
By Yvonne Vávra
The problem with Theodore Roosevelt Park is that I never know where to sit. Should I face north and watch the Emery Roth beauties and other stunning buildings play peekaboo behind the trees? Or face south, soaking in the uncomplicated happiness from the dog run, while the universe on display in the Rose Center for Earth and Space reminds me how small I am, and yet part of something so big?
But that challenge to my indecisive soul is really the only problem I have with the park, which stretches from 77th to 81st streets, between Central Park West and Columbus Avenue. In fact, I’m in love with its trees, birds, flowers, nannies, toddlers, squirrels, other regulars — and, more often than not, with one of the benches facing north, where I can marvel at the buildings, the happy dogs, and the galaxies behind me.
Someone once had a very different opinion about this place: “It is a disgrace to the city. It is in some places forty feet below the grade and well characterized as ‘a pestilential hole of stagnant water.’” Pestilential! How dramatic. That someone was Samuel B. Ruggles, a lawyer and politician who developed both Union Square and Gramercy Park in the 1830s and was a fan of open space: “Buildings, towers, palaces, may moulder and crumble beneath the touch of time; but space—free, glorious, open space—will remain to bless the City forever.” Understandably, he wasn’t thrilled with how the city had let the area go downhill.
The city had purchased the land in 1839, with visions of New Yorkers strolling beneath trees in mind. A main-character name was chosen: Manhattan Square. Theodore Roosevelt, the president it would eventually be named for, hadn’t even been born yet. This was also long before anyone dreamed up Central Park. It wasn’t until 1858 that Frederick Law Olmsted and Calvert Vaux were selected to transform the swampy area into the country’s first landscaped park. Meanwhile, Manhattan Square just sat there in the wilderness, surrounded by rocks and rubbish, with pigs roaming around and not much else going on. It was giving off middle-of-nowhere vibes.
With the more exciting Central Park project underway, the city forgot all about its Manhattan Square dreams. Literally forgot. On August 25, 1860, The New York Times published an article about a man — his name, apparently, “not necessary to mention” — who had approached the Comptroller with an offer he hoped the city couldn’t refuse. He claimed to know of a large property, referring to Manhattan Square, that belonged to the city but was being occupied by private parties. He offered to disclose both the location and the names of the “pseudo owners” in exchange for a cut of the property’s value. The city did, in fact, refuse, although at the time of publishing, negotiations were still pending.
However it came about, the city was eventually reunited with its square — but had no idea what to do with it. At various points, they considered turning it into a military parade ground during the Civil War, a botanical garden, or a zoo. In the end, Manhattan Square was rescued from its dumpy existence and became the home of the American Museum of Natural History. When Albert Bickmore, the museum’s founding father, first visited the site, he said: “As I sat on top of this rock, the surrounding view was dreary and my only companions were scores of goats.” Not long after, the museum’s first structure opened in 1877, followed by many expansions, the transformation of the surrounding wasteland into a green retreat, and more than a few heated arguments over what, exactly, it should look like.
You certainly remember the wrangling about the museum’s latest expansion. Thousands of Upper West Siders signed a letter against the construction of the Gilder Center, fearing it would destroy the park. The museum won that battle. However, when the fencing came down in the summer of 2023 and the newly renovated park was revealed, I for one immediately forgot about all the worries. The park now had more than 20 new trees, a fresh layer of plants and flowers, a larger lawn, more benches, and cute new pathways winding around the Gilder Center, which I sincerely can’t get enough of. It looks like an alien landed on the historic site, a friendly alien of out-of-this world beauty, who seemed destined to be exactly here, next to these old Romanesque structures of the museum that couldn’t look more different — and yet, it’s as if they’ve been waiting for this visitor all along.
I get why the thought of losing part of Teddy Roosevelt Park troubled Upper West Siders. Outsiders might not have been able to grasp the fuss over a small green space when hundreds of acres of luscious, world-famous Central Park are right across the street. Why sit here, when you can sit there?
The charm of smaller, less dramatic spaces can be surprisingly powerful. Central Park belongs to the whole world and holds so many of its stories. People leave their hearts in it, get entangled with it, and hold it captive in pictures, captive to their expectations. Sure, there are plenty of tourists in Teddy Roosevelt Park, but do they even know its name? They’ve got nothing but dinosaurs on their minds, already planning their next stop. To us, it’s more than just trees around a museum. This one is ours. Not larger-than-life, but the perfect size for the days of our lives.
Pestilential turns resplendent. A swamp becomes a sanctuary. Goats one day, galaxies the next. Our park shows us that no story is ever over. They might be forgotten or nearly lost, but there’s always some winding path leading to an unexpected turn. From pigs and rubble to peonies and planets, this little square has come far. Or maybe it’s just getting started.
Yvonne Vávra is a magazine writer and author of the German book 111 Gründe New York zu lieben (111 Reasons to Love New York). Born a Berliner but an aspiring Upper West Sider since the 1990s (thanks, Nora Ephron), she came to New York in 2010 and seven years later made her Upper West Side dreams come true. She’s been obsessively walking the neighborhood ever since.
Subscribe to West Side Rag’s FREE email newsletter here. And you can Support the Rag here.
Beautiful story! I spent many happy days at the dog run with my Beagles! Made lots of good friends !
One of the neighborhood’s most underrated spots!
I was one of those fighting the science building and fearing the surrounding landscape would be forever lost or compromised. I still think the building is ugly but the renovated park is wonderful! I spend a lot of time there relaxing and people watching.
Fascinating history and beautiful write-up + impressions! I grew up right across the street from the park (indeed, overlooking it), and for my father, brother and me, it was a place to play catch with our mitts and soft ball: this was long before there was a dog park, and long before lush green grass carpeted the floor. And of course in those days, it was just the faded green dome of the Hayden Planetarium, site of stoned Pink Floyd fans all weekend night.
What a lovely tribute for a little gem that is often overshadowed (literally…) by the museum next door. Also, thank you for the piece of history I did not know, about the forgotten parcel of land that was ‘found’ and made into part of what is such an icon of NYC today. To be fair, I won’t mind a few goats roaming around along the kids … but I am with you on loving that little piece of calm that wraps so well around the bustle of the museum and Columbus and a crosstown street.
Worth mentioning that Margaret Mead Green is in TR Park.
Wonderful article, wonderfully written. Thanks, WSR, for publishing it.
You write so beautifully that it is difficult to believe that Engiish is not your native tongue!
I, too, appreciate her wonderful writing. The funny thing is, if you want to really improve your English, become fluent in German. Not really that hard, and andsince English is a Germanic language, it really polishes all of your English. I learned German in college, studied in Germany, and the main thing in my 70s now is how effortless English grammar became. (And I’m an engineer who became a physician, so up until college had no exposure at all— it was the best part of my education. And, aside from the obvious blight surrounding WW II, the culture, music, literature, philosophy , and history of science are amazing.)
I appreciate your appreciation of the phenomenal German contributions in the arts and sciences. I hope that I understand your personal observations accurately. A gentle clarification, although I may be in error, Dr. Anne: English may not be considered exclusively a Germanic language. Confirm with professional linguists: English is at least 1/5 Teutonic-languages-derived; English also is as much derived from Latin and subsequent “romance” languages such as Spanish, Italian, and French; and Anglo-Saxon. Latin and German generally put their verbs at the end of the sentence, unlike standard English structure.
You are a FANTASTIC writer! I lived around the corner and spent many hours in, walking through, and passing by this park. Thank you for bringing me right back!
“Goats one day, galaxies the next. ” One of the lovely pearls of writing in this sweet essay. Thank you for this little gift to New Yorkers.
Yes, it’s a lovely park but the rat population really diminishes one’s enjoyment. The last several times I’ve been there the vermin were both audible and highly visible, scampering in and out of the bushes. Distressing, unpleasant.
I am surprised no one wants to rename the park.
Exactly what I was thinking, The ultra liberals who know nothing of what Teddy Roosevelt did collaborated to get rid of his statue but are somehow ok with his name on the park? Quite ironic and funny in a sardonic kind of way.
The issue with the statue was less with Teddy Roosevelt in general but with the racial hierarchy it represented.
Speaking for all “ultra-liberals,” TR was not the problem with that statue
My dad, an Upper Westsider, died on July 4th, 2016. I sat alone, with my sorrow, in the park all afternoon. The intimacy of the small space was perfect. My dad supported the construction of the Gilder Center. As usual, he was right.
Another wonderful article, beautifully written — thank you!!
A park right across the street from another park. That is unusual. I was sitting in TR Park one day. A guy in a hurry asked me where something was. I said that it was in Central Park. He said, “Isn’t this Central Park?”. I said, “No this is Theodore Roosevelt Park”. He groaned. But then I told him thatCentral Park was right across the street
The landscaping, if you can call it that, outside the Richard Gilder Center is a disgrace. How about some attractive native pants and maybe a Butterfly Garden.
Native pants— too many of those in our parks. Butterfly Garden is a nice idea.
What a delightfully written piece about a delightful little slice of NYC
My only “appearance” in a film was set against this park, so it has a special meaning for me as well.
A thoroughly engaging and elegantly composed narrative—both illuminating in its content and admirable in its craftsmanship. Well done Yvonne.