West Side Rag
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART & CULTURE
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • ABOUT US
    • OUR STORY
    • CONTRIBUTORS
    • CONTACT
    • ADVERTISE
    • GET WSR FREE IN YOUR INBOX
    • SEND US TIPS AND IDEAS
West Side Rag
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result

Favorite WSR Stories

    SUPPORT THE RAG
    Get the neighborhood news that matters.
    Sign up for our free newsletter

    PUBLIC SCHOOL PARENTS AND TEACHERS SET TO RALLY THURSDAY

    March 11, 2015 | 10:29 AM - Updated on June 5, 2022 | 11:44 PM
    in NEWS, POLITICS, SCHOOLS
    13

    test
    A sign from a rally last year at PS 199.

    Public school parents are planning to rally at neighborhood schools on Thursday at 7:45 a.m. to protest plans by Governor Cuomo to change the way the state evaluates teachers.

    Cuomo is pushing a plan that would make student tests account for 50% of a teacher’s score, up from 40% now. It would also take evaluations out of the hands of principals by having third-party reviewers evaluate teachers. Their scores would account for 35% of the teachers’ total score, with school administrators’ ratings accounting for 15%.

    The governor’s plan is explained starting on page 227 of this document. He argues that the evaluation system needs to be changed, given that less than 1% of New York state teachers were deemed ineffective last year even though 35.8% of students were proficient in math and 31.4% were proficient in English Language Arts.

    Teachers say that the new evaluation system takes control over the schools away from local communities and into the hands of the state bureaucracy, and will only increase “teaching to the test,” which has drawn rising complaints from parents and teachers in the neighborhood.

    Some parents who have contacted us also criticize the governor’s policies on co-locating charter schools, and giving tax breaks for private school tuition even as NYC public schools remain underfunded.

    The Protect Our Schools protest will take place on Thursday morning, and is expected to include thousands of teachers, parents and students around the city.

    PS 87 teachers sent out the following letter to families.

    Dear P.S. 87 Families:

    As you have probably heard, Governor Cuomo has proposed major policy
    changes for New York and we need your help to protect our children’s
    education. At P.S. 87 we strive to develop engaging, creative and
    thoughtful curricula so that all types of learners succeed and develop a
    love of learning. However, if the Governor’s proposals take effect, what we
    value as a quality and fulfilling education will be in jeopardy.

    If Governor Cuomo’s emphasis on test scores becomes law, each and every
    classroom in our school will be affected. There will be less time for
    meaningful integrated studies throughout the grades. There will be less
    time to study trees and create apple markets. There will be less time to
    study animals, design habitats, and create animal museums. There will be
    less time to explore our neighborhoods, visit New York City landmarks, and
    create guidebooks. There will be less time to study Chinese culture, make
    shadow puppets, arrange music, and create original plays based on Chinese
    legends. It is through these kinds of integrated studies that we teach
    children to work collaboratively, think critically and problem solve. It
    is through these kinds of studies that all learners can thrive. If Governor
    Cuomo has his way, there will be less time for us to educate your children
    in the ways we find most meaningful and beneficial.

    We want to let you know, from our perspective, the changes Governor Cuomo’s proposed law could bring to public schools — and to our profession — if it passes.

    * 50% of a teacher’s rating will be based on state test scores.
    (Currently it is 20%).
    * 35% of a teacher’s rating will be based on the findings of an
    outside “independent observer” who will conduct a one time visit to the
    classroom. (This has never been done before. Currently our principal’s and
    assistant principals’ observations count for 60%.)
    * 15% of a teacher’s rating will be based on observations by the
    principal or assistant principal. The very people who know our work best
    will have the least input into our evaluation.
    * 50% + 35% = 85% of our evaluations will be removed from the
    hands of our community and placed in the hands of the state. And then,
    using these numbers, any teacher who is rated ineffective two years in a
    row can be fired. Principals may have no say in this.

    What might this mean for our schools?

    It might mean that standardized testing begins as early as kindergarten.
    It might mean that standardized tests will be given in specials such as
    art, drama and gym.

    Also, many people are not aware that even in schools where children do well
    on the standardized tests, many teachers do not. Teachers’ ratings are not
    based on their students’ scores for the year, but whether their students
    improved from one year to the next. For example, a student can get a four
    on the test in both 3rd grade and 4th grade. However, if that student
    answers only one fewer question correctly, she will not have demonstrated
    the “added value” her teacher is expected to have instilled. Even though
    she has mastered that grade’s content and even though it’s just one
    question.

    One or two wrong answers can make or break a teacher’s rating. This already happens, and if Governor Cuomo’s evaluation proposals come to pass, it may start to happen more frequently. As a result, quality teachers may be rated ineffective. If teachers are rated ineffective two years in a row, they may be fired. What might this mean for P.S. 87’s teachers? Realistically, many of us could be fired. Every year. And many more of us could be pushed away from the profession we love.

    This is what forces teachers to do test prep even though we know that the
    tests do not give an accurate picture of student learning or of the
    effectiveness of teachers, and even though we know that teaching to the
    test is bad teaching. These proposals may push many teachers to teach in
    ways they know to be counterproductive. The P.S. 87 that we all love and
    cherish, a school full of active and engaged learners, inquiry,
    questioning, creativity, and joy in learning may cease to exist.

    And what about the social and emotional toll these changes will inflict on
    children? As teachers, we look at the whole child. We know how they exist
    and operate within a community, and we strive to meet their emotional
    needs. We want our students to become citizens of the world. Narrowing our focus to improve performance on standardized tests means losing sight of the whole child. We know the emotional toll this takes on children. The
    genuine joy of learning disappears and is replaced with headaches,
    stomachaches, and school avoidance. We do not want this for our students.
    We didn’t go into teaching to spend hours, weeks and months on test prep.

    We hope this is not the type of education you want for your children.

    And that is not all. There is also Cuomo’s proposed “budget increase.”

    The governor’s plan proposes to increase the state education budget to $1.1
    billion only if the state legislature lifts the cap on charter schools and agrees to the proposed changes to teacher evaluations. If these terms are not met, the budget will be reduced to $377 million. Meanwhile, the state owes New York City public schools $2.5 billion following a 2006 Campaign for Fiscal Equity lawsuit settlement. P.S. 87 is owed $2 million, which amounts to over $2,000 per student.

    Voters should not have their school districts penalized for urging their
    legislators to resist these changes.

    We need your help, and we need it now. The education law is folded into the
    state budget. It goes up for a vote on April 1st.

    If you want to take action, here’s what you can do:

    1. You can call, email, and/or send letters to your state senator<
    https://www.nysenate.gov/senators>, your assemblyman<
    https://assembly.state.ny.us/>, and the Governor<
    https://www.governor.ny.gov/contact>. Go to https://assembly.state.ny.us/mem/
    to find contact information. Governor Cuomo’s email address is
    gov.cuomo@chamber.state.ny.us<https://gov.cuomo@chamber.state.ny.us/>.

    2. Visit https://www.nyteacherletter.org/ and sign the letter to let
    your legislator know you disapprove of the law.

    3. Participate in the Protect our Schools citywide event. Before school
    on Thursday, March 12, members of 87’s community plan to come together to protest Governor Cuomo’s proposals and show support for public schools. Stay tuned for more information.

    4. Talk to your friends and family members and post the information on
    Facebook.

    5. Get the information out any way you can. We feel protective of what we have created at P.S. 87. We don’t want to take our community for granted. All that we have, all that we do together, is far too important and far too valuable to be taken away. Thank you, as always, for your energy, your support and entrusting us with your children.

    P.S. 87’s Teachers

    Share this article:
    SUPPORT THE RAG
    Leave a comment

    Please limit comments to 150 words and keep them civil and relevant to the article at hand. Comments are closed after six days. Our primary goal is to create a safe and respectful space where a broad spectrum of voices can be heard. We welcome diverse viewpoints and encourage readers to engage critically with one another’s ideas, but never at the expense of civility. Disagreement is expected—even encouraged—but it must be expressed with care and consideration. Comments that take cheap shots, escalate conflict, or veer into ideological warfare detract from the constructive spirit we aim to cultivate. A detailed statement on comments and WSR policy can be read here.

    guest

    guest

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    13 Comments
    D.
    D.
    11 years ago

    Oh Noah, have you nothing better to do?
    #dontstealpossible

    0
    Reply
    senyc
    senyc
    11 years ago
    Reply to  D.

    You clearly have drunk the Eva koolaid. If, as I assume, you’re referencing Noah Gotbaum, the UWS is lucky to have him as an astute and intelligent advocate!!

    https://m.nydailynews.com/new-york/education/hedge-fund-execs-money-charter-schools-pay-article-1.2145001?cid=bitly

    0
    Reply
    Bruce Bernstein
    Bruce Bernstein
    11 years ago
    Reply to  senyc

    agreed in re: Noah Gotbaum. He has stood up for public schools. Good for him. And he has been effective.

    0
    Reply
    Henry
    Henry
    11 years ago

    Not sure if Cuomo has the right approach or not, but his actions seem to be based on an alarming status quo:

    only 35.8% of students were proficient in math and 31.4% were proficient in English Language Arts!!!!!!

    While I appreciate that “There will be less time to study Chinese culture, make shadow puppets, arrange music, and create original plays based on Chinese legends.”

    maybe we’re a bit spoiled and need to exercise some discipline to remain competitive in a very competitive global labor marketplace.

    0
    Reply
    Sami-Beth
    Sami-Beth
    11 years ago
    Reply to  Henry

    With all due respect Henry, you have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. Children are not robots. They do not learn by parroting back information and sitting silently listening to an adult drone on. They learn by doing, by participating, and by exploring. No one thinks chilsren should have a dedicated “Shadow Puppetry” class every day, and implying that is a real straw man. What the issue is with hours and hours and hours of math and english language arts test prep is that teachers have no time for social studies, science, handwriting practice, hands-on science experiments or anything remotely fun or engaging in any way. There is nothing spoiled about wanting children to engage in learning that is both meaningful and authentic, meaning learning that prepares them for real-life scenarios that involve critical thinking. Andwering hundreds of multiple choice test prep questions is not authentic work. In fact, it is the least authentic learning experience possible. Children aren’t speaking or listening or synthesizing information, they’re simply sitting in silence filling in bubbles, for up to 3 hours a day around testing time. I wonder if you would appreciate it someone who had no expertise in your area of employment made sweeping, incorrect generalizations about the nature of your work…

    0
    Reply
    Beth
    Beth
    11 years ago

    @D

    You are the ones stealing possible from NYC public school students. You are the ones stealing space in public school buildings. You are the ones stealing public funds.

    Typical for a charter school supporter, you attempt to marginalize opposition by calling out one visible opponent. Today, it’s Noah Gotbaum. Other days, it’s the teachers union, the DOE, Zephyr Teachout, etc. Unfortunately for you charter school supporters, the impetus behind these protests are DOE parents. We have seen the negative impact that the Bloomberg and Cuomo administrations’ education policies have had on our children and we’ve had enough!! We do not want excessive standardized testing and inexperienced teachers. We do not want more of those horrible “Success” Academies with their autocratic discipline and overly structured curriculum.

    The only reason why the charter school/standardized testing agenda continues is because of huge political contributions made to Governor Cuomo by individuals and groups who support this nonsense. Eva Moskowitz is neither an appointed nor an elected government official and should not be allowed to use public funds to create her own mini-empire. (Oops – I meant to say create an unresponsive, exclusionary parallel school system.)

    Opposition to standardized testing and charter schools is not just exclusive to NYC or NYS, but a growing nationwide movement. We support investment in our public schools, as opposed to the vilification of public schools by Governor Cuomo, Bill Gates, Eli Broad and the like. We are fighting the good fight, and we will win.

    #endannualtesting

    0
    Reply
    pjrod
    pjrod
    11 years ago

    Teachers Unions sure do hate accountability.

    0
    Reply
    marie
    marie
    11 years ago
    Reply to  pjrod

    and, seemingly, competition

    0
    Reply
    Sarah
    Sarah
    11 years ago

    PS87 parents can hold themselves above others, but year after year the same schools’ results do not improve. In certain neighborhoods, kids do not have the basic skills they need. The tests are well done and cover crucial skills so why not teach to the test- that’s what kids need to know!!

    0
    Reply
    Sami-Beth
    Sami-Beth
    11 years ago
    Reply to  Sarah

    Um curious, did you even read this article? Are you aware that an effective and dedicated teacher can be rated as “ineffective” and lose their job simply for having a student who, though he is thriving academically and scoring high on the test, scored a question or two less than the previous year? Fired. Even though that student is demonstrating more than a proficient performance. And that’s something you’re fine with?

    “Why not teach to the test?” Because time and time again, research h has shown that this is an ineffective way to educate children. The tests are NOT “well-done”, they are confusing, poorly composed and down-right ridiculous at times. I am 28 years old, have a masters in education and scored a 760 on the verbal section of my SATS and I am even stumped by the unnecessarily wordy, intentionally convoluted phrasing. They are also NOT AN EFFECTIVE MEASURE OF WHAT A STUDENT HAS LEARNED. Let me reiterate that: they do not accurately measure what a student has learned. This is conclusion that is supported by endless data and research and it simply cannot be argued. So please explain to me why these ineffective, poorly constructed tests are supposed to determine the fate of both school children and teachers? Maybe your employer should administer an ineffective measure of how you’re performing at your job and see how you feel about it, because you seem to know everything about everything.

    0
    Reply
    Bruce Bernstein
    Bruce Bernstein
    11 years ago

    I’m a supporter of public education and agree with Sami-Beth and Beth in the above postings.

    What is notable is the supporters of public education in this thread make informed and passionate arguments, citing facts… whereas the opponents argue with one-line throw-aways denigrating unions or advocates. Snark vs. substance, it seems to me.

    0
    Reply
    Beth
    Beth
    11 years ago
    Reply to  Bruce Bernstein

    A-ha!! On something we actually agree!! 🙂

    0
    Reply
    pjrod830
    pjrod830
    11 years ago

    So… “less than 1% of New York state teachers were deemed ineffective last year even though 35.8% of students were proficient in math and 31.4% were proficient in English Language Arts” If standardized tests (however imperfect they may be) are not part of the solution then please give me an alternative.

    0
    Reply

    YOU MIGHT LIKE...

    COLUMNS

    Upper West Side Historical Photo Challenge No. 37

    October 6, 2026 | 8:00 AM
    A Political Brain Trust in an Upper West Side Building
    NEWS

    A Political Brain Trust in an Upper West Side Building

    October 5, 2026 | 2:51 PM - Updated on October 6, 2026 | 12:07 PM
    Previous Post

    OUR THROWBACK THURSDAY POST HELPED UNITE A TEACHER AND STUDENT 40 YEARS LATER

    Next Post

    DRAMA: TWO LOCAL PLAYS ARE CROWD-PLEASERS

    this week's events image
    Next Post
    DRAMA: TWO LOCAL PLAYS ARE CROWD-PLEASERS

    DRAMA: TWO LOCAL PLAYS ARE CROWD-PLEASERS

    CHURCH ON 96TH STREET GETS APPROVAL FOR CONDO CONVERSION

    CHURCH ON 96TH STREET GETS APPROVAL FOR CONDO CONVERSION

    MARSHAL SEIZES MAMAJUANA CAFE, RETURNS POSSESSION TO LANDLORD

    MARSHAL SEIZES MAMAJUANA CAFE, RETURNS POSSESSION TO LANDLORD

    • ABOUT US
    • CONTACT US
    • NEWSLETTER
    • WSR MERCH!
    • ADVERTISE
    • EVENTS
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS OF USE
    • SITE MAP
    Site design by RLDGROUP

    © 2026 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • TOP NEWS
    • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
    • OPEN/CLOSED
    • FOOD
    • SCHOOLS
    • OUTDOORS
    • REAL ESTATE
    • ART & CULTURE
    • POLITICS
    • COLUMNS
    • CRIME
    • HISTORY
    • ABSURDITY
    • ABOUT
      • OUR STORY
      • CONTRIBUTORS
      • CONTACT US
      • GET WSR FREE IN YOUR INBOX
      • SEND US TIPS AND IDEAS
    • WSR SHOP

    © 2026 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.