West Side Rag
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART & CULTURE
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • ABOUT US
    • OUR STORY
    • CONTRIBUTORS
    • CONTACT
    • ADVERTISE
    • GET WSR FREE IN YOUR INBOX
    • SEND US TIPS AND IDEAS
West Side Rag
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result

Favorite WSR Stories

    SUPPORT THE RAG
    Get the neighborhood news that matters.
    Sign up for our free newsletter

    Participatory Budgeting Voting Begins April 2nd; Finalists and Polling Places Here

    April 1, 2022 | 5:38 AM - Updated on June 5, 2022 | 11:38 PM
    in CRIME, NEWS, OPEN/CLOSED, POLITICS
    22

    By Molly Sugarman

    If you had $1 million to spend on improving the Upper West Side, would you upgrade the restrooms at Jessie Isadore Straus School ($300,000), or add adult fitness equipment in Riverside Park ($300,000)? You can do both and still have enough money for trees and tree guards on Broadway ($250,000).

    By the way, you do have $1 million to spend on these projects and others. It’s called Participatory Budgeting (PB), which means residents of the district get to allocate money to capital projects they want rather than leaving it up to the City Council to decide.

    If you are concerned about public safety, you can spend $600,000 on security cameras for Westside Urban Renewal Brownstones, and another $320,000 on security cameras on Broadway, Amsterdam, Columbus, and Riverside Drive. And you’d be able to add another $72,000 for security cameras at De Hostos Houses as well.

    The PB process started in January, when Councilperson Gale Brewer put out the call for capital projects that cost at least $50,000 and have a lifespan of at least five years. Seventy-one projects were suggested by district residents. Volunteers and city agencies pared the list down to nine. Now, everyone — age 11 and up — gets to vote on the combination of projects they want for that $1 million.

    Starting on April 2nd you can vote in person at one of several polling places throughout the district. Or you can vote online. Just do it before April 10th when the polls close.

    Here are the nine 2022 Participatory Budgeting finalists, courtesy of CM Gale Brewer. You can choose three.

    1. Sarah Anderson School Technology Grant: $117,000
    [P.S. 9, grades K-5, 100 W. 84th St.]
    Purchase 12 Promethean Boards & 30 laptops with 1 laptop cart to ensure each classroom has a smart board & laptops that are connected to the smart boards. This project will ensure that the school has technology deployed to the classrooms to support an enriched & interactive learning experience.

    2. Center School Technology Grant: $117,000
    [M.S. 243, grades 5-8, 100 W. 84th St.]
    Purchase 12 Promethean Boards & 30 laptops with 1 laptop cart to ensure each classroom has a smart board & laptops that are connected to the smart boards. This project will ensure that the school has technology deployed to the classrooms to support an enriched & interactive learning experience.

    3. Jessie Isadore Straus School Infrastructure Improvements: $300,000
    [P.S. 199, grades K-5, 270 W. 70th St.]
    Upgrade & repair 2 existing student restrooms (replace fixtures, stalls, floor/wall tiling, ADA accessibility).

    4. Adult Fitness Equipment for Riverside Park: $300,000
    Create an area with exercise equipment for adult use that includes a section for group classes and a cooling mist fixture.

    5. Greening Broadway: $250,000
    [Trees & Tree Guards for Broadway Above 72nd St.]
    Install approximately 35 trees & tree guards on the sidewalks along Broadway. This would make the avenue a more attractive destination, is environmentally sound, & offers additional shade.

    6. Bus Countdown Timers on Broadway: $320,000
    [Intersection placement to be determined by DOT.]
    Install four bus arrival time countdown timers on northbound & southbound multiple-route bus stops on Broadway, where they intersect with crosstown routes.

    7. Security Cameras on Broadway, Amsterdam, Columbus, & Riverside Drive: $320,000
    [Locations determined in consultation with NYPD.]
    Install eight security cameras on Broadway, Amsterdam, Columbus, and Riverside Drive to deter crime and and ensure public safety.

    8. Security Cameras for Westside Urban Renewal Brownstones: $600,000
    [NYCHA, West 90th St.]
    Install approximately 15 security cameras at Westside Urban Renewal Brownstones to deter crime and ensure public safety.

    9. Security Cameras for De Hostos Houses: $72,000
    [NYCHA, 201 W. 93rd St.]
    Install four security cameras for the ground floor of De Hostos Houses to deter crime & and ensure public safety.

    Share this article:
    SUPPORT THE RAG
    Leave a comment

    Please limit comments to 150 words and keep them civil and relevant to the article at hand. Comments are closed after six days. Our primary goal is to create a safe and respectful space where a broad spectrum of voices can be heard. We welcome diverse viewpoints and encourage readers to engage critically with one another’s ideas, but never at the expense of civility. Disagreement is expected—even encouraged—but it must be expressed with care and consideration. Comments that take cheap shots, escalate conflict, or veer into ideological warfare detract from the constructive spirit we aim to cultivate. A detailed statement on comments and WSR policy can be read here.

    guest

    guest

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    22 Comments
    ST
    ST
    4 years ago

    There is no point. Parents vote in all the school projects. Separate the school projects from the other projects.

    0
    Reply
    Linda
    Linda
    4 years ago
    Reply to  ST

    You are absolutely correct, and the less diverse schools with wealthier parents win once more.

    0
    Reply
    Carlos
    Carlos
    4 years ago
    Reply to  Linda

    So why don’t the other schools get their acts together and mobilize. This is about as easy as it gets. It is very well publicized and easy to submit an idea then vote.

    Their principals and/or PAs really need to get on the ball. Or else they need to stop complaining.

    0
    Reply
    Otis
    Otis
    4 years ago

    I’m in favor of an adult fitness center in Riverside Park.

    There’s a very big outdoor fitness center on the East River near Chinatown that’s very popular. We should have one like that in our neighborhood.

    0
    Reply
    Lea
    Lea
    4 years ago

    Is is possible to see why some of these things so much money? Why do 15 security camera cost $600k? Each security camera is 40k? And what kind of laptops are these kids getting? Even with a MacBook it shouldn’t be 100k for these items.

    0
    Reply
    Josh
    Josh
    4 years ago
    Reply to  Lea

    DOE laptops are macbook air’s with a retail cost of about $1000 hardware only. Then, there is a software license cost, a warranty (extended) and service contract that goes on top of that, bringing the computer cost up.to around $1500 per computer. Promethean Boards run $3000 to $6000 depending on the model and installation location. They also require a service contract.

    0
    Reply
    Lea
    Lea
    4 years ago
    Reply to  Josh

    Ok, good to know! I hope there was an effort made to get a discount on these Promethean boards if we’re potentially buying 24 of them but regardless, this budget makes sense. It would be good to see this breakdown for each of these ideas.

    Even though I think most of these prices are ridiculous, I understand the cost is not entirely up to the 6th district since some vendors are mandated by the government. I just think it’d be useful for me to know who to be angry at and who to email about these cost issues rather than blaming the 6th council because they’ve chosen not to be transparent in this process.

    0
    Reply
    Peter
    Peter
    4 years ago

    What type of security cameras (and installation) cost $40,000 (outdoor) and $18,000 (indoor), respectively? I’d love to see those detailed invoices.

    0
    Reply
    ML
    ML
    4 years ago

    I like #4 (adult fitness) and #7 because the security cameras will be in common areas used by the general public. The cost of #8 is really high, $600,000 for 15 cameras, did they submit invoices for that estimate?

    0
    Reply
    ML
    ML
    4 years ago

    Please do waste money on bus countdown timers, it will do nothing to improve service and bus safety. Building better lighting and actual bus shelters at the bus stops would be a better use of money. A few years ago, participatory budget money was wasted on bus countdown timers that broke right away.

    0
    Reply
    ML
    ML
    4 years ago
    Reply to  ML

    ** correction .. please do not waste money on count down timers. Sorry for the typo.

    0
    Reply
    Terence
    Terence
    4 years ago
    Reply to  ML

    the BUSTIME app on a phone works very well

    0
    Reply
    ag
    ag
    4 years ago
    Reply to  Terence

    i use 2 different bus apps and they are never the same and neither one is accurate so please, which one do you use hat works ??? thx

    0
    Reply
    Christine E
    Christine E
    4 years ago

    Much more info is needed to make informed choices. Can we see detailed bids/estimates/components of the projects? Some seem rather exorbitant for what is listed — for example, $40,000 per security camera or $80,000 per bus countdown timer. Do the bids include the hardware only, or also wiring, labor, installation, ongoing maintenance, operating costs, warranty, insurance, etc. Can the entities receiving the grants afford to operate, maintain, and repair the items, and were they required to prove that in the application?

    Who are the entities making grant requests and receiving funds? Why do the applicants themselves not provide such services? NYCHA (or the RAD private entities that are taking over management) should already be required to provide security including cameras. Further NYCHA as a city agency does not seem eligible (or even capable) as a grant applicant. Is the applicant actually the tenant association? Do the tenants want the cameras?

    For the Broadway trees ($7143 per tree and guard), who is the applicant? Is this a consortium of property owners? Property owners are responsible for tree guards in front of their buildings, and Broadway property owners should be able to afford the guards. They already can get free street trees from the city . And there already is a city program for discount tree guards . So why use the PB program for something already covered in city budgets?

    0
    Reply
    Christine E
    Christine E
    4 years ago
    Reply to  Christine E

    Links to the free tree and tree guard programs:

    Request a street tree: https://www.nycgovparks.org/trees/street-tree-planting/request

    Tree guard program:
    https://www.nycgovparks.org/trees/tree-care/tree-guards

    0
    Reply
    Jen
    Jen
    4 years ago

    Security cameras will be my vote. This way we can have a recording of a perpetrator or an actual crime which is a positive step in fighting crime regardless what the current laws are like. Recording is a recording, it is a valuable evidence.

    0
    Reply
    Uwsmom
    Uwsmom
    4 years ago

    Most of the projects seem to be the same. In the past, there was a much wider variety in the types of projects to be voted on. And they seemed much more grassroots.
    I understand there is no $, but it is baffling to have in school bathrooms on here- I can understand the ones at the school linked playgrounds.

    0
    Reply
    Adam
    Adam
    4 years ago

    Whoever designed this I appreciate the gesture and encourage more of this sort of thing. In order to make a good decision one needs good information. Is there a way to see the full proposals?

    0
    Reply
    Christine E
    Christine E
    4 years ago
    Reply to  Adam

    I emailed Gale Brewer’s office to ask them to post the proposals to the web site so constituents can make informed decisions and since there seem to be many questions… She emailed back that her staff does not have time to respond to me, and that I should call her directly and she can explain them. (?!?) While responsive, this seems the opposite of efficiency.

    0
    Reply
    Lisa
    Lisa
    4 years ago
    Reply to  Christine E

    Sounds like someone doesn’t want you to see the proposals. How could these not be publicly posted from the get-go? Oh, right. We have a dinosaur in office who doesn’t do technology.

    0
    Reply
    Comment Bob
    Comment Bob
    4 years ago

    I am more than dismayed that this program — “Participatory Budgeting” — has continued into the Adams administration. This is nothing more than a free giveaway to the 51 council members who get to write about their “largess” and their “fight for the community” it in their newsletters and crow about “all their achievements” in their latest legislative term.

    It’s not to say that some of these ideas and proposals aren’t meritorious, but they should have been addressed in the normal process of government if they were. Yes, some schools might need high-tech whiteboards and many other areas might benefit from increased video surveillance cameras, but then they should have been put in those respective budgets and been looked at a whole in terms city-wide needs from the start. “Bus timers on Broadway?” — Isn’t that an MTA expense? What does that have to do with the city budget?

    This, on the contrary, in nothing more than free money given to 51 council members totaling (the math here is easy) 51 million dollars in the city budget. Is there really 51 million dollars laying around that has not been spent that can be handed out for these ‘worthy causes”? This is not how Government is run. We elect you, our council people to do the hard work and make these decisions. If you are not up to it, please resign. These are serious times to get our city back on its feet, not a time for participatory workarounds meant to pay off the populace with cheap gimmicks.

    As an Upper West Sider, we owe a debt to Gale Brewer who has put up a good fight for the community for many years now, and so, I would ask you Gale to see reconsider how misguided this program is and put a stop to it in our name, and in the interest of the entire city at large. This boondoggle was expected from the previous occupant of District 6 and Mayor, but I thought that after your years as Borough President, you might have come back to your old job with a “bigger perspective.” I am not an anti-taxer voter, but if we don’t start looking at ourselves honestly here, we risk losing many years of past (and future) progress.

    This is nonsense.

    As an aside, I’m pretty sure I was at a school auction (mentioned here for a grant) where the PTA raised all the money for these “Promethean boards”, and we congratulated ourselves mightily for having done that – what a glorious night it was. I think Gale even came by. Did they not get them after all, and why are they asking for the same thing again? I guess our children moved on to new schools and there is a new generation of parents to promise things to. Something is wrong here.

    0
    Reply
    E L W
    E L W
    4 years ago

    Nobody has mentioned that anyone, even a tourist from another country, can pick up a paper ballot, or 2, or 3, or 10, and fill it out WITHOUT PROVIDING A NAME OR ADDRESS! Just grab a sheet and go. Second, the online system asks for a NAME and EMAIL but we know these can be made up; and again someone can vote 2, or 3, or 30 times. The system must absolutely require some form of identification whether it’s name plus address or name plus public school attending etc. You cannot just leave sheets of paper and let any Joe Shmo fill it out and call that a democracy. One District 6 resident = one vote. Address needs to be confirmed. Children don’t pay ConEd Bills. Must ask for address up front and verify it!
    ttps://www.participate.nyc.gov/users/sign_up

    0
    Reply

    YOU MIGHT LIKE...

    COLUMNS

    Upper West Side Historical Photo Challenge No. 37

    October 6, 2026 | 8:00 AM
    A Political Brain Trust in an Upper West Side Building
    NEWS

    A Political Brain Trust in an Upper West Side Building

    October 5, 2026 | 2:51 PM - Updated on October 6, 2026 | 11:13 AM
    Previous Post

    Newly Drawn NY State Redistricting Maps Rejected by State Supreme Court; 11 Days to Draw New Ones

    Next Post

    It Is ‘Devastating’ To Be on the Other Side of the World When Your Family and Friends Are in Ukraine

    this week's events image
    Next Post
    It Is ‘Devastating’ To Be on the Other Side of the World When Your Family and Friends Are in Ukraine

    It Is 'Devastating' To Be on the Other Side of the World When Your Family and Friends Are in Ukraine

    The Man Who Gave Us The Masterpieces

    The Man Who Gave Us The Masterpieces

    Revel’s Fleet of Ride-Share Teslas Expanding Uptown to 96th Street

    Revel’s Fleet of Ride-Share Teslas Expanding Uptown to 96th Street

    • ABOUT US
    • CONTACT US
    • NEWSLETTER
    • WSR MERCH!
    • ADVERTISE
    • EVENTS
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS OF USE
    • SITE MAP
    Site design by RLDGROUP

    © 2026 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • TOP NEWS
    • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
    • OPEN/CLOSED
    • FOOD
    • SCHOOLS
    • OUTDOORS
    • REAL ESTATE
    • ART & CULTURE
    • POLITICS
    • COLUMNS
    • CRIME
    • HISTORY
    • ABSURDITY
    • ABOUT
      • OUR STORY
      • CONTRIBUTORS
      • CONTACT US
      • GET WSR FREE IN YOUR INBOX
      • SEND US TIPS AND IDEAS
    • WSR SHOP

    © 2026 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.