West Side Rag
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART & CULTURE
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT
West Side Rag
No Result
View All Result

Get WSR FREE in your inbox

Search the site

No Result
View All Result

Get WSR FREE in your inbox

AVAILABLE NOW!


HERE

Century Resident Files to Dismiss the Lawsuit Against CPW Protected Bike Lane; ‘It Came as a Complete Surprise’

August 26, 2019 | 8:49 PM
in NEWS
34

By Carol Tannenhauser

A resident and unit owner of the Central Park West condominium that recently filed a lawsuit to block a protected bike lane on the east side of the avenue has submitted a “memorandum of law” calling for the suit to be dismissed.

In the memorandum, Kenneth B. Squire contends that the action taken by the Residential Board of The Century condominium, located at 25 Central Park West, between 62nd and 63rd Streets, “came as a complete surprise to the residents and unit owners….They were never told of the Residential Board’s intention to file this lawsuit, nor were they ever asked if they supported it. But more importantly, the residents never authorized the Residential Board to file this lawsuit in Century Condominium’s by-laws or otherwise.”

Squire also argued that the financial burden of the lawsuit would “undoubtedly” fall on the residents and owners who, furthermore, were portrayed in the press “as caring more about parking spots than the safety of bikers and the community.”

The bike lane, designed by the Department of Transportation and approved by Community Board 7 in early July, requires the elimination of 400 parking spaces.

When asked about Squire’s arguments, the attorney for The Century’s Board emailed “No comment.” Squire included with his memorandum a Q&A distributed by the building management to residents about the suit. The document says the board didn’t have a unit owner meeting about this issue because until the week before the suit was filed it was just a proposal. The Q&A raises concerns that the bike lane will create “a 2.5 mile bicycle speedway” that will make it difficult to cross Central Park West. It also says that the board is “building a coalition of other CPW buildings” to fight the bike lane.

Squire received the approval of Justice Lynn Kotler, of the New York State Supreme Court, to be an “intervenor” in the case last Tuesday. He filed his memorandum on Wednesday. His main argument is that the Board “lacks capacity to bring this action, a threshold issue that must be resolved before considering the merits of the petition.”

The case is back in the hands of Justice Kolter, awaiting her decision. Meanwhile, the bike lane, which now reaches West 77th Street, is already in use.

Share this article:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

34 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Intervene This
Intervene This
3 years ago

I thought that’s what co-op boards were for– elected representatives to take decisions on behalf of a building’s shareholders, so that every decision wouldn’t have to be put before every shareholder.

0
Reply
Catherine
Catherine
3 years ago
Reply to  Intervene This

Exactly, and boards have broad powers to act on behalf of in this case “condo” owners, not shareholders as in a co-op. I understand his concern about an extended law suit bringing costs that would undoubtedly fall on the shoulders of the condo owners. The Century is located at a particularly congested area coming off Columbus Circle and is highly trafficked. There are 2 issues in my opinion – cyclist safety, but also pedestrian safety. Cyclists often think they have the right of way and present hazardous conditions for pedestrians especially older people trying to cross CPW.

0
Reply
michael
michael
3 years ago

Today, NYC reported a 14% increase in pedestrians being hit by cyclists. Four occurred in Central Park yesterday. Why did the city not take pedestrians into consideration when they designed these bike lanes?

0
Reply
Billy Amato
Billy Amato
3 years ago
Reply to  michael

You are so correct Michael and bicycles are so out of control and Central Park just yesterday at 77-year-old man was taken to the hospital hit by a E-bike in Central Park on the West Drive near the Delacorte Theater it would be parallel with W. 81st St.
“The bike was an E bike” why aren’t they not licensed and registered with the city and state they can go up to 60 miles an hour… do you know what a force of metal at 60 miles an hour can do to pedestrian!
Most of the Bikers in the city have no regard for pedestrians!!!!

0
Reply
Mike
Mike
3 years ago
Reply to  michael

Well, in all fairness, those pedestrians weren’t hit in a bike lane. Also, I really don’t think bike lanes are so difficult to cross. They’re like 4 feet across, and it’s not like there’s a bike every 3 seconds or anything. They also move bikes into one predictable place instead of being all over the road. I think bikes unexpectedly coming from every which way is a bigger issue than crossing bike lanes.

0
Reply
Jay
Jay
3 years ago
Reply to  michael

They did. Bike lanes make pedestrian crossings safer as well.

What are the actual numbers of pedestrians being hit by bikes? 5? Percentages are bad metrics unless you are looking to obfuscate the real numbers.

Meanwhile, another pedestrian died yesterday in Brooklyn from being struck by a minivan. There was no bike lane on Coney Island Parkway.

0
Reply
Five to One
Five to One
3 years ago
Reply to  Jay

Last year, the city reported 303 crashes between cyclists and pedestrians.

Of those, 270 pedestrians were injured; 55 cyclists were also hurt.

0
Reply
michael
michael
3 years ago
Reply to  Jay

@Jay
1) Percentages are far superior to raw numbers. *I am a published medically-based epidemiologist who studies health morbidity and mortality. I understand how to read, report and assess frequency. You are incorrect on so many levels. May I recommend reading Hans Rosling’s “Factfulness”?
2) To this point, bicycle accidents involving pedestrians are an inconsistently reported and poorly monitored statistic whereas accidents with motor vehicles are mandated (read, required by law). As such, there is an underestimation in the reported incidence of pedestrian-bicycle accident/injury for which reporting is not mandated.
2b)The above point is noted by the NYC DOT, but correction is ignored in the annual reporting.
3) Bike lanes do not make pedestrian crossings safer. Cyclists following rules makes pedestrians safer.

0
Reply
Pedestrian
Pedestrian
3 years ago
Reply to  michael

I could not agree more with Michael.

0
Reply
Chris
Chris
3 years ago
Reply to  michael

Your statement about percentages being far superior to raw numbers is both incorrect and misunderstanding the comment. If, say, the average number of pedestrians being hit by bikes over some period of time is 5 and the standard deviation is 2, then it would not be remarkable to see a 40% increase in hits from the previous period to the current period. It would be a true statement that sounds highly concerning, yet is purely stochastic and contains no meaningful information.

0
Reply
michael
michael
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris

Ok, I stand corrected. Percentages are not always better than raw numbers. You are correct. But in this case, raw numbers alone cannot tell an entire story. So, I’m not entirely sure of your point.

1010WINS reported this morning that the number of bicycle accidents associated with pedestrians as compiled by the DOT has increased by 14% in NYC over last year at this time.

In this case, the proportion tells you something more than the individual raw number. Similarly, it allows us to compare to these incidences to other incidences (eg. automobile-pedestrian rates).

However, to another point, without question, this year’s accident number, as in previous years, is underestimated due to the fact that all incidences are not reported – unlike automobile-bicycle and automobile-pedestrian accidents which is mandated.

Thank you for the technical correction. But in this instance, the raw number is not a better measure.

0
Reply
Jay
Jay
3 years ago
Reply to  michael

You forgot the number one rule of being a published author… always cite your sources.

Injuries between bicycles and pedestrians actually reduced in 2018 (270) from 2017 (315). That’s actually a 17% reduction.

The big thing about these statistics that you seem to be missing is the number of injuries with motor vehicle, which is 10783. That’s 40x the rate of bicycle crashes.

You are incorrect that bike lanes don’t make pedestrian safer as well. Many peer reviewed studies show that.

See: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140518301488?via%3Dihub

https://www1.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/bicycle-crash-data-report-2018.pdf

https://www1.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/bicycle-crash-data-report-2017.pdf

0
Reply
michael
michael
3 years ago
Reply to  Jay

I never said bikes were not safer for pedestrians than motor vehicles. Of course, they are.

You, however, failed to address my primary point – accidents with vehicles are mandated and therefore counted whereas accidents with bicycles are not. Any statistic you present on the bicycle-pedestrian accidents will, therefore, be UNDER-estimated. That is basic epidemiology.

Funny thing with data, we cannot tabulate what hasn’t been recoded.

0
Reply
Bill Williams
Bill Williams
3 years ago
Reply to  michael

What happened in the park was classic and indicative that the problem isn’t cars or pedestrians, it is out of control law breaking cyclists. Everyone needs protecting from them!

0
Reply
Big Earl
Big Earl
3 years ago

This is what happens when you have a knee jerk reaction without doing proper impact studies to the surrounding areas. All NYC has done is robbed Peter to pay Paul. Now bike riders are “safer” but yet pedestrians have to now pray they don’t get run over. Pedestrians will be run over along CPW and other areas because bicyclists don’t pay attention to rules they must follow. They feel they own the road. Then add in all the illegal electronic bikes, skateboards, uni wheels etc and NYC has become a walking deathtrap for pedestrians. But at least bikers are supposedly safer. Sad.

0
Reply
at
at
3 years ago
Reply to  Big Earl

Honestly if you’re dumb enough to get hit by a bicycle because you weren’t paying attention to it coming from a mile away then thats on you.

0
Reply
Dump DeBlasio
Dump DeBlasio
3 years ago
Reply to  at

Guess you’ve never been crossing the street, checked for bicyclists, and had one coming at you from the wrong direction. Cyclists need to be ticketed for not obeying traffic rules. How about DeBla-bla-blasio have traffic cams for them?

0
Reply
UWS Barb
UWS Barb
3 years ago
Reply to  at

Except when they are riding the wrong way.

0
Reply
Joe Rappaport
Joe Rappaport
3 years ago
Reply to  at

“Honestly if you’re dumb enough to get hit by a bicycle because you weren’t paying attention to it coming from a mile away then thats on you.” That’s a flippant comment. While there’s no doubt that motor vehicles are the greater threat, it’s clear that, for some people (though obviously not you), bicycles also put them at risk. One reason for this is that some people, as they age or if they have a disability, can’t actually see, hear or react as quickly as other people. Bikes seem to come out of nowhere, making walking around town a challenge. With autos, at least you know where they are; with bikes, not so much. Bike lanes help, from my point of view, since they reduce the lanes of motor traffic to navigate and you generally know to keep an eye out for bikes when crossing. But they are not perfect for all pedestrians, and I hope you will take this into account as you think more about this problem, at.

0
Reply
SFDH
SFDH
3 years ago

He needs to out his coop board reps so they can be publicly shamed for being awful NIMBYS

0
Reply
Alfred
Alfred
3 years ago
Reply to  SFDH

His Co-op Board should get a Nobel Peace Prize for Pedestrian Safety.

0
Reply
Stu
Stu
3 years ago

The Board of the Century deserve to be removed. They are imposing the costs of unnecessary (and futile) litigation — which can be substantial –onto its shareholders, none of whom approved of the suit.

What is worse is that the majority of these Board members are wealthy enough to — and likely do — pay for garage parking. Perhaps it is to save the spots used by the building staff/workers — and lets face it, we all know that these spots are reserved and taken by supers, doormen and other workers who have the time and ability to do the “car dance” every other day. But, like the PPW battle, it is NIMBY action taken by wealthy folks.

0
Reply
Mike
Mike
3 years ago

Wish I could thank this guy. There are so many people in the UWS who’d like to bike more, but don’t because of safety concerns. I’d like to bike to work in Midtown, but before this bike lane there was no safe way to get from about 57th street to the 70s on the west side (other than near the Hudson, but that’s hugely out of the way unless you live & work on the far west side ). You were seriously risking your life. Terribly dangerous. I may try it again now.

0
Reply
Chris
Chris
3 years ago

Now that the path is safe I have made it part of my daily commute. I obey the rules of the road. Thank you CB7!

0
Reply
Pedestria
Pedestria
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris

Kudos to you Chris! You are an anomaly amongst your cycling brethren (general neutral).

0
Reply
ReasonablePeopleCanDisagree
ReasonablePeopleCanDisagree
3 years ago

I ride this route daily from midtown. Biking up Central Park West is much improved. Hurray!

But since no good deed should ever go unpunished, here’s my biking wish list:

1) bike lane added to Sixth Avenue.
2) bike lane added to Central Park South.
3) parked cars removed from Central Park West from Columbus Circle to 63rd Street (they’re still there!)
4) bike lanes swept by street cleaners. The lanes are already filled with dirt, leaves, litter and other debris. Snow removal in winter, too!
5) No motorized bikes in bike lanes. Particularly the fast delivery guys.
6) Stop wrong-direction bikers.

0
Reply
Stuart
Stuart
3 years ago
Reply to  ReasonablePeopleCanDisagree

6) How do you suggest we stop wrong-direction bikers? And how do we stop cyclists who do not obey traffic signals and signs?

My answer is: licensing, after a satisfactorily-passed mandatory exam, followed up by ticketing when traffic laws are broken, followed by confiscation of bicycles when tickets are not paid. If cyclists are using the same roadway as cars, they should be subject to the same rules, laws, and punishments.

0
Reply
ReasonablePeopleCanDisagree
ReasonablePeopleCanDisagree
3 years ago

I ride this route daily from midtown. Biking up Central Park West is much improved. Hurray!

But since no good deed should ever go unpunished, here’s my biking wish list:

1) bike lane added to Sixth Avenue.
2) bike lane added to Central Park South.
3) parked cars removed from Central Park West from Columbus Circle to 63rd Street (they’re still there!)
4) bike lanes swept by street cleaners. The lanes are already filled with dirt, leaves, litter and other debris. Snow removal in winter, too!
5) No motorized bikes in bike lanes. Particularly the fast delivery guys.
6) Stop wrong-direction bikers.

0
Reply
JB
JB
3 years ago

Is it really so incredibly inconvenient for cyclists to USE THE PARK? The elimination of these free parking spots will raise costs for the entire neighborhood. There are many building workers and tradespeople who use these spots, and now will have to find parking elsewhere. Supply and demand suggests increased parking costs will result, and those costs will be passed on to all of us in higher rent, maintenance and services costs. Not to mention UWS residents who commute out of the city for work. Just ridiculous!

0
Reply
Kevin F
Kevin F
3 years ago
Reply to  JB

The park is a one-way bike lane southbound, whereas Central Park West is a northbound bike lane. Cyclists are not allowed to ride up the west side of central park northbound, and even if they could, they couldn’t make any of the street connections from CPW.

0
Reply
Anne
Anne
3 years ago

Bicyclists are supposed to obey the same laws as cars!
If they do not, the bike lane WILL become a (potentially fatal) hazard for pedestrians & bicyclists alike. If they do, crossing into the park b no worse than it is now with car traffic.

0
Reply
Joey
Joey
3 years ago

Put the bike lane in the park. Allow angle parking on one side of CPW. This should provide at least an additional 200 parking spots, keep dangerous bicyclists away from pedestrians and increase traffic safety.

0
Reply
LPS
LPS
3 years ago

As usual, it’s the bikers that are at fault and the pedestrian is at risk.
I’m a biker and I obey the rules and frankly I’m at risk from self absorbed, oblivious pedestrians walking in or crossing bike lanes without looking while texting or just not caring about anyone else.

Regarding the accidents in Central Park, all the collisions happened in the bike lanes, not the pedestrian lane. Amazing how pedestrians are never at fault!!

0
Reply
Dita
Dita
3 years ago

Speaking of the bike lane, what happened to the North bound west 86th street bus stop? The sign is gone and cars are parking there, yet no notice that the stop has been elimnated.

0
Reply

YOU MIGHT LIKE...

Reports, Resources, and a Photographic Record of NYC’s Record Pollution: Send Your Photos!
NEWS

Reports, Resources, and a Photographic Record of NYC’s Record Pollution: Send Your Photos!

June 7, 2023 | 9:06 PM
Openings and Closings: Broadway Restaurant; Sherry Herring; Spark; PingPod; Sales & Design Gallery
COLUMNS

Openings and Closings: Broadway Restaurant; Sherry Herring; Spark; PingPod; Sales & Design Gallery

June 7, 2023 | 9:43 AM
Previous Post

New Details Emerge in Murder of 20-Year-Old Tony McClain; Family Says ‘They Picked the Wrong Kid’

Next Post

Falling Tree Smashes Park Bench, Narrowly Misses Woman and Children

this week's events image

Explore Your Favorite Subject

20th precinct 24th precinct american museum of natural history animals art bicycling bulletin central park closings columns community board 7 coronavirus crash crime dogs events fdny fire food gale brewer helen rosenthal history homelessness jcc lincoln center monday bulletin morning bulletin nypd openings openings and closings pedestrian safety photography photos politics public schools pupper west side real estate restaurants riverside park silver stars fitness snow sponsored subway upper west side uws

CITY NEWS

The City
Brick Underground
City Limits
Eater
Gothamist
NY Daily News
NY Post
NY Times

LOCAL RESOURCES

Bloomingdale Neighborhood History Group
Central Park Conservancy
CB7
Community Education Council 3
Assembly District 67
The New York Historical Society
Riverside Park
West End Preservation

UWS Blogs

Bloomingdale History Central Park Blogger
North River Notes

Next Post
Falling Tree Smashes Park Bench, Narrowly Misses Woman and Children

Falling Tree Smashes Park Bench, Narrowly Misses Woman and Children

‘Poetic Modernism’ on the West Side

'Poetic Modernism' on the West Side

Police Try to Slow Bicyclists in Central Park After Four Crashes In Short Span

Police Try to Slow Bicyclists in Central Park After Four Crashes In Short Span

  • ABOUT US
  • CONTACT US
  • NEWSLETTER
  • WSR MERCH!
  • ADVERTISE
  • EVENTS
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • SITE MAP
Site design by RLDGROUP

© 2023 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • TOP NEWS
  • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART & CULTURE
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT US
  • WSR SHOP

© 2023 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.