West Side Rag
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART & CULTURE
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • ABOUT US
    • OUR STORY
    • CONTRIBUTORS
    • CONTACT
    • GET WSR FREE IN YOUR INBOX
    • SEND US TIPS AND IDEAS
West Side Rag
No Result
View All Result
SUPPORT THE RAG
No Result
View All Result

Favorite WSR Stories

  • They are ‘Absolutely’ Back and Some Early Customers Say the Bagels Are Still ‘10 out of 10’
  • Meet the 2nd Busiest Person on the Upper West Side: Gale Brewer’s Scheduler
  • UWS Church Raises Over $200,000 for 107th Street Fire Victims: ‘Everyone Lost Everything’
Get WSR FREE in your inbox
SUPPORT THE RAG

Community Board 7 Wants Emergency Right to Virtual Meetings Restored So They Can Meet Safely

August 13, 2021 | 2:37 PM - Updated on June 5, 2022 | 11:44 PM
in NEWS, POLITICS
24

By Carol Tannenhauser

The emergency rule that allowed public meetings to take place virtually during the pandemic has expired, forcing community boards to meet in person. But with the Delta variant causing a new wave of COVID in the city, the local board is pushing back, saying it endangers their health.

Concerned about their ability to meet safely, 31 members of Community Board 7 have signed an open letter to Governor Cuomo, Lt. Governor Hochul, and members of the state legislature, asking that the right to meet virtually afforded to them during the pandemic be restored.

“Thanks to the State of Emergency declared by the Governor in March 2020, our Community Board, as well as as many other…government entities were able to continue to meet and conduct the public’s business using virtual platforms such as Zoom, Teams and WebEx,” the letter stated. “The lifting of the State of Emergency in June 2021 has for all practical purposes eliminated the ability of Community and other Boards to meet via virtual platforms….We respectfully urge the Legislature to adopt, and the Governor to sign into law, amendments to the Open Meetings Law that would restore the ability of Boards to meet using virtual platforms that accomodate public participation.”

Normally, the Community Board would have drafted a formal resolution — a non-binding recommendation — to accomplish its goal, but time ran out, said Board Member Richard Robbins. “We had an emergency full board meeting in early July before the executive order ended, at which many board members said they weren’t comfortable meeting in person. We talked about meeting outdoors but that idea got rejected. I proposed a resolution calling for an extension of the executive order, but by the time we started discussing it, too many members had left the meeting so we didn’t have a quorum.”

With Delta raging, community boards have no safe way to meet. An open letter signed by 30 @CB7Manhattan members (as we can’t legally meet to vote on a resolution) to once again allow Zoom meetings. https://t.co/J2JDjii4vj cc: @westsiderag

— Richard Robbins (@rich1) August 13, 2021

In addition to safety, the letter lauds the increased public participation that the virtual meetings engendered. “Indeed, several Community Boards have reported far greater numbers of public participants in virtual meetings than had ever attended in-person meetings prior to the Pandemic — at least one Community Board reported participation by over 1,300 members of the public in a virtual meeting in 2020.”

We are awaiting a response from the Governor’s office.

 

Share this article:
SUPPORT THE RAG
Leave a comment

Please limit comments to 150 words and keep them civil and relevant to the article at hand. Comments are closed after six days. Our primary goal is to create a safe and respectful space where a broad spectrum of voices can be heard. We welcome diverse viewpoints and encourage readers to engage critically with one another’s ideas, but never at the expense of civility. Disagreement is expected—even encouraged—but it must be expressed with care and consideration. Comments that take cheap shots, escalate conflict, or veer into ideological warfare detract from the constructive spirit we aim to cultivate. A detailed statement on comments and WSR policy can be read here.

guest

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

24 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
babrarus
babrarus
4 years ago

Are they so scared of life that they can not meet in person?
Stadiums are filled up with fans.
Movies are sold out, to people.
Stop this none sense, get a life, do your duty and get together in person, or – resign.

0
Reply
Erica
Erica
4 years ago

As a working mom, I love that I was finally able to attend Community and CEC meetings last year. I hope this continues and, when they’re ready to meet in person, perhaps there will still be a way to join virtually as well. Thank you, board members, for your service!

0
Reply
Miriam Fisher
Miriam Fisher
4 years ago
Reply to  Erica

The pandemic raised awareness of different ways of organizing activities.Zoom virtual meetings allowed participation and public voice of previously unheard members of the community,people with schedule conflicts,illnesses,disabilities,other restrictions Hybrid meetings for all city community boards and public forums would allow full participation and no exclusions

0
Reply
Bob Lamm
Bob Lamm
4 years ago

Remarkable to read the ugly attack on members of Community Board 7 by “babraus” (who of course hides behind a fake name). The second comment by Erica has it right. I’ve known great people who were on CB7 and other community boards. Many thanks to all of you for your service to our neighborhood and our city.

0
Reply
Leadership
Leadership
4 years ago
Reply to  Bob Lamm

I applaud civic commitment too. However, there is a public service just in meeting. The CDC says vaccines prevent serious symptoms even if people are infected after being vaccinated. The issue isn’t infection. It’s hospitalization, and hospitalized people, the data show, are over 99% not vaccinated. So meeting in person actually showcases to the vaccine hesitant the benefits of being vaccinated. Meeting in person id acivic service.

0
Reply
nemo paradise
nemo paradise
4 years ago
Reply to  Bob Lamm

Samuel Johnson, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Lewis Carroll and Mark Twain are among those who “hid behind a false name.”

Most of them would chuckle at Mr. Lamm’s choice of words. These folks knew a thing or two about “ugly attacks,” and by current standards, Babrarus’s comment is a Valentine.

0
Reply
PubliusJay
PubliusJay
4 years ago

Whatever the longer term merits of continuing to allow virtual meetings (and there are some), while we are re-imposing mask mandates and eviction moratoriums, continuing to work from home and considering vaccine mandates it seems blindingly obvious that public meetings should largely remain virtual.

0
Reply
Silencedogood
Silencedogood
4 years ago
Reply to  PubliusJay

By that argument Congress should be virtual also. It isn’t. congresspersons have not been hospitalized after vaccination even if infected post vaccinations. That’s because these vaccines work well. They may not stop infections but they sure stop the symptoms. Are the CBS more needful of protection than Congress?

0
Reply
Paul Fischer
Paul Fischer
4 years ago
Reply to  Silencedogood

congress gets paid ,CB members are volunteers

0
Reply
Missing link
Missing link
4 years ago
Reply to  Paul Fischer

… volunteers who can’t be held accountable to those over whom they have power as a hyper local form of government. If they want pay they can compete for votes.

0
Reply
Paul Fischer
Paul Fischer
4 years ago
Reply to  Missing link

I like being a volunteer ,

0
Reply
Richard Robbins
Richard Robbins
4 years ago
Reply to  Silencedogood

I like the comparison to Congress. Are you suggesting we should get paid and get health benefits for life?

I’m fine with meeting in-person, though a number of my colleagues (and a number of members of the public) are not. As long as a reasonable number of people who would otherwise attend the meetings are not comfortable doing so, I think we need to offer a remote option.

PLUS…. Many more people have been able to attend public meetings on Zoom than in real life. Zoom makes them accessible for people with any number of complications, from busy work schedules, family obligations, accessibility issues, etc. I think having hybrid meetings forevermore would be a great thing for our community.

(All views my own.)

0
Reply
Christine E
Christine E
4 years ago
Reply to  Silencedogood

@Silencedogood, Have you been to a Community Board meeting? They are held in a tiny, stuffy, windowless, low-ceiling room. There is barely space for the CB members, let alone interested members of the public. Virtual meetings are a no-brainer, even in non-pandemic times.

0
Reply
ST
ST
4 years ago

CB7 doesn’t listen to the community anyway. Attending those meetings is a waste of time for citizens. CB7 does exactly as it pleases. The fact is the citizens of New York City have no representation.

0
Reply
Paul Fischer
Paul Fischer
4 years ago
Reply to  ST

Wrong again

0
Reply
joe braun
joe braun
4 years ago

Question:
Do the members of the board get paid for their service or are they doing it for free?

0
Reply
Paul
Paul
4 years ago
Reply to  joe braun

It’s a volunteer position.

0
Reply
Reality check
Reality check
4 years ago
Reply to  Paul

“Volunteer” here = actually unelected and unaccountable sinecure only open to those with the right connections. CB members’ equally-interested-in-volunteering neighbors are not only out of luck but also can’t vote CB out if CB members make poor decisions.

0
Reply
joe braun
joe braun
4 years ago
Reply to  Paul

Thank you very much.

0
Reply
UWS Craig
UWS Craig
4 years ago

Given that it is unsafe for vaccinated, N95-wearing adults to congregate, it is doubly unsafe for unvaccinated children to congregate. The schools should be online while Delta rages. What are we trying to prove, anyway?

0
Reply
Leon
Leon
4 years ago
Reply to  UWS Craig

The mental health risk to kids of another year going in and out of school is currently greater than the health risk of being in school full time. This risk would be even less if every single person who is eligible for the vaccine would get it.

However, when kids are in school, they need to be fully masked and precautions need to be taken. And there needs to be a plan for those kids who have to be quarantined so they don’t miss a week or two of school. But resources shouldn’t be wasted on a full time remote option.

0
Reply
Life is a risk
Life is a risk
4 years ago
Reply to  UWS Craig

This is well meaning but silly. Parents have to assess risks for kids all the time since no life activity – including crossing busy streets to get to school or riding a bike to grandma – is completely safe. Most parents have concluded that having kids blow yet more school online and fall further behind academic and social development after so long is a severe risk that outweighs extremely mild symptoms in most kids (not infection, symptoms). It’s a risk balance as with all life activities. Most parents have this one figured correctly, which is why parental market forces resulted in private schools being primarily open while it is the public schools — that unlike private schools do not answer to parents directly but to teachers unions — have been shut.

0
Reply
Miriam Fisher
Miriam Fisher
4 years ago

An unintended consequence of the pandemic is
we became aware of benefits of absentee ballots,public shared streets,reduced congestion. Zoom virtual meetings allowed a forum for many previously unheard voices to participate and address unmet issues, people with health issues, disabilities, other restrictions. Hybrid meetings in all community boards would be equitable and not exclude participants

0
Reply
Paul Fischer
Paul Fischer
4 years ago

the health and safety of people should come ahead of anything else ,if meeting was held public would be excluded . allow virtual meetings until virus is fully beaten down

0
Reply

YOU MIGHT LIKE...

Where to Responsibly Dispose of Your Christmas Tree on the Upper West Side
NEWS

Where to Responsibly Dispose of Your Christmas Tree on the Upper West Side

January 6, 2026 | 12:54 PM
Ruthless Advice for Upper West Siders: All of the Answers With None of the Expertise
ABSURDITY

Ruthless Advice for Upper West Siders: All of the Answers With None of the Expertise

January 6, 2026 | 8:30 AM
Previous Post

Stuck Inside, the ‘Mayor’ of the UWS Is ‘Keeping Love Alive’

Next Post

Weekend History: Along the Bloomingdale Road (Broadway) After the Revolution: Taverns and Tavernkeepers

this week's events image
Next Post
Weekend History: Along the Bloomingdale Road (Broadway) After the Revolution: Taverns and Tavernkeepers

Weekend History: Along the Bloomingdale Road (Broadway) After the Revolution: Taverns and Tavernkeepers

Monday Bulletin: Architectural Departures, Taming an Owl, Jogging and Acting

Monday Bulletin: Architectural Departures, Taming an Owl, Jogging and Acting

Experience the Best of Summer at the Reimagined 212 West 72nd Street on the Upper West Side

Experience the Best of Summer at the Reimagined 212 West 72nd Street on the Upper West Side

  • ABOUT US
  • CONTACT US
  • NEWSLETTER
  • WSR MERCH!
  • ADVERTISE
  • EVENTS
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • SITE MAP
Site design by RLDGROUP

© 2026 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • TOP NEWS
  • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART & CULTURE
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • ABOUT
    • OUR STORY
    • CONTRIBUTORS
    • CONTACT US
    • GET WSR FREE IN YOUR INBOX
    • SEND US TIPS AND IDEAS
  • WSR SHOP

© 2026 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.