West Side Rag
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT
West Side Rag
No Result
View All Result

Get WSR FREE in your inbox

Search the site

No Result
View All Result

Get WSR FREE in your inbox

AVAILABLE NOW!


HERE

CITY WANTS TO BUILD LUXURY APARTMENT BUILDING INSIDE FREDERICK DOUGLASS HOUSING PROJECT

February 13, 2013 | 1:46 PM - Updated on February 18, 2013 | 9:24 AM
in NEWS, REAL ESTATE
15


The Frederick Douglass houses, via Wikimedia Commons.

The city has been working on a plan to lease land to private developers so they can build market-rate apartments on public space within housing projects. The plan, revealed last week by the Daily News, includes a possible luxury development in the Frederick Douglass Houses between Amsterdam and Manhattan Avenues from 100th to 104th Street. The developments would be built on top of playgrounds, community centers and parking lots, tenant leaders and others told the News. At the Douglass Houses, the plan is to build on top of a current parking lot.

The city wants to build the developments to help raise money for the New York City Housing Authority, which is underfunded and has often been slow to make repairs or improve public housing.

In total, 4,330 apartments would be built in 8 developments. The developers would get 99-year leases and payments to NYCHA would be frozen for the first 35 years. Requests for proposals could go out as soon as next month.

But the plan strikes some as a little insulting: “Now they have this influx of yuppies who can afford these big rents,” said Douglass Houses tenant Madelyn Innocent, 56. “The people who already live in public housing are going to be resentful that you built this housing and left them in shambles.”

In some developments, the News says, the luxury apartments would face away from the public housing units — presumably, the rich people would not want to have to look at the decaying buildings around them.

It does sound a little insane. And yet, the same dynamic is arguably already on display all over the Upper West Side, as luxury developments are built just steps away from housing projects and within formerly middle class neighborhoods.

There is no sure thing that this will happen. The next mayor would likely have to approve the idea, and fierce opposition is already popping up in various neighborhoods, including the Lower East Side.

Will Upper West Siders embrace or reject the idea? Let us know how you feel in the poll below, and in the comments.

Should luxury housing be built inside public housing projects?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Correction: Because of a typo, we initially misstated the length of the lease as 990 years.

Share this article:
guest

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ken
Ken
10 years ago

The Frederick Douglass Houses include parking lots for the residents?

0
Reply
jd
jd
10 years ago
Reply to  Ken

Yes, most developments do.

0
Reply
Scooter Stan
Scooter Stan
10 years ago

Life imitates art … or is it the other way around? The “art” is the recent excellent flick entitled “Broken City,” in which Russell Crowe plays a long-term NYC mayor seeking to sell public housing to his developer buddies (Hmmm…maybe it IS the other way around).

He tries to enlist the aid of Mark Wahlberg, as a private investigator/ex-NYPD, but, after several plot-twists and double-double-crosses, Wahlberg eventually stops him, even though he has to also take a fall.

Hey, Mr. Wahlberg, are you available? The people of NYC might need you!

0
Reply
Andrew
Andrew
10 years ago

This would seem to be a no-brainer and a win-win if done correctly. NCYCHA is dead BROKE and has no source of revenue to fix-up public housing. The city has changed in a lot of these neighborhoods and there is no reason the very valuable real estate should sit there as parking lots. I live in the city and can’t afford parking. Having a car is not an entitlement.

Sell the land and take they money to upgrade and fix the derelict public housing projects.

Everyone wins. NYCHA gets revenue, the residents of the homes get dramatically improved living conditions and the neighborhoods improve and get more stores/services.

Why would this even be a question?

0
Reply
Harriet
Harriet
10 years ago

I’m in favor of it. I’d rather not use playgrounds, but parking lots certainly. The mix of lower income housing and upper income housing is part of what gives NYC it’s unique ability to get along with each other. Helps everyone to see how the “other half lives” and that works both ways.

0
Reply
sm
sm
10 years ago

Economically it seems to make sense. In reality, however, it could only work if the building is erected on the right spot. There are few spots in the FDB House footprint that I can see it working. The FDB residents would be highly resentful and I am not sure someone would want to pay $3200 for a one-bedroom smack in the middle of public housing. It works on columbus because they built the whole complex (including the shops – whole foods, etc) on parking lot/tennis court land, that was not smack in the middle of public housing.

0
Reply
Bruce Bernstein
Bruce Bernstein
10 years ago

it is land for the housing project. if the parking lot is not used, then build a playground, or, god forbid, more public housing. certainly there are ways to finance this without giving the land away on perpetual lease (990 years!)

0
Reply
will
will
9 years ago
Reply to  Bruce Bernstein

How can these people complain about losing their parks. Central Park is 50 yards away!!! Is that not good enough for them?
These people are beyond ignorant and greedy. What makes it worse is all of this is being given to them!

0
Reply
Upper West Hazel
Upper West Hazel
10 years ago

I would support middle-income housing inside public housing, with the proviso that the city finally allow the retail outlets that are so important to a sense of community. I am thinking of Douglass, just to the north. Assuming tenants still support that.

0
Reply
jan
jan
10 years ago

..there goes the neighborhood!…will luxury housing be built in Lincoln Towers?

0
Reply
Ann
Ann
10 years ago

I think this sounds awful. I walk through the projects every day on my way to work and back to get to the B train. Right now the residents have open air, views, playgrounds, trees, things that give them a decent quality of life. Plunking a bunch of tall buildings down in the middle of it would block views, put everything into shade, get rid of the open space and force the residents to confront the inequalities of income 24/7. I think it sounds like a big “screw you” from the city to poor people. Did someone raise Robert Moses from the dead?

0
Reply
Liz
Liz
10 years ago

This is really disgraceful. It is just one more indication that Mayor Bloombucks could not care less about the average New Yorker.

It’s all about the rich and the corporate fat cat cronies of the mayor. New York City would have money for housing if the city didn’t waste money on things we don’t need and don’t want such as the Disneyfication of Times Square, bike lanes, a payroll records system that doesn’t work, etc., etc., etc.

It was time for Bloomberg to go eight years ago. I cannot wait till he is gone. He has no compassion for the poor and is totally out of touch with how the average person lives.

P.S. Doesn’t the idea of the rich folks entrance facing away from the “poor folk” housing smack of the days when they put decals on the windows in the Bronx.

0
Reply
May
May
10 years ago

There are approximately 500+ community gardens throughout NYC that tax payers support. What about adding those spaces into the mix?

Ask the residents themselves to vote if they prefer parking space or building upgrade.

0
Reply
Maysadesimone
Maysadesimone
9 years ago

This is a lie the NYCCHA is broke. ther is a billion dollor sur plus that has not been tapped into. Luxury condos?…how about affordable and/or low income housing. There is less afforadable housing in this city. Reports have shown that there is a growing population of homeless families in this city. There are more people who are moving into the projects due to the crisis of less affordable housing. If the city was going to build or have a developer build for low income families, then I am for it.

0
Reply
Tim
Tim
9 years ago

As someone stated they have a huge surplus which is true. Michael Bloomberg reason for building is the money is needed. He threw a lot of money to charities while in office to get votes and stay in office.
I see and understand Michael Bloomberg spends his fortune only when its benefits him. I’m Grateful he donated 500,000 to the Dance Theater of Harlem which kept they’re
doors open. That was Solely for votes which he got The following term. He also spent more off his fortune which only benefited him And that was for his third term. Other then a 500.000 dollar donation 2 the Dance Theater of Harlem, Michael Bloomberg has done nothing for our community.

0
Reply

YOU MIGHT LIKE...

Openings & Closings: Poulet Sans Tête; The Drilling Company; Robofun; Nuts Factory; Blossom Jewelry
FOOD

Openings & Closings: Poulet Sans Tête; The Drilling Company; Robofun; Nuts Factory; Blossom Jewelry

March 29, 2023 | 6:40 PM
SRO ‘Reclaimed’ as Permanent Supportive Housing on West 107th Street
NEWS

SRO ‘Reclaimed’ as Permanent Supportive Housing on West 107th Street

March 29, 2023 | 10:05 AM
Previous Post

UPPER WEST SIDE FRACKING FORUM WEDNESDAY

Next Post

UWS GETS SOLAR-POWERED COMPACTING GARBAGE CAN, SPONSORED BY SHAKE SHACK

this week's events image

Explore Your Favorite Subject

20th precinct 24th precinct american museum of natural history animals art bicycling bulletin central park closings columns community board 7 coronavirus crash crime development dogs events fdny fire food gale brewer helen rosenthal history jcc lincoln center monday bulletin morning bulletin nypd openings pedestrian safety photography photos politics public schools pupper west side real estate restaurants retail riverside park silver stars fitness snow sponsored subway upper west side uws

CITY NEWS

Brick Underground
City Limits
Eater
Gothamist
NY Daily News
NY Post
NY Times

LOCAL RESOURCES

Bloomingdale Neighborhood History Group
Central Park Conservancy
CB7
Community Education Council 3
Assembly District 67
The New York Historical Society
Riverside Park
West End Preservation

UWS Blogs

Bloomingdale History Central Park Blogger
North River Notes

Next Post
UWS GETS SOLAR-POWERED COMPACTING GARBAGE CAN, SPONSORED BY SHAKE SHACK

UWS GETS SOLAR-POWERED COMPACTING GARBAGE CAN, SPONSORED BY SHAKE SHACK

METRO-NORTH TRAINS COMING TO THE UPPER WEST SIDE?

METRO-NORTH TRAINS COMING TO THE UPPER WEST SIDE?

DEBLASIO

DE BLASIO RETURNS DONATIONS FROM HOMELESS SHELTER LANDLORD

  • ABOUT US
  • CONTACT US
  • NEWSLETTER
  • WSR MERCH!
  • ADVERTISE
  • EVENTS
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • SITE MAP
Site design by RLDGROUP

© 2023 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • TOP NEWS
  • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT US
  • WSR SHOP

© 2023 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.