By Daniel Krieger
Earlier this year, in response to rampant Republican gerrymandering, New York Democrats decided to try their hand at that dark art to increase their chances of holding onto the House in the 2022 midterm elections.
But the plan backfired spectacularly and led to a heated primary contest for the seat representing the newly drawn, Manhattan-only 12th Congressional District, pitting longtime Democratic allies, Reps. Carolyn Maloney and Jerry Nadler, against each other and Suraj Patel, a young challenger.
But when the smoke clears after that bruising brawl, there will be one additional candidate left standing – a Republican who will challenge the victor in the November general election. That candidate is Michael K. Zumbluskas, or ‘Mike Z,’ as his campaign literature identifies him. He says he is running because he believes he has an outside chance of winning.
Sure, a Republican taking the 12th District might defy demographics, probability, logic and physics, but Mike Z. is undeterred. In fact, he is barreling ahead in his sixth — and most ambitious — campaign for public office. (He ran for State Senate three times and New York Assembly twice, without success.) He offers what he calls “a better path” than the current leadership. “I’m scared of the direction we’re heading,” he says during a recent early morning Zoom interview, “and I want to help. I just don’t think what’s happening in this country is healthy.”
The son of an Air Force master sergeant, Mike Z. was born in Hempstead, NY, started elementary school in Okinawa, Japan, and graduated from high school in Aviano, Italy, with multiple stops in between; he served in the Army; he has lived on the Upper East Side for over 30 years; he has been steeped in politics since the 1992 Ross Perot presidential campaign, as a consultant and a candidate, working for Republicans and Democrats, local and national. A self-described “policy wonk,” his first political debate was at age 8 with his Aunt Thelma who supported Richard Nixon, while he backed Hubert Humphrey.
Mike Z., who is 62, is a resource management analyst at the New York City Department of Transportation where he has worked for 15 years. But 20 years ago, he was earning $8.25 an hour as a security guard at Stevenson Commons in the Bronx and struggling to pay rent. “That gives me a good perspective that a lot of people don’t have,” he says.
When it comes to the issues, Mike Z.’s platform does not read like the typical partisan Republican you may love or hate. He is against gerrymandering. He believes in clean energy alternatives. And he wants to reduce homelessness, expand affordable housing and repair democracy after the January 6th attack by “the morons who rioted that day.”
“My policies are not coming from ideology,” he says. “I call myself a ‘practicalist’ because I look at what will work.”
But on some hot-button issues, he does join his Republican brethren. On the 2020 election he says: “Anyone who says that Biden is an illegitimate president is wrong because Congress certified him. But whether the election was stolen or not, I don’t know, because we need to do more research.” And he would not have voted to impeach Trump on either occasion.
On abortion, he is pro-choice “until the second trimester” but also agrees with the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade, believing states should decide. On guns, he is “a defender of the second amendment,” favors arming teachers, and approves of the recent Supreme Court decision that requires New York City to allow concealed carry of handguns. “New York was way too restrictive,” he says. “We need to open up.”
He would vote against the Inflation Reduction Act that is blazing its way toward law. “Government spending has always increased inflation,” he insists, starting with ancient Rome to the present day. (As a history buff with a degree in history, he sees things through a historical lens.) “You have an elite that’s out of touch with the majority of the population. They don’t understand what’s going on in small-town America or poor neighborhoods in the city.”
And he doesn’t solely blame Democrats but also Republicans for what’s gone wrong, though certainly and especially Democrats, such as Jerry Nadler and Carolyn Maloney, whom he critiques for being too partisan, for promoting policies that have worsened inflation, for insufficient oversight of government spending, for letting American manufacturing decline on their watch and being too focused on gun crime while giving short shrift to non-gun crime, which was one of his takeaways from a recent live debate between the three Democrats on WPIX11.
Mike Z. would prefer to run against Suraj Patel, which he calculates could be a toss-up. His hope is that with the timing of the August 23rd primary, Nadler and Maloney supporters might go on vacation without sending in their absentee ballots. In his view, his most formidable foe would be Maloney since the Upper East Side has been his political stomping ground where he is most known.
For most of his political career, Mike Z. has been affiliated with the Independence Party of New York, which no longer qualifies to field candidates. The problem with being a Republican in New York City, he says, is that the party doesn’t provide enough support here. “They are backing me up to a point,” he says. They do provide a small amount of money, not to mention retweets and personnel for events. Mike Z. estimates he has spent about $10,000 so far and has $3,000 in the bank. At upcoming fundraisers his aim is to raise at least $50,000 to make it till November. That will be enough, he says, because “I know how to stretch a dollar.” In contrast, Nadler and Maloney each have north of $1 million on hand.
“I’m not the greatest fundraiser in the world,” he admits, “but I’m starting to raise more funds now. And when I’m out on the street, when I’m talking to people, I win a lot of people over. The problem is a lot of Republicans don’t come out. They’re so used to being beat up so they don’t show up.”
That’s why his strategy is to court Democrats, who vastly outnumber Republicans in the area. He believes that he has a lot of crossover Democratic support, and received endorsements from Democrats such as Carmen Quiñones, a leader at the Douglass Houses on the Upper West Side, Bilal Malik, a county committee member in Brooklyn and Angela Di Gangi, a former Upper East Side State committee member, with more to come after the primaries. He also feels buoyed by the political headwinds this season that seem to strongly favor Republicans, and can imagine an upset like that of Republican newcomer Edward Durr, a truck driver with a shoestring budget who beat the Democratic State Senator Steve Sweeney last year in New Jersey.
“I have a lot of people telling me that they’re not voting Democrat this year,” he says. “And these are lifelong Democrats! They’re upset with what’s going on.”
Thank you, WSR, for your objectivity and journalistic integrity. Not easy in today’s climate.
Lost me at concealed guns and supporter of Supreme Court decision
So you opt instead for Democratic policies letting criminals roam free, no bail, completely clueless DA and State lawmakers and demoralizing cops and removing their immunity lest criminals be offended? Really?
Plenty of Democrats are running on law and order tickets. Try listening and reading.
FYI, there are four major republican led cities in the US; Miami, Jacksonville, Oklahoma City and Fort Worth.
All have higher crime rates than NYC. With the exception of Fort Worth, they are substantially higher.
Glad to be of help.
Lost me at “he favors arming teachers.” No way.
YES, way! Think about the horror of Uvalde, TX. Wonder if that many innocent kids would’ve been slaughtered if their teacher had a gun. Yes, she might have been killed, but if she had fired at the gunman as soon as she saw his weapon things might have gone differently.
When these tiny-town “police*” are too self-interested to rush the classroom, only an armed (and trained) teacher might have changed the outcome.
*P.S.: I MEANT no insult to our NYPD and other big-city police officers.
Yes only criminals should be armed right? No second amendment and defund the NYPD.
Lost me at “need more research to decide whether the election was stolen.” This is a guy who tries to keep on foot on each side of the fence, a most uncomfortable and unconvincing position. No wonder he’s zero for five.
You get a gun, you get a gun, everybody gets a gun!! Woo hoo. Yeah, that sounds a really good idea. SMH.
He was doing OK until he started questioning the legitimacy of the election and saying he supports the second amendment. I stopped reading after that. I’m not a huge fan of any of the Democrats but this guy is a total non-starter.
Are there any moderate Republicans still out there who are not beholden to Trump and believe in a middle path when it comes to guns, abortion, and many other issues? Due to balance of power and party majority issues I probably couldn’t vote for one for a federal office but I would consider one at the state and/or local level, particularly if running against a very woke progressive.
Hillary has been questioning the 2016 election fir 6 years. What is your middle path? Ban guns and allow taxpayer funded abortions up until the moment of birth?
She conceded. And never questioned the electoral college decision. More than the former guy has done.
And she never got arrested and held accountable for her “Russian collusion hoax” so the comparison is ridiculous and disingenuous.
That “hoax” imprisoned several of Donny’s closest advisors, snared 38 individuals, and three corporations, and brought in more in off shore, tax evaded accounts than it cost. It was NO hoax. Calling something a hoax doesn’t make it a hoax. There simply wasn’t enough to snare Teflon Don. That was the result. But it was NO hoax.
That’s the “truth?” Got more evidence-free ideas?
The problem is one of false equivalence. From multiple independent, verifiable sources, we know Biden won the general election of 2020. But Michael Zumbluskas is pretending that delusion fill rumors, ,many of which are easy to contradict with facts one can check in multiple ways are valid viewpoints regards Trump’s claims about winning in 2020.
Furthermore, HRC’s claims that Russia stole the election for Trump in 2016 were always obvious self-serving nonsense. Russiagate is a fable and one can confirm this is multiple ways.
Ironically in the 2016 general election Michigan was almost certainly stolen for DJT by vote count authorities tossing all presidential votes for Detroit and the surround suburbs. HRC’s team actively chose to not pursue this, when the judge ruling on Jill Stein’s request for a recount of Michigan asked HRC lawyers in the courtroom observing the Stein case what they wanted to do, and they replied, we’re just here to observe”.
In 2016, Wisconsin was stolen for Trump in a similar manner, but the cities were Madison and Milwaukee.
Then the exit polling (which is highly accurate, despite what the NYTimes likes to claim to defend 2016 Democratic primary irregularities) gives the Florida to HRC in 2016.
HRC also likely won Pennsylvania in 2016, but in that state, I believe, the records are all electronic, so easy to manipulate after the fact.
So had HRC the gumption to request a full formal recount of Michigan in 2016, she’d likely have been sworn in as US President come January 2017. But HRC instead chose to pretend that Onanism jokes on Facebook and “fake news” somehow lost her the election against DJT.
That’s what I’m thinking. Over and over.
My thoughts exactly.
I’m very anti- gun and pro-choice. I would still vote for him. I had enough of Democrat lip service. We have criminals with guns anyway and the situation is not going to change with the current policies, identity games , decriminalisation of many crimes, destroying education.
Most importantly – shutting everyone up who dares to criticize the approved party lines.
@MJB I might agree with you if he were running for a state level position. Bail reform and education are largely controlled at the state level. But he is running for congress, a national position, and he will side with the extremists in the Republican party on all votes. I can’t see him holding his alleged positions on clean energy or affordable housing for long. He said it himself, he has no funding. If he got elected at the national level, big oil and other lobby money would pour in, surely reversing his clean energy stance.
I understand that he runs for a national position. However nations, state and city policies are influenced by the party across all levels.
All politicians have been supported by big money – be it oil or tech, etc. The woke DAs that popped up in major cities recently have all been propped by big money.
There’s nothing at the moment we can do (but I believe we should try) to get better control of big money pouring into our politics. While it is not on the horizon yet, all we can do is pick someone who is mostly likely to address our priorities. Apparently we can’t find a candidate that can or will address all our needs, so priorities for now.
Your needs in the State of New York are not affected by his election. He can do nothing about Albany, and he will, as Christine said, side with the crack pots, remove more rights, divide the nation more, and then what? You will have more white collar criminals to match the blue collar ones. The answer is to vote for law and order Democrats in NY. We have plenty. You just have to know who they are.
The Law & Order democrats need better publicists.
If Republican candidates ever decide to detox from the election-denying, anti-abortion, Trump-worship Kool-Aid they’ve been guzzling for the past few years, they might have a chance with those of us in the center. Until that happens, my vote stays left, as much I can’t stand it.
I just as soon move to Ukraine before I’d vote for a Republican.
and that is part of the problem. Too many people in this country simply vote because the person has an R or a D next to their name on the ballot. This is the recipe that has elected extremists on both sides of the aisle.
Do that and take all the auto-pilot democrats voters with you. Maybe then we`ll have a city run by republicans so we can be safe again.
The City is safe because of police, not politicians. The politicians have to change the laws. They might change the laws for criminals, but create more criminals by outlawing abortion, supplying more guns, and letting more white collar crooks off the hook, while ensuring more homeless. Good luck with that.
Guess he can give it a try but it’s probably hopeless—these are dyed in the wool ‘D’ voters and apparently they can’t get enough of the crime, filth and mayhem that comes with one party rule—at least he’d be on the ballot— back in the day no one even bothered to run against Rangel—you can have Rangel …or Rangel
I am very conservative, and still get angry when anyone dares to criticize George W Bush or Dick Cheney in my presence. I would have voted for this guy until I read the following sentence: “And he would not have voted to impeach Trump on either occasion.”
Not thrilled with any of the 3 Dems either. I’ll look at the Independent candidates instead.
…you think George W Bush and Dick Cheney are above criticism?
No one is above criticism. Not really the point, is it?
Apparently only Joe and Hunter Biden are above criticism and the law.
Rarely if ever is there a candidate whose policies and ideologies to which voters will be in complete lock-step. That said however, when it comes to Maloney and Nadler, the old saying, “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results,” would seem to apply. The UWS deserves far better.
Stopped reading at “But whether the election was stolen or not, I don’t know, because we need to do more research”.
(Or rather I kept reading but that was enough for me to make my mind up about this guy.)
That’s not a pro-choice position he holds.
That’s an extremist states’ “rights” anti women and anti privacy position he holds.
“Letting the states decide”
is code for: while Obama and the dems slept, the vast majority of statehouses, through gerrymandering and other chicanery, was taken over by the Radical Right and are FAR to the right of where polls say the electorate are on a whole host of issues, beginning with gun laws and abortion.
Does anybody really think that vast numbers of the electorate in the heart of the heart of this country demand that NO abortion be allowed to take place for ANY reason whatsoever?
Give this Mike Z. das boot.
NY allows abortion right up to the day of birth. Can you concede that other states might not see that has being a terrific thing.
The same good people who don’t care about children nobody wants who end up in foster care, detention centers, prison and homelessness. Those are the people who are against a woman’s right to choose (after she obviously made some mistakes herself and doesn’t want to add to them.)
@ Bill. Fact check: NYS only allows late term abortions when the fetus is not viable or when the mother’s life is in danger.
https://www.factcheck.org/2019/02/addressing-new-yorks-new-abortion-law/
I for one was carrying dead twins. My doctor removed them rather than forcing me to carry them until they fell out while I rode the crosstown bus or shopped at Fairway.
Frankly I don’t care whether you concede or not. Stay out of my medical care and my uterus.
“Does anybody really think that vast numbers of the electorate in the heart of the heart of this country demand that NO abortion be allowed to take place for ANY reason whatsoever?”
No, they don’t look at the recent Kansas referendum that attempted to ban abortion (via voters) in the state.
It went down to a massive defeat.
Exactly my point; the Kansas NO vote won massively; a YES vote would’ve allowed their far right statehouse to trash abortion rights.
But in most red states the electorate DON’T get a vote on abortion (or any other issues [like guns]) instead, the right wing legislatures in state after state, unafraid of any electoral challenge from the left or even the center, push further to the right because their ONLY fear is being primaried by someone even FURTHER to the right than they are.
That shouldn’t be a political issue to start with. It is disgusting that something like this is abused by both parties for their political gain.
I’m a relative newcomer to the neighborhood, just close to 3 years. Looks like everyone else on this forum lived in the area for decades. So far I couldn’t find a different forum for younger people and people who haven’t lived here fewer than 20 years.
I have to say that I am still trying to figure out the mindset of some of my neighbors that are complaining about crime and homeless issues daily, but don’t see or don’t want to see any connection between current policies and current state of the city. They are staunch anti-Republicans but I have a feeling it has mostly to do with the legacy of 30+ years ago when Democrats were actually good for the country. Most of them are the ladies of older generation who claim to be pro-working class and pro-people in general. Same ladies angrily push the strollers out of their way (happened to our friends) and bother everyone at the most inappropriate moment pushing their fliers. For example when families are celebrating a birthday or a graduation at a restaurant. They aggressively approach the group and start shoving fliers into people’s faces. When they are politely asked not to interrupt a family/friend occasion, they get angry. So there, my impression of UWS democrats are older aggressive ladies who won’t let anyone else speak their mind.
I see the same behavior on this forum. When moderate Dems or republicans express their opinion, they are attacked with disgusting labels. That’s how they want to defend their party policies? Sounds like exactly what current administration is doing.
I had enough of it in my grad school, I will definitely not be intimidated by this crowd.
I’m pushing 67, been working full time since I’m 21, and ageism is as ugly as racism and any other “ism.” If you have no friends of an older demographic, I recommend you start engaging with some. I perform on stage with people in their teens and 20s. I cannot understand your point at all. I’m a life long Democrat and for the past 25 years have been the writer for a police union. I spent 16 years on my neighborhood Community Council and four years as an Auxiliary Police Officer. I still have NO idea what your point is.
As soon as you used the term “ladies,” I knew where you were going. Ugh.
The only people who have ever harassed me—at restaurants—were Trump voters who overheard a conversation and got angry! Very angry.
” Most of them are the ladies of older generation who claim to be pro-working class and pro-people in general. Same ladies angrily push the strollers out of their way (happened to our friends) and bother everyone at the most inappropriate moment pushing their fliers.”
What on earth are you talking about?
Also, women specifically being incredibly rude with strollers on the street and in stores is a decades long problem on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, and elsewhere in the City. No, it doesn’t appear to be just upper middle class women or their nannies. So someone not standing for someone being rude with a stroller is hardly news on the Upper West Side.
“For example when families are celebrating a birthday or a graduation at a restaurant. They aggressively approach the group and start shoving fliers into people’s faces. When they are politely asked not to interrupt a family/friend occasion, they get angry. ”
I have never heard of such an event in a restaurant in Manhattan, including restaurants with outdoor dining.
I’m not saying what you claim occurred didn’t happen, but the event you describe is extremely oulier.
Well said. There is no explaining it in rational terms.
A lot of people today may not realize, that many of our fathers and grandfathers were conservative, and lived in New York city. Many of them voted for Reagan. And certainly, a lot of people on the upper West side voted for Giuliani clean up the city, there is no question that a lot of us will vote for a moderate Republican. There is no question that people like me who have been lifelong Democrats consider these current policies failures, I want people arrested and sent to jail if they are committing crimes, I am not supporting any of these failed liberal policies. And neither are my friends, and we grew up here on the upper Westside going to Public schools like PSA 84 on 92nd St. and Joan of arc junior high school… I grew up with a lot of people that were problematic and I don’t care where that happened or what the excuse is. During the Dinkins administration, right before Giuliani when everything was out of control, there was a woman unpacking her car, yes she was white, I guess it was a Volvo, I guess she was coming back from the Hamptons or Cape Cod or whatever… The doorman was busy in the elevator helping her up with her stuff while she went to get the last of her things with her purse in the double parked car, it is at that time, where some deranged crackhead who lived in The Projects up the street, I’m not going to name names, hit her over the head with a lead pipe, and ran away with her purse… Obviously it was unnecessary he could’ve just grabbed her purse… But this is what happens when you let things go too far… At that time, they had a beautiful two bedroom apartment that was worth a lot of money but they sold it at a loss, just to move out of the city because of her permanent brain injury .. and it was these kinds of things that caused upper West side or‘s and other lifelong Democrats to realize we cannot allow animals to be outside of cages and you can interpret that however you want, because we live in a world thanks to liberals where I will be called a racist anyway even though I went to PS 84 and Joan of arc and have tons of black and Latino friends in this neighborhood that know me since I was five. Even they think the current state of affairs are insane… I spoke to a friend, from The Projects I 91st St. between Amsterdam and Columbus, and I said what do you think about what’s happening and he was like yeah it’s crazy out there, I guess white people don’t want Any punishment so they’re just having a party, and he was referring to people that we both know in the neighborhood who have been in and out of prison, and they see this as a cash grab opportunity that stupid liberals paved the way for, Mark my words there will be a new Republican . He may not be perfect, but he will follow the Giuliani footprint, and then once everything is stabilized again, meaning that we will have restored law and order, including at the district attorneys office and fire everyone that is currently working towards these failed policies, then someone like Bloomberg will need to do all that work again to bring us to where we were, and hopefully at that point, we won’t let it slip back to this chaos
Reagan was a radical, his policies are still incredibly destructive both within the USA and outside, and yes plenty of Democrats went along with them, then Bill Clinton expanded upon them after the 1994 midterm losses by the Democrats. Some examples, cable TV deregulation, allowing the mass mergers of media companies, welfare destruction, the repeal of Glass Steagall, the approval of unregulated trading of derivatives, which are basically junk bonds without any real insurance, which even class 1980s junk bonds had to carry.
Reagan saved the country from the utter disaster of a second term for Carter
Actually, he deregulated broadcasting, giving rise to the propaganda network of fake Faux Fox rapist Roger Ailes. His trickle down economic didn’t work. He watched millions die of AIDS. His answer to the crack epidemic was “just say no.” He was a union buster who destroyed the air traffic controllers. He supported criminals trading arms to Iran to send dark money and arms to Nicaragua. I could go on, but why bother? He was one of the worst Presidents … in American history.
I see no evidence for that.
Reagan went on a trillion dollar debt fueled spree, and that was mostly in his first term.
“A lot of people today may not realize, that many of our fathers and grandfathers were conservative, and lived in New York city.” And (gasp!) maybe even some of our mothers and grandmothers.
Nice!
The last mayor who saw crime rise constantly in his term was named Ed Koch.
Crime continued to rise in the first year of Dinkins’ term.
Then he brought in Ray Kelly to run the NYPD and Bill Bratton to run the Transit PD. And he increased the forces to 40,000.
Crime dropped by over 15% off it’s 1990 high, and was lower when Dinkins left office than when he took over from Koch.
All the police funding in the world won’t do a bit of good without bail reform.
You mean repealing bail reform.
NYC needs a 2 party political management system in order to survive.
Vincent McGowan
Former republican candidate for Congress
If it’s Maloney or Nadler, this guy has got my vote, for the simple reason that the former two have been in the loop for 30 (!!!) years.
Enough is enough.
Term limits.
It’s going to be either Nadler or Maloney, Patel is a fake.
Term limits have significant problems.
And Bloomberg + some City Council Members (Christine Quinn in particular) simply illegally ignored them, but it sounds like you liked Bloomberg
Furthermore, after the towers crumbled to dust, Rudy Giuliani attempted to suspend the the November 2001 mayoral election, and to thereby extend his second term, which was his last legal term as mayor.
Rudy Giuliani wanted to extend his term due to the fact that 9/11 happened and he acted as a mayor should, showing the better side of himself, and helping, a lot, to heal the open wounds.
And your assumption that I liked Bloomberg – where is this coming from?
I liked John Lindsay, a Republican before he became a Liberal.
How does this sit with you?
Many of the comments on here point more at local politicians than they address the Congressional primary.
True, but policies and ideology are the same on every level.
Public Service Announcement: This candidate is on the ballot in November, not now. The primary elections decide who represents each party on the November ballot. Before you head to the polls for the August primary, look up your sample ballot, by address and party registration: https://vote.nyc/page/understanding-ballot.
If, like many UWSers, you are in the 12th Congressional and 47th State Senate districts, there is no Republican ballot, as it is an uncontested primary. The same for Working Family and Conservative parties. So anyone registered to these parties can skip the August primary.
The only August primary contests for 12th/47th are for voters registered to the Democratic Party.
There are more people not voting Republican this year. Go to any right wing politician’s page and read their constituents’ comments. If someone doesn’t know after two years of recounts, cases thrown out of 70 courts, Dominion’s lawsuit, and election research certifying that there as NO fraud, and still “needs to “do more research” about a sociopathic liar with no evidence, sorry dude, not voting for that level of non-intelligence. Plus, 90% of the GOP is in the cult of a tax evading, p-grabbing, wife cheating, compulsively lying, nasty Tweeting, seditious traitor. Nope. Not the GOP. Never. Not until that swamp is really drained and imprisoned.
This audience ability to miss the point is staggering. President Trump was a primal scream by 50 million people. Be over that top and say 20 million of his voters are deplorable. What does that tell you when 50 million people don’t agree with you to the point of electing a known sociopath? You better move to the center.