an emergency call ?

We are not getting the whole story.

Last edited 16 days ago by OPOE
15
Reply
deegee
deegee
15 days ago
Reply to  OPOE

you must be new to the city.

0
Reply
OPOD
OPOD
16 days ago
Reply to  OPOE

Foot posts Citywide.

6
Reply
deegee
deegee
16 days ago
Reply to  dannyb

he had a choice between hitting a car and hitting other peds, seems like the other car was more important.

21
Reply
ILikeYou
ILikeYou
16 days ago
Reply to  deegee

Amazing. Another first hand report! Were you with dannyb?
Thank you for your eyewitness information.

19
Reply
Josh
Josh
16 days ago
Reply to  deegee

When you are driving, you don’t usually have the ability to register the full surroundings and decide between a collision with another vehicle and other objects/people, especially when there is a good bit of distance between those objects and the road. The cab driver was required to yield to the police twofold- 1) because a left turning driver must always yield to oncoming drivers going straight and 2) a driver must always yield to an emergency vehicle with its emergency lights activated.

And Danny, the operator of a vehicle does not always have the ability to come to a full stop when another driver/pedestrian does something unexpected (by a reasonable person doing the same thing) or illegal. For example, if a car is five feet from the crosswalk as it is exiting the intersection with the right-of-way and within the legal speed limit, and a pedestrian steps out into the crosswalk against the light into the oncoming path of the car, the driver could not possibly have expected the pedestrian to do something so stupid and be able to stop the car. Brakes only work so well that the only way to guarantee being able to stop in time no matter what anyone does is to not be moving in the first place.

23
Reply
deegee
deegee
15 days ago
Reply to  Josh

if you can’t make that distinction, you should not be driving.

2
Reply
Sal Bando
Sal Bando
16 days ago
Reply to  Josh

None of that garbage makes it OK to swerve onto the sidewalk.

26
Reply
Joey
Joey
16 days ago
Reply to  Sal Bando

Sal do you really think the officer intentionally swerved onto the sidewalk?

13
Reply
Sal Bando
Sal Bando
15 days ago
Reply to  Joey

Yes absolutely. When faced with the prospect of being injured in a crash he chose to save himself from the risk of being harmed.

9
Reply
danny_b_is_right
danny_b_is_right
16 days ago
Reply to  Josh

cops drive recklessly literally all the time, it’s like their favorite thing to do after candy crush (and i’m sure there is a non-trivial contingent of cops whose favorite thing to do is to drive well above the speed limit while playing candy crush)

sorry but unless some strong evidence comes out that the cops were going at a safe rate (lol would not put money on that) dannyb is 100% correct. insane to give the cops the benefit of the doubt here

36
Reply
Louise
Louise
16 days ago
Reply to  danny_b_is_right

Why so disrespectful to the police? Also, please remember you are sharing your opinion, which is different from fact.

17
Reply
danny_b_is_right
danny_b_is_right
16 days ago
Reply to  Louise

we’re all sharing opinions, louise.

the taxi driver probably shouldn’t have made that turn, but he also wasn’t the one who plowed into a 70-year-old and a 63-year-old on the sidewalk

the question is: do you think it is more likely than not that the cops were justified to be traveling at a clearly unsafe speed, and the answer is overwhelmingly “no”. nypd stats back this up – one in every four high-speed chases results in a collision, property damage, harm, or death. this is so clearly a problem that they had to publicly issue a new policy around these sorts of high-speed chases because they’re dangerous and often transparently not justified

so again – until we hear more evidence that they absolutely needed to be traveling at speeds both (1) unsafe to the officers themselves and (2) unsafe to the completely innocent people on the sidewalk they are supposedly protecting — until this evidence comes out, they don’t get the benefit of the doubt here. simple as that

26
Reply
GiveMeCake
GiveMeCake
16 days ago
Reply to  danny_b_is_right

Actually, they do get the benefit of the doubt. Our entire legal system is built on presumed innocence.

7
Reply
Frustrated UWS
Frustrated UWS
16 days ago
Reply to  danny_b_is_right

Really, Candy Crush? Just so disrespectful. If you need urgent help from an officer one day, let’s see how you feel.

Last edited 16 days ago by Frustrated UWS
12
Reply
deegee
deegee
15 days ago
Reply to  Frustrated UWS

not once ever in my 50 years have the police been helpful. they have lied in court, and lied to write summones, but not ever once helped when i asked for some.

5
Reply
Hasbara
Hasbara
16 days ago
Reply to  Frustrated UWS

look over their shoulders at their phones. you’ll be surprised what you see

4
Reply
Davids
Davids
16 days ago
Reply to  danny_b_is_right

I concur. Decades ago, I was a passenger in a car that had a collision with a police car. The police car (without lights/siren) went into the opposing lane to bypass traffic stopped at a light, and sideswiped us when they tried to cut back into the correct lane. The officers in the car started making up a story about how it was our fault. The only reason they didn’t get away with it was that the third person in our car was an NYPD sergeant who made sure that the report was written up to reflect what actually happened. If not for that, my friend who was driving would have shouldered the blame for an accident he didn’t cause.

33
Reply
Anon
Anon
16 days ago
Reply to  Davids

I’m sorry that happened to you and your friend. In the case we are discussing the police car had lights and sirens on and the cab thought he could get in a quick left turn in front of it. That was a crazy stupid move to make.

10
Reply
Good Humor
Good Humor
16 days ago
Reply to  danny_b_is_right

I see. Guilty until proven innocent.

14
Reply
Good Humor
Good Humor
16 days ago
Reply to  dannyb

what on earth? have you ever driven?

9
Reply
dannyb
dannyb
16 days ago
Reply to  Good Humor

not clear if you’re responding to me or the other poster, but yes, I have. In fact, I’ve operated emergency vehicles with, yes, lights and sirens and going through red lights, etc.
“Stopping” quickly is almost always an option. And with today’s “anti lock brakes” (we didn’t have them), something to be ready for anytime you’re driving.

13
Reply
Brandon
Brandon
16 days ago
Reply to  dannyb

Have you ever taken a physics class? We don’t know the specifics here of how fast the cop was gping or how close the car was when it made it’s left. But we do know that the laws of physics come into play (anti lock breaks or not) and a car cannot always stop in time to avoid a collision.

You seem to be suggesting that not only didn’t the cop try to stop to avoid the cab but that he swerved, heading towards the dining shed, and again chose not to stop but to plow into diners. Is that your take on this?

12
Reply
Hasbara
Hasbara
16 days ago
Reply to  Brandon

Lick the boot a bit more

4
Reply
Jay
Jay
16 days ago
Reply to  Good Humor

The cop should have been altert to the guy driving the cab who wanted to turn left, even if the left turn would (and was) illegal under the circumstances.

Part of driving is expecting the unexpected.

Differently: The “rules” may have very well said the cabby was to yield, but the NYPD officer at the wheel of the squad car should have expected the cabby to turn.

It would be ironic (given the nonenforcement by the NYPD) if the cabby were glued to his smartphone when he made the illegal turn.

6
Reply
Rob
Rob
16 days ago

This is terrible. This is right at Columbia with thousands of students.

2
Reply
Not For Me
Not For Me
16 days ago

Outdoor Dining: It’s where the action is!

12
Reply
Otis
Otis
16 days ago

That’s the diner from Seinfeld.

7
Reply
Boss Tweed
Boss Tweed
16 days ago
Reply to  Otis

“Jerry I swear; that outdoor dining place came out of no where!”

14
Reply
Ralph Caso
Ralph Caso
16 days ago

Time to end outdoor dining. At least a parked car or other parked vehicle would have been a more effective barrier.

15
Reply
Edge of UWS
Edge of UWS
15 days ago
Reply to  Ralph Caso

Damn, that’s the best take you got from this? Maybe cars are DEADLY and should be more careful in a densely populated pedestrian such as the UWS

9
Reply
Jan
Jan
15 days ago
Reply to  Ralph Caso

Yes, end outdoor dining. But no more cars. How about trees in the space instead? Everybody benefits from trees (unfortunately, so do uncontrolled dogs).

0
Reply
Do Better
Do Better
16 days ago

As a police officer driving is a part of your job. In essence being a professional driver is part of being a police officer. From what I understand, typically you have to undergo a certain amount of driving training to become a police officer and must train annually in driving. This officer should have made a better choice. I hope the people at the restaurant sue and get compensation from the police department. “Protect and Serve” unless there might be expensive vehicle damage involved 🤦‍♀️

11
Reply
ecm
ecm
16 days ago
Reply to  Do Better

This is the old “Protect and Serve” vs. “Protect and Swerve” debate.

3
Reply
ILikeYou
ILikeYou
16 days ago
Reply to  Do Better

You were there?

8
Reply
Joey
Joey
16 days ago
Reply to  Do Better

The fault should lie with the taxi driver who failed to yield to an emergency vehicle. Did the taxi driver have earbuds on or maybe texting or doing something on his phone.

Last edited 16 days ago by Joey
9
Reply
Citycatsman
Citycatsman
15 days ago
Reply to  Joey

OF COURSE the fault should lie with a driver who fails to yield to an official vehicle with flashing lights and siren! Have we lost our minds? Would the police bashers say the same if it was an ambulance in a medical emergency that had to swerve to avoid a distracted driver? Anyone who has driven in Manhattan knows well how dangerous conditions are caused by taxi drivers who without warning switch lanes, make u turns, or come to a dead stop to pick up a fare.
I wasn’t there, of course. None of us were. But the information provided makes it difficult to jump to the conclusion that it was the fault of the police. The cab driver, or the company, should be held liable for the collateral injuries. They were a major, if not primary cause of the accident.

6
Reply
Do Better
Do Better
15 days ago
Reply to  Citycatsman

Look again I said nothing about the taxi driver being innocent or not at fault. He probably should not have made that turn.

Why do you forgive the police officer so immediately for choosing to hurt pedestrians as their reaction?? As someone who has driven in Manhattan I understand taxis are unpredictably predictable in how they move. Cops in a car drive around Manhattan all the time so of course they would know best of all how unpredictable a cab driver can be.

None of this information changes the fact that the officer chose to swerve so drastically that all of the people inside their car as well as the people that were hit all went to the hospital. The officer made the wrong choice in their reaction. Thank God no one was killed because of their reckless decision

0
Reply
Steve M
Steve M
16 days ago

Wasn’t this an episode of Seinfeld with Kramer, Jackie Chiles and a personal injury lawsuit against the NYPD?

3
Reply
OPOD
OPOD
16 days ago
Reply to  Steve M

Oh Henry candy bar heiress

0
Reply
Harry
Harry
16 days ago

Rule number one is do not outdrive your ability to stop. It didn’t matter if they had lights and sirens, you’re in the middle of Manhattan and need to expect that sort of thing. This could’ve been so much worse all to save maybe sixty seconds at the destination if it had worked out? But hey, blame it on the cabbie.

13
Reply
Edge of UWS
Edge of UWS
15 days ago
Reply to  Harry

Even worse, people here are blaming the outdoor dining and patrons.

7
Reply
Sal Bando
Sal Bando
16 days ago

Next time when you have a choice, hit the cab instead of the people.

15
Reply
Carol
Carol
9 days ago
Reply to  Sal Bando

Right?? Always choose the car over the SIDEWALK.

0
Reply
Ellen
Ellen
16 days ago

It used to be illegal to make that turn, i.e. left or right across the Broadway island when north and southbound traffic have the green light. There used to be signs prohibiting it. Drivers were supposed to wait for the crosstown light to turn (I still do). The reason is that there are often people in the crosswalk who have the light. Drivers often gun it to avoid southbound or northbound traffic and don’t see the pedestrians in the crosswalk. I would like to know if and why that law was changed.

3
Reply
neighbor785
neighbor785
16 days ago
Reply to  Ellen

I was hit driving on Broadway when another car made a left turn and swept right past the traffic island and smashed into me. That car had the red light once the turn had commenced. I didn’t know they changed the law about making such turns.

0
Reply
Ish Kabibble
Ish Kabibble
15 days ago
Reply to  neighbor785

They didn’t change the law.

0
Reply
Victor N.
Victor N.
16 days ago

Something I’ve learned many years ago: do not risk hitting an innocent driver or pedestrian in order to avoid contact with the guy at fault. Should be a reflex.

8
Reply
Joey
Joey
16 days ago

Another example of why outdoor dining should not be allowed.

6
Reply
Edge of UWS
Edge of UWS
15 days ago
Reply to  Joey

Another example of reckless driving at the expense of pedestrians

5
Reply
Ish Kabibble
Ish Kabibble
15 days ago
Reply to  Joey

Of the thousands of sheds, and hundreds of thousands of diners utilizing them, I think this is the 3rd or 4th incident I’ve heard of like this. I’m not a mathematician, but I will take those odds.

3
Reply
Retumos
Retumos
16 days ago

It looks like a car assigned to the Transit Bureau. Maybe driving a victim to try and catch up to a perpetrator on a train to do an identification? Or maybe its just one of the NYPD’s preferred hires from the city that just got their license a month before the academy? Good to see people sticking up for the cabbie. They are known worldwide for their safety, courtesy and adherence to vehicular and traffic laws. Hope everyone gets better.

4
Reply
OPOD
OPOD
16 days ago

Enough is enough make the whole NYPD park all vehicles for 6 months. They can take the bus or subway like real New Yorkers.

5
Reply
Edge of UWS
Edge of UWS
15 days ago
Reply to  OPOD

They even used to get free personal metrocards from the MTA, but was program was cancelled because none of the cops ever used them

1
Reply
Ish Kabibble
Ish Kabibble
15 days ago
Reply to  OPOD

Gee, OPOD with another great idea.

2
Reply
Frustrated UWS
Frustrated UWS
16 days ago

I can’t believe the people blaming the police. Do you every do anything other than blame the police? So sick of it.

You would complain if they did NOT try to rush to where they needed to go. You would say they don’t care, they don’t try, why don’t they go after motorcycles, etc? They put pedestrians at the top of their lists which is WHY they can’t go after crazy motorcycles, etc.

Enough.

You risk YOUR life trying to answer an emergency call and then comment. They had their lights and siren on so blame the taxi if you NEED to blame someone.

21
Reply
neighbor785
neighbor785
16 days ago
Reply to  Frustrated UWS

When through blaming the police, one can always blame politician X. Oh wait, this accident didn’t occur in X’s district.

2
Reply
UWSforreal
UWSforreal
16 days ago
Reply to  Frustrated UWS

Honestly question, how does that boot taste? Pretty good, I guess?

4
Reply
Hasbara
Hasbara
16 days ago
Reply to  Frustrated UWS

LOLOLOL

1
Reply
UWS Dad
UWS Dad
16 days ago
Reply to  Frustrated UWS

Trust has to be earned, unfortunately NYPD has proven over and over again that they don’t think the rules apply to them. They’ve lost the public’s trust and with it the benefit of the doubt.

13
Reply
GiveMeCake
GiveMeCake
16 days ago
Reply to  UWS Dad

Please don’t ever serve on a jury. We don’t need people serving who disagree with the most fundamental basis for a jury system.

8
Reply
UWS Dad
UWS Dad
15 days ago
Reply to  GiveMeCake

You think the fundamental basis for our jury system is ‘always trust the police’?? The jury system exists to determine if police reports are accurate and make them prove as much beyond a reasonable doubt.

0
Reply
OPOD
OPOD
16 days ago
Reply to  UWS Dad

New Yorkers have proven over and over again that they will sell their Police Department up the river whenever they feel like it. Take the George Floyd riots for example. They have lost the trust of their Police Department and good Cops leave for departments where they feel appreciated. Recruitment is a disaster and only gets worse. UWS Dad is a classic example of New Yorkers who Cops hate, and the reason they leave NYC.

13
Reply
UWS Dad
UWS Dad
15 days ago
Reply to  OPOD

Why is it so controversial to think NYPD should do their jobs professionally?

Has everyone forgotten our last NYPD chief was using fraudulent OT to sexually extort subordinates?!

0
Reply
Manhattan parent
Manhattan parent
15 days ago
Reply to  OPOD

Yup. Soon it will be just UWS Dad and his Open Streets.

7
Reply
OPOD
OPOD
15 days ago
Reply to  Manhattan parent

He hates Cops and cars.

0
Reply
D M
D M
15 days ago
Reply to  Manhattan parent

Right on!

0
Reply
Claire
Claire
16 days ago
Reply to  Frustrated UWS

Most cops are in it for the pension and not a deep desire to serve their fellow man. The cops who drove into the two old ladies are not purple hearted marines marooned behind enemy lines, they’re the blue collar brothers of plumbers trying to pay off their mortgage in Rockville Centre while griping about how much they hate the city.

13
Reply
MSL
MSL
15 days ago
Reply to  Claire

Claire,
I recently had grand jury service. I’ve been on criminal case juries before but first grand jury experience.

Thankful for NYPD.
Some really horrific cases out there- including horrific sex abuse, child abuse…

0
Reply
Ish Kabibble
Ish Kabibble
15 days ago
Reply to  Claire

Flunked out of the academy?

1
Reply
Claire
Claire
15 days ago
Reply to  Ish Kabibble

What I said wasn’t even an insult, 20 is plenty right?

0
Reply
GiveMeCake
GiveMeCake
16 days ago
Reply to  Claire

Evidence for your claim?

6
Reply
Claire
Claire
15 days ago
Reply to  GiveMeCake

I don’t live under a rock for starters. Every Long Island student I’ve ever had who bragged about using daddy’s PBA card to get out of running red lights and speeding. I knew a kid who totaled his dads car a few blocks from his house on Merrick Road, had time to run and grab the PBA card and never got so much as a ticket. He was the grandson of a famous 24th precinct detective who was responsible for railroading the central park 5. He’s still mad at Ava for the Netflix film depicting him for exactly who he is. No wonder cops are crashing into pedestrians, their parents spent decades teaching them such recklessness and retired early. Now they hang out at a bar off of Sunrise griping about the city and hoping Trump will return Nassau to 1958.

1
Reply
Manhattan parent
Manhattan parent
16 days ago
Reply to  Claire

What?! For the pension? There are easier ways to get similar pension.

Unbelievable entitlement and snobbery.

15
Reply
GiveMeCake
GiveMeCake
16 days ago
Reply to  Frustrated UWS

People hate the police until they need the police.

18
Reply
OPOD
OPOD
16 days ago
Reply to  Frustrated UWS

And then they wonder why NYC has become a crabhole and the NYPD is not proactive.

12
Reply
Hasbara
Hasbara
16 days ago

Reflects the quality of the NYPD’s recent hires. Predictable, and another reason why more cops should be moved OUT of their patrol cars

5
Reply
dick jones
dick jones
16 days ago

everyone who drives here sucks. running lights, turning into people crossing, no one can stop before the line, right on red, all stop signs optional,, double the speed limit. any time someone proposes traffic calming all the cheapskates go nuts about losing a parking spot. LOL

5
Reply
Pat W
Pat W
16 days ago

I’m afraid the way outdoor dining has been squeezed in next to increasing bike Lanes and parking that these accidents are going to happen more frequently. There really isn’t space on the sidewalk for outdoor dining on some of these structures. They’re awfully close to bicycle and vehicular traffic.. caveat emptor

3
Reply
Jan
Jan
15 days ago
Reply to  Pat W

Outdoor dining. No space on sidewalks for pedestrians. I don’t appreciate having no space to get away from whatever needs getting away from out there at the moment — bikes, dogs, marijuana smoke, (how to POLITICALLY CORRECTLY say — people who everyone is needing to avoid!!!!!!!) etc. And God bless the NYPD — THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE!

7
Reply
OPOD
OPOD
16 days ago

OPOD, stands for One Pissed Off Detective, I retired a little while back, I worked on the UWS for several years and worked some of the most horrific crimes in this neighborhood. I have tried to explain readers here the danger of what was happening to this city. I warned readers about raise the age, bail reform and discloser laws which took effect in 2020. I worked robbery after robbery where the perp was 17 years old and got off scot- free. Then the George Floyd riots took place New Yorkers don’t really understand they fundamentally and permanently changed the NYPD. Patrol Cops went into survival mode. Teachers and Nurses marched in the streets protesting the NYPD over something that happened in Minneapolis. We did nothing wrong and the people of the city of New York turned on US. I used to be involved with Police charities, and I could pull up to any Precinct in the city pop my trunk and sell 100 t shirts for a fund raiser in an hour. After the city betrayed the NYPD I lost the pride in the profession, I lost the love for the job and the people of the city of New York. I did my job, and I never took short cuts. I had dozens of ” buff shirt” Police t shirt I bought to support this cause or that cause, I wore them almost daily many cops did. After that I put them all in the attic and never wore them again, after a while I threw them all in the trash. I watched what the NYPD was hiring, it’s good cops who use the job as a steppingstone or bottom of the barrel cops who will stick around for a while. When I took the test to get hired 12000 people took the test the same day I did. Nobody wants the job anymore. I wonder why? People here attack the Police over a traffic accident, an accident you know nothing about Shame on you.

20
Reply
Claire
Claire
15 days ago
Reply to  OPOD

Your department murdered Eric Garner, that’s why we were in the streets.

1
Reply
Sal Bando
Sal Bando
15 days ago
Reply to  OPOD

So did the driver do the right thing here?

2
Reply
Retumos
Retumos
15 days ago
Reply to  OPOD

Well said. Just watch them step on the rake over and over again. Zohran 2025!!

2
Reply
GiveMeCake
GiveMeCake
15 days ago
Reply to  OPOD

I for one thank you for your service. I will never understand the hatred for the police. So many white liberals hate officers and root for defunding while black city dwellers tend to feel more positive towards the police.
I don’t blame you for your bitterness.
Please know that there are plenty of people like me who support and respect our police. It’s the loud whiners banging their proverbial drums whose voices get heard.

16
Reply
Hasbara
Hasbara
15 days ago
Reply to  OPOD

re: NYPD and summer 2020, the ‘we did nothing wrong’ line is uhhhhh Nixonesque revisionism. MANY of us were in the streets that summer and saw the NYPD’s Bull Conner turn.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/10/the-nypd-beat-protesters-in-2020-will-there-be-a-reckoning.html

The city paid out more than $40 milllion in taxpayer money as a result. Misconduct complaints and payouts have risen steadily during Adams’ mayoralty.

Respect is EARNED, not given. And the NYPD is not a praetorian guard – it’s a civil service job and you’re beholden to taxpayers AND THE LAW

17
Reply
Jerome
Jerome
15 days ago
Reply to  Hasbara

The NYPD has nothing to earn from you, nobody cares about you, your respect, emotions or feelings. I wish the NYPD would keep arresting all of you clowns during your “protests”…

0
Reply
Richard Robbins
Richard Robbins
15 days ago

A big issue here is that vehicles are allowed to complete left turns from Broadway without waiting for the light to change. A number of years ago, DOT told CB7 that vehicles turning left only have to stop and wait if there is a posted sign. My memory is that CB7 requested that DOT install these signs on every block on Broadway, but they have not done so.

On Park Avenue there are “Stop here on red signal” signs requiring cars to wait for the light to change and a green light for East/West traffic. This crash is a good prompt that DOT should install these signs on Broadway before anyone is killed!!

2
Reply
Vera
Vera
15 days ago

Comments, as usual, are the entertainment in this otherwise really sad story.
Everyone should know the rules and exercise proper judgment but who is perfect? Police receive training to prevent such poor judgment but clearly when it comes to a real world situation they make bad decisions. On a positive note, I’ve recently seen police cars speeding with sirens on yet very observant of traffic patterns. There is hope yet!

Last edited 15 days ago by Vera
0
Reply
OPOE
OPOE
15 days ago
Reply to  Vera

Who said the officer made a bad decision.

Maybe they took the course of action that caused the least injury ?

Seconds count when on route and aid/backup is needed.

Last edited 15 days ago by OPOE
0
Reply
J.L.
J.L.
15 days ago

Just. curious, what was offensive about my perspective?

0
Reply
Brownie
Brownie
15 days ago

That’s Seinfeld’s Diner.

0
Reply

YOU MIGHT LIKE...

UWS Weekend: Great Things To Do in the Neighborhood
COLUMNS

UWS Weekend: Great Things To Do In (and Around) the Neighborhood: Pride Family Picnic; “Bee My Friend” Nature Workshop; Much Ado About Nothing; Mets Hawaiian Shirt Day

June 13, 2025 | 8:24 AM
WSR Cartoon: Father’s Day on the Upper West Side
NEWS

WSR Cartoon: Father’s Day on the Upper West Side

June 13, 2025 | 8:20 AM
Previous Post

Upper West Side Pizza Joint Named Among Best in NYC by New York Times

Next Post

WSCAH ROCKS THE BLOCK Returns to the Upper West Side on June 1st Community, Advocacy, and Family Fun Come Together at This Can’t-Miss Event

this week's events image
Next Post
SB WSCAH

WSCAH ROCKS THE BLOCK Returns to the Upper West Side on June 1st Community, Advocacy, and Family Fun Come Together at This Can’t-Miss Event

NY Classical Brings the Bard Back to the UWS with ‘All’s Well That Ends Well’

NY Classical Brings the Bard Back to the UWS with 'All’s Well That Ends Well'

Social Action Has Shaped the UWS Ethical Culture Society for Nearly 150 Years

Social Action Has Shaped the UWS Ethical Culture Society for Nearly 150 Years

  • ABOUT US
  • CONTACT US
  • NEWSLETTER
  • WSR MERCH!
  • ADVERTISE
  • EVENTS
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • SITE MAP
Site design by RLDGROUP

© 2025 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • TOP NEWS
  • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART & CULTURE
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • ABOUT
    • OUR STORY
    • CONTRIBUTORS
    • CONTACT US
  • WSR SHOP

© 2025 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.