
This story was originally published by THE CITY. Sign up to get the latest New York City news delivered to you each morning
By Reuven Blau, THE CITY: Jan 16 5:00 a.m. EST
Murders. Shootings. Robberies.
The number of those major crimes in the city all fell sharply last year — with some plunging to their lowest levels in modern recorded history.
How much attention should New Yorkers pay to figures like these? And what numbers do criminologists and police officials believe matter most?
Those questions are taking on added meaning with President Donald Trump deploying the National Guard in cities such as Washington D.C., Chicago and Los Angeles, where the White House says crime is spiraling to dangerous levels — even though violent crimes are generally trending down in large U.S. cities.
“We see the headlines and hear the pundits talk about crime being out of control,” Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch told reporters last Tuesday as she announced the overall drop in so-called major crimes. “These numbers tell a very different story.”
THE CITY spoke with multiple experts who study crime data and asked what metrics they look at and how they interpret them.
Here’s what they said:
What are the main crime statistics, according to the police?
When talking about crime in New York City, the conversation almost always begins with the so-called seven index crimes, or major crimes: murder, rape, robbery, felony assault, burglary, grand larceny (theft of property worth $1,000 or more) and grand larceny auto.
The NYPD posts those figures online each week as well as some historical data to put the information into context.
The FBI also collects index crime information from other cities.
Of those major crimes, which are the most useful and reliable to watch?
Homicide is widely regarded as the most important and reliable data point, as well as the most scrutinized by the public and policymakers. Some experts also rely on firearm violence statistics.
“I just look at shootings and murders,” said Peter Moskos, a professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
The former Baltimore beat cop said he doesn’t trust other statistics because they are frequently underreported and left to interpretation.
In New York City, the number of homicides dropped by 20% last year, from 382 in 2024 to 305 in 2025, according to the NYPD. By contrast, there were over 2,200 murders in 1990 during the peak of the crack epidemic.

“People are more concerned about homicide,” said Alex Piquero, who served as the director of the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics during the Biden administration.
“That’s always what is the first story in the news, or they watch it on TV, and that’s what people look at,” he added.
The number of homicides is dropping across the country, federal data shows. “We’re moving in a really good direction in most places,” Piquero, who teaches at the University of Miami, told THE CITY.
Homicide rates are considered the most accurately recorded crime stats because the end result is undeniable. “There’s a body and the medical examiner’s office is involved,” said Alex Vitale, coordinator of the Policing and Social Justice Project at Brooklyn College.
“It’s not really an issue of reporting bias,” he continued. “Basically, when we see significant changes in homicide numbers over time, we have a lot of confidence in that.”
Similarly, auto theft numbers are highly reliable because people must report it to the police to remove the registration from their name and claim insurance, added Vitale, author of “The End of Policing,” who is also on the Mamdani transition team.
Which major crime statistics are less reliable?
Other index crimes, such as burglary and felony assault, are traditionally underreported, according to the National Crime Victimization Survey, which asks a group of random people “about crimes they may have experienced in the past six months.”
Still, that does not render the year-to-year trends meaningless. “When patterns hold over time, they do tell us something,” Vitale said.
Rape is the least reliable index crime reported, according to Vitale and other criminologists.
“The willingness of rape survivors to report to the police seems to be driven in part by some external factors,” he said. “And so that’s the lowest reliable number of the major crimes that we typically look at.”
In New York City, reported rapes rose 16% citywide in 2025, a spike the NYPD attributed largely to a state law change in 2024 that expanded the legal definition of rape. Nearly half of reported rape cases were domestic violence-related, police said.
The NYPD conducts spot check audits of its index crime figures but doesn’t post those reviews online or in any other public forum. Over the years, the audits have discovered top police officials downplaying some statistics. Top brass is under intense pressure to reduce crime in their areas and they are called out during routine “CompStat” meetings inside the department’s main office at 1 Police Plaza.

How accurately do the major crime stats reflect what’s actually happening?
Jaeok Kim, associate director for research at the Vera Institute’s Greater Justice New York, said the major crime categories don’t always line up with how people experience safety in their daily lives.
Felony assault, for instance, is often used as a shorthand for whether a city feels safe, feeding the idea that those cases reflect random acts of violence by strangers, she said. But when you look more closely at the data, that picture starts to break down.
About half of felony assaults involve someone the victim already knows, Kim said, which makes it a far less straightforward measure of public safety than it’s often treated as.
The focus on crime stats also fails to address underlying causes that led up to the offense being committed.
Kim said that’s why she and other researchers look well beyond crime data when trying to understand safety.
In recent work, she said, researchers have paired crime statistics with measures of housing and food security, environmental conditions and economic stability. Those factors include things like education levels, poverty rates, noise and air pollution, and how many residents are struggling to afford basic needs.Research has shown that higher poverty neighborhoods frequently also have higher rates of violent crime.
Just as important, Kim said, is asking people directly what makes them feel unsafe in their own communities. When residents are part of defining the problem — alongside city agencies — the picture of safety becomes far broader than crime alone.
That approach, she added, has another advantage: it points to solutions. While violent crime can be difficult to prevent in a targeted way, issues like food insecurity, housing instability, pollution and job access are often more concrete and more actionable. Research has shown that improving those has been associated with crime reductions.
Vitale, who is also a sociologist at Brooklyn College, said “disorder” is among the most poorly measured aspects of public safety.
Encounters that often shape how safe people feel, such as seeing a homeless person who appears disoriented or in crisis in a subway station, do not show up in crime statistics, he said. Many quality-of-life issues are not crimes at all, and even when they are, they frequently go unreported.
Crime statistics seem to go up and down a lot throughout the year. What does that mean?
Almost all the experts agree that sudden spikes or drops in crime from week to week or month to month should not be given too much credence.
“I normally would want to look at at least a year’s worth of data before drawing any significant conclusions,” Vitale said. “And you know, ideally longer than that.”
He cautioned that sensational coverage of some murders, like a mentally ill person shoving someone on the subway tracks, should not be taken out of context when looking for trends. “Yes, homicides sometimes come in spikes, but that doesn’t necessarily tell us what the overall trend is,” he added.
Piquero, a criminologist, said he starts with the year-to-year trend when reviewing crime data and asks himself, “Is it going down, up, or steady?”
Not everyone agrees with that approach. One expert says it’s important to look out for any major trends happening during the year. “Nothing magic about Dec. 31 as a cut off,” said Moskos, author of “Back from the Brink: Inside the NYPD and New York City’s Extraordinary 1990s Crime Drop.”
Overall, the experts also noted that crime often goes up in the summer when the weather is warmer and people spend more time outside — and teens are home from school.

What figures don’t matter?
Vitale and some other criminologists contend that the number of people locked up doesn’t make a difference to public safety.
The population of Rikers has gone from a decades low of under 4,000 during the peak of the pandemic to around 7,000 right now.
Almost half of the people detained there suffer from some sort of mental health issue, according to the city’s Department of Correction.
“When we look at the population at Rikers, what we see is that a huge proportion of it is basically people in acute crisis,” Vitale said. “They’re unhoused, they’re unemployed, they have mental health and substance use issues, and yes, some of them are a source of harm and burdens and quality of life issues for the community.”
But sending them to Rikers, where it costs an estimated $500,000 per person a year, is “the most expensive thing we could possibly do,” he said. “If we look long term, we do not see a simple correspondence between the population of Rikers and crime rates.”
He pointed out that the number of people in city jails dropped during the entire Bloomberg administration from 2002 to 2013. Yet murder and other crime plummeted to record lows.
Moskos, the former Baltimore police officer, has a different take. The number of people in jail does matter to public safety, he said.
“You hate to judge effectiveness by the number of people in jail, and I would hate for there to be a goal or quota, but of course if more people who would be hurting people on the street are in Rikers it means less people being hurt in the street,” he told THE CITY.
So which numbers should people really be paying attention to?
Criminologists say indicators such as overdose deaths, homelessness, and health insurance coverage rates often reveal more about public safety than crime statistics alone.
“That’s something that people often miss,” said Kim from the Vera Institute.
The number of people being admitted to hospital emergency rooms after suffering some type of assault is also a potential indicator of public safety. But those figures aren’t updated regularly so they are hard to keep a close eye on and flag for trends.






6% commit over 50% of the violent crime. That’s the stat you need to know.
Which 6%? That might be good to know, too.
Yup. Great point. Logical laws would be such that for each additional offense where someone is found guilty, the sentence is incrementally larger. So steal a pack of gum the first time, slap on the wrist. Third time, larger sentence. Sixth time, larger sentence. Recidivism should be punished more so truly bad actors are removed from the streets. This should not be controversial.
I would hate to be a police officer, seeing the person I have arrested several times wandering around a few days after their latest arrest (I understand the concept of bail, but you get my point).
PS Please try to restore the old format. This one isn’t as good, particularly the lack of the like function.
We know that but we are coached to believe that it is “disproportionate “ and needs to be addressed by leniency at the expense of innocent victims.
Yes, the “disproportinate” argument is sophistical. One might as well not penalize big landlords or securities fraudsters because the penalties will fall disproportionately on white men.
Bail reform, Raise the Age, and other progressive legislation keeps dudes on the street and not in prison. That 6% does not want to be incarcerated!
The left wingers who demanded that the discovery laws be changed caused a lot of these problems.
Yes, that too.
Murder is lower than before bail reform was passed. Seems like it works?
Bail reform had little correlation with murder cases. Bail reform’s main effect was on people accused of lesser crimes. Felony assault and shoplifting, for example, are still notably above 2019’s stats.
And in every Walgreens the toothpaste is locked up. Why?
Because Walgreens is losing sales to Amazon every year and cracking down on shoplifting (which has always existed) is one of the only things they can do to preserve margins.
Stop confusing facts with “truth.”
Remember, my perception is actual reality. My opinion is the ultimate truth. And my belief is what everyone thinks.
Very thoughtful and detailed article. Well done!
I know you say that homicide is people’s biggest concern, but I am not sure if that is true. I would suggest (without data to back me up) that UWSiders are less concerned about the rate of murders in the Bronx, or Brooklyn, or even Harlem, than about 11am assaults on the Platform at 72nd and B’way or in Riverside park and the like. Or drive by scooter muggings. Or random assaults. These are the kind of things that make people feel unsafe, when they feel like walking to the market, or the bank or to catch the subway puts them at risk. It is unclear to me if those crimes are actually up or if it is simply social media, crime apps and hyper local websites reporting crimes are making it seem like it is more frequent in neighborhoods that were previously thought of as “safe.”
I agree Alfonse – most murders are not random; the murderer usually knows the victim. Assaults seem like crimes of opportunity, so if you’re in the vicinity you’re not safe.
I agree, re 72nd and B’way.
Majority of crimes are committed by repeat offenders. Please hold and charge offenders. Get rid of cashless bail.
Cashless bail is not responsible for an increase in crime.
How about understanding the actual facts instead of promoting specious arguments.
Cashless bail didn’t increase crime? So no one who was released under no cash bail committed a crime during the period they would have been incarcerated?
Democrats believe that’s racist.
Police refuse to file a police report for anything non-murder related these days. It’s true, if you need insurance to pay for your stolen car and need a police report you’ll harass the precinct for however long it takes to do their job. If your purse and wallet with $200 get stolen you probably won’t even go because it’ll take hours of your day and the perpetrator is unlikely to get caught and even if they do unlikely they’ll still have it. We need to have an agency separate from the NYPD for reporting and data gathering. I don’t trust statistics put out by the same agency that has a direct benefit from the numbers going a certain direction. By writing less reports they get the double benefit of not having to do extra work AND looking better when stats get released.
Hard to believe any crime stats. How many felonies are downgraded to misdemeanors? How many misdemeanors aren’t prosecuted? Lots of activities that used to be crimes aren’t prosecuted anymore. Raise the age has altered crime stats. It’s impossible to do any comparison to 10 years ago.
The true measure of public safety is the stranger on stranger crime such as assaults, larceny from the person, shop lifting, burglary, harassment, auto theft and minor nuisance violations. The nuisance violations, the willful disregard of of regulations and norms of society are what affect the stability of everyday life.
Dogs off the leash = breaking the law. Smoking in parks = breaking the law. It’s tiring to have to waste limited patience on people being so selfish and arrogant.
I’ve long suspected that noise pollution contributes to violent crime. Meaningless noise is irritating, and irritated people behave with impulsive anger. Parked vehicles noisily idling their engines, angry drivers honking at slow moving vehicles or at service vehicles (like garbage trucks) that have blocked traffic, vehicles with broken mufflers, those ridiculous and purposeless so-called car alarms that no one pays any useful attention to but do annoy everyone within earshot, all this and more stir up feelings that all to often gets discharged with violent action. Or at least that’s what I suspect. There are studies that noise raises blood pressure. Unnecessary noise should be treated the way we treat second-hand smoke — as a public health hazard, and the police should be encouraged to enforce laws against those to make unnecessary noise.
Around the time Uber came onto the scene, yellow cabs think it’s fine to honk as they pass pedestrians, just in case. Each time, I resolve to ignore and take a bus. There’s no way in h I’d respond to any car honking at me least of all a cab trying to annoy the crap out of me enough to make me weary.
Not sure what everyone is celebrating. The data post-Covid shows a definitive and significant reversal of the long-term decline trend. In the 3 years pre-Covid (2017-2019), the M7 crimes had settled at around 96,000, a two-decade decline from ~184,000 in 2000. In the 3 years post-Covid (2022-2025), the average is 124,700 – a 29.8% increase.
Anything increasing 25-30% is indeed spiraling out of control, and clear failure (or inadequacy) of policy to meet the demands of the moment. A 1.8% decline in 2025 might be heartwarming to some, but is statistically insignificant and not (yet) a sign of any durable improvement.
This really comes down to how the statistics are being interpreted. The benchmark people keep using from the 1970s just doesn’t make sense anymore. The so‑called recent decline mostly reflects underreported incidents and offenses being downgraded to lesser categories.
One could also easily make the case that when crime is increasing, lack of harsh punishment (or any consequences at all) is to blame.
Is anyone else in disbelief that we pay $500,000 annually for each prisoner? That cannot possibly be right.
Tldr. Call me when they study the increase in public hangings with the reduction in crime.
Sounds like something Iran might be keeping track of these days.
Here’s an interesting new crime statistic I just read: in the past year, the U.S. has deported a half-million dangerous murderers, rapists, gang members, sex traffickers, and sundry other depraved criminals.
Or at least a half-million human beings whose papers may or may not have been in order.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/01/18/us/trump-deportation-numbers-immigration-crackdown.html
Anyone who keeps a watchful eye on the Citizen app, know that this under reporting is widespread. Police don’t want to be bothered, filling out paperwork, just to see the same perps out 3 hours later. Twice in the past year I have been encouraged not to bother pressing charges. The police seem demoralized,. An issue that happened in my store led to a conversation about a homeless man that got in the face of a women employee, I said isn’t there something I can do, and his sweet response was “Yeah, move out of New York”! Crime is back, the numbers are not telling the real story.