West Side Rag
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART & CULTURE
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • ABOUT US
    • OUR STORY
    • CONTRIBUTORS
    • CONTACT
    • ADVERTISE
    • GET WSR FREE IN YOUR INBOX
    • SEND US TIPS AND IDEAS
West Side Rag
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result

Favorite WSR Stories

    SUPPORT THE RAG
    Get the neighborhood news that matters.
    Sign up for our free newsletter

    Weekend Column: We’re Coming for You, JD Vance

    August 18, 2024 | 4:25 AM - Updated on August 31, 2025 | 5:43 PM
    in ABSURDITY, COLUMNS, NEWS, POLITICS
    36
    Illustration via Facebook screenshot. Image by Danielle Zembe.

    By Andrea Sachs

    Not to brag, but as a real-life childless cat lady on the UWS, I am supremely qualified to write this story. Yes, I check all the boxes: over the years, in succession, five rescued cats have spent their coddled lives on West 72nd Street with me. My bona fides include having Chewy.com’s 24/7 help number on my cell phone. As for being childless, it’s neither a badge of honor nor of shame to me. It’s just how the dominoes fell. 

    Republican vice-presidential nominee Sen. JD Vance, during his senatorial campaign in 2021, famously (and likely to his eternal regret) told Fox News host Tucker Carlson: “We are effectively run in this country, via the Democrats, via our corporate oligarchs, by a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they’ve made, and so they want to make the rest of the country miserable, too.”  

    When Vance’s words recently resurfaced, there was an immediate backlash by Democrats, feminists, feline fanciers — and me. The only thing I was personally miserable about was his statement! His popularity in the polls plummeted dramatically, and he almost drowned in a sea of cat memes on social media. Clearly, this was dangerous territory for an opinionated politician. As of 2020, nearly 47% of American women did not have children. Not to mention the fact that there are 47 million households in this country with pet cats.

    Prolific author Gwen Cooper might well be called the literary patron saint of this cat-loving female cohort. If there were a Nobel Prize for cat literature, Cooper would have a lock on it. Her New York Times bestselling memoir about her blind cat, Homer’s Odyssey: A Fearless Feline Tale, has been published in 24 languages and has more than a million books in print worldwide. That’s not kibble, baby! Sorry — too many other bestselling titles to mention here. Cooper describes her 16-year marriage with writer Laurence Lerman as “happily child-free.” 

    I reached out to Cooper for her thoughts on this campaign controversy. Naturally, she came out with both barrels blazing: “I find it telling that Vance was referring to both Democrat women and men [Pete Buttigieg] in his original quote — the very clear implication being that the only thing more insulting than comparing someone to a woman would be comparing them to a woman with cats. Ultimately, I fully expect people to make voting decisions based on the top of the ticket. Nevertheless, Vance’s ​attack on women who rescue animals is indefensible.”

    It’s true that the PR for my sisterhood hasn’t always been flattering. Historically, witchcraft — a deadly serious criminal matter — was often associated with cats. In a typical case in 1324, Alice Kyteler was put on trial in Ireland for charges that included the accusation that she was in possession of an incubus that looked like a black cat. Legendary UWS author Edgar Allan Poe (who wrote the poem “The Raven” at his home on West 84th Street and Broadway) was a cat owner who penned a characteristically macabre short story entitled “The Black Cat” in 1843.

    My own love for cats, which has resulted in an apartment full of cat tchochkes and art, has enhanced and informed my life. Too much so? Just after 9/11, I was lucky enough to interview Jane Goodall, the famed primatologist. Out of curiosity, I slipped in a personal query. “Why are pet owners so fond of their pets?” She looked at me like I was clueless, then declared in her distinctive British accent, “Because we’re animals, too.”

    Got that, JD?

    Subscribe to West Side Rag’s FREE email newsletter here.

    Share this article:
    SUPPORT THE RAG
    Leave a comment

    Please limit comments to 150 words and keep them civil and relevant to the article at hand. Comments are closed after six days. Our primary goal is to create a safe and respectful space where a broad spectrum of voices can be heard. We welcome diverse viewpoints and encourage readers to engage critically with one another’s ideas, but never at the expense of civility. Disagreement is expected—even encouraged—but it must be expressed with care and consideration. Comments that take cheap shots, escalate conflict, or veer into ideological warfare detract from the constructive spirit we aim to cultivate. A detailed statement on comments and WSR policy can be read here.

    guest

    guest

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    36 Comments
    Regan Mutherford
    Regan Mutherford
    2 years ago

    Truth! Great essay, Andrea!

    20
    Reply
    Joanne
    Joanne
    2 years ago

    As a childless dog lady (who also lives on West 72nd) I am offended that J.D. Lance excluded us in his insult.

    40
    Reply
    Vagabond
    Vagabond
    2 years ago
    Reply to  Joanne

    Haha. Sounds like a Dorothy Parker quote. : )

    4
    Reply
    TW Baskins
    TW Baskins
    2 years ago

    None of us are immune from making in-artful remarks for which we regret afterwards. That said, the substantive question when it comes to presidential and vice presidential candidates should not be based on an insensitive comment but rather, “Are you better off today than you were 4 years ago?”

    31
    Reply
    Katherine
    Katherine
    2 years ago
    Reply to  TW Baskins

    It was not one comment. He has no regret for it. It is a sincere, consistent expression of how he genuinely thinks. JD Vance has a deep contempt for women who fall outside of his idea of what women’s roles (baby incubators, mothers, caretakers) should be.

    As far as the 4 years ago comment, I don’t know a single person ISN’T isn’t better off in 2024 than 2020, a year of catastrophically mismanaged global pandemic and resulting economic meltdown.

    13
    Reply
    Jessica Seigel
    Jessica Seigel
    2 years ago
    Reply to  TW Baskins

    The problem is that it was not one insensitive comment but emblematic of how Vance sees women and people in general, as well as his and Heritage Foundations’ 2025 plans for us.
    and although I agree with Emma below, I would also note that we ARE better off than we were when Trump was in office 4 years ago. In every way possible, including but not limited to the effort to save democracy.

    11
    Reply
    Emma
    Emma
    2 years ago
    Reply to  TW Baskins

    I have never understood this as the political question we should be asking ourselves even though people say it all the time. You can be better or worse off having absolutely nothing to do with the president or any other politician. To me the question is whether you want your country led by racists and sexists and religious bigots.

    37
    Reply
    neighbor785
    neighbor785
    2 years ago
    Reply to  TW Baskins

    Four years ago we were still in the beginning stages of COVID. Considering where Biden/Harris started, I’d say quite a lot was accomplished.

    Some of our LOCAL pols, OTOH …

    14
    Reply
    pedestrian
    pedestrian
    2 years ago

    Childless cat ladies unite! I’m also offended that JD Vance..will that be his name next year…feels that children are better off watching their mothers being brutalized! He seems to be a card carrying member of the “keep the women bare foot and pregnant in the kitchen” brigade.

    Vance and Trump are a pair of authoritarian theocratic men whose thirst for power, if they get it, won’t be quenched unless they have it all. Men will not be immune.

    24
    Reply
    Angelina
    Angelina
    2 years ago

    With all due respect, JD Vance’s comment is “much ado about nothing”. Need to get past that and focus on which direction America is going based on the results of the election.

    37
    Reply
    Ethan
    Ethan
    2 years ago
    Reply to  Angelina

    That may be so, however who could possibly resist the temptation to make it much ado about something? It’s just too delicious to let it go.

    21
    Reply
    Karen
    Karen
    2 years ago

    The illustration at the top of this piece is brilliant. What’s the source?

    14
    Reply
    Sue
    Sue
    2 years ago

    I really enjoyed his book Hillbilly Elegy and am glad he is a candidate who could help run our country a bit more effectively than the current administration. Soundbites are soundbites; I hope people can start looking at policy.

    39
    Reply
    Susannah
    Susannah
    2 years ago
    Reply to  Sue

    His policies include opposing IVF, abortion.

    8
    Reply
    Attapooch
    Attapooch
    2 years ago
    Reply to  Sue

    Trump is directly responsible for cratering the economy because he refused to take COVID seriously. If completely botching COVID and the January 6th insurrection are evidence of effective handing of the country, then I’ll take whatever Harris is offering.

    11
    Reply
    mdkids
    mdkids
    2 years ago
    Reply to  Sue

    It wouldn’t surprise me to learn that some childless cat woman (or JD’s wife, whom I just can’t make sense of) ghost-wrote the book for him. I’m just saying…

    7
    Reply
    neighbor785
    neighbor785
    2 years ago
    Reply to  Sue

    If policy includes Project 2025 or big parts of it, that’s a NO for me!

    26
    Reply
    Sby
    Sby
    2 years ago
    Reply to  neighbor785

    Stop scaring yourself with the project 2025 boogeyman—nobody is implementing it

    8
    Reply
    neighbor785
    neighbor785
    2 years ago
    Reply to  Sby

    We don’t know this. And we don’t know that they won’t implement some of it, or similar policies even if not worded just as in P 2025.

    2
    Reply
    Miranda Loop
    Miranda Loop
    2 years ago

    Glorious artwork.

    7
    Reply
    Ella
    Ella
    2 years ago

    Great piece! & best written piece i’ve ever read in here. Thank you n

    4
    Reply
    Jessica Seigel
    Jessica Seigel
    2 years ago
    Reply to  Ella

    Reply to Sue: We ARE looking at policy. HIS proposed POLICIEs are the problem.

    6
    Reply
    One childless Cat lady living on the UWS
    One childless Cat lady living on the UWS
    2 years ago

    Oh my goodness I’m a member of that club I never signed up for, and living on the UWS! So proud of my fur baby I show off his picture constantly! Proud of my label, where can I buy the T shirt? Lol. At least I’m not a krazy cat lady anymore, we have a New label. You know Taylor Swift is also a proud famous member of the club. (3 fur babies) although not sure if all of many many homes if one of these homes she resides in are on the UWS.

    3
    Reply
    Elisabeth Jakab
    Elisabeth Jakab
    2 years ago

    Nice essay. Thank you.

    4
    Reply
    nycityny
    nycityny
    2 years ago

    The idea that this patriarchal country, which has never had a female president, is run by women (married or not, with or without cats) is absurd to begin with, particularly coming from a rich, white privileged man.

    22
    Reply
    good humor
    good humor
    2 years ago

    A single sentence does not determine my political opinions.

    19
    Reply
    nycityny
    nycityny
    2 years ago
    Reply to  good humor

    You’re right. It’s all the other sentences out of his mouth that cement my disdain for him.

    15
    Reply
    Jessica Seigel
    Jessica Seigel
    2 years ago

    Excellent article, Andi!!!

    3
    Reply
    Sby
    Sby
    2 years ago

    Wow he really got under ppls skin since the reaction just goes on and on—the spirit of what he was saying is that ppl with children and grandchildren have a bigger stake in the future and should have more of a presence in decisions for the country’s future—he could have just as easily said dog moms—amazing that this piece is out in WSR a month after his comments hit the news and they are still being ruminated on

    20
    Reply
    Sam Katz
    Sam Katz
    2 years ago
    Reply to  Sby

    The Washingtons (George and Martha) had no kids. Try again on that “stake” thing. I have just as big a stake with my five nieces and nephews and their kids. Oh wait — do I have as big as stake as the Menendez parents? You bet I do! If you watched the crime channels, you’d know plenty of parents kill their kids and plenty of kids kill their parents. The notion that there is any validity in the stupid Vance comment or that I am less of an American or deserve less benefit is so sad … for anyone who bought into it.

    6
    Reply
    Attapooch
    Attapooch
    2 years ago
    Reply to  Sby

    Perhaps the reason why people are still upset is that what he said and what it represents is deeply insulting to people? The amount of say someone should have in the country should not depend on whether they have any kids.

    Unless, of course, you believe that there should be classes of citizens.

    16
    Reply
    Peter
    Peter
    2 years ago
    Reply to  Attapooch

    Are you joking? Different “classes” already exist. The amount of say already depends on something as trivial as where someone lives. The Electoral College makes my vote a joke in value, compared to that of someone living in Wyoming.

    3
    Reply
    Ergo
    Ergo
    2 years ago

    Great! Brewer, Hochul and AG James are the stars that prove NY knows the answers for all of America and should be given complete control.

    4
    Reply
    OPOE
    OPOE
    2 years ago

    Can you afford more cat food then you could 4 years ago ?

    Can you afford more cat litter then you could 4 years ago ?

    No one thinks about the cats.

    11
    Reply
    Lori
    Lori
    2 years ago

    Wonderful article, thank you.

    2
    Reply
    TW Baskins
    TW Baskins
    2 years ago

    It’s deeply troubling when newspapers solicit comments from their readers, claiming to value diverse perspectives, only to delete those that don’t align with their own views. This practice undermines the very foundation of free speech and open discourse, which are supposed to be the bedrock of a free press. By selectively silencing dissenting voices, these publications not only betray the trust of their readership but also contribute to the erosion of public confidence in the media. It’s a manipulative tactic that distorts reality, fostering echo chambers rather than fostering genuine dialogue and understanding. Such actions are a disservice to journalism and the public it is meant to serve.

    0
    Reply

    YOU MIGHT LIKE...

    UWS Weekend: Great Things To Do in the Neighborhood
    ART

    UWS Weekend: Great Things to Do in (and Around) the Neighborhood

    September 18, 2026 | 8:15 AM
    WSR Cartoon: The Trade-Off With the UWS Trader Joe’s
    ABSURDITY

    WSR Cartoon: The Trade-Off With the UWS Trader Joe’s

    September 18, 2026 | 8:13 AM
    Previous Post

    Walk Like an Upper West Sider: A Half-Rant on Pedestrian Etiquette

    Next Post

    Stuffed!

    this week's events image
    Next Post
    Stuffed!

    Stuffed!

    Monday Bulletin: UWSer to Play Trump for Kamala Harris’ Debate Prep; Loaded Gun Found in Riverside Park; Local Richard Kind Profiled In NY Times; UWS Close to Top in NYC for Most Home Listings

    Monday Bulletin: UWSer to Play Trump for Kamala Harris' Debate Prep; Loaded Gun Found in Riverside Park; Local Richard Kind Profiled In NY Times; UWS Close to Top in NYC for Most Home Listings

    Over 80% Leased! Brand New, Spacious 2 and 3 Bedroom Apartments on the Upper West Side with Up to 3 Months Free!*

    Over 80% Leased! Brand New, Spacious 2 and 3 Bedroom Apartments on the Upper West Side with Up to 3 Months Free!*

    • ABOUT US
    • CONTACT US
    • NEWSLETTER
    • WSR MERCH!
    • ADVERTISE
    • EVENTS
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS OF USE
    • SITE MAP
    Site design by RLDGROUP

    © 2026 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • TOP NEWS
    • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
    • OPEN/CLOSED
    • FOOD
    • SCHOOLS
    • OUTDOORS
    • REAL ESTATE
    • ART & CULTURE
    • POLITICS
    • COLUMNS
    • CRIME
    • HISTORY
    • ABSURDITY
    • ABOUT
      • OUR STORY
      • CONTRIBUTORS
      • CONTACT US
      • GET WSR FREE IN YOUR INBOX
      • SEND US TIPS AND IDEAS
    • WSR SHOP

    © 2026 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.