By Claire Davenport
The New York City subway turned 120 last month. But while that longevity is cause for some celebration, a recent study out of New York University indicates the subway’s age also gives reason for worry about a little-noticed issue: the air quality on subway trains and in underground stations.
The report’s title is bland: “Exposure to fine particulate matter in the New York City subway system during the home-work commute.” But here’s the bottom line from one of the study’s coauthors, Shams Azad, a postdoctoral researcher at Columbia University’s Climate School: “The majority of underground stations and platforms are highly polluted.”
Azad said the pollution is due to iron-based particulate matter that accumulates in the subway system over time. It’s especially high, he told the Rag in an interview, on older, underground lines like the 1 train, which runs through the Upper West Side and Washington Heights. “These stations are deep underground – the particles are trapped and can’t get out,” Azad said.
The study, published in August, is based on measurements taken by Azad and his colleagues between October 2021 and March 2022. They measured the air quality on 19 different subway lines and in 429 of the 472 subway stations in the city, using handheld monitors to calculate the particle concentration in the air. The researchers rode the train lines from one end to the other, then rode the same lines in the opposite direction, getting off at every station for 10 to 15 minutes to collect air samples.
Based on their measurements, they were able to calculate how long different commuters were exposed to the polluted air. Some of the city’s most polluted stations by particulate matter concentration are the stations at West 72nd Street, 168th, and 181st on the 1 line.
“It’s not a surprise to hear,” said Rey Marte, a commuter the Rag spoke with at the 96th Street station on the 1 line. “I’ve been riding the subway since I was 16, and I can tell that the air quality is getting worse.”
Marte estimates that he spends about eight hours a week on the subway and wishes the trains and stations had more ventilation. “In the summer I ride my bike, but in the winter I have no choice but to take the train,” he said. “The city could do more to make it a nice environment.”
So should commuters worry about the quality of the air they are breathing on the subway? It’s unclear how much. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the recommended limit for particulate matter exposure is a daily concentration of 15 micrograms per cubic meter. New Yorkers who frequently ride the subway are exposed to levels over ten times that amount.
The WHO guidelines on exposure are not specific to iron-based particle inhalation. Still, that doesn’t mean there aren’t concerning health implications, according to Scott Weichenthal, associate professor in the Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health at McGill University, who researches the health effects of air pollution.
It’s clear, said Weichenthal, that iron-particulate matter exposure can have a negative effect on the body; less clear is the level of that effect.
“It’s sort of like comparing pollution on the subway versus from a forest fire,” he explained. “We know they’re both probably bad for you; we just don’t know the relative toxicity.”
Weichenthal said metal particulates can cause “oxidative stress.” “Our body has a sort of natural capacity to deactivate harmful chemicals,” he said. “And when you have high levels of PM 2.5 and high levels of metals like iron and copper in those particles, you’re tipping the scale in favor of more of that damage happening.”
Asked about the findings in the August report, MTA communications director Tim Minton said: “This recycled study based on years-old ‘data’ draws no conclusions on potential health issues regarding air in any subway system. Every serious person knows transit is the antidote to climate change.”
Minton also said that particles that rest on tunnel floors are cleaned by vacuum trains that rotate nightly through the system and by the mobile wash crews that clean the stations; he argued that particles in subway cars are mitigated by air filtration.
“Given that we collected data in 2021 and 2022, their comment about it being ‘recycled, based on years-old data’ is incorrect,” said Azad. “The steps taken by the MTA so far are clearly not sufficient to improve air quality effectively,” he said.
Azad suggested that commuters who are concerned by these findings can protect themselves by wearing N95 masks, which have 98 percent particulate-matter-filtration rates. He also said riders can be cognizant of higher-risk moments – air-particulate-matter concentrations are not as big a concern in above-ground stations and transit lines, and concentration increases during train arrivals and departures.
For a longer-term solution, Azad said the MTA would need to install stronger filters in train cars and ventilation at stations. Until recently, the agency’s budgeting shortfalls and Governor Kathy Hochul’s suspension of congestion pricing appeared to make such changes unlikely, though Hochul and the state are now moving forward to reinstate a congestion pricing program with a lower fee.
If you want to check your exposure to iron-based particulate matter, you can use this interactive platform Azad and his team put together.
Subscribe to West Side Rag’s FREE email newsletter here.
Concerning, perhaps the congestion pricing toll could be tripled so the MTA can finance these critical air filtration improvements.
I have to be honest, thinking like this is exactly why Donald J Trump WON. FIX the problem not a band aid. Charge people who don’t ride the subway? SMH.
**Not sure why my original & very innocuous response was blocked?
The ‘problem’ is an aging subway system, I suppose we could replace all the old metal as well, that sounds more expensive/disruptive.
People who DON’T ride the subway and instead drive around NYC are the people who create the congestion, noise and air pollution. They should be charged. Subway riders don’t do any of that.
The journal in which this research was published (Plos One) has a thorough editing and peer review process and is exceptionally well respected among the health science community. The statement made by the MTA communications director is misinformed at best and an attempt to gaslight us at worst. Whichever it is, his blatant disregard for our safety represents a perfect example of why citizens have lost faith in those in charge.
Really not helpful comments! So many ways he could have been more upbeat:How about, “Fortunately with our excellent train time predictions, most riders spend most of their time on the subway inside the cars, protected by MTA’s modern air filtration systems. “ Or: “This study can be helpful to MTA in targeting the stations that can benefit most from improved ventilation. We love our historic transit system, but some stations are clearly feeling their age more than others.”
The study is so interesting- and makes me want to look at the data especially in the big maze stations like 42nd/Times Square where you are often running from one line to another, breathing hard, the air always feels beyond stale and you go for blocks underground. I also really wonder about the relative exposure of train staff and MTA workers who spend a lot more time than most of us inside underground stations. Mind you, the diesel fumes from planes, trucks and cars above ground and around major intersections and underpasses can provide a sobering comparison of a different kind. He’s right that more transit is better.
Further incentive to keep those doubled N95 masks on, people! It might also be worthwhile to research the potential protective effects of various antioxidants — e.g., SOD, NAC, glutathione, selenium, selenomethionine, vitamin E, vitamin C, quercetin, etc. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41420-024-02078-0 might offer a few starting points in that effort.
Me, I just avoid the subway as much as possible.
Thanks for this informational piece. Aggravating that the MTA tries to excuse away the study’s findings.
This is depressing.
Actually noise is a pretty massive issue
Thank you for publicizing this study. The abstract mentions city-average platform and train PM2.5 of 139 and 99 micrograms per cubic meter, which equate to US AQI of 214 and 182 respectively. For a daily commute, that is definitely very significant exposure over a lifetime. I’m very curious to see this myself and want to bring my portable AQI monitor to check it out on a trip.
As for whether the subway PM2.5 particles are as bad as outdoor sources like fires, exhaust, fumes…my understanding is that PM2.5 danger isn’t about the material, it’s about the SIZE. That size of particle can penetrate deeply into the lungs and enter the bloodstream. It’s like microplastics. They may be inert, but they are nonetheless foreign substances. Linked to measurable health risks, best avoided.
In that vein, given it’s winter…do you use a humidifier? Is it ultrasonic (the most popular kind of the market)? Do you feed it distilled water (most people don’t, it’s expensive in quantity)? If not, you are exposing yourself to PM2.5 pollution, and you owe it to yourself to read this very logical, easy to read explanation why they’re a bad idea: https://dynomight.net/humidifiers/. I have no connection to the author.
As for noise – I have measured it with dosimeters on the platform. Yes, sound levels can exceed 95db when an express train is roaring through – but it’s a fairly short interval. Not nearly as serious a concern as air quality IMO. Easily minimized by doing what I and a few others do: close up your ears with your fingers when a train comes through.
People are worried about “air quality,” and Alvin Bragg, about to be re-elected,” are letting an 8 time viscous offender out on the streets to slaughter 3 innocent people. Keep up your sanity neighbors!!!
And this study was done during the pandemic when there were few trains running and few people in them.
This is the problem with government, who the hell think’s the NYC subway is healthy? Nobody even talks about it. RFK jr. is a person who will have a conversation about this. Does RFK jr. scare the hell out of me YES but he will start very important conversations. This Country can do much better, and it starts with conversation.
He’ll be in a position to do more than start a conversation.
Now I know what the MTA can upgrade with the money collected from the new $9 toll—a communications director!
Oh, we knew they’d waste the money already! New comms director, old comms director.. same bankruptcy.
Last time I was on a Subway was in 1968 when I had to go to 23rd St. in a rush ever since then I’ve never been on any subway or bus in New York or anywhere else. I “sleep like a baby”.
This is the least of your problems on the subway.
Charming story!
FYI Lego is a registered trademark (as “LEGO”), so it should always be capitalized. Your use of generic lowercase made me wonder if there was some ancient term called a “lego” until I looked it up. It’s a word the company created out of two Danish words, leg and godt, or “play well.”