West Side Rag
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT
West Side Rag
No Result
View All Result

Search the site

No Result
View All Result

Get WSR FREE in your inbox

NOT JUST THE APTHORP: AT LEAST 3 OTHER UWS BUILDINGS SEEK ROOFTOP ADDITIONS

October 8, 2013 | 6:09 AM - Updated on June 5, 2022 | 11:38 PM
in NEWS, POLITICS, REAL ESTATE
8

Rooftop additions are the hot new accessory in Upper West Side real estate. The Apthorp on 79th street and Broadway may be the most famous building looking to add more apartments on the roof, but it’s certainly not the only one. Here are a few of the buildings where owners have been trying to add apartments on the roof.

The Evelyn

The owners of the seven-story building at 101 West 78th street on the corner of Columbus Avenue are attempting to add two more stories. They presented their plans at a Landmarks Preservation Commission meeting in July. The building went up in 1886 and the owners say a two-story addition was actually approved in the 1890’s, according to a publication called City Land, which covered the LPC meeting.

“The proposed addition would be clad in zinc, while a brick bulkhead would rise an additional story. Glass railings would surround the accessible rooftop areas. Portions of the addition would be visible from multiple viewpoints from public thoroughfares.”

But Community Board 7 recommended denial, and the design was criticized by Councilwoman Gale Brewer and Assemblywoman Linda Rosenthal.

“An Evelyn tenant said the building would be ‘desecrated’ by the addition, and likened the design to “a rooftop bus terminal.” Numerous other area residents decried the addition’s bulk and visibility, and other neighbors said the addition would negatively affect the reach of light and air to their dwellings.”

The preservation commission urged the applicants to go back to the drawing board.

The Chatsworth

The historic building at 340-344 West 72nd street sold last year for $150 million and now the new owner HFZ Capital is proposing extensive renovations, including a rooftop addition (half the building is rent-stabilized, so the developer is clearly looking for other ways to make money).

The Chatsworth, at Riverside Drive, was built in 1904 and got landmark designation in 1984. The plan goes before Community Board 7’s preservation committee on Thursday night at 6:30. The meeting is at community board offices, on the second floor of 250 west 87th street (just West of Broadway). Update, 10/10: The West End Preservation Society tells us the CB7 Chatsworth hearing has been postponed.

Opponents are already mobilizing, airing concerns about the dust and pollution that construction would create. The developer could be in for a tussle. The residents at the Chatsworth once sued Donald Trump over the possibility that Riverside South would block their views, Curbed notes.

The Forum

The condo building at 54 West 74th street that houses Pioneer supermarket is also looking to add a rooftop addition. The owners of “The Forum” recently put up orange netting to show the landmarks commission the visual impact of the addition. A meeting was scheduled at the LPC to discuss the addition last month, but it was postponed. The building was built in 1902-03. Thanks to Geoff for the tip.

The Apthorp

At a meeting last week the community board recommended that the Apthorp’s rooftop addition be denied. Harriet Flehinger attended one of the committee meetings and sent us this dispatch:

“More than 100 people crowded into the space to protest, mostly current residents of the Apthorp and people living in buildings directly facing it. The committee was very even-handed and allowed everyone to speak. In the end, the committee agreed that some infusion of capital to the sponsors was required to provide funding for all the work which needs to be done on the building, but that they would reject the current proposal as too large and bulky and not in keeping with the feel of the landmark building. They left it open for the sponsors to come back with a new plan, saying they were not totally opposed to something being built there.”

The LPC has the final say over whether it will be approved. They were supposed to discuss the Apthorp on Tuesday, but that discussion is expected to be postponed. The rendering of the proposed addition is below, with the before picture on top and the after picture at the bottom:

guest
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
dcortex
dcortex
8 years ago

The Belnord added their ‘penthouse’ level in the 1960’s.
Cheap contracting led to a Sheet Metal clad shed construction that hardly matched the rest of the structure.
These cabins (with low ceilings unlike the rest of the building) are now being renovated-new windows and sealing this ‘temporary type’ structure- because the original construction was so lacking.

0
Reply
Jeff
Jeff
8 years ago

Not having seen the rendering, can’t pass judgment, but zinc cladding atop the Evelyn certainly sounds like it would resemble a bus terminal, as described. These developers face enough trouble adding anything, not sure why they would make things harder for themselves by slapping something contemporary on 19th century buildings.

0
Reply
JW
JW
8 years ago

This is clearly a trend. It is currently happening above two contiguous buildings off the southeast corner of 82nd and Amsterdam, and a block away at a former post office building now used by Crunch gym.

0
Reply
BILL
BILL
8 years ago

IT WILL ONLY BE A MATTER OF TIME BEFORE ONE OF THESE OLD TURN OF THE CENTURY BLDGS COLLAPSE FROM THE WEIGHT OF THE ADDITIONS,KILLING MANY DUE TO GREED OF MAN & GOVT.

0
Reply
julie
julie
8 years ago

Why does the UWS have scaffolding on every block that stays there for decades.
Extremely unsightfull, and considering the overcrowding on the sidewalks, they should be made to fix it, take it down, or sell the building!

0
Reply
DLKD
DLKD
8 years ago

I’ll oppose the Chatsworth addition solely because the sleazebag new owner refused to renew my lease – or any leases – in order to clear out the building for renovations. Ten years of paying market rent, not controlled rent or stabilized rent, and this guy comes along, buys the building and tosses everyone out. Welcome to the neighborhood Ziel Feldman, now go to hell.

0
Reply
WestSider
WestSider
8 years ago
Reply to  DLKD

you can blame the seller who demanded (and got) a ridiculous unsustainable price for the building.

0
Reply
Pedestrian
Pedestrian
8 years ago

Roof top additions are another way for greedy owners to make more money by desecrating beautiful landmarked buildings. They usually claim is that they NEED the roof top addition to make “ends” meet but then they should not have paid an exorbitant price for the building in the first place. Of course this argument is a lot of hot air but it seems to find a sympathetic hearing with the LPC since Mayor Bloomberg made it clear that land marking, zoning, land use regulations and planning mean nothing when someone wants to MAKE MONEY!

If you don’t like roof top additions of the type and kind discussed in this article write to Robert Tierney, Chairman of the LPC. You should also write to the mayor candidates and tell them to appoint LPC members who actually believe in Landmark Preservation.

0
Reply

YOU MIGHT LIKE...

CRIME NEWS: ATM-SKIMMING AT 7-ELEVEN, BIG RISE IN BIKE CRASHES, MOTORCYCLE THEFTS
NEWS

Cyclist Seriously Injured in Head-On Collision in One-Way Bike Lane

June 30, 2022 | 9:00 PM - Updated on July 1, 2022 | 1:01 AM
Upper West Side Real Estate Market Bulletin
NEWS

Upper West Side Real Estate Market Bulletin

June 30, 2022 | 7:03 PM
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Previous Post

FREE SCREENING OF NEW DE NIRO MOVIE FOR WEST SIDE RAG READERS

Next Post

DE BLASIO HINTS AT EXPANSION OF UPPER WEST SIDE ‘MOM & POP’ REZONING

this week's events image

Extra, Extra!

Authentically Local

Explore Your Favorite Subject

20th precinct 24th precinct american museum of natural history animals art bicycling bulletin central park closings columns community board 7 coronavirus crash crime development dogs events fdny fire food gale brewer helen rosenthal history jcc lincoln center monday bulletin morning bulletin nypd openings pedestrian safety photography photos politics public schools pupper west side real estate restaurants retail riverside park silver stars fitness snow sponsored subway upper west side uws
Get WSR FREE in your inbox

NOT JUST THE APTHORP: AT LEAST 3 OTHER UWS BUILDINGS SEEK ROOFTOP ADDITIONS

Rooftop additions are the hot new accessory in Upper West Side real estate. The Apthorp on 79th street and Broadway may be the most famous building looking to add more apartments on the roof, but it’s certainly not the only one. Here are a few of the buildings where owners have been trying to add apartments on the roof.

The Evelyn

The owners of the seven-story building at 101 West 78th street on the corner of Columbus Avenue are attempting to add two more stories. They presented their plans at a Landmarks Preservation Commission meeting in July. The building went up in 1886 and the owners say a two-story addition was actually approved in the 1890’s, according to a publication called City Land, which covered the LPC meeting.

“The proposed addition would be clad in zinc, while a brick bulkhead would rise an additional story. Glass railings would surround the accessible rooftop areas. Portions of the addition would be visible from multiple viewpoints from public thoroughfares.”

But Community Board 7 recommended denial, and the design was criticized by Councilwoman Gale Brewer and Assemblywoman Linda Rosenthal.

“An Evelyn tenant said the building would be ‘desecrated’ by the addition, and likened the design to “a rooftop bus terminal.” Numerous other area residents decried the addition’s bulk and visibility, and other neighbors said the addition would negatively affect the reach of light and air to their dwellings.”

The preservation commission urged the applicants to go back to the drawing board.

The Chatsworth

The historic building at 340-344 West 72nd street sold last year for $150 million and now the new owner HFZ Capital is proposing extensive renovations, including a rooftop addition (half the building is rent-stabilized, so the developer is clearly looking for other ways to make money).

The Chatsworth, at Riverside Drive, was built in 1904 and got landmark designation in 1984. The plan goes before Community Board 7’s preservation committee on Thursday night at 6:30. The meeting is at community board offices, on the second floor of 250 west 87th street (just West of Broadway). Update, 10/10: The West End Preservation Society tells us the CB7 Chatsworth hearing has been postponed.

Opponents are already mobilizing, airing concerns about the dust and pollution that construction would create. The developer could be in for a tussle. The residents at the Chatsworth once sued Donald Trump over the possibility that Riverside South would block their views, Curbed notes.

The Forum

The condo building at 54 West 74th street that houses Pioneer supermarket is also looking to add a rooftop addition. The owners of “The Forum” recently put up orange netting to show the landmarks commission the visual impact of the addition. A meeting was scheduled at the LPC to discuss the addition last month, but it was postponed. The building was built in 1902-03. Thanks to Geoff for the tip.

The Apthorp

At a meeting last week the community board recommended that the Apthorp’s rooftop addition be denied. Harriet Flehinger attended one of the committee meetings and sent us this dispatch:

“More than 100 people crowded into the space to protest, mostly current residents of the Apthorp and people living in buildings directly facing it. The committee was very even-handed and allowed everyone to speak. In the end, the committee agreed that some infusion of capital to the sponsors was required to provide funding for all the work which needs to be done on the building, but that they would reject the current proposal as too large and bulky and not in keeping with the feel of the landmark building. They left it open for the sponsors to come back with a new plan, saying they were not totally opposed to something being built there.”

The LPC has the final say over whether it will be approved. They were supposed to discuss the Apthorp on Tuesday, but that discussion is expected to be postponed. The rendering of the proposed addition is below, with the before picture on top and the after picture at the bottom:

guest
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
dcortex
dcortex
8 years ago

The Belnord added their ‘penthouse’ level in the 1960’s.
Cheap contracting led to a Sheet Metal clad shed construction that hardly matched the rest of the structure.
These cabins (with low ceilings unlike the rest of the building) are now being renovated-new windows and sealing this ‘temporary type’ structure- because the original construction was so lacking.

0
Reply
Jeff
Jeff
8 years ago

Not having seen the rendering, can’t pass judgment, but zinc cladding atop the Evelyn certainly sounds like it would resemble a bus terminal, as described. These developers face enough trouble adding anything, not sure why they would make things harder for themselves by slapping something contemporary on 19th century buildings.

0
Reply
JW
JW
8 years ago

This is clearly a trend. It is currently happening above two contiguous buildings off the southeast corner of 82nd and Amsterdam, and a block away at a former post office building now used by Crunch gym.

0
Reply
BILL
BILL
8 years ago

IT WILL ONLY BE A MATTER OF TIME BEFORE ONE OF THESE OLD TURN OF THE CENTURY BLDGS COLLAPSE FROM THE WEIGHT OF THE ADDITIONS,KILLING MANY DUE TO GREED OF MAN & GOVT.

0
Reply
julie
julie
8 years ago

Why does the UWS have scaffolding on every block that stays there for decades.
Extremely unsightfull, and considering the overcrowding on the sidewalks, they should be made to fix it, take it down, or sell the building!

0
Reply
DLKD
DLKD
8 years ago

I’ll oppose the Chatsworth addition solely because the sleazebag new owner refused to renew my lease – or any leases – in order to clear out the building for renovations. Ten years of paying market rent, not controlled rent or stabilized rent, and this guy comes along, buys the building and tosses everyone out. Welcome to the neighborhood Ziel Feldman, now go to hell.

0
Reply
WestSider
WestSider
8 years ago
Reply to  DLKD

you can blame the seller who demanded (and got) a ridiculous unsustainable price for the building.

0
Reply
Pedestrian
Pedestrian
8 years ago

Roof top additions are another way for greedy owners to make more money by desecrating beautiful landmarked buildings. They usually claim is that they NEED the roof top addition to make “ends” meet but then they should not have paid an exorbitant price for the building in the first place. Of course this argument is a lot of hot air but it seems to find a sympathetic hearing with the LPC since Mayor Bloomberg made it clear that land marking, zoning, land use regulations and planning mean nothing when someone wants to MAKE MONEY!

If you don’t like roof top additions of the type and kind discussed in this article write to Robert Tierney, Chairman of the LPC. You should also write to the mayor candidates and tell them to appoint LPC members who actually believe in Landmark Preservation.

0
Reply

YOU MIGHT LIKE...

CRIME NEWS: ATM-SKIMMING AT 7-ELEVEN, BIG RISE IN BIKE CRASHES, MOTORCYCLE THEFTS
NEWS

Cyclist Seriously Injured in Head-On Collision in One-Way Bike Lane

June 30, 2022 | 9:00 PM - Updated on July 1, 2022 | 1:01 AM
Upper West Side Real Estate Market Bulletin
NEWS

Upper West Side Real Estate Market Bulletin

June 30, 2022 | 7:03 PM
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Previous Post

FREE SCREENING OF NEW DE NIRO MOVIE FOR WEST SIDE RAG READERS

Next Post

DE BLASIO HINTS AT EXPANSION OF UPPER WEST SIDE ‘MOM & POP’ REZONING

Next Post
DE BLASIO HINTS AT EXPANSION OF UPPER WEST SIDE ‘MOM & POP’ REZONING

DE BLASIO HINTS AT EXPANSION OF UPPER WEST SIDE 'MOM & POP' REZONING

CHANGING OF THE FRO-YO GUARD: TWO NEW SPOTS OPEN AS TWO CLOSE

CHANGING OF THE FRO-YO GUARD: TWO NEW SPOTS OPEN AS TWO CLOSE

FDNY COMMEMORATES FALLEN FIREFIGHTERS: VIDEO

FDNY COMMEMORATES FALLEN FIREFIGHTERS: VIDEO

  • ABOUT US
  • CONTACT US
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • SITE MAP
Site design by RLDGROUP

© 2022 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • TOP NEWS
  • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT US

© 2022 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.