West Side Rag
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT
West Side Rag
No Result
View All Result

Get WSR FREE in your inbox

Search the site

No Result
View All Result

Get WSR FREE in your inbox

AVAILABLE NOW!


HERE

Congestion Pricing Public Hearings are Coming Over the Next Month, After Plan Got Delayed

September 5, 2021 | 8:57 AM
in NEWS
52


Photo by Bernard & Myrtha Garon.

Congestion pricing, the system of tolls that will charge people to drive into Manhattan below 60th Street, was pushed back from its expected 2021 launch, and is now expected to start no sooner than 2023. The delay is a blow to the MTA’s plans to use the money for system upgrades.

There are a few things that still need to happen. A Traffic Mobility Review Board needs to be appointed to review how much the tolls will cost. And the federal government wants an environmental review that could take 16 months. The review also includes public hearings, which start this month. On the Upper West Side, residents and lawmakers have raised concerns that the tolls could mean an influx of suburban drivers coming into the city and parking in the neighborhood to avoid the tolls. One possible solution discussed in 2019 was to institute resident parking permits, though that was never approved.

The full public hearing schedule, and info on how to participate, is here.

Below are some hearing dates targeted at particular groups:

Manhattan CBD (60th Street and below)

Thursday, September 23, 6-8 p.m.

Register to speak or request services

Manhattan Outside CBD (61st Street and above)

Wednesday, October 6, 6-8 p.m.

Register to speak or request services

And there’s a hearing for New Yorkers to discuss the impacts on minority and low-income communities as well:

New York

Thursday, October 7, 6-8 p.m.

Register to speak or request services

Share this article:
guest

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

52 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ian Alterman
Ian Alterman
1 year ago

There is little question that congestion pricing is long overdue. The issue is whether, given the ineptness and incompetence of City and State bureaucracy, the plan will be administrated properly and efficiently so that the money raised actually does what i’s supposed to do.

0
Reply
Js
Js
1 year ago
Reply to  Ian Alterman

Ian,
I would prefer a major tax on billionaires and pied a terre owners.

There are many non-rich drivers who will be impacted – this is another way to cement Manhattan only for the affluent.
BTW during this Covid year a neighbor regularly purchased and drove supplies to 2 family homeless shelters below 60th Street. Under CP, he’d be paying for his volunteer efforts….

0
Reply
Peter G
Peter G
1 year ago
Reply to  Js

I understand wanting to tax a billionaire who lives here full time but you want an owner of a pied a terre to pay for congestion that they barely contribute to simply because they’re rich? Thats absurd.

0
Reply
Josh P.
Josh P.
1 year ago
Reply to  Js

It doesn’t matter whether a driver is rich or poor – their cars still cause pollution in our neighborhood. Reducing the amount of traffic is essential to increasing the health and livability of the upper west side.

0
Reply
Js
Js
1 year ago
Reply to  Josh P.

Josh,
Seems to me to reduce vehicles, building development (which inevitably generate vehicles) should be curtailed and able-bodied residents should walk to stores instead of ordering Amazon etc.
Also no more food trucks (they really pollute) and carts.

Bus and subway fare should be lower and service increased to encourage ridership

Unfortunately none of this will happen….

0
Reply
Josh P.
Josh P.
1 year ago
Reply to  Js

If we are trying to reduce traffic globally and not just in our own backyards, we have an obligation to add as much housing as possible in walkable neighborhoods like the Upper West Side. Someone who lives in the suburbs has the take a car for almost every trip, whether they are able bodied or not. If that person could live here instead they could walk or take public transit for a significant number of trips.

0
Reply
Jay
Jay
1 year ago
Reply to  Js

Why would development need to be curtailed? The congestion zone has the best public transportation in the nation.

The costs for individual deliveries within the zone will be minuscule.

0
Reply
nycityny
nycityny
1 year ago
Reply to  Ian Alterman

There is little question that the plan will not be administered properly nor efficiently and the money raised will be misspent or pilfered. Thus congestion pricing is likely to be a boondoggle that costs residents greatly without many of the intended benefits. Traveling to or living in Manhattan will just get much more expensive (the cost of bringing goods into the borough will have to be paid by its residents).

0
Reply
Michael
Michael
1 year ago

Along with congestion pricing residential permits should also be put in place. There are too many out of state cars parking on our streets some are residents that live in NYC as their primary residence yet purchase and register vehicles in another state to avoid sales tax and insurance costs. Out of state plates should have time limited parking (4 hours for example).

0
Reply
Kindly Dr Dave
Kindly Dr Dave
1 year ago
Reply to  Michael

i agree

0
Reply
PSP
PSP
1 year ago
Reply to  Michael

I entirely agree on residential permits. With spaces designated for hybrids and EVs that have charging stations. Obviously some spaces for non-residents will be available, but commuters will find them scarce. Hopefully that will push people to public transport.

0
Reply
Mark Moore
Mark Moore
1 year ago
Reply to  Michael

There have been two white Honda Accords with red TN dealer plates on 94 between Columbus and Amsterdam for months now. There used to be a third but I haven’t seen that one in a while.

0
Reply
UWSer
UWSer
1 year ago

Residential parking permits are a terrible and elistist idea. Why should UWSers with a car 24/7 be given privileges not conferred to UWSers who occasionally rent and park a car?

Car owners are part of the pollution and congestion problem. They should not be given prizes for this.

If we are going to have residential parking permits, they need to be given to or available for purchase by ALL residents, not just those who own cars.

Otherwise, it would be better to have meters everywhere, so all drivers pay the same effective parking tax.

0
Reply
Reality check
Reality check
1 year ago
Reply to  UWSer

Please bear in mind that the people who park on the streets – and thus are affected by meters or residential permits or alternate side parking for that matter – are the NON affluent. Car owners who can afford to do so park in the lots. So what is really being proposed is further hurting only the working class. Separately, congestion pricing is regressive – hurting those who actually live here and have elderly family or large families who cannot be otherwise transported or must work for a living outside of commuting lines. Those people who are affluent don’t feel the pinch and will not change behavior bec congestion pricing- they can afford it. It’s the NON affluent at issue. What about caring for those who are trying to make ends meet?

0
Reply
Josh P.
Josh P.
1 year ago
Reply to  Reality check

Take a walk down any block in the neighborhood and count the number of Mercedes, BMWs, Audis, Land Rovers and other luxury brands. There’s even a Maserati that parks around 75th sometimes! You won’t have to walk far to see that the idea that “everyone who uses street parking is working class” isn’t anywhere close to true.
It really doesn’t matter though – working class cars cause pollution and congestion too!

0
Reply
Christine E
Christine E
1 year ago

Federal legislation is being introduced to exempt NJ drivers from NYC congestion tax, either directly or through federal tax rebates. If that goes through, what is the point of this tax, except to penalize NYers.

https://www.insidernj.com/press-release/gottheimer-announces-federal-legislation-fight-back-new-york-congestion-tax-protect-new-jersey-residents-commuters/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/reason.com/2021/08/12/new-jersey-congressmen-want-to-exempt-new-jersey-drivers-from-new-yorks-congestion-tolls/%3famp

0
Reply
Uwsider
Uwsider
1 year ago
Reply to  Christine E

Want to make a bet that this makes it through Congress. I’ll put up 5k that says this bill dies and dies hard. The cost for an NJ pol to propose a populist bill benefitting his constituents : 0. The cost to him when it dies in committee : 0.

0
Reply
Paul
Paul
1 year ago
Reply to  Christine E

Will New Yorkers be exempted from the rediculously hight tolls on the New Jersey Turnpike and Garden State Parkway?

Jersey is literally a choke point for over 30 million people getting to and from NY and New England and they gouge like crazy.

0
Reply
joe braun
joe braun
1 year ago

In the city that never sleeps – this will never happen
And it should NOT happen.
You want to slow down the number of out of Manhattan cars coming in?
Institute a high price on entering the city, on ALL bridges & tunnels.
How about $30? This will eliminate 50% of the cars coming in.

0
Reply
mary
mary
1 year ago

Resident parking permits have worked well in other major metropolitan areas and should definitely be considered as part of the parking and driving equation here in NYC. Residents should, of course, have to pay for such permits, but having them in use would improve the current situation, which sees too many spots occupied permanently by out-of-state cars.

0
Reply
Mike M
Mike M
1 year ago

How about a different kind of congestion pricing: increase fees for dog licenses. More dogs on leashes produce congested sidewalks, not to mention dog residue on sidewalks. Dogs on leashes expand the amount of sidewalk space occupied by people walking dogs, especially with those expanded leashes. People with dogs in little strollers could request a reduced license fee.

0
Reply
RK
RK
1 year ago
Reply to  Mike M

Let’s do the same for strollers. And children.

0
Reply
Carlos
Carlos
1 year ago

Pre-covid I was generally in favor of this. Now I think it is a really bad idea. Commercial real estate is really struggling and this will not help the situation. I know everyone here hates the big bad corporations but they create a lot of jobs (both primary and secondary, such as food service, janitorial, etc.) and pay a lot of taxes. This will just make things more difficult for them.

0
Reply
ST
ST
1 year ago

LOL. More incompetence from city and state government. Parking uptown has disappeared due to Covid Shanties and now congestion pricing is supposed to come? NO ONE will come into NYC anymore, not for fun, not for work. Talk about killing the goose that lay the golden egg.

0
Reply
Phil
Phil
1 year ago

Why 60th Street as the border for congestion pricing? If you need to load/unload a vehicle, you pay a congestion fee if you live on 60th St, but don’t pay a fee if you live on 61st St? It’s a completely arbitrary Berlin Wall running through the middle of residential neighborhoods. If there’s going to be a congestion fee zone it ought to be all of Manhattan, not running down the middle of a block that people live on.

0
Reply
Paul
Paul
1 year ago
Reply to  Phil

The CBD and Financial District are universally defined as Manhattan below 60th Street.
You can exempt or rebate residents of that area with little problem. You can’t if you go into the almost totally residential areas north of 60th St.

0
Reply
Phil
Phil
1 year ago
Reply to  Paul

…except that the proposed plan doesn’t exempt or rebate residents. The London congestion plan, which is often cited as a model, does give a large discount to residents of the zone. The NYC plan emulates the London plan is all respects EXCEPT this one. Believe me, any car owner below 60th street is not the cause of mid-town congestion; they are not driving to their mid-town offices, nor putting the family in their car to drive to a Broadway show. They mainly use their cars to leave the city.

0
Reply
Josh P.
Josh P.
1 year ago
Reply to  Phil

If you live in Midtown and only ever use your car to leave the city, you still have to drive through Midtown, creating traffic and pollution in Midtown. Just because you drive out of the zone first and back into it second doesn’t mean your trip causes any less congestion or air pollution than someone who does the opposite.

0
Reply
Phil
Phil
1 year ago
Reply to  Josh P.

If I bring my child home from college north of the city at the end of the semester and unload the car at my home on 61st street I wouldn’t pay a congestion fee, but if I live on 60th street I would pay a congestion fee. Both addresses are in the same council district, the same school district, pay the same taxes, yet one is treated differently, based on what block in a neighborhood one chose to live on, years before congestion pricing was even imagined. My argument is that geographic boundaries are the customary placement for tolls — make all of Manhattan the congestion zone at the river crossings — rather than penalizing residents depending on which block within a neighborhood they happen to live on. If a resident of downtown Brooklyn or any other neighborhood in NYC can, say, drive an elderly parent a few blocks to a doctor in the neighborhood without a fee, why should someone who lives on 60th street in Manhattan be treated differently? If you picked the wrong block to live on 20 years ago, it’s just too bad for you, right? People outside the congestion zone have the option of avoiding or going around it. People already living inside the zone don’t.

0
Reply
Tim
Tim
1 year ago
Reply to  Phil

How is it arbitrary? They’re putting tolls on all of the free bridges essentially. The 59th street Bridge is the last one….

0
Reply
UWS Skeptic
UWS Skeptic
1 year ago

I don’t think I can articulate why, but congestion pricing just seems like a bad idea to me. As others have said, it will probably have unintended consequences. Also, the main cheerleaders for this don’t really have a great record. Everyone knows that driving in midtown is difficult and anyone who chooses to do so knows what they are in for. Raise taxes a different way please.

0
Reply
Jay
Jay
1 year ago
Reply to  UWS Skeptic

Why should driving in one of the most public transportation rich areas in the world be easy or necessary?

If you don’t want to pay the fee, then use the subway, bus, train, etc.

0
Reply
Mother and daughter
Mother and daughter
1 year ago
Reply to  Jay

The universal ease and convenience of trains and buses is a myth. The author of the comment above cheerleading it may not have elderly parents or multiple small children who have to deal with baby carriages and walkers and wheelchairs which cannot be negotiated swiftly and easily onto and off buses and down to trains. Additionally, it is a myth that public transportation is ubiquitous – is only great if your work and home readily connect via the lines. A bunch of us have to to take mult buses or trains to get to work. The transfers are crazy. commuting time even in a high train bus zone can br nightmarishly long if you don’t luck out re work/home.

0
Reply
Paul
Paul
1 year ago
Reply to  Mother and daughter

The anti-car people don’t seem able to acknowledge that there are a lot of people whose lives are such that a car is a necessity. Jobs, family responsibilities, etc., often lie outside Manhattan and aren’t reasonably accessable by transit.

The transit system is designed to efficiently bring people to and from the Central Business District and Financial District from various residential neighborhoods in and around the Five Boros.

If you need to get from one residential neighborhood (the UWS) to another? If transit works it’s happenstance. If not, you drive. And if you have to do it often? You get a car.

And that is a perfectly reasonable approach to living.
_

0
Reply
Paul
Paul
1 year ago
Reply to  Paul

You misunderstand me, Brandon. I am for congestion pricing. I am arguing that, in residential neighborhoods like ours, a car can be a necessity and the decision to own one is rational.

0
Reply
Brandon
Brandon
1 year ago
Reply to  Paul

You seem to misunderstand what congestion pricing is, Paul. It would not ban all private car use in the city.

Rather, residents would be able to keep their cars under congestion pricing. People would also be able to continue using cars to drive south of 60th St. It would just cost them more money to do so.

And if you think that’s unfair to the tiny proportion of downtown households described in your scenario — i.e. all the people who live in Manhattan south of 60th St. but must regularly drive out of the city — why do their comparatively small financial interests here outweigh the needs of the countless other NYC households who depend on adequately funded public transit and clean air?

0
Reply
Paul
Paul
1 year ago
Reply to  Paul

Luxury is a word, and all words have defintions.
A luxury is something you don’t “need.” Or it’s something you “need” but you get in excess (a Rolex instead of a Timex).

Someone whose responsibilities include leaving a residential area of NYC for another area not served by transit has a need, not a luxury.
And with many households, one member may have that need while another works within the CBD or FiDi and can take a subway.
So they should both just up and leave?
Why?

0
Reply
100wrez
100wrez
1 year ago
Reply to  Paul

A car is a luxury here. If you don’t want to pay the costs of that luxury, there’s lots of the country for you to choose from.

0
Reply
fred w
fred w
1 year ago

What about Manhattan residents who reverse commute? I live on W/79th and work in Hoboken. I leave the city via the Lincoln Tunnel. Why should I be penalized for commuting to work? And don’t tell me to take the GWB as that is logistically inane.

0
Reply
Josh
Josh
1 year ago
Reply to  fred w

The way the plan is set up, as long as you take the West Side Highway to the tunnel, you wont be paying a toll.

0
Reply
UWS Craig
UWS Craig
1 year ago

In 2026 electric flying cars will be available to the general public. I hope the congestion pricing scheme also applies to flying cars else that would be completely unfair.

0
Reply
June
June
1 year ago

Concerned about the white placard for disabled. Will they have to pay for going below 60 Street, Doctors appts, etc?

0
Reply
Michael H. Stearns
Michael H. Stearns
1 year ago

I agree with Mary as I have lived in cities that require the use of resident parking stickers to park in residential areas. The use of stickers has been in effect successfully since the late 1970s in Boston and Cambridge, Mass. And I know some other cities use the sticker system.

0
Reply
C Holter
C Holter
1 year ago

What about residents of upper Manhattan who do not drive but take cabs to go to doctors appointments because they cannot travel on subway or bus? Why are non drivers being penalized? Why are residents being penalized?

0
Reply
Rhoda E Kleiman
Rhoda E Kleiman
1 year ago

what, if any, accommodations for HANDICAPPED whose physicians and hospitals are in Manhattan?

and/or coming in from Bklyn, Staten Island,Queens?????????????????????????

0
Reply
John
John
1 year ago

The mayor congestwd the roads with Uber ,Lyft care to the tune of over 100,000 cars they are the ones who should be paying congestion pricing not regular folks ,The mayor create this mess and now wants all to pay for his screw up ,find it unfair to start telling when all congestion is car services and delivery trucks. The city will still make millions of dollars without tolling regular folks.

0
Reply
Robt. Crenshaw
Robt. Crenshaw
1 year ago

Residential Parking Permits, vistor’s should park in Garages/Parking Lots. Those who live in said area should not be charged a toll, we live here! I shouldn’t have to pay to enter and park in my neighborhood.

0
Reply
Sam M
Sam M
1 year ago

Congestion pricing is in effect on all taxi fares for quite some time already. How is that fair when the start date for other vehicles has been delayed until 2023?

0
Reply
RAL
RAL
1 year ago

many other cities have managed very well with congestion fees and resident parking – why is Manhattan special? And BTW – half of the cars on my block have their Hamptons summer stickers on them and they’re gone every weekend – so enough already with the poor people argument.

0
Reply
Chris
Chris
1 year ago

I live on West 63rd and worry this will become a drop off pick up block to avoid the toll. More cars will be turning North off 62nd and 63rd street on a already congested Broadway which will back the traffic up to CPW and up CPW. These two blocks will be a disaster.

0
Reply
Ben
Ben
1 year ago

There will surely be a need to fine-tune the implementation, but in my college Econ 101 course, we called this “pricing in externalities.” Very happy to see this move forward!

0
Reply
J UWS
J UWS
1 year ago

Let’s hope this gets implemented soon! Personally I’d like to breathe less polluted air, be safer biking in the city, and have better funded subways and buses. Any big city – especially NYC – should be looking at ways to reduce the number of cars driving around the city and stop them from forcing pedestrians to breathe their poisonous exhaust.

0
Reply

YOU MIGHT LIKE...

Check Out this Year’s Participatory Budgeting Choices; Voting March 25-April 2
NEWS

Check Out this Year’s Participatory Budgeting Choices; Voting March 25-April 2

March 24, 2023 | 1:48 PM
PANEL VOTES TO (FINALLY) MAKE CATHEDRAL OF ST. JOHN THE DIVINE A LANDMARK
HISTORY

Cathedral of St. John the Divine to Host Service of Apology for Slavery on Saturday

March 24, 2023 | 8:06 AM
Previous Post

Volunteer for DOROT’s 9/11 National Day of Service Package Delivery!

Next Post

Target Store Remains Closed Because of Storm Destruction

this week's events image

Explore Your Favorite Subject

20th precinct 24th precinct american museum of natural history animals art bicycling bulletin central park closings columns community board 7 coronavirus crash crime development dogs events fdny fire food gale brewer helen rosenthal history jcc lincoln center monday bulletin morning bulletin nypd openings pedestrian safety photography photos politics public schools pupper west side real estate restaurants retail riverside park silver stars fitness snow sponsored subway upper west side uws

CITY NEWS

Brick Underground
City Limits
Eater
Gothamist
NY Daily News
NY Post
NY Times

LOCAL RESOURCES

Bloomingdale Neighborhood History Group
Central Park Conservancy
CB7
Community Education Council 3
Assembly District 67
The New York Historical Society
Riverside Park
West End Preservation

UWS Blogs

Bloomingdale History Central Park Blogger
North River Notes

Next Post
Target Store Remains Closed Because of Storm Destruction

Target Store Remains Closed Because of Storm Destruction

Monday Bulletin: Dirty Streets, An Exonerated Candidate, Surely You Joust!

Monday Bulletin: Dirty Streets, An Exonerated Candidate, Surely You Joust!

Join the Hearing Loss Association of America at Walk4Hearing

Join the Hearing Loss Association of America at Walk4Hearing

  • ABOUT US
  • CONTACT US
  • NEWSLETTER
  • WSR MERCH!
  • ADVERTISE
  • EVENTS
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • SITE MAP
Site design by RLDGROUP

© 2023 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • TOP NEWS
  • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT US
  • WSR SHOP

© 2023 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.