By Carol Tannenhauser
There are three churches involved in this story. One is a building. One is the congregation that worships there. One is the body that governs the congregation and about 90 others throughout New York City: The Church. The denomination involved is Presbyterian. The governing body is called the Presbytery.
The building involved is breathtaking; it sits like an uncut ruby amid tall, beige, rectangular boxes, on the corner of Amsterdam Avenue and West 86th Street, a central intersection on the Upper West Side.
The congregation numbers 12 — laughable unless you know its history. It was told to us by Zachery Tomlinson, artistic director of the Center at West Park, a nonprofit performing arts center that has been operating out of the building since 2010.
It’s very important to note that West Park Presbyterian Church was an important institution in responding to the AIDS crisis in the 1980s, and was majorly involved in gay rights activism and providing social services to people with HIV and AIDS. It was actually the place where God’s Love We Deliver, the organization that now provides meals to 10,000 people every week, had their first commercial kitchen in the 1980s. The congregation was decimated by people dying of AIDS. There was this massive loss of life, very tragically, and that, in part, set up the situation.
Built in the 1880s, the church is as architecturally important as it is socially. Here is what the Landmarks Preservation Commission wrote when it declared the building a NYC landmark in 2010.
The West Park Presbyterian Church is considered to be one of the best examples of a Romanesque Revival style religious structure in New York City. The extraordinarily deep color of its red sandstone cladding and the church’s bold forms with broad, round-arched openings and a soaring tower at the corner of West 86th Street and Amsterdam Avenue produce a monumental and distinguished presence along those streets.
Unfortunately, even before it was declared a landmark by the LPC, it had been declared “unsafe” by the DOB (Buildings). Zachery Tomlinson picks up his story:
Around 2001, the congregation noticed that there were some very small particles flaking off the red sandstone façade of the building, and turning the snow reddish. That meant the façade was not secure, and, by requirement of the city, they had to put up a sidewalk shed to protect people below, in case anything larger fell.”
Roger Leaf, chair of the West Park Presbyterian Church’s Administrative Commission, told West Side Rag, “It almost bankrupted the church trying to keep up with the almost endless list of repairs.” When he says “the church,” he means the congregation. “The sidewalk shed went up around the building over 20 years ago. It’s still up today and there is no prospect at this stage of taking it down unless we can spend something like $20 million on the restoration of the facade.”
Now, they have other options. A company called Alchemy Properties has offered to buy the church provided it’s demolished. The price is $33 million, Leaf said, plus another $8.8 million to build out the 10,000 square-foot space they would be provided in the 19-story residential condominium Alchemy hopes to build.
“In addition, there would be funds received from the sale of the property that would create an endowment for the church that would allow them to hire a new minister and reinvigorate some of the community programs that they’ve run over the years. The balance of the sale proceeds would be gifted to the Presbytery of New York City in support of its mission.”
There’s one major obstacle to the plan: the building’s landmark designation. There is, however, a “hardship provision” in the Landmark Law that allows an owner to apply to ‘de-landmark’ a building if they can no longer sustain it. Leaf and his attorney applied to do so on Tuesday.
“If we don’t get the hardship, we’ll have to try to sell the building to whoever will take it off our hands. It’s one of those buildings though. It’s a little like a car that’s been in a wreck. You know, if the cost of repairs is more than what the car would be worth after it’s repaired, it’s totaled. In this case, we have a church, a building that the cost of the repairs exceeds what the fair market value of the building would be after the repairs. So it’s a little like the building has been totaled.”
Susan E. Sullivan, president of the West 80s Neighborhood Association and a Board Member of the Center at West Park, contested Leaf’s claim in an email to West Side Rag.
Thanks to the support of our community, West Park is in better working condition today than the day it was officially landmarked. However, it is a fact that the exterior condition of West Park has been neglected by the Presbytery for the past 30 years. It is inexcusable that the Presbytery has allowed the building’s exterior to even further degrade since its landmark designation. That neglect attests to the Presbytery’s gross dereliction of duty to maintain a NYC landmarked building under its ownership. It is foolhardy to believe that the Presbytery, as a billion dollar world-wide enterprise, does not have the resources to maintain and improve West Park.”
*** Update: Following publication, the West-Park Presbyterian Church objected strenuously to Sullivan’s statements.
“The building is owned by the West-Park Presbyterian Church, which is nearly bankrupt, not the Presbytery of New York City. The Presbytery of New York City is not a ‘billion-dollar worldwide enterprise’ — it has an annual budget of less than $100,000 to help all of its 89 member churches pay for repairs. The totality of the Presbytery of New York’s unrestricted assets would not even be sufficient to pay for repairs to the building’s façade alone, which today would cost $17.9 million. The baseline restoration of the entire building would require at least $50 million and will only grow larger over time.”
So far in 2022, the congregation has had to pay over $75,000 on emergency repairs to prevent [the building’s] south wall from collapsing onto 86th Street. [They borrowed the money from the Presbytery, Leaf said.] As recently as January, the church had to be closed for three months because of building-condition issues, the spokesperson said.
Sullivan said the Center has “offered to buy West Park from the Presbytery and take on the capital improvements required. Second, we have requested the Presbytery to honor our right to renew our 5-year lease as stipulated in our lease contract,” she said. “We have acted in good faith and conducted our interaction with the Presbytery with complete transparency, recognizing that it will take time to raise the money to actualize our vision of West Park.
“Over the past 5 years [we have] built a vigorous performing arts center servicing the entire UWS community and beyond,” she added. “Since 2017 we’ve provided 100 artist residencies serving over 600 individual artists, as well as over 10,000 hours of affordable performance and rehearsal rental space.”
That has not translated into money for the restoration, according to a spokesperson for the congregation. “In total, less than 2% of the necessary funds have been raised by the community to date, including $135,000 raised by the Center at West Park between 2017 and 2019, nowhere near the amount needed to address even just the façade repairs.”
***“The Center at West Park unequivocally rejects [the congregation’s] explanation,” Susan Sullivan responded. “In 2011, Friends of West Park and elected officials committed to raise funds to ensure that West Park would be the iconic landmark that it is, situated on the crossroads of the Upper West Side with a long and storied social-activism history.
“The Center at West Park has actively undertaken that challenge by forming a vibrant performing arts center, where every penny of our profit has been dedicated to improving the infrastructure of West Park. The Center at West Park was formed in January of 2014 (not a 501c3 until several years later) while a group of us sat in the frigid church sanctuary. There was no heat and the temperature was less than 28 degrees. It was freezing. The Presbytery had failed to repair its boiler and failed to repair a burst pipe. They were allowing the church to become derelict. Honestly, it was a herculean effort to pull support together to form the Center.”
The LPC is not the only hurdle to de-landmarking West Park Presbyterian Church, the building. Before the decision, which Leaf said should come in late June, the application must have a public hearing and get an approving nod from Community Board 7. There will be a CB7 committee meeting on May 12, Leaf said, then, the full board will meet on June 1st.
We’ll keep you posted.
The church building is referenced, not by name but by location, at the end of Philip Roth’s novel, “Operation Shylock.”
It would be a crying shame to lose this fine building, the intrinsic handsomeness and artistic value of which are stunningly evident, despite its present neglect and dilapidation. Maybe one of our billionaires, rather than sending himself to Mars or putting his name on some trophy building could be persuaded to rescue this true monument, this true landmark of an important architectural tradition.
To Newcavendish–What a fantastic idea. Protect beautiful architecture ( among other things–like people) on earth! Then, if there are sufficient funds left for these trillionaires to take insanely priced brief trips to nowhere on rocket ships, let them.
The very worst thing about billionaires is their selfish and stubborn refusal to spend their money the way I want them to. Who do they think they are?
But if a billionaire doesn’t volunteer for this how would you finance the “savings” of a building that exists to service a congregation of about 10 people?
Do we chain the 10 to it with handbooks about pointing and grouting and window repair?
Or do we tax ourselves to raise the necessary funds?
And if the latter then to what purpose do we put this building?
The idea that economically unsustainable buildings should be “landmarked” is questionable at best.
a valid comparison because as i write this there are two American businessmen orbiting the earth who paid 50 million dollars each for their tickets.
Yep. The billionaire religious group doesn’t give a rat’s ass. Big surprise.
I’m surprised that the NY Presbytery, along with the Presbyterian Church USA, would allow this magnificent architectural and historic gem to be razed and replaced by yet another ugly high rise for millionaires. Once again, God as realtor. Thanks for this excellent article!
Have a look through Daytonian In Manhattan blog, city has lost many finer buildings. Life went on, and will go on even if WP also meets same fate.
https://daytoninmanhattan.blogspot.com
It may not be of comfort to you, but same is happening not just in USA, but across Europe. France (where state owns all religious buildings), is tearing down churches left and right.
I still grieve for the original Penn Station. Life has indeed gone on, but uglier, less awesome, more just keep your head down & keep moving.
Original Pennsylvania Station is still there underground where it was always. Only the head house was torn down and redeveloped.
So is The Center asking for or suggesting any action by members of the West side general community?
Get rid of it. 21 years of blight? This landmark most certainly hasn’t been preserved. It’s a landstain.
While I’m feeling cranky, objects like air conditioners or cars are serviced. People and communities are served.
What doesn’t Susan understand about the fact that there is no money available from any source to preserve the building.
If left with its current owner, over time the building will collapse and all during that period will be an eyesore and danger to the community.
If any of the imaginary not for profits that Susan believes exists take control of the building the result will be the same.
Unfortunately there are more important issues facing NYC then trying to preserve a building that has no economically viable purpose.
Oh, please! Let us keep some heritage! If I see any more “apartment buildings” poorly constructed, to get them up quickly and make money I’ll scream. There are reasons we live in New York, and it is not to stare at sun-obliterating, ugly lego-like, boring structures….there are too many of them. The church is beautiful. I’ve been in it.
If “The balance of the sale proceeds would be gifted to the Presbytery of New York city in support of its mission” then why isn’t the Presbytery also obligated to maintain the building? Responsibility should go both ways.
I agree with the overall premise, but the unfortunate truth is the only asset is the land, not the structure. To maximize the value of the asset the building has to be razed.
Presbytery of New York City has provided funds in past including recently. But it is same thing as Roman Catholic archdioceses in New York and across country, they also are strapped, thus there is only so much in kitty to go around.
https://nypost.com/2022/04/08/nyc-parish-sells-church-to-save-12-person-congregation/
Archdiocese of New York couldn’t (or wouldn’t) save Saint Vincent’s hospital, and Presbytery of New York cannot save West Park Presbyterian Church.
In common with Saint Vincent’s hospital along with scores of other churches, houses of worship, religious affiliated schools, etc… it simply comes down to two facts; active congregations are too small to support, and high land values.
West Park Presbyterian Church could have, would have, and should have been sold years ago. This and or congregation and or “Church” enter into an agreement with a developer that would have provided much needed funds for former.
On UES Extell paid St. Monica’s nearly *40 million* just for air rights.
https://therealdeal.com/2018/05/21/extell-to-buy-churchs-dev-rights-for-big-ues-assemblage/
People must face the fact, because it is a fact United States population is becoming more and more secular. As consequence houses of worship of all faiths simply do not have congregations large (or wealthy) enough to support these barns of buildings built a century or centuries ago.
LPC got involved way they usually do; self serving and preserving interests (most notably residents of buildings on either side of WP who faced loss of lot line views), forced through landmark status declaration. Fine and good, but no one bothered to consider who or what was going to pay to keep that pile of bricks from falling down.
If congregation of WP and or Presbyterian Church couldn’t afford to keep WP up before it was declared a landmark, why did anyone believe things would be different afterwards?
A congregation of < 30 people (and that number is dwindling each year), cannot support this huge building, even if it was in tip-top shape.
Many forget that it wasn’t just Jackie Kennedy and rest who “saved” Grand Central Terminal by leading legal battles.
While they won in court it was fact NYS (via MTA) took out a long term lease and poured billions of bonded and taxpayer money into the place to renovate, restore and preserve. Absent that fact GCT likely would have continued to deteriorate as Penn-Central certainly didn’t have that kind of money.
It’s unconscienable to tear down such a Landmark building that moreover has Done so much for the Community. The Presbytery should BE given an interest-free loan to fix the church which could then BE shared with one or two other Presbyterian congregations. Their relocation can Help Liquidate the mortgage.
Churches are not buildings, they are congregations, meaning bodies of believers. They are also legal entities under law. West Park may be handsome as architectural history, it is also an incontestable eyesore with an impossibly high cost of restoration. The structure is in very bad condition. Can Sullivan’s group buy the building and restore it now? Her comment is a threat of endless litigation. We may be looking at that shed for another 20 years.
I quit. Defeated by Akismet yet again for tapping Post Comment twice with my old man’s fat forefinger. My comment sent to oblivion. I was arguing a hope that the congregation’s wishes are not defeated by the usual NYC litigation and yakity-yak.
The church creates a perfect contrast with it’s neighbor, Barney Greengrass. Side by side, they epitomize the infinite cultural variety of the Upper West Side.
“like an uncut ruby”!!
Original congregation was “Park Presbyterian”.
Down at 29 East 42nd Street was “West Presbyterian” church. The two congregations merged in 1911 becoming West-Park Presbyterian.
Church at 29 East 42nd was sold and land redeveloped into an office tower.
https://daytoninmanhattan.blogspot.com/2022/03/the-lost-west-presbyterian-church-29.html
https://daytoninmanhattan.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-masterful-1884-west-park.html
It should be duly noted and remembered that while congregation of West-Park were considering their options back in 2010, LPC jumped in an landmarked the church against congregation’s wishes. Essentially pulling rug from out under them..
As already stated in this thread, a congregation is not same as the building they worship in. Time and time again in past, and recent memory congregations have used their most valued asset, land, to shore up finances and other uses.
WP was crumbling down back in 2010 when LPC made their move.
It’s all very well for Landmark West and others to gush on about anticultural details, etc… But that doesn’t pay bills or provide funds for major work these old barns require.
The Church knows it will get more from a real estate developer than a nonprofit. They’ve got a valuable asset, and they want to monetize it. Could any nonprofit come up with the $40 million Alchemy is offering for the property?
Let’s face it: the building is a goner. The Church will plead a hardship case and it will be sold and torn down.
Every single Catholic hospital in NYC was not for profit; they’ve all closed (St. Vincent’s, St. Clare’s, Mother Cabrini), land sold and redeveloped into various levels of luxury housing.
It isn’t just Catholic non profits/religious either, many synagogues and associated properties owned by Jewish faiths have gone to a similar fate.
https://www.nytimes.com/1981/06/30/nyregion/former-synagogue-on-west-side-sold-to-developers-for-2.4-million.html#:~:text=The%20former%20Mount%20Neboh%20Synagogue,church%20group%20paid%20for%20it.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/standing-on-real-estate-gold-manhattan-synagogues-seek-to-double-as-condos/
https://www.westsiderag.com/2017/07/26/shaare-zedek-gets-final-court-approval-to-sell-94-year-old-synagogue-which-will-be-demolished
https://www.jta.org/2020/12/03/ny/forest-hills-jewish-center-for-sale-to-pave-synagogues-future
And so it goes…
As have already stated USA is becoming more and more secular each passing decade. Places built to accommodate several hundred worshipers often barely have active congregations of 50 or less. They just don’t have funds to keep up these large barns of buildings.
Best thing is to extract value from their main asset (buildings and land they rest upon), and move on.
Lets hope this grand building can be saved
and restored.
If they are being offered $42 million and the repair cost is $20 million how is that “totaled”?
Current state of WP building isn’t the issue, it’s the land that any developer would want. Right now prices in NYC are at all time high.
Corner lot with huge amount of buildable FAR that can be developed as of right. No current residential tenants (especially rent regulated).
Said lot is on a prime UWS area a few blocks from both Central Park and subway station (express & local), etc…
It is blocks like this that make one wish more blocks of nyc were zoned to have the space and air that the average NYCHA complex has. The prospect of more boxes like those that surround the old church is dis-spiriting to those of any faith.
With all due respect you’ve got it backwards.
Last major zoning for area came about long after WP was built. Thus as with many, many, many other buildings in NYC (in particular Manhattan), current structure is vastly under built for what Floor Area Ratio (FAR) allows.
UWS, UES, Mid-town, etc.. all over (especially along avenues or major cross streets), same thing has been happening for about a decade or so now. Low rise buildings that went up long ago and thus have tons of available air rights are being sold, and property redeveloped. This and or air rights are sold creating a new tower that occupies 1/3 to 1/2 of block, but leaves old low rise buildings intact.
The purpose of a church is worship, not architectural preservation. If there is no congregation to worship, there is no purpose in maintaining the church. Preservationists have a different purpose — either historical or aesthetic, or perhaps NIMBY. In any case, preservationists should either foot the bill or pass legislation to have taxpayers do so. It is not the tiny congregation’s, nor the Presbytry’s obligation to support a cause that was never a part of their mission.
I suppose that it’s unsurprising, but the spread on estimates to restore the church’s facade is pretty wide: the WSR article says $20,000,000, but the NYP article linked in the comments says $50,000,000.
What I don’t get is how The NY Presbytery has no obligation to maintain the building but is entitled to at least some of the sale proceeds.
Things vary by hierarchy of a particular faith but Presbyterians like Catholics, Episcopalians and some others have a structure where local churches do not exist on their own, but are part of a larger network.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presbyterian_polity
https://www.nycpresbytery.org
As already stated NYC Presbytery over years has provided funding and other things to WP, wo it isn’t exactly unfair to expect something in return if or when WP congregation receives windfall profits by selling that church.
Can Susan Sullivan support her statement that the Center has offered to buy the building and pay for capital improvements? According to the Guidestar database of non profit organizations, the Center’s assets total $78,915. Hard to imagine how the Center could obtain sufficient financing to compete with the Alchemy offer.
Please!! No more luxury housing buildings on the UWS! We need everything but this in our neighborhood.
When money was collected to “donate” to politicians to landmark WSP the church billboard said “stop the forced landmarking of our church.”
This church and the necessary sidewalk shed and the homeless men who sleep under the shed have blighted the neighborhood long enough. I hope I’ve seen the last man pull down his pants and take a dump in the trash can.
Would it not be possible to find a developer that would agree to preserve the facade of the church as has been with townhouses in the neighborhood. This would at least preserve a valuable example of architecture and still allow this congregation to have their space.
NYU did that with St. Anne’s in Greenwich Village. Not everyone was pleased with outcome.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Ann_Church_(Manhattan)
In 5 years or so it will be another hi-rise catty-cornered to 535 WEA, another building where foreign money has been parked. Did you ever see “tenant” go in and out of that building the last 10 years? Best doorman job in the city. Maybe Mackenzie Scott will see this story….?
Unless the 12 people in the congregation want to make profit on the sale of the building, they should just give it to whomever can take care of it.
Individual members of congregation do not receive any sort of financial benefits from sale of building, but group as whole under laws governing not for profit organizations, and of course their faith.
Since it was the original (very small) congregation of what became WP that put up money to build that church, don’t see any problems.
Back in those days churches often raised funds by selling of pews. Every family was expected (or chided into) coughing up money to purchase theirs and still today you can see brass or other metal name plates attached noting original owners.
Other way of raising funds was to tie suggested “donations” for this or that church project to what a family paid for their pew or pews.
Find a billionaire to finance it. They can pretend it’s a part of the taxes they should pay, except it’ll be a write off!