West Side Rag
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART & CULTURE
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • ABOUT US
    • OUR STORY
    • CONTRIBUTORS
    • CONTACT
    • ADVERTISE
    • GET WSR FREE IN YOUR INBOX
    • SEND US TIPS AND IDEAS
West Side Rag
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result

Favorite WSR Stories

    SUPPORT THE RAG
    Get the neighborhood news that matters.
    Sign up for our free newsletter

    Local Bar & Grill Gets Liquor License Suspended for Allowing Dining Inside Atrium

    July 31, 2020 | 3:42 PM - Updated on June 5, 2022 | 11:44 PM
    in NEWS, POLITICS
    63


    Dining in the Hi-Life atrium.

    By Carol Tannenhauser

    On Thursday, July 30th, the New York State Liquor Authority (SLA) suspended the liquor license of Hi-Life Bar & Grill, on 83rd Street and Amsterdam Avenue, for allegedly violating the dining-in ban still in effect in New York City due to the coronavirus.

    “I’m still reeling,” said owner Earl Geer, in an email to WSR. “A half hour ago, reps from the SLA came with cops to shut our bar down. Last night, we were given a notice by an SLA rep for utilizing our sidewalk café atrium, with French doors open, to serve diners. This is a gray area, as it has a fixed roof.”

    Geer said he was under the misunderstanding that when guidelines were modified to include street seating with solid overhead covering, i.e. tents, that seating in his cafe, with all doors open and plexiglass separating diners, was in compliance.

    “We complied immediately on Wednesday night, but today we learned that the ‘Full Board’ voted and suspended a number of licenses, including ours. So much for three strikes,” he added.

    The fine for the violation could be as much as $10,000, Eater said.

    Geer emphasized that he is “very supportive of Governor Cuomo and all he has done to keep New York City safe,” and will always comply with city and state regulations. “While we would have appreciated a warning,” he said, “We apologize for the misunderstanding and any noncompliance.”

    “I’m heartbroken,” said Upper West Sider and tipster Joe Mutz. “I’ve consumed more meals there than I can count.”

    Until the matter is resolved, Hi-Life’s kitchen will remain open for outdoor dining and delivery, and they will offer complimentary watermelon-and-mint-infused water, ice teas and Arnold Palmers. Geer is calling this a “neighborhood booze cleanse.”

    Earl wrote about the difficulties of operating a restaurant amid the pandemic here.

    The staff of Hi-Life created a GoFundMe account to help with Hi-Life’s legal expenses and lost business. Click here to donate.

    Share this article:
    SUPPORT THE RAG
    Leave a comment

    Please limit comments to 150 words and keep them civil and relevant to the article at hand. Comments are closed after six days. Our primary goal is to create a safe and respectful space where a broad spectrum of voices can be heard. We welcome diverse viewpoints and encourage readers to engage critically with one another’s ideas, but never at the expense of civility. Disagreement is expected—even encouraged—but it must be expressed with care and consideration. Comments that take cheap shots, escalate conflict, or veer into ideological warfare detract from the constructive spirit we aim to cultivate. A detailed statement on comments and WSR policy can be read here.

    guest

    guest

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    63 Comments
    Geez Louise
    Geez Louise
    6 years ago

    What a joke! With all the crime around here lately, this is really what we’re worried about? This is arguably a better setup than 90% of outdoor seating venues. You still have outside air, are not really inside, and have full barriers in between you and other patrons. Plus, you don’t have a constant stream of people walking directly by you as you eat. This one is a real headscratcher.

    0
    Reply
    Weird
    Weird
    6 years ago
    Reply to  Geez Louise

    Completely agreed. This looks like a much safer scenario for all parties because you don’t have just random people who are trying to get from place to place forced to walk around all of the tables. It sounds to me like I did the person they have in forcing this regulation isn’t really capable of critical thinking or maybe that the enforcers have some sort of quota.

    It’s one thing to enforce the law and quite another to take corrective action in the spirit of the law. Is the goal to keep people safe or just for somebody to check boxes on a piece of paper? Because as somebody who has to hold my breath every time I walk past all of these tables that are taking up the whole sidewalk, this setup sure does look a whole lot safer to me.

    0
    Reply
    Oyster
    Oyster
    6 years ago

    Hi-Life certainly did everything reasonably and in good faith and it was just as safe as other outdoor dining all over the City. The SLA should dismiss this and let them reopen.

    0
    Reply
    Boris
    Boris
    6 years ago
    Reply to  Oyster

    No, they didn’t act in good faith and tried to skirt the regulations. It’s obvious that is INDOOR seating with a large open window. They shouldn’t act so surprised as if they didn’t know. I wish people would stop making such ridiculous rationalizations to justify bad behavior.

    0
    Reply
    James Demetrios
    James Demetrios
    6 years ago
    Reply to  Boris

    It’s just you. There are several restaurants with similar dining arrangements that are still operating. I was at a similar one last night. It seems so
    Much safer than other outside seating f where am dozens of people brush by you. So, either there is something else to this story, or it was very unfair.

    0
    Reply
    JSN
    JSN
    6 years ago
    Reply to  Boris

    I agree with Boris. That seems like INDOOR seating, but it might have been an honest mistake, so I’d give them a warning and not fine them.

    0
    Reply
    Yikes
    Yikes
    6 years ago
    Reply to  Boris

    Well, so far out of 15 comments, looks like its just you with that interpretation, Boris. That is no easy feat on this website, or in general.

    0
    Reply
    Parker
    Parker
    6 years ago
    Reply to  Yikes

    Yeah, I’m with Boris here. Three non-ventilated walls and a wall of windows. I’m not feeling the grey area here.

    0
    Reply
    Griff
    Griff
    6 years ago
    Reply to  Parker

    Congratulations to you both, you heartless busybodies.

    0
    Reply
    anthomellius
    anthomellius
    6 years ago

    I am very covid cautious but this seems like overly aggressive enforcement.

    Go after the real violators, but to those that are on the line of what’s allowed and not, give a clear warning at least to give them a chance to comply. Some are clear cut violations and there’s probably a good amount of gray area, and the gray areas should receive ample warning .

    We can’t have another bar/resaurant go belly up on the UWS.

    0
    Reply
    RP
    RP
    6 years ago

    That looks COVID super safe with the full open doors and WAY better than crowded street seats and people walking by. Tough enough to save a business these days. Hope city can see this is a gray area and turns this around quickly

    0
    Reply
    James Brummel
    James Brummel
    6 years ago

    you think it may have actually had to do with all the sidewalk drinking in the area? seems a bit harsh, no warning.

    0
    Reply
    JC
    JC
    6 years ago

    Hi Life has been dealing with the scaffolding for 10 years and are just trying to make money. Yes, it was a grey area, that’s why they should appeal and get it back, and then not use that area anymore.

    0
    Reply
    Sandy
    Sandy
    6 years ago

    THIS is what they focus on, vs the groups of men that are together without masks a few blocks away? Defies logic.

    0
    Reply
    jhminnyc
    jhminnyc
    6 years ago
    Reply to  Sandy

    I agree with you. I see groups of men chatting away up close with one another all the time. It’s like they think the virus wouldn’t dare bother them as they’re men. I guess it’s a macho thing.

    0
    Reply
    J M Kass
    J M Kass
    6 years ago

    My husband and I have eaten at the Hi-Life since we moved to the UWS. Good booze, good vibe, good food.

    Good luck to Earl!

    0
    Reply
    Me in the city
    Me in the city
    6 years ago

    Hi Life has been very conscientious . It’s the only place in the area that had signs all over their outdoor space weeks ago saying drinks are to go only, no congregating on their space,etc.
    I’m pretty low tolerance with violators usually, but this fine seems to miss the spirit of the law. Tell them it’s wrong, give them a chance to correct it, and let it be if they abide.
    What a shame!

    0
    Reply
    Naomi Paul
    Naomi Paul
    6 years ago

    We are so shocked by this. We are very cautious people, and this restaurant, and one of those tables, was the only reason we decided to eat out last week. We had the benefit of being ‘outside’ and felt better protected by the doors in between the tables. This is such a good restaurant. I cannot believe they are being penalized.

    0
    Reply
    Noel DeKing
    Noel DeKing
    6 years ago

    P.J. Clarke’s at Lincoln Center has an identical setup along Columbus Ave with seating in an enclosed sidewalk cafe with open windows. As of Thursday they were serving these tables from inside the restaurant.

    0
    Reply
    Griff
    Griff
    6 years ago
    Reply to  Noel DeKing

    Way to rat ‘em out! Thank you for your service, apparatchik!

    0
    Reply
    Marianne
    Marianne
    6 years ago

    Oh my goodness. Dining with the windows wide open- no difference than being outside on the sidewalk , only more safe since you won’t get run over by a bicyclist or truck when you eat at tables in the gutter. I hope this fine restaurant, where I have frequented often, will be given a break. This is too much of a fine! No fine and just a warning should be enough!!!!

    0
    Reply
    Dan M
    Dan M
    6 years ago

    I agree with most of the comments- very upset to see this out of the State Liquor Authority. I ate at Hi Life a week and a half ago and felt that the set up they have was excellent- much better than tables right next to each sitting on an avenue. I am not personally against lighter restrictions on outdoor drinking, but the offenses by many in the city have been blatant- why are the efforts not focused here if their goal is to enforce their code. Best of luck to Hi Life

    0
    Reply
    Danny
    Danny
    6 years ago

    The Hi Life setup seemed much safer than many other outdoor seating set ups you see.

    0
    Reply
    Jean Luke
    Jean Luke
    6 years ago

    From the photo it looks perfectly safe and ridiculous for NY to try and close them. There is ample opening and ventilation. I hope the SLA rethinks that onerous fine and let them continue to operate the way they were.

    0
    Reply
    SB
    SB
    6 years ago

    I feel hi-life got a raw deal. This looks safer than eating under a tent. Even though I’ve never been there I can still say “you gat a raw deal”

    0
    Reply
    KL
    KL
    6 years ago

    How is this not in compliance? We eat at PJ clarkes across from Lincoln Center and also the Greek Kitchen on 10th Ave. And they have the same setup.

    0
    Reply
    Ejlat Feuer
    Ejlat Feuer
    6 years ago

    This is ridiculous- the set up in the “cafe” is super safe. Customers are separated by dividers and are for all practical purposes sitting on the side walk. So sad to see this happen to a neighborhood institution that has been serving families for m- must be at least 25 years.

    0
    Reply
    Jonathan mohrer
    Jonathan mohrer
    6 years ago

    Earl is a great guy who spent bundles to make his place safe and comfortable. Much more so than his neighbors.
    His feels like a vendetta Let’s see if PJ Clark suffers the same fate.
    Earl, we are with you all the way !

    0
    Reply
    dannyb
    dannyb
    6 years ago

    Perhaps, no make that, it’s way beyond time, to zero out the SLA. There are a dozen overlapping, redundant, and often contradictory tax supported agencies restaurants have to answer to.
    Cut it down to one or two and save taxpayers money.
    And yes, that might mean cutting staff positions. Get me a violin.

    0
    Reply
    BN
    BN
    6 years ago

    But the protests are allowed?

    0
    Reply
    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    6 years ago

    I’m so sorry to hear this. This was actually the only restaurant that I’ve dined at during covid and I did it because I felt safe with the setup hi life created. Seems much safer than being on the middle of the sidewalk

    0
    Reply
    Julie
    Julie
    6 years ago

    This is indoor dining with open windows. It just is. Theres only air flow coming from 1 direction and not 4. You can feel it is safe but they’re not following the rules so I don’t feel too bad for them. By the way the 3 strike rule is for a complete shutdown which they didn’t get.

    0
    Reply
    UWS Wes
    UWS Wes
    6 years ago

    Looks pretty safe to me. Our local business owners need a break.

    0
    Reply
    ST
    ST
    6 years ago

    The Hi Life is an UWS institution that has had to suffer for years under a scaffolding that never comes down. Now this??? Did the restaurant get two warnings? Sitting by floor to ceiling open doors seems harmless. Can’t Linda Rosenthal do something? Or State Senator José M. Serrano?

    0
    Reply
    S. Hayes
    S. Hayes
    6 years ago

    THIS CITY is reward for all it will enable you to achieve and punishment for all the crimes it will force you to commit.
    Maybe we become New Yorkers the day we realize that New York will go on without us.
    Colson Whitehead
    The Colossus of New York

    0
    Reply
    S
    S
    6 years ago

    What about Guyer’s? They have violated rules for over a month.

    0
    Reply
    Patrick D Duff
    Patrick D Duff
    6 years ago

    It definitely is a gray area. What Hi-Life did is completely legal in New Jersey where indoor dining is also banned.

    0
    Reply
    Dr. Diana Bloom
    Dr. Diana Bloom
    6 years ago

    It is too soon to open up “As usual”

    0
    Reply
    Susan
    Susan
    6 years ago

    They are outside. I wonder if the governor is as strict with dining in the Hamptons as he is with our poor restaurants just trying to survive in the city.

    0
    Reply
    Bill
    Bill
    6 years ago

    I walked by there the other day and thought they were pushing it. I think a warning would have been sufficient. It certainly wasn’t necessary to suspend their liquor license and potentially fine them, especially since they complied immediately.

    0
    Reply
    Karen L. Bruno
    Karen L. Bruno
    6 years ago

    When will the people of the UWS learn?! When will they start fighting back with their votes?

    0
    Reply
    Roflo
    Roflo
    6 years ago
    Reply to  Karen L. Bruno

    Agree! Vote em out

    Vote Vote vote!

    0
    Reply
    nycityny
    nycityny
    6 years ago

    Shouldn’t science be the guide here? How safe are the patrons from the virus? Indoor dining is considered unsafe because of the air conditioning systems distributing the virus and lack of outside air ventilation. Neither of those seem applicable here so what’s the issue? Is it just a technicality? Semantics?

    On Amsterdam yesterday I saw patrons sitting under a tent with plastic barriers separating tables. I stopped to look because it seemed very enclosed and not necessarily that airy/safe. The tables at the large windows at Hi Life seem more “outdoors” to me.

    In the end the issue is the risk of contracting the virus, not the legal definition of inside vs outside.

    0
    Reply
    Michael Rosenberg
    Michael Rosenberg
    6 years ago

    HiLife is, by far, the best saloon on the west side!
    This is an egregious overreach in interpretation of the rules!
    This should have merited a warning at most!
    Michael Rosenberg…dedicated customer.

    0
    Reply
    Marilyn
    Marilyn
    6 years ago

    Duh! It’s an enclosed indoor space. Give ne a break, they didn’t know.

    0
    Reply
    Covid Jones
    Covid Jones
    6 years ago

    If you want this to end you have to write your state representative and state senator and *demand* that Cuomo’s “emergency” powers be subject to legislative review!

    The state legislature made him a de facto dictator until March of 2021. He can make any rule he wants, regardless of logic or fairness. We are no longer in an emergency, and Cuomo is petty and vindictive. Take away his right to drive New Yorkers into poverty!!

    Find your senator and representative, and demand change:

    https://www.nysenate.gov/find-my-senator
    https://nyassembly.gov/mem/search/

    0
    Reply
    Ellen
    Ellen
    6 years ago

    I feel bad for the Hi Life Bar and Grill. An UWS restaurant owner I know told me he got a warning call from the City telling him he was in violation of the City’s dining-in ban for the same conduct that is depicted here. Perhaps Mr. Geer can ask the SLA for an expedited review of the suspension of the loss of the liquor license and reinstatement based on lack of notice to cure from the City, especially as these regulations are new. (Also to take pity😉). As to the substantive issue, there is no doubt, in view of what is happening in large segments of our country that are reopening, that not enough precautions are being taken and it is much, much better to err on the side of safety. I know I wouldn’t sit down to dine “at the edge” as I have seen diners doing in many restaurants.

    0
    Reply
    Robert
    Robert
    6 years ago

    Our city council rep should demand a little common sense from the SLA, considering the damage already being done to neighborhood businesses especially our restaurants. This virus doesn’t need help from pandering politicians on a power trip.

    0
    Reply
    Naomi Paul
    Naomi Paul
    6 years ago

    The staff of Hi-Life has started a GoFundMe fundraiser. If you would like to help them out, here is the link: https://gf.me/u/yjvag5

    0
    Reply
    Valerie Duval
    Valerie Duval
    6 years ago

    Since it was a misunderstand and no intent to circumvent the “rules” can’t we as human beings give this establishment a warning rather than suspend the liquor license. Times are tough enough without no compassion for each other. There was no harmful intent and since a SLA representative was there the night before and saw the seating arrangements and they were give the go ahead to serve diners, which included liquor, While I live in the neighborhood I’m not a “regular” at HiLife but do go there occasionally and don’t want to see this great local establishment under any more constraints than the COVID-19 has already provided. Thanks.

    0
    Reply
    Jackie Hawkins
    Jackie Hawkins
    6 years ago

    I just heard! I’m so sorry. I’m hoping they give you some kind of break because you really thought the cafe with doors open would be okay. How long is the suspension for? Best of luck, really sorry & I hope it works out in your favor.
    Jackie Hawkins

    0
    Reply
    Bodhivata Dharmashanti
    Bodhivata Dharmashanti
    6 years ago

    I have been eating at Hilife often lately and, on weekends, have witness somewhat of a loud, at times even obnoxious crowd with too many drinks in the belly.

    It is very difficult, in a moment of difficulty, to deal with difficult people.

    Earl and his team have been doing a great job, and it is very unfortunate that now they have become the poster-boy of a well thought law in a debatble application.

    It may be hurting the business in the meantime but it won’t kill it. Because the business success is not in the bubbles or the martinis, it is in the hearts of all those of us who came to love this wonderful joint.

    Hang in there Earl, you are writing UWS history every night and we will support you all the way through.

    Pay attention to details, like making the decision of charging me, a regular customer, only to cover your cost for the filet mignon I did not eat last night because I got sick. They say the details are in the devil, I say they are in the Greed Dragon when he bites you in the neck. There was nothing wrong with the filet which looked made to perfection, it was a re-awakening of my meat allergy.
    Never the less…
    See you tonight again,
    Bodhi

    0
    Reply
    Yana Mateja Schammel
    Yana Mateja Schammel
    6 years ago

    Looks safer than most outdoor restaurants

    0
    Reply
    Rik
    Rik
    6 years ago

    I have never been to Hi-Life, but looking at where patrons were eating “inside” certainly looks safer than some of the “outside” dining on the upper West Side. The table seemed to be better insulated from neighboring tables than most restaurants, and in other locations it is difficult for those folks walking past the diners to keep a safe 6 feet between tables.

    0
    Reply
    lmm
    lmm
    6 years ago

    I’d actually feel much safer with solid walls blocking me from the other diners, than under a tent where you are not as separate. Not to mention, I’ve seen this done in multiple other restaurants around the city. So it seems others may be interpreting the rule in the same way. A warning would have seemed more fair!

    0
    Reply
    James Brummel
    James Brummel
    6 years ago

    from what I understand about the guidelines the issue there is no cross ventilation. Open on one side does not move air around like being open on 2+ sides. I think the fine is out of line and they should have been given warning.

    0
    Reply
    Jon Jon
    Jon Jon
    6 years ago

    I see that GEORGE CLOONEY just donated $2,500 to the legal fees. Thank you, George!!

    LOVE LOVE LOVE HI-LIFE…an Upper West Side institution…please show your support and give their EUS some love and business too. And no, I am not an employee, just a local whose called this place my second home for over 15 years.

    0
    Reply
    HelenD
    HelenD
    6 years ago
    Reply to  Jon Jon

    I never saw anyone get that excited about George Cooney. Of course I don’t know him, so he may very well be more exciting than George Clooney, heehee.

    0
    Reply
    Seriously
    Seriously
    6 years ago
    Reply to  HelenD

    When I saw the GoFundMe the other day, I’m pretty sure it was for 15,000. With a potential fine of 10,000 plus other expenses,I get it. But now they’re asking for 50,000? That doesn’t feel right to me.

    0
    Reply
    Linsey
    Linsey
    6 years ago
    Reply to  Seriously

    Unfortunately, the hearing with SLA isn’t scheduled until the 19th. The organizer increased the amount so they could try to hold on to their 20 employees.

    The GoFundMe page was updated with that information yesterday.

    0
    Reply
    lynn
    lynn
    6 years ago
    Reply to  Jon Jon

    I’m almost positive the UES location is permanently closed. That was my old neighborhood. 🙁

    0
    Reply
    David S
    David S
    6 years ago

    I’m not an epidemiologist, so I can’t comment whether this setup is more or less safe than having the tables outdoors. I’m also not a lawyer, so I can’t comment on whether or not this setup is in compliance with either the letter or the spirit of the regulations we have in place today. I do have some common sense, though, so I will note that it seems like it would have been a very minimal effort to have set up those tables just a few feet away on the sidewalk or in the street, and this problem would have never occurred.

    0
    Reply
    Kimberly Robinson
    Kimberly Robinson
    6 years ago

    I was there when the SLA suspended Hi-Life’s license. I felt it was unjust only because they didn’t give Earl a warning and they had inspected Hi-Life before and evidently did not let Earl know that he was not in compliance with the regulations. I was very upset because Hi Life worked so hard to abide by the rules. But goodness will prevail and Hi-Life will come out even stronger. Praying for a fast recovery. Your friend and faithful customer – Kimberly Robinson. Much love to Earl, Sarah and the Hi-Life team. Keep Hi-Life alive!! Hi -Life Bar & Grill Matter!

    0
    Reply

    YOU MIGHT LIKE...

    COLUMNS

    Monday Bulletin: Small Businesses Struggle to Survive on the UWS; Artist Inspired by UWS Has a Solo Exhibition; Friends Remember Murdered Central Park Artist

    October 5, 2026 | 8:26 AM
    Barn Owl Spotted Outside of Upper West Side Buildings: ‘Extremely Rare’ in NYC
    NEWS

    Barn Owl Spotted Outside of Upper West Side Buildings: ‘Extremely Rare’ in NYC

    October 4, 2026 | 10:22 AM
    Previous Post

    Man Found Dead Behind Building on 81st Street, May Have Fallen from Fire Escape

    Next Post

    Comments of the Week: Right-Wing UWS? ‘Homeless Hotels,’ Mopeds Cancelled

    this week's events image
    Next Post
    Comment of the Week: A Public School Teacher Asks the Tough Questions About Reopening

    Comments of the Week: Right-Wing UWS? ‘Homeless Hotels,’ Mopeds Cancelled

    13 Blocks of the Upper West Side Approved for Traffic-Less Outdoor Dining

    13 Blocks of the Upper West Side Approved for Traffic-Less Outdoor Dining

    Museum of Natural History Plans to Reopen in September With New Payment System

    Museum of Natural History Plans to Reopen in September With New Payment System

    • ABOUT US
    • CONTACT US
    • NEWSLETTER
    • WSR MERCH!
    • ADVERTISE
    • EVENTS
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS OF USE
    • SITE MAP
    Site design by RLDGROUP

    © 2026 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • TOP NEWS
    • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
    • OPEN/CLOSED
    • FOOD
    • SCHOOLS
    • OUTDOORS
    • REAL ESTATE
    • ART & CULTURE
    • POLITICS
    • COLUMNS
    • CRIME
    • HISTORY
    • ABSURDITY
    • ABOUT
      • OUR STORY
      • CONTRIBUTORS
      • CONTACT US
      • GET WSR FREE IN YOUR INBOX
      • SEND US TIPS AND IDEAS
    • WSR SHOP

    © 2026 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.