West Side Rag
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT
  • TOP NEWS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT
West Side Rag
No Result
View All Result

Search the site

No Result
View All Result

Get WSR FREE in your inbox

ST. AGNES SCHOOL SOLD TO CONDO DEVELOPER

December 4, 2014 | 4:40 PM - Updated on December 6, 2014 | 11:52 AM
in NEWS, REAL ESTATE
20

st agnes

The St. Agnes Boys High School on 87th street and West End Avenue has been sold for $50 million to Cary Tamarkin, a developer and architect known for building condos. The school shut down after the 2012/2013 school year, and the building was still owned by the Archdiocese of New York.

The brick and limestone building was constructed in 1907-1908. It has 42,000 square feet and sold for $1,190 per square foot. “It lies within an R10A zone and possesses approximately 39,000 square feet of additional air rights.”

The building is part of the West End Avenue-Riverside Historic District. “The school was built by the New York Protestant Episcopal School Corporation (aka Trinity School) to house St. Agatha’s School for Girls (established 1898) its sister school. Trinity sold the building to the Roman Catholic Archdiocese in 1941 and it became the home of Cathedral College, a high school and college seminary. Since 1992, it has housed St. Agnes Boys’ High School, a Roman Catholic school formerly located on East 44th Street.”

The school had been considered as a possible site for a new UWS school, and we’ve heard some disappointment that it will instead be used for luxury housing. “Why didn’t the DOE – Facilities Planning – not bid on the school building when District 3 is so desperate for school space?” wrote Batya Lewton.

guest
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

20 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ursus arctos
ursus arctos
7 years ago

Was just a matter of time from when the Archdiocese closed the school.

District 3 definitely could use the space, but I imagine that they were outbid by the developer.

Cary Tamarkin have done some interesting projects in Chelsea. I’ll be watching their plans for this space very closely.

0
Reply
webot
webot
7 years ago
Reply to  ursus arctos

well said, Ursus.

Certainly great to see historic buildings put to new uses, rather then torn down.

This being Central Park West, what else but fancy homes can you expect….if not here , where. Clearly a school was not working for the Archdiocese, which has been going through monumental demographic and lifestyle changes. Glad to see this one is not being torn down, like sadly most of the catholic churches are. They sell them as development sites with no regard to their beauty and history. This developer is one the best – he is an architect by trade and understands quality and will restore and improve the building.

0
Reply
Bruce Bernstein
Bruce Bernstein
7 years ago
Reply to  webot

it’s not CPW, the school building is on West End.

0
Reply
Kathy J
Kathy J
7 years ago

I Know I’m not the only one exhausted by the endless news of historic buildings converted into obscenely expensive condos. Too many in too short of a timespan for the neighborhood to properly absorb. what was good and necessary for the community was another school. A thriving community, a thriving city ,is so much more than a market bearing exchange of properties. Just exhausting

0
Reply
Bruce Bernstein
Bruce Bernstein
7 years ago
Reply to  Kathy J

well said, Kathy. we’re heading down a steep slope.

0
Reply
Paul RL
Paul RL
7 years ago
Reply to  Bruce Bernstein

Interesting comment coming from a self-proclaimed luxury condo owner. Why are you allowed to own a luxury UWS condo but are so against others coming into the neighborhood?

0
Reply
Bruce Bernstein
Bruce Bernstein
7 years ago
Reply to  Paul RL

i should add that i don’t think you appreciate the succinct insight of Kathy J. above. I envy her gift for capturing the current reality in a few short sentences.

0
Reply
Bruce Bernstein
Bruce Bernstein
7 years ago
Reply to  Paul RL

I’ve been in the same building on the Upper West Side for 23 years and started as a rent stabilized tenant. i bought when the building went condo.

I am not against people “coming into the neighborhood”… people always come and go in NY. i am against the middle class and poor being driven out. For example, Paul, the seniors at the Williams –you are supporting the SALE of that building and want to get rid of the affordable housing for seniors. Similarly, you have advocated getting rid of all rent stabilized units, which would end up displacing hundreds of thousands of people throughout the city and tens of thousands on the Upper West Side. Another commenter on this site has, appallingly, advocated again and again the TEARING DOWN of the thousands of public housing units in the neighborhood, instead of improving their maintenance. It’s not hard to see the racial and class overtones in these sorts of view.

I have never described my building as “luxury”, though the real estate sharks describe it that way. the values have skyrocketed, despite the so-called “terrible conditions” on the block with a homeless shelter.

As a property owner, I believe in living at peace with my neighbors, be they rent stabilized tenants, other property owners, people in public housing, or even — god forbid — people in homeless shelters! We all add things to this wonderful mix we call the UWS. If and when it all becomes homogenized with only one type of person, all upper income, we will have all lost out.

And let’s not forget the small businesses who being driven out!

I reject the libertarian-induced greed that looks at housing only as tradable commodity and not a home, and looks at people only for their wealth. The UWS was never about that.

0
Reply
Nathan
Nathan
7 years ago
Reply to  Bruce Bernstein

As a renter, I object to all this subsidized housing taking supply off the market, making rents higher for those of us who can’t yet afford to own. Rent control laws create a new aristocracy, those whose wealth is derived from inheriting property (or in this case leases) rather than doing anything to earn it. There’s nothing racial about it, it’s a tax on the rest of us for the benefit of the few.

0
Reply
Paul RL
Paul RL
7 years ago
Reply to  Bruce Bernstein

Did you protest when your bulding went condo? Did you march for your neighbors who couldn’t afford to buy their apartments, as you did? And if you could afford to buy, what were you doing in a rent controlled
apartment anyway? You’re pretty quick to accuse everyone you disagree with of racism and class warfare, but your own hypocrisy makes you pretty transparent.

0
Reply
Bruce Bernstein
Bruce Bernstein
7 years ago
Reply to  Bruce Bernstein

sorry, 9D, but if someone wants to advocate TEARING DOWN thousands of units of low income housing — our public housing on the UWS — tear down ALL of it, and that housing is where the vast majority of Blacks and Hispanics in the district live, the racial overtones are obvious. I call ’em as I see ’em.

as i noted, there are serious class overtones as well.

0
Reply
Mike
Mike
7 years ago
Reply to  Bruce Bernstein

Where’s the “Like” button?

0
Reply
9d8b7988045e4953a882
9d8b7988045e4953a882
7 years ago
Reply to  Bruce Bernstein

> “It’s not hard to see the racial and class overtones in these sorts of view.”

Stop trying to turn everything into a racial issue please.

0
Reply
robert
robert
7 years ago

I doubt the city could have matched the developers 50 million bid

0
Reply
Pedestrian
Pedestrian
7 years ago

Will the diocese that has made a bundle on this sale sale pay up its back property taxes? When a tax exempt religious organization sells a major property and makes massive amounts of profit it should not be allowed to get away with paying no taxes on the exchange. It is time that Churches start paying taxes.

As to why the DOE didn’t bid..a developer wanted it and the City could get in the way of that.

0
Reply
Pedestrian
Pedestrian
7 years ago
Reply to  Pedestrian

I missed an all important NOT. The city could not get in the way of that, that is, the desire of a developer to have the building.

0
Reply
Louise
Louise
7 years ago

Paul RL and Bruce Bernstein:
I would be so grateful if you would take your personal disagreements to another forum–like, for example, YOUR OWN EMAIL ADDRESSES.

0
Reply
Molama
Molama
7 years ago

How wonderful that we have this historic district saving this building and our neighborhood from becoming Third Avenue. Words cannot express the extent of the f my gratitude to the tireless UWSiders who fought for this for so long, especially Gail Brewer

0
Reply
Dave
Dave
7 years ago

SCHOOLS. SCHOOLS. SCHOOLS. Where will the families who move into this building send their kids to school? They’ll be zoned for the already overcrowded PS87, correct?

There is SUCH A NEED for new schools on the UWS, particularly Middle and HIGH SCHOOLS. District 3 gets SCREWED when it comes to High Schools. There are none that are specific for our kids, while District 2 (over on the East Side) keeps District 3 kids out. WHY IS THIS FAIR?

This would have been a PERFECT location for a new PUBLIC school. Same goes for the Williams. If they had to sell, why not make it a HIGH SCHOOL?

We all want to stay in the City and on the UWS, but the lack of GOOD public schools with availability often drives people out.

0
Reply
student of Harry
student of Harry
7 years ago
Reply to  Dave

Father Harry Brown taught at 555 West End Ave. for many years and was a tireless advocate for tenant rights around the corner in Stryker’s Bay. His two loves were education and fair housing. Having lost both in this transaction, it is fortunate Father Brown has long since gone to his reward in a better neighborhood.

0
Reply

YOU MIGHT LIKE...

CRIME NEWS: ATM-SKIMMING AT 7-ELEVEN, BIG RISE IN BIKE CRASHES, MOTORCYCLE THEFTS
NEWS

Cyclist Seriously Injured in Head-On Collision in One-Way Bike Lane

June 30, 2022 | 9:00 PM - Updated on July 1, 2022 | 1:01 AM
Upper West Side Real Estate Market Bulletin
NEWS

Upper West Side Real Estate Market Bulletin

June 30, 2022 | 7:03 PM
2
SHARES
5
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Previous Post

OPENINGS & CLOSINGS: ARTIFACTS STORE, PURE BARRE, RISOTERRIA, TEN BELOW

Next Post

RABBIS, JEWISH ACTIVISTS ARRESTED AFTER BLOCKING 96TH AND BROADWAY

this week's events image

Extra, Extra!

Authentically Local

Explore Your Favorite Subject

20th precinct 24th precinct american museum of natural history animals art bicycling bulletin central park closings columns community board 7 coronavirus crash crime development dogs events fdny fire food gale brewer helen rosenthal history jcc lincoln center monday bulletin morning bulletin nypd openings pedestrian safety photography photos politics public schools pupper west side real estate restaurants retail riverside park silver stars fitness snow sponsored subway upper west side uws
Get WSR FREE in your inbox

ST. AGNES SCHOOL SOLD TO CONDO DEVELOPER

st agnes

The St. Agnes Boys High School on 87th street and West End Avenue has been sold for $50 million to Cary Tamarkin, a developer and architect known for building condos. The school shut down after the 2012/2013 school year, and the building was still owned by the Archdiocese of New York.

The brick and limestone building was constructed in 1907-1908. It has 42,000 square feet and sold for $1,190 per square foot. “It lies within an R10A zone and possesses approximately 39,000 square feet of additional air rights.”

The building is part of the West End Avenue-Riverside Historic District. “The school was built by the New York Protestant Episcopal School Corporation (aka Trinity School) to house St. Agatha’s School for Girls (established 1898) its sister school. Trinity sold the building to the Roman Catholic Archdiocese in 1941 and it became the home of Cathedral College, a high school and college seminary. Since 1992, it has housed St. Agnes Boys’ High School, a Roman Catholic school formerly located on East 44th Street.”

The school had been considered as a possible site for a new UWS school, and we’ve heard some disappointment that it will instead be used for luxury housing. “Why didn’t the DOE – Facilities Planning – not bid on the school building when District 3 is so desperate for school space?” wrote Batya Lewton.

guest
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

20 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ursus arctos
ursus arctos
7 years ago

Was just a matter of time from when the Archdiocese closed the school.

District 3 definitely could use the space, but I imagine that they were outbid by the developer.

Cary Tamarkin have done some interesting projects in Chelsea. I’ll be watching their plans for this space very closely.

0
Reply
webot
webot
7 years ago
Reply to  ursus arctos

well said, Ursus.

Certainly great to see historic buildings put to new uses, rather then torn down.

This being Central Park West, what else but fancy homes can you expect….if not here , where. Clearly a school was not working for the Archdiocese, which has been going through monumental demographic and lifestyle changes. Glad to see this one is not being torn down, like sadly most of the catholic churches are. They sell them as development sites with no regard to their beauty and history. This developer is one the best – he is an architect by trade and understands quality and will restore and improve the building.

0
Reply
Bruce Bernstein
Bruce Bernstein
7 years ago
Reply to  webot

it’s not CPW, the school building is on West End.

0
Reply
Kathy J
Kathy J
7 years ago

I Know I’m not the only one exhausted by the endless news of historic buildings converted into obscenely expensive condos. Too many in too short of a timespan for the neighborhood to properly absorb. what was good and necessary for the community was another school. A thriving community, a thriving city ,is so much more than a market bearing exchange of properties. Just exhausting

0
Reply
Bruce Bernstein
Bruce Bernstein
7 years ago
Reply to  Kathy J

well said, Kathy. we’re heading down a steep slope.

0
Reply
Paul RL
Paul RL
7 years ago
Reply to  Bruce Bernstein

Interesting comment coming from a self-proclaimed luxury condo owner. Why are you allowed to own a luxury UWS condo but are so against others coming into the neighborhood?

0
Reply
Bruce Bernstein
Bruce Bernstein
7 years ago
Reply to  Paul RL

i should add that i don’t think you appreciate the succinct insight of Kathy J. above. I envy her gift for capturing the current reality in a few short sentences.

0
Reply
Bruce Bernstein
Bruce Bernstein
7 years ago
Reply to  Paul RL

I’ve been in the same building on the Upper West Side for 23 years and started as a rent stabilized tenant. i bought when the building went condo.

I am not against people “coming into the neighborhood”… people always come and go in NY. i am against the middle class and poor being driven out. For example, Paul, the seniors at the Williams –you are supporting the SALE of that building and want to get rid of the affordable housing for seniors. Similarly, you have advocated getting rid of all rent stabilized units, which would end up displacing hundreds of thousands of people throughout the city and tens of thousands on the Upper West Side. Another commenter on this site has, appallingly, advocated again and again the TEARING DOWN of the thousands of public housing units in the neighborhood, instead of improving their maintenance. It’s not hard to see the racial and class overtones in these sorts of view.

I have never described my building as “luxury”, though the real estate sharks describe it that way. the values have skyrocketed, despite the so-called “terrible conditions” on the block with a homeless shelter.

As a property owner, I believe in living at peace with my neighbors, be they rent stabilized tenants, other property owners, people in public housing, or even — god forbid — people in homeless shelters! We all add things to this wonderful mix we call the UWS. If and when it all becomes homogenized with only one type of person, all upper income, we will have all lost out.

And let’s not forget the small businesses who being driven out!

I reject the libertarian-induced greed that looks at housing only as tradable commodity and not a home, and looks at people only for their wealth. The UWS was never about that.

0
Reply
Nathan
Nathan
7 years ago
Reply to  Bruce Bernstein

As a renter, I object to all this subsidized housing taking supply off the market, making rents higher for those of us who can’t yet afford to own. Rent control laws create a new aristocracy, those whose wealth is derived from inheriting property (or in this case leases) rather than doing anything to earn it. There’s nothing racial about it, it’s a tax on the rest of us for the benefit of the few.

0
Reply
Paul RL
Paul RL
7 years ago
Reply to  Bruce Bernstein

Did you protest when your bulding went condo? Did you march for your neighbors who couldn’t afford to buy their apartments, as you did? And if you could afford to buy, what were you doing in a rent controlled
apartment anyway? You’re pretty quick to accuse everyone you disagree with of racism and class warfare, but your own hypocrisy makes you pretty transparent.

0
Reply
Bruce Bernstein
Bruce Bernstein
7 years ago
Reply to  Bruce Bernstein

sorry, 9D, but if someone wants to advocate TEARING DOWN thousands of units of low income housing — our public housing on the UWS — tear down ALL of it, and that housing is where the vast majority of Blacks and Hispanics in the district live, the racial overtones are obvious. I call ’em as I see ’em.

as i noted, there are serious class overtones as well.

0
Reply
Mike
Mike
7 years ago
Reply to  Bruce Bernstein

Where’s the “Like” button?

0
Reply
9d8b7988045e4953a882
9d8b7988045e4953a882
7 years ago
Reply to  Bruce Bernstein

> “It’s not hard to see the racial and class overtones in these sorts of view.”

Stop trying to turn everything into a racial issue please.

0
Reply
robert
robert
7 years ago

I doubt the city could have matched the developers 50 million bid

0
Reply
Pedestrian
Pedestrian
7 years ago

Will the diocese that has made a bundle on this sale sale pay up its back property taxes? When a tax exempt religious organization sells a major property and makes massive amounts of profit it should not be allowed to get away with paying no taxes on the exchange. It is time that Churches start paying taxes.

As to why the DOE didn’t bid..a developer wanted it and the City could get in the way of that.

0
Reply
Pedestrian
Pedestrian
7 years ago
Reply to  Pedestrian

I missed an all important NOT. The city could not get in the way of that, that is, the desire of a developer to have the building.

0
Reply
Louise
Louise
7 years ago

Paul RL and Bruce Bernstein:
I would be so grateful if you would take your personal disagreements to another forum–like, for example, YOUR OWN EMAIL ADDRESSES.

0
Reply
Molama
Molama
7 years ago

How wonderful that we have this historic district saving this building and our neighborhood from becoming Third Avenue. Words cannot express the extent of the f my gratitude to the tireless UWSiders who fought for this for so long, especially Gail Brewer

0
Reply
Dave
Dave
7 years ago

SCHOOLS. SCHOOLS. SCHOOLS. Where will the families who move into this building send their kids to school? They’ll be zoned for the already overcrowded PS87, correct?

There is SUCH A NEED for new schools on the UWS, particularly Middle and HIGH SCHOOLS. District 3 gets SCREWED when it comes to High Schools. There are none that are specific for our kids, while District 2 (over on the East Side) keeps District 3 kids out. WHY IS THIS FAIR?

This would have been a PERFECT location for a new PUBLIC school. Same goes for the Williams. If they had to sell, why not make it a HIGH SCHOOL?

We all want to stay in the City and on the UWS, but the lack of GOOD public schools with availability often drives people out.

0
Reply
student of Harry
student of Harry
7 years ago
Reply to  Dave

Father Harry Brown taught at 555 West End Ave. for many years and was a tireless advocate for tenant rights around the corner in Stryker’s Bay. His two loves were education and fair housing. Having lost both in this transaction, it is fortunate Father Brown has long since gone to his reward in a better neighborhood.

0
Reply

YOU MIGHT LIKE...

CRIME NEWS: ATM-SKIMMING AT 7-ELEVEN, BIG RISE IN BIKE CRASHES, MOTORCYCLE THEFTS
NEWS

Cyclist Seriously Injured in Head-On Collision in One-Way Bike Lane

June 30, 2022 | 9:00 PM - Updated on July 1, 2022 | 1:01 AM
Upper West Side Real Estate Market Bulletin
NEWS

Upper West Side Real Estate Market Bulletin

June 30, 2022 | 7:03 PM
2
SHARES
5
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Previous Post

OPENINGS & CLOSINGS: ARTIFACTS STORE, PURE BARRE, RISOTERRIA, TEN BELOW

Next Post

RABBIS, JEWISH ACTIVISTS ARRESTED AFTER BLOCKING 96TH AND BROADWAY

Next Post
RABBIS, JEWISH ACTIVISTS ARRESTED AFTER BLOCKING 96TH AND BROADWAY

RABBIS, JEWISH ACTIVISTS ARRESTED AFTER BLOCKING 96TH AND BROADWAY

FDNY MAKES QUICK WORK OF DRAMATIC BLAZE ON 96TH STREET

FDNY MAKES QUICK WORK OF DRAMATIC BLAZE ON 96TH STREET

A FEW WORDS ABOUT COMMENTS

OUR NEW COMMENTING POLICY

  • ABOUT US
  • CONTACT US
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • SITE MAP
Site design by RLDGROUP

© 2022 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • TOP NEWS
  • THIS WEEK’S EVENTS
  • OPEN/CLOSED
  • FOOD
  • SCHOOLS
  • OUTDOORS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • ART
  • POLITICS
  • COLUMNS
  • CRIME
  • HISTORY
  • ABSURDITY
  • CONTACT US

© 2022 West Side Rag | All rights reserved.