West Side Rag
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART & CULTURE
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • ABOUT US
    • OUR STORY
    • CONTRIBUTORS
    • CONTACT
West Side Rag
No Result
View All Result
SUPPORT THE RAG

Search the site

No Result
View All Result
Get WSR FREE in your inbox
SUPPORT THE RAG

CITY SAYS PARK 79 SHOULDN’T BE OPERATING AS A HOTEL

January 4, 2016 | 10:03 PM
in NEWS, REAL ESTATE
19

Park79Hotel

By Joy Bergmann

Just weeks after the Department of Buildings cited the Park 79 Hotel at 117 West 79th Street for operating a hotel without a valid certificate of occupancy, the hotel has stopped taking reservations and an owner says it will be undergoing renovations. Just how long those renovations may last, and whether the hotel will contest the violations is still unclear.

“The hotel is not closing. There’s going to be renovation going on,” one owner, Larry Goldstein, told us on December 24th, noting that no guests would be accommodated during the renovation. He would not say what kind of renovation was being undertaken.

Hotel staff are telling guests they can’t book rooms this month. Managers declined to comment.

The building shouldn’t have been used as a hotel, the Department of Buildings alleged in one of 13 open Environmental Control Board violations issued on November 17th. Its Certificate of Occupancy says it is supposed to be a “single room occupancy” building. SROs were built to provide affordable housing to low-income adults; rooms have tended to rent for $500 to $1,000 per month.

However, hotel sites like TripAdvisor and Booking.com have had the Park 79 among their listings since at least 2007. Visitors have typically paid $259 for a queen accommodation, a front-desk clerk said. The boutique hotel has 108 rooms.

Goldstein did not answer messages Monday seeking comment on the alleged violations or the existence of a Certificate of Occupancy allowing for hotel use.

Park 79’s owners may choose to fight or to comply with the DOB’s requests at upcoming hearings this month in the Office of Administrative Trials & Hearings [OATH]. The potential penalties are high, especially for a Class 1 violation of the City’s rule against illegal hotels. According to OATH spokesperson Marisa Senigo, the owners could face a $3,200 fine plus daily penalty of up to $45,000 for just one of the 13 alleged violations.

Dan Evans, tenant organizer at Goddard Riverside Law Project, said he isn’t surprised that Park 79 could operate openly as a hotel in possible violation of the Multiple Dwellings Law. “It’s much more lucrative for landlords to rent to tourists than tenants. And unless a tenant calls 311 and files a 4A complaint, they get around the law.”

What happens next with Park 79 remains a mystery.

Photo by Joy Bergmann.

Share this article:
SUPPORT THE RAG
guest

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bob
Bob
9 years ago

we’ll i’ll be

0
Reply
Michael
Michael
9 years ago

Beautiful building, on a great street, in a superb location. I see no reason why these owners shouldn’t be able to operate as they wish. I adore boutique hotels in Europe and the UWS establishments could use the additional overnight tourism.

0
Reply
PedestrianJustice
PedestrianJustice
9 years ago
Reply to  Michael

OK, but these owners must follow the same laws as every other hotelier if and when they are granted an appropriate C of O. If you look at the open violations there are other issues re: fire doors etc which are esp germane to hotels. Not forgetting hotel tax collection and payment…

0
Reply
Michael
Michael
9 years ago
Reply to  PedestrianJustice

100% agree – the owners need to comply witht he appropriate regulations. All I wanted to say was that it is a BEAUTIFUL building in a prime location that as a boutique hotel offers more to the the area than it “takes.” To suggest that this should be an SRO and that as a hotel it’s facilitating homelessness is somewhat absurd. I’d say the BIGGER problem is the 100,000 illegal and unsafe SROs across the city.

0
Reply
Michael G
Michael G
9 years ago
Reply to  Michael

Isn’t this building being cited as an “illegal and unsafe SRO” because it is illegally operating as a hotel and violating safety regulations?

0
Reply
Frank
Frank
9 years ago

It’s not zoned for commercial use. Can’t operate a hotel.

0
Reply
dannyboy
dannyboy
9 years ago

More Trickle Down:

3,000 Homeless people are being kicked out of SROs to make room for tenants.

SRO rooms are taken away for tourists.

Guess this shifts the homeless to the streets.

0
Reply
Scott
Scott
9 years ago
Reply to  dannyboy

It’s a big country Dannyboy. There are wide open spaces in upstate NY, in Pennsylvania and further west. Cheap land as far as the eye can see.

Only an eejit thinks the only option for the homeless is a Manhattan studio apartment.

0
Reply
Bruce Bernstein
Bruce Bernstein
9 years ago
Reply to  Scott

apparently you’re not aware of the # of homeless who are families and people with jobs. Shipping them out to areas remote from their work and/or schools only makes the problem worse.

of course the central issue is affordable housing. i hope we can maintain some level of affordable housing in Manhattan, even in areas like the UWS.

0
Reply
Scott
Scott
9 years ago
Reply to  Bruce Bernstein

Really Bruce? Tell us more. How about some hard stats. Vetted by the city, not from the Coalition for the Homeless, who are about as believable as Obama’s maudlin tears.

Your talking points have been used now for over 30 years. They’ve been utterly discredited as complete horseshit. But you keep going back to the well. You people never will quit, will you?

0
Reply
lisa
lisa
9 years ago
Reply to  Scott

Scott – A certain portion of homeless individuals and homeless families are working people, albeit low or moderate wage earners. You’d be surprised.
One such example – at my son’s graduation from one of NYC’s top high schools, a student brought down the house disclosing that the student and student’s family had lived in a homeless shelter…

0
Reply
RK
RK
9 years ago
Reply to  dannyboy

An SRO on 79th and Bway would get a lot more than $500-$1000/month rent. I don’t think too many homeless would be able to afford it as an SRO. Nice try, though

0
Reply
21D
21D
9 years ago
Reply to  dannyboy

dannyboy, every homeless person in NYC has the legal right to shelter. We may be the only major city that can say that. There is always the bottom rung of housing: homeless shelters.

0
Reply
dannyboy
dannyboy
9 years ago
Reply to  21D

Exactly because these rooms are no longer available that the homeless’ only options are the shelters, which, in many cases are so filthy or dangerous as to be uninhabitable.

Must be nice to think that there is a warmroom for everyone.

0
Reply
21D
21D
9 years ago
Reply to  dannyboy

Well, at least, the option, though I know from those who have experienced shelters, that some are unimaginably awful. And you probably can trace the rise of shelters to the demise of SROs.

0
Reply
Chuck D
Chuck D
9 years ago

Now how about Hotel 99 on 99th Street? Same problem, slightly seedier (anyone else notice the young women taking smoking outside while rough dudes stand close by before escorting them back inside?) What exactly is going on in that “hotel?”

0
Reply
Maria
Maria
9 years ago
Reply to  Chuck D

I live on 99th and have wondered that many times myself! It is an extended stay hotel – but I seem to remember that it had been a nightly hotel and it turned out they did not have a c/o for that? I have to wonder if they are also an SRO cashing in. It is pretty quiet though.

0
Reply
msz
msz
9 years ago

It took the Building Department at least eight years to realize the building was violating it’s certificate of occupancy? And it is such a visible building that advertised itself as a hotel online. Imagine what else is going on behind their backs.

0
Reply
Arvin
Arvin
9 years ago

So sad to hear specially the peolple working there for long like me…i was working as a doorman for more than 5 years and they just give us a layoff for no reason its really hard for me to accept because i have a family and kid to fed…this hotel is crazy the owner wanted to get money all the time and we never get increase

0
Reply

YOU MIGHT LIKE...

Tales of Frustration From One of the UWS’ Most Rat-Infested Blocks: ‘Nobody Is Taking Accountability’
OUTDOORS

Tales of Frustration From One of the UWS’ Most Rat-Infested Blocks: ‘Nobody Is Taking Accountability’

May 22, 2025 | 9:19 AM
Recreational Boats Could Return to UWS In 2028: Update on 79th Street Marina Project
NEWS

Recreational Boats Could Return to UWS In 2028: Update on 79th Street Marina Project

May 21, 2025 | 1:24 PM
Previous Post

THIS WEEKEND, THE PAST PULLED INTO THE 96TH STREET STATION

Next Post

PHOTO CONTEST: WINNER WILL FEAST ON A SPECIAL TASTING MENU DINNER AT TELEPAN

this week's events image
Next Post
PHOTO CONTEST: WINNER WILL FEAST ON A SPECIAL TASTING MENU DINNER AT TELEPAN

PHOTO CONTEST: WINNER WILL FEAST ON A SPECIAL TASTING MENU DINNER AT TELEPAN

THE FRENCH GUIDE TO THE UPPER WEST SIDE (SPONSORED)

THE FRENCH GUIDE TO THE UPPER WEST SIDE (SPONSORED)

MORNING BULLETIN: OVER 20 VEHICLES STOLEN IN 1 NIGHT, H&M OPENING CONFIRMED

BUMPED STROLLER LED TO VIOLENCE AT 72ND STREET SUBWAY STATION: POLICE

  • ABOUT US
  • CONTACT US
  • NEWSLETTER
  • WSR MERCH!
  • ADVERTISE
  • EVENTS
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • SITE MAP
Site design by RLDGROUP

© 2025 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • TOP NEWS
  • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART & CULTURE
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • ABOUT
    • OUR STORY
    • CONTRIBUTORS
    • CONTACT US
  • WSR SHOP

© 2025 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.