West Side Rag
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT
West Side Rag
No Result
View All Result

Get WSR FREE in your inbox

Search the site

No Result
View All Result

Get WSR FREE in your inbox

AVAILABLE NOW!


HERE

TENANTS AT REAR OF NEW LUXURY RENTAL BUILDING DISTURBED BY RAW CONCRETE VIEW

October 25, 2015 | 10:33 AM
in NEWS, REAL ESTATE
86

170 amsterdam rear
Photo of the rear of 170 Amsterdam Avenue after rain, taken from a 23rd story apartment at 160 West End Avenue. Courtesy of the tenants group that has raised concerns about the building.

By Eileen Katz

The new rental building at 170 Amsterdam Avenue (68th street), which stands out for its unique exoskeleton structure, is rapidly wearing out its welcome for some of its neighbors.

Residents at 160 West End Avenue whose apartments face the rear of the new building say they’ve quickly grown tired of the raw concrete view. They’ve come to call a small structure on the roof “the bunker.”

“While everyone understands all views are insecure in NYC, unprecedented ugliness on a luxury building suggests cause for alarm,” the residents wrote in a letter to West Side Rag.

diagridThe building won a citation this year from the New York state division of the American Institute of Architects, among other awards. Apartments hit the market several months ago. The picture at right shows the front towards the end of construction.

According to the statement from the residents group, they first grew concerned about how the structure looked in July and were “stunned to hear from Equity’s on-site property manager that the roof was in fact ‘finished per design.’”

The residents wrote to Handel Architects and developer Equity Residential more than a month ago. Group co-leader Fran Seigel said she heard back this week, after West Side Rag began making inquiries.

George Kruse, Equity Residential VP of Development, said he’d discuss the issue with architect Frank Fusaro. “The entire building is poured concrete. When it gets wet, it’s going to look like that.”

“No one is thrilled about this,” Fusaro acknowledged. He called Seigel and discussed possible remedies, including treating the concrete to eliminate the mottling.

It’s still not clear what might be done about this – if anything – and who would pay for it.

“We realize it is a very challenging situation – David and Goliath at best – but we think a minimal cosmetic fix, like properly finishing the unsightly concrete, is not a huge deal,” the residents wrote in their statement.

Two more photos from the tenants group show the roof on a dry day:

entire roof

Aug. roof photo

Share this article:
guest

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

86 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sean
Sean
7 years ago

I always thought Lincoln Towers was kind of an eyesore itself.

0
Reply
Sherman
Sherman
7 years ago

I live in the area. I think this building is actually kinda cool looking.

0
Reply
Nathan
Nathan
7 years ago
Reply to  Sherman

I like the building too. The roof isn’t the best part, but guess what? Roofs are going to look like roofs. We should all be so lucky to have view from the 23rd floor.

0
Reply
drg
drg
7 years ago

Sean..how true.
can you imagine the utter uproar and condemnation the Lincoln Towers proposal would have today…replacing the landmark worthy tenements…not to think of the population density issue…the horror, the horror…

0
Reply
Sean
Sean
7 years ago
Reply to  drg

It seems like the residents of this building are disturbed by a great many things.

0
Reply
lss
lss
7 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Sean – Are you in commercial or residential real estate?

0
Reply
Sean
Sean
7 years ago
Reply to  lss

Social Criticism

0
Reply
Jeff
Jeff
7 years ago

I’m generally a fan of this building, but the roof is definitely its aesthetic weak spot. That’s not so much because of the “bunker” but rather the weird beams that resemble lumber and make the structure look unfinished. The owners should really think about staining/painting them.

0
Reply
Nathan
Nathan
7 years ago
Reply to  Jeff

Is a roof deck planned? I thought those crossbeams up there would be used for some sort of pergola.

0
Reply
Jeremy
Jeremy
7 years ago
Reply to  Nathan

There’s a nice deck up there already. The crossbeams help to create a very open lattice-y detail over the south end of the roof.

0
Reply
Don
Don
7 years ago
Reply to  Jeff

As an architect I definitely agree.

0
Reply
senyc
senyc
7 years ago

Oh,the worries of the one percent….

0
Reply
Steve J
Steve J
7 years ago
Reply to  senyc

Lincoln Towers is hardly the home of the one percent. Look further east to CPW or 5th Ave for that.

0
Reply
Gigi
Gigi
7 years ago
Reply to  senyc

I know. Silly of them.

0
Reply
Upper West Sider2
Upper West Sider2
7 years ago

It’s the Emperor’s New Clothes – cheap construction being presented as an aesthetic. The reality is that it is a truly hideous construction from any angle and in all weathers.

0
Reply
24gotham
24gotham
7 years ago
Reply to  Upper West Sider2

I would hardly call this cheap construction. There is a lot technology and design involved to create an exposed concrete exoskeleton structure such as this is. This isn’t just a basic glass box. And it is far more than the value engineered bland and banal concrete bunkers that make up Lincoln Towers.

Raw concrete is an aesthetic that does not appeal to a good many people, but that doesn’t make it bad design or cheap.

0
Reply
Christina
Christina
7 years ago

I hate the design of the building. Reminds me of something ( possibly a bus depot or car garage) that belongs by the Port Authority on 42nd St. It’s an eyesore! Oh well.

0
Reply
Diana B
Diana B
7 years ago

Now, that’s a first-world problem!

0
Reply
Ellie
Ellie
7 years ago

The new rental building is an eyesore, particularly the view of its rear. The bare-cement look is ugly and as another writes, it is a case of the Emperor’s New clothes. Horrible appearance, and one wonders how the inside structure looks to tenants. UWS declines with this architectural mess. Sorry to say.

0
Reply
Gretchen
Gretchen
7 years ago

I like this building, despite comments. It’s infinitely better than its neighbor, the hideous, gloomy structure housing the Lincoln Sq. synagogue, which looks like it should be on Rikers Island.

0
Reply
Anon
Anon
7 years ago

I can’t believe anyone rents on the bottom few floors of this building. Walking down Amsterdam it’s like being in their apartments with them. Floor to ceiling windows might be nice on the upper floors but near the street there is no privacy if you want some natural light.

0
Reply
Michael Marks
Michael Marks
7 years ago

At least from ground level, I generally like the new building. The exterior of Lincoln Towers is awful, it reminds me of the projects. There are so many great buildings on the UWS, Lincoln Towers is one of the worst.

0
Reply
Liam
Liam
7 years ago

Are you kidding me???? I live in this building and although I admit the design isn’t necessarily cohesive with the upper west side it is hardly some thing to complain about. Unfortunately, my apartment faces the back so If anyone should be writing a letter it should be me!

Lincoln towers would not look out of place In the Soviet Union…. If anything, LT should be demolished it’s hedious!!

0
Reply
daniela weiss
daniela weiss
7 years ago
Reply to  Liam

I had a question about the community room for anyone who currently lives in the 170 Amsterdam Avenue building. please email me at yafaconsulting@gmail.com thanks!

0
Reply
ScooterStan
ScooterStan
7 years ago
Reply to  Liam

Re: “LT should be demolished it’s hedious!!”

Perhaps YOU should be demolished for misspelling “hideous”. Remember, it’s “eye before eee except after see…or whenever the mood strikes”.

As for Lincoln Towers looking “hideous” that’s the opinion of someone who DOES NOT LIVE THERE.

Actually, on the inside, Lincoln Towers is:
a) home to lovely spacious apartments featuring parquet floors, walk-in closets, excellent sound-proofing, etc.;
b) a diverse community of active seniors and busy young families;
c) excellent landscaping and plenty of outdoor benches for socializing.

But PLEASE DON’T EVEN THINK OF LIVING HERE. You obviously would NOT be welcome with an attitude such as yours!

0
Reply
Jeremy
Jeremy
7 years ago
Reply to  ScooterStan

On what planet are “parquet floors” a selling point? 🙂

0
Reply
Sean
Sean
7 years ago
Reply to  Jeremy

They are if you are eighty.

0
Reply
Una
Una
7 years ago

This building is a joke..all you see are beds in the windows. It’s the furthest thing from a luxury building. I think most of the comments here were written by the building agent as there could not be that many people interested in such an ugly building

0
Reply
Sean
Sean
7 years ago
Reply to  Una

All you need is a bed if you live in the cloud. Young people don’t have as much stuff as the oldsters.

0
Reply
Jeremy
Jeremy
7 years ago
Reply to  Una

You don’t know what you’re talking about. It’s not at the top of the high end, and Equity doesn’t really have its act together on the service side, but it’s a perfectly fine building. Biggest two issues are the floors that aren’t flat, and the view of 170 WEA.

0
Reply
neighbor
neighbor
7 years ago

100% with Liam: LT should be razed and replaced with twice as many modern buildings, each half the size of each current humongous monstrosity. And how about the security guards. And in general, those huge, nondescript buildings are the remnants of a much bleaker times. They do look and feel like projects, or the Soviet dream housing, or a medium security prison. It’s a shame that such pretty, leafy grounds look and feel like a waste of space.

0
Reply
ScooterStan
ScooterStan
7 years ago
Reply to  neighbor

Re: ” LT should be razed and replaced with twice as many modern buildings, each half the size of each current humongous monstrosity.”

OH, SURE! On your say-so, the Co-Op Boards of each of the LT buildings will IMMEDIATELY arrange to have the buildings demolished and replaced with less “Soviet-looking” structures!

But, Ummm…do you have any recommendations as to WHERE the current residents (some 80% to 85% of whom are shareholders…which means they’ve BOUGHT their apartments) would live while their buildings are being made visually appealing so as to suit YOUR taste???????

OH, Re: “And how about the security guards.” Our LTCA (Lincoln Towers Community Association) Security Guards are ABSOLUTE PROFESSIONALS AND WONDERFUL PEOPLE who are there to help at a moment’s notice.

As is said about NSA surveillance applies to our security force: “If ya ain’t done nothing wrong, ya ain’t gotta worry!”

0
Reply
Don
Don
7 years ago

Complaining what a building looks like while living in the NYC version of a Russian Housing Bloc probably means the commenter never looked at the ear sore in which he/she lives. I’m happy for any building that blocks my view of those visual atrocities from Broadway. Saying that the Lincoln Towers site is well located for enjoying a cultural center of Manhattan. I’m finally happy I no longer am forced to look at Lincoln Towers on a stroll down Broadway.

0
Reply
Pedestrian
Pedestrian
7 years ago

The modern Buildings that get architecture awards rarely are built to enhance the neighborhood in which they are built or to add any beauty to the city, they are built to satisfy an architectural conceit and an owners greed.

This is another build that should get an awRd for ugliness! I pity the neighbors who have to look at this monstrosity. It is bad enough to look at it as one passes by.

0
Reply
Bob
Bob
7 years ago

i live on w68th between columbus and central park west. the building isn’t as bad as everyone makes it out to be. But it’s true, the back is ugly as hell.

also lincoln towers look kinda shabby too.

0
Reply
Steve in Manhattan
Steve in Manhattan
7 years ago

Fifth Avenue residents tried to kill the Guggenheim starting in the late 40s. I’m not saying this is a Wright-style masterpiece, but at least let them finish it.

0
Reply
Fran Seigel
Fran Seigel
7 years ago
Reply to  Steve in Manhattan

The problem is it’s apparently finished, but yes, we are hoping the roof will someday actually LOOK finished.

0
Reply
Gary
Gary
7 years ago

I live in 160 WEA face the new building at 170 Amsterdam. The view of that building that wins awards faces Amsterdam Ave. The view from our side is the one pictured. It’s surprising that the developers didn’t think to give the rooftop structures a uniform appearance. One is black, one plain concrete and one wood. For little investment, there’s no reason they can’t make it uniform. In addition, the elevator bank for the upper half of that building facing 160 WEA has fluorescent lights on all day and night. It’s like the Seinfeld episode where Kramer said he couldn’t get any sleep because of the Kenny Roger’s Roast Chicken blinking neon sign facing his bedroom window. 170 Amsterdam should use curtains or some other window covering so we don’t have to see the “wall of white light” all night. We would like our new neighbors to be good neighbors.

0
Reply
denton
denton
7 years ago
Reply to  Gary

Did you try using curtains yourself?

0
Reply
Sean
Sean
7 years ago
Reply to  denton

I agree.

0
Reply
Jessie
Jessie
7 years ago

Despite the un-attractiveness of LT, I will tell you that as a resident, this couldn’t be a better place to live. Our apartment was renovated by the previous owners and it is very spacious and modern, we have outdoor space and the building itself is very well run – super clean, organized, not in the red. In addition, the private park is certainly a huge draw for many of us, especially those of us with kids. AND it’s still zoned for 199. So many of us are now millionaires.

So – yeah – it looks like the projects and these types of buildings would never be built today, but don’t judge a book by its cover. Lots of us are very happy.

0
Reply
Puddles
Puddles
7 years ago
Reply to  Jessie

I also live in a large beautiful studio in 170 at Lincoln Towers with a very large Terrace. The landscaping throughout Lincoln Towers’ grounds are delightful. It’ the best place to live in NYC!!

0
Reply
Iiari
Iiari
7 years ago
Reply to  Jessie

Totally agree on LT. Not much to look at, but they’re comfortable, spacious, genuinely economically diverse (by NYC standards), and extremely well run. We’re happy to be there.

And count me as a fan of 170 Amsterdam. I absolutely called the wet concrete issue, however, and remember clearly telling my wife when it was being built that you could “start the wet concrete countdown complaint clock.” I’ve lived in several cities with prominent concrete buildings, and they do look atrocious when wet. “Wet rags” we used to call them. I wonder if they’ll consider painting or sealing them. I’d prefer sealing, and I would think it wouldn’t be super expensive to do…

0
Reply
24gotham
24gotham
7 years ago
Reply to  Jessie

“I love my 8′ ceilings!”

Said
Nobody
Ever

0
Reply
jessie
jessie
7 years ago
Reply to  24gotham

Ah… 24Gotham – the benefits FAR outweigh 8″ ceilings.

Keep snarking, I’m enjoying my LT life and laughing all the way to the bank…

0
Reply
Sean
Sean
7 years ago
Reply to  jessie

If the ceiling height is so low, the first tenants fifty some years ago must have been really short.

0
Reply
24gotham
24gotham
7 years ago
Reply to  jessie

Moot point – Most of us on the UWS are laughing all the way to the bank.

I will stick with my classic prewar with 9’9″ ceilings and irreplaceable detail, and trade in the “lush gardens” for 1/3 less monthly maintenance. Riverside Park is only a block away, it doesn’t cost extra, and it always interesting.

0
Reply
jessie
jessie
7 years ago
Reply to  24gotham

Well, 24Gotham, that is the difference between you and me. For me and my family, LT works perfectly and I have no qualms about saying so. And you are incorrect in stating that we are all on a level playing field as far as value of apartments. If you’ve been following ANY of the discussions on the school situation you’d know that things are changing. We will always be zoned for 199. So – that’s that. And I don’t think that Riverside Park compares to a private park where kids can literally roam free like nowhere else in the area. But maybe that’s not your priority. It IS mine. I’d trade that for your precious “detail” any day of the week.

So feel smug about what you will and I will do the same.

0
Reply
24gotham
24gotham
7 years ago

Well isn’t this just a case of the pot calling the kettle black? Except in this case, it is a stunningly beautiful kettle.

0
Reply
Jake
Jake
7 years ago

The Equity buildings (like Arch Stone before them) are arguably the worst run in the city. Dirty, scuffed halls, smelly trash rooms, lifeless personnel, every day a different moving truck, constant for rent signs and half-inflated balloons…They are the Wal*mart of UWS housing.

This architectural effort is the least crappy things about them.

0
Reply
Frank
Frank
7 years ago

Why not both … and restore the grid. ‘Superblocks” are dreadful.

0
Reply
Fran Seigel
Fran Seigel
7 years ago

A BIT OF CLARIFICATION:

We do not see that the admitted unattractiveness of the Lincoln Towers buildings has any bearing on the crux of the issue.
What we are talking about is the highly disturbing and unsightly roof on anew luxury building which has received various design awards, and praised in the press for being well-done and beautiful.

And how can it be possible that those who so thoroughly dislike Lincoln Towers can be fine with adding to the neighborhood, 170 Amsterdam’s unsightly roof?
Do they really believe that because we live in Lincoln Towers we are somehow disqualified from protesting an unsightly stained 3-story structure on the unfinished- looking roof that dominates from the windows of hundred or more of our homes?

Lincoln Towers buildings and coop community have been a done deal for many decades, and are large rock-solid community of diverse owners, living in roomy and well cared-for apartments admittedly built as boring and unattractive1960s boxes. To suggest tearing down this community is not within the realm of legality, viability, overall health (or humanity for that matter) of the Upper West Side.

In the big picture, West Siders now face a large number of many aggressive changes and challenges in our neighborhoods. Hopefully the overarching needs for balance and understanding with the rapid changes in density, affordability, services, commercial rents, etc. will inspire us to create a better shared community and resources for all of us.

0
Reply
Nathan
Nathan
7 years ago
Reply to  Fran Seigel

How’s the roof at Lincoln Towers look?

0
Reply
Jeremy
Jeremy
7 years ago
Reply to  Fran Seigel

Fran, would you be amenable to investing money to make some changes to 160 and 170, in order to improve the view from 170 Amsterdam?

0
Reply
fran Seigel
fran Seigel
7 years ago
Reply to  Jeremy

Hi Jeremy,
I understand you see this as a parallel issue, but we absolutely do not. I don’t think I can explain better than my “clarification” given above. So we may have to agree to disagree.

0
Reply
Jeremy
Jeremy
7 years ago
Reply to  fran Seigel

Unfortunately, you don’t control this conversation. I don’t see why Lincoln Towers owners should be allowed to let these giant eyesores impose on the community. You can’t call out “the overarching needs for balance and understanding,” and not take any of your own steps to remediate the abject visual pollution that is 160 and 170 WEA – a design that is far more criminal than any amount of unsealed concrete at 170 Amsterdam.

Also, the rats! You guys have so many rats behind your building – so much hantavirus.

0
Reply
Andrea Reese
Andrea Reese
7 years ago

I’m relieved to see this article. I often work as a photographer in the Lincoln Center area and so I saw this building going up. Because I like to shoot portraits outside using natural light, I found myself having to adjust many shots to avoid this building in the background. At a certain point, it appeared that the construction had stopped even though the building still didn’t look completed. I assumed the construction had been halted due to a violation, but much later, the building remained the same, with ugly splotches on the concrete that seemed to keep getting worse each week. I really felt for the local residents. While I like raw, urban, distressed architectural in general, and this building might even look ok in Dumbo or Williamsburg, it really clashes with the Lincoln Center area surroundings.

0
Reply
Robert Hellmann
Robert Hellmann
7 years ago

I’ve been a visitor to the building across the way on a number of occasions and have noticed the ugliness of the concrete structure. The irony is that this structure is part of an “award winning” building! Fix this eyesore to justify the title. This is a new building, there’s an opportunity here; don’t say it’s finished when it’s clearly not. Do it right, and do right by the neighborhood!

0
Reply
Audrey Ellinger
Audrey Ellinger
7 years ago

This is really an eyesore that needs to be attended to . I am sure noone in the opposite buildings wishes to view this on a daily basis rain or shine.
audrey

0
Reply
Liz
Liz
7 years ago

What an eyesore. Who designed this piece of garbage. It looks like something throw together in a Third World country.

What a nightmare to be paying NYC type rents to see that ugly monstrosity every morning.
Makes you want to put up a fake vista on your window like back in the ’80s.

What zoning board approved this addition?

0
Reply
Jeremy
Jeremy
7 years ago
Reply to  Liz

Could have been NYCHA. At the time, whoever had the authority was pretty much able to run roughshod over the existing San Juan Hill neighborhood. I’m sure that those dreary Lincoln Towers weren’t the aesthetic goal, but we’re stuck with ’em now.

While putting up a fake vista on the 170 Amsterdam windows might be a little helpful, the apartments are actually relatively bright, and it would be terrible to put those huge windows to waste.

0
Reply
LILA T BELANOFF
LILA T BELANOFF
7 years ago

As a frequent visitor to neighbors in the 160 West End Avenue building that faces “the bunker”, I would agree that in fairness to the residents of apartments facing it, something should be done to change what is a depressing view. It looks like a war zone. The creative architect and developer can come up something that would be more pleasant to look at- perhaps one approach might be some some cedar framing.
Come on people , take responsibility for the aesthetics. It’s a quality of life issue.

0
Reply
LILA T BELANOFF
LILA T BELANOFF
7 years ago
Reply to  LILA T BELANOFF

Thank you. Please explain.

0
Reply
Sean
Sean
7 years ago
Reply to  LILA T BELANOFF

Well all that lawn could go to a better use. How about a merry-go-round for the kiddies?

0
Reply
Sean
Sean
7 years ago
Reply to  LILA T BELANOFF

Build a giant Food Emporium on that empty green field to block out the sight of it. Its a win win.

0
Reply
Gemma
Gemma
7 years ago

The only thing worse than the hideous cross-bars is the floor-to-ceiling windows. Without even trying, you get an unobstructed view of unmade beds and people walking around in their underwear. It would be hilarious if it weren’t so repulsive.

0
Reply
Sean
Sean
7 years ago
Reply to  Gemma

Put down those binoculars at once.

0
Reply
Gemma
Gemma
7 years ago
Reply to  Sean

You don’t need binoculars. It’s part of the landscape. It’s appalling.

0
Reply
anon
anon
7 years ago
Reply to  Gemma

I was treated to a view of a tenant walking around in his underwear this morning. I was walking down Amsterdam before 7AM. It was still dark outside, he had his lights on, his floor to ceiling blinds up and was only on e the second floor. I assume the tenants know they can be seen from the street.

0
Reply
Anon
Anon
7 years ago
Reply to  anon

Boxers. Was it you?

0
Reply
Sean
Sean
7 years ago
Reply to  anon

Boxers or briefs?

0
Reply
ann kleiman
ann kleiman
7 years ago

What an untidy,poorly planned and ill matched top the architect stuck on 170 Amsterdam Avenue!! He should be ashamed not to have considered his neighbors.

0
Reply
Joel Kramer
Joel Kramer
7 years ago

Mr. Fusaro was candid and he is clearly honorable. He indicated the mottled, stained appearance of the concrete was NOT the envisioned or desired appearance of the structure. Mr. Kruse is reasonable as well. Ms Seigel your heading up the concern of many people is certainly appreciated. It seems we are on track for a reasonable solution to this issue.
Let`s hope we can all see this to a successful conclusion for everyone. Mutual cooperation is a winning combination every time.

0
Reply
Jeremy
Jeremy
7 years ago
Reply to  Joel Kramer

Cooperation implies that people are working together. As far as I can tell, LT residents are just ogling and making fun of people in their underwear and otherwise making unilateral demands, with zero consideration for their own neighbors.

0
Reply
Sean
Sean
7 years ago
Reply to  Jeremy

Well, they do firmly believe that since they have been here for some 50 odd years and have thus set the tone for their area for so long that they should be allowed to continue as such. It takes an enormous amount of effort to torture everyone at Fairway and then be on the offensive at Lincoln Center.

0
Reply
w. neff
w. neff
7 years ago

philistines

0
Reply
Upper West Sider2
Upper West Sider2
7 years ago
Reply to  w. neff

Better than being a mindless follower of the Emperor! Or paying $4,365-$5,315/month for a one-bedroom apartment!

0
Reply
tyler
tyler
7 years ago

Personally, I think this building AND Lincoln Towers are both eyesores, especially when placed against the backdrop of nearby architectural gems like the Apple Bank, The Ansonia, etc.

0
Reply
Rick
Rick
7 years ago

The roof of 170 Amsterdam Avenue is quite unsightly and very depressing to have to look at, particularly the mottled cement structure. It looks shabby and unfinished and it would seem to me to be below normal architectural standards. Roofs make up part of our cityscape; and I would assume architects today take that into consideration when designing a building. If there’s anything that can be done to improve the appearance of that roof, that would be the right thing to do.

0
Reply
Ronnie tuft
Ronnie tuft
7 years ago

It is a monstrosity. Surely the residents of 160 WEA who face it deserve some redress from the architects and the city dept that approved it. It is the very worst of urban design without any concern for the residences surrounding it. It is shocking and sad, too, that there are some who make such a smarmy remark that Lincoln Towers is an eyesore too. We’re talking about hard working, ordinary folks who have paid a lot of money to buy an apartment and then have such an ugly building arise and take over their view. This should elicit sympathy not contempt.

0
Reply
Upper West Sider2
Upper West Sider2
7 years ago

Presumably some if not at all of the posters vilifying LT live in 170 Amsterdam. Why did they rent there?

0
Reply
Missing the Point
Missing the Point
7 years ago

Most of the comments are missing the point. It’s not about the ugliness of the neighborhood buildings, it’s about the unfinished/poorly finished roof of 170 Amsterdam. From the street, you cannot see the problem. Look at the picture above – it’s inconceivable that was the intended design. It’s one thing to lose your view but quite another to have a 3-story stained cement bunker directly outside your window.
The developer should take pride in their work and rectify the situation.

0
Reply
Peter
Peter
7 years ago

The builders of 170 Amsterdam, for the years the scaffolding and noise inconvenienced their neighbors, could be “neighborly” and improve the appearance for those who consider the rear of the building unsightly. It may not be considered “necessary” to everyone, but it can’t “hurt” anyone to improve the look with a little paint.

0
Reply
Len Margulies
Len Margulies
7 years ago

Congratulations Fran. It must be gratifying to see your hard work pay off. It reminds us all that a single individual who perseveres still can make a difference.

When I look out my window I notice almost all the high rises make some attempt to integrate the roof top utilities into the architecture of the building. With all the care given to the unique design of 170 Amsterdam Avenue, it seems that after the roof top terrace was designed, the remainder of the roof was planned by the engineering team with no sense of the aesthetic.

I am eager to open my window shades again to the fullest extent rather than use them to hide the offensive roof top.

With all that said, I am very pleased that the architect is willing to work with us to address the issue.

0
Reply
Jack
Jack
7 years ago

Ain’t that called Art?

0
Reply
Bloomie
Bloomie
7 years ago

Ugly roof. Ugly building. Not worthy of any awards, except the UGLY AWARD.

0
Reply

YOU MIGHT LIKE...

Armed Robbers Swipe Bikes and Cell Phone in ‘Robbery Pattern’: NYPD
CRIME

Armed Robbers Swipe Bikes and Cell Phone in ‘Robbery Pattern’: NYPD

March 31, 2023 | 1:16 AM
Former NY State Senate Candidate Sucker Punched in Central Park
CRIME

Former NY State Senate Candidate Sucker Punched in Central Park

March 30, 2023 | 5:48 PM
Previous Post

WEEKEND HISTORY: HOW UPPER WEST SIDE COFFEE DRINKERS TOOK DOWN TAMMANY HALL

Next Post

INVESTIGATORS WHO SCARED RESIDENTS ON 93RD STREET WEREN’T ‘FAKE COPS’ AFTER ALL

this week's events image

Explore Your Favorite Subject

20th precinct 24th precinct american museum of natural history animals art bicycling bulletin central park closings columns community board 7 coronavirus crash crime development dogs events fdny fire food gale brewer helen rosenthal history jcc lincoln center monday bulletin morning bulletin nypd openings pedestrian safety photography photos politics public schools pupper west side real estate restaurants retail riverside park silver stars fitness snow sponsored subway upper west side uws

CITY NEWS

Brick Underground
City Limits
Eater
Gothamist
NY Daily News
NY Post
NY Times

LOCAL RESOURCES

Bloomingdale Neighborhood History Group
Central Park Conservancy
CB7
Community Education Council 3
Assembly District 67
The New York Historical Society
Riverside Park
West End Preservation

UWS Blogs

Bloomingdale History Central Park Blogger
North River Notes

Next Post
INVESTIGATORS WHO SCARED RESIDENTS ON 93RD STREET WEREN’T ‘FAKE COPS’ AFTER ALL

INVESTIGATORS WHO SCARED RESIDENTS ON 93RD STREET WEREN'T 'FAKE COPS' AFTER ALL

MORNING BULLETIN: AGGRESSIVE STREET VENDORS, BIBLE BUILDING DEMOLITION, WOODY ALLEN’S COMPLAINTS

MORNING BULLETIN: AGGRESSIVE STREET VENDORS, BIBLE BUILDING DEMOLITION, WOODY ALLEN'S COMPLAINTS

THE PLOT THICKENS IN SCHOOL REZONING DEBATE

THE PLOT THICKENS IN SCHOOL REZONING DEBATE

  • ABOUT US
  • CONTACT US
  • NEWSLETTER
  • WSR MERCH!
  • ADVERTISE
  • EVENTS
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • SITE MAP
Site design by RLDGROUP

© 2023 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • TOP NEWS
  • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT US
  • WSR SHOP

© 2023 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.